Re: [HACKERS] error building head on OS X 10.7.1

2011-09-07 Thread Dave Cramer
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com writes: Well the problem is that buildfarm can't build HEAD on OS X 10.7.1 HEAD builds fine on my 10.7.1 laptop.  If you're referring to orangutan, it's not failing on that, it's failing here

[HACKERS] Generating a query that never returns

2011-09-19 Thread Dave Cramer
I have a need to test timeouts in JDBC, is there a query that is guaranteed not to return ? Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org

Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1

2011-04-18 Thread Dave Cramer
the client encoding is unicode. Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1

2011-04-18 Thread Dave Cramer
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com wrote: On 18/04/11 15:57, Tom Lane wrote: Bernd Helmlemaili...@oopsware.de  writes: If i am reading it correct, it reads UTF8 from the backend, while expecting UNICODE only. Not sure what change has caused this, though. I am

Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] JDBC connections to 9.1

2011-04-18 Thread Dave Cramer
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com writes: On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: I wasn't aware that JDBC would fail on that.  It's pretty annoying that it does, but maybe we should grin and bear

Re: [HACKERS] Support for cert auth in JDBC

2011-05-17 Thread Dave Cramer
Marc, Please just send a cvs context diff from HEAD to the JDBC list. Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca 2011/5/17 Marc-André Laverdière marc-an...@atc.tcs.com: Hello developers, My project had a requirement to use certificate authentication to the PG

Re: [HACKERS] orangutan seizes up during isolation-check

2015-01-16 Thread Dave Cramer
On 16 January 2015 at 01:33, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:24:01AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 04:48:53PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: What I'm seeing now is that

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-15 Thread Dave Cramer
Not sure what the point of this is: as you indicated the ship has sailed so to speak Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On 15 May 2015 at 15:14, Bruno Harbulot br...@distributedmatter.net wrote: Hello, I've been trying to use the new JSONB format using JDBC

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-15 Thread Dave Cramer
On 15 May 2015 at 16:41, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote: I don't really want to take a violently strong position on this without understanding what's really going on here. Well our solution was to use

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-15 Thread Dave Cramer
On 15 May 2015 at 16:21, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote: Not sure what the point of this is: as you indicated the ship has sailed so to speak Well, if we were to agree this was a problem, we could introduce

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-15 Thread Dave Cramer
On 15 May 2015 at 16:35, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote: Well, if we were to agree this was a problem, we could introduce new, less-problematic operator names and then eventually deprecate the old ones

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-15 Thread Dave Cramer
On 15 May 2015 at 16:44, Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote: On 15 May 2015 at 16:41, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Dave Cramer p...@fastcrypt.com wrote: I don't really want to take a violently strong position on this without understanding

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-19 Thread Dave Cramer
custom operators is a separate discussion. David J.​ It would seem that choosing ? for operators was ill advised; I'm not convinced that deprecating them is a bad idea. If we start now, in 5 years they should be all but gone Agreed a patch would be the first place to start Dave Cramer

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-19 Thread Dave Cramer
be faster than what's there now (when the option was not set). Some operators would look a little funny in Java string literals, but that's not so bad. Perhaps reviewing https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/187 might help understand why we chose ?? Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-20 Thread Dave Cramer
noticed this one thought was to create duplicate operators specifically for the use of the JDBC driver. I had dismissed this at the time, now I'm not so sure Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-19 Thread Dave Cramer
Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca On 19 May 2015 at 13:15, Mike Blackwell mike.blackw...@rrd.com wrote: A Google search suggests Oracle 9.x supports a unary '?' operator (fuzzy match), so the use of '?' in an operator name is not without precedent

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-19 Thread Dave Cramer
connector expected to follow both? Currently pull requests are the easiest to deal with so most discussion is on github. I guess updating the JDBC web page would be in order. Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with question marks in operators (JDBC, ECPG, ...)

2015-05-19 Thread Dave Cramer
On 19 May 2015 at 15:02, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com writes: Dave Cramer opined: It would seem that choosing ? for operators was ill advised; I'm not convinced that deprecating them is a bad idea. If we start now, in 5 years they should

Re: [HACKERS] JDBC driver debug out?

2015-10-24 Thread Dave Cramer
Add DriverManager.setLogWriter(new PrintWriter(System.out)); below the setLogLevel and it will I'll fix this though Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com On 23 October 2015 at 22:35, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: > Unfortunately it doesn't work (no de

Re: [HACKERS] JDBC driver debug out?

2015-10-23 Thread Dave Cramer
No, I need to provide you with a 41 version. I just happened to have java 1.8 on my machine. Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com On 23 October 2015 at 21:31, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: > Dave, > > Thanks for the quick response. Unfortunately

Re: [HACKERS] JDBC driver debug out?

2015-10-23 Thread Dave Cramer
This should work better https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/postgresql/postgresql/9.4-1204-jdbc41-SNAPSHOT/ Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com On 23 October 2015 at 21:32, Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > No, I need to pr

Re: [HACKERS] JDBC driver debug out?

2015-10-23 Thread Dave Cramer
Tatsuo, Can you confirm it is fixed in this snapshot https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/postgresql/postgresql/9.4-1204-jdbc42-SNAPSHOT/ Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com On 23 October 2015 at 19:00, Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com>

Re: [HACKERS] JDBC driver debug out?

2015-10-23 Thread Dave Cramer
Tatsuo, posting to jdbc list Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com On 23 October 2015 at 18:28, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: > It seems > org.postgresql.Driver.setLogLevel(org.postgresql.Driver.DEBUG) does > not work anymore in the newer JDBC dri

[HACKERS] Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102

2016-01-12 Thread Dave Cramer
We have an interesting problem, and the reporter has been kind enough to provide logs for which we can't explain. I'd be interested to hear any plausible explanations for a prepared plan suddenly going from 2ms to 60ms for the same input values ? Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102

2016-01-12 Thread Dave Cramer
Hi Marko, Interesting so why would it choose a worse plan at that point ? Why would it change at all if the current plan is working well ? Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com On 12 January 2016 at 07:15, Marko Tiikkaja <ma...@joh.to> wrote: > On 12/01/16 13:00, Da

Re: [HACKERS] Packaging of postgresql-jdbc

2016-02-16 Thread Dave Cramer
here. There is an impedance mismatch between the java ecosystem and distros. We have moved to maven as have most other java projects. As Craig said, if you want to build it, patch it out, and create a ant/Makefile to make the jar. Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

[HACKERS] building on windows using VC 2008

2016-03-12 Thread Dave Cramer
Getting lots of POSTGRESQL_TRACE_... undefined. Any hints ? Dave Cramer

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()

2016-04-03 Thread Dave Cramer
to turn this question around. Are there good reasons to use -ng over pgjdbc ? As to your question, you may be interested to know that pgjdbc is more performant than ng. Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()

2016-04-03 Thread Dave Cramer
On 3 April 2016 at 15:35, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Dave Cramer (p...@fastcrypt.com) wrote: > > On 9 March 2016 at 20:49, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > > > On 10 March 2016 at 00:41, Igal @ Lucee.org <i...@lucee.org&g

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()

2016-04-03 Thread Dave Cramer
On 3 April 2016 at 12:18, Igal @ Lucee.org <i...@lucee.org> wrote: > On 4/3/2016 8:21 AM, Dave Cramer wrote: > > > On 9 March 2016 at 20:49, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> On 3/8/2016 5:12 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: >> >>> >>

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()

2016-04-03 Thread Dave Cramer
On 3 April 2016 at 21:56, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > Dave, > > * Dave Cramer (p...@fastcrypt.com) wrote: > > On 3 April 2016 at 15:35, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > > Not generally much of a JDBC user myself, but the inabili

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()

2016-04-03 Thread Dave Cramer
On 3 April 2016 at 22:20, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Craig Ringer (cr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > > On 4 April 2016 at 10:13, Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > > > Async notification is the easier part, I wasn't aware that the ssl &g

Re: [HACKERS] Add jsonb_compact(...) for whitespace-free jsonb to text

2016-04-27 Thread Dave Cramer
ON with no inserted whitespace. > > As I mentioned to Sehrope on IRC, at least for my 2c, if you want a > compact JSON format to reduce the amount of traffic over the wire or to > do things with on the client side, we should probably come up with a > binary format, rather than just ha

Re: [HACKERS] SPI_exec ERROR in pl/r of R 3.2.4 on PostgreSQL on Windows 7

2016-05-03 Thread Dave Cramer
Does anyone else have a Windows 7 installation we can test this on ? This https://github.com/postgres-plr/plr/files/191013/plr-8.3.0.16-pg9.5-win32.zip is actually a 64 bit version built on windows 10. I've had one confirmation that it works. Dave Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] regression test for extended query protocol

2016-08-03 Thread Dave Cramer
tests every time a PR is created on github, but I don't think there are any animals running the JDBC test suite We can add tests, what exactly do we want to test. Then setting up an animal to run the tests would be fairly straight forward. Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] Slowness of extended protocol

2016-08-13 Thread Dave Cramer
u're doing > something very different - not necessarily wrong - and not attempt to > impose your ideas on everyone as if it's the only true way to write a db > driver. > A number of other drivers default to this behaviour, including at least MS-SQL and Oracle. psqlODBC

Re: [HACKERS] One process per session lack of sharing

2016-07-18 Thread Dave Cramer
; calling jvm from sql or vice-versa is not really possible. I do like the idea of the background worker and shared memory though. Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] No longer possible to query catalogs for index capabilities?

2016-08-08 Thread Dave Cramer
> 3) Add build badge to the readme (link to travis ci build) for simplified > navigation to test results. > > Here's the commit: https://github.com/vlsi/postgres/commit/ > 4841f8bc00b7c6717d91f51c98979ce84b4f7df3 > Here's how test results look like: https://travis-ci.org/vlsi/postgres > > Nice work +! Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] Slowness of extended protocol

2016-08-15 Thread Dave Cramer
that both JDBC and ODBC are not exclusively PostgreSQL drivers and as such we sometimes have to jump through hoops to provide the semantics requested by the API. Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

[HACKERS] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication

2017-01-19 Thread Dave Cramer
The travis job https://travis-ci.org/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/jobs/192517342 is seeing a segfault when we are testing against HEAD with REPLICATION turned on. Logs can be found here https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B-Heg5ZYCWbreEE4Uk5LdnJ5eWM?usp=sharing Regards, Dave Cramer

Re: [HACKERS] [JDBC] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication

2017-01-19 Thread Dave Cramer
Not sure you can get the exec. We are working on producing the BT from Travis-CI or I will build and run the test locally and get the trace Dave Cramer On 19 January 2017 at 15:31, Craig Ringer <craig.rin...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > On 20 Jan. 2017 04:13, "Ro

Re: [HACKERS] [JDBC] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication

2017-01-19 Thread Dave Cramer
I'll try to get the stack trace from the core dump, have to build master first Dave Cramer On 19 January 2017 at 12:01, Jorge Solórzano <jor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Robert, the logs I get from postgres (at least the section that matters) > is here: > If you need somethin

Re: [HACKERS] [JDBC] SEGFAULT in HEAD with replication

2017-01-19 Thread Dave Cramer
= 140728909791233, hash = 0x7ffe96960d58, match = 0x16da2d1, keycopy = 0x7ffe96960d58, alloc = 0x1703af0, hcxt = 0x16da2d0, hctl = 0x0} max_table_size = 117899280 requestSize = found = 0 '\000' Dave Cramer On 19 January 2017 at 12:05, Dave Cramer <dave

Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] PGSERVICEFILE as a connection string parameter

2017-02-27 Thread Dave Cramer
bc, npgsql CCed). > > Currently PGPASS is in the users home directory Many JDBC applications are in much larger apps such as tomcat, etal this concept is a bit foreign to JDBC. That being said I don't think it's difficult to implement. Just somewhat harder to specify for us. psql is rather limited being a command line app which is *usually* evoked directly from the command line. Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Send numeric version to clients

2016-08-29 Thread Dave Cramer
ight not have been the best thing to do in > a green field, but given the precedent ... > > regards, tom lane > > > seems to me that it should report 10 for the major and whatever comes after the . for the minor ? Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] PL/Python adding support for multi-dimensional arrays

2016-09-26 Thread Dave Cramer
"inner" and "outer" dimensions? I wonder > if that would be easier to read, if it was written in a recursive-style, > rather than iterative with stacks for the dimensions. > > Yes, it is fairly convoluted. Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] PL/Python adding support for multi-dimensional arrays

2016-09-29 Thread Dave Cramer
On 27 September 2016 at 14:58, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > On 09/27/2016 02:04 PM, Dave Cramer wrote: > >> On 26 September 2016 at 14:52, Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com> wrote: >> >>> This crashes with arrays with non-default lower bou

Re: [HACKERS] PL/Python adding support for multi-dimensional arrays

2016-09-21 Thread Dave Cramer
On 18 September 2016 at 09:27, Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > > On 10 August 2016 at 01:53, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> 2016-08-03 13:54 GMT+02:00 Alexey Grishchenko <agrishche...@pivotal.io>: >> >

Re: [HACKERS] Fix for PL/Python slow input arrays traversal issue

2016-09-18 Thread Dave Cramer
Pavel, I will pick these up. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] PL/Python adding support for multi-dimensional arrays

2016-09-18 Thread Dave Cramer
t; I am sending review of this patch: > > 1. The implemented functionality is clearly benefit - passing MD arrays, > pretty faster passing bigger arrays > 2. I was able to use this patch cleanly without any errors or warnings > 3. There is no any error or warning > 4. All tests passed - I tested Python 2.7 and Python 3.5 > 5. The code is well commented and clean > 6. For this new functionality the documentation is not necessary > > 7. I invite more regress tests for both directions (Python <-> Postgres) > for more than two dimensions > > My only one objection is not enough regress tests - after fixing this > patch will be ready for commiters. > > Good work, Alexey > > Thank you > > Regards > > Pavel > > >> -- >> Best regards, >> Alexey Grishchenko >> > > Pavel, I will pick this up. Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] Fix for PL/Python slow input arrays traversal issue

2016-09-19 Thread Dave Cramer
Yes, this should be closed as it is contained in https://commitfest.postgresql.org/10/697/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] PL/Python adding support for multi-dimensional arrays

2016-09-27 Thread Dave Cramer
On 26 September 2016 at 14:52, Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > > > >> >> This crashes with arrays with non-default lower bounds: >> >> postgres=# SELECT * FROM test_type_conversion_array_int >> 4('[2:4]={1,2,3}'); >> INFO: ([1, 2

[HACKERS] RFC Changing the version number for JDBC

2016-11-27 Thread Dave Cramer
and they see no problems. Please speak up now if you foresee any issues with this idea. FYI, 42 was more or less chosen at random. But it is large enough to avoid any future conflicts with the server, and greater than 9 to avoid issues with maven requesting things like > 9 Dave Cramer

Re: [HACKERS] RFC Changing the version number for JDBC

2016-11-27 Thread Dave Cramer
On 27 November 2016 at 11:29, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Cramer <davecra...@gmail.com> writes: > > We are proposing changing the JDBC version from > > 9.4. to 42.x.x > > > We have two issues we are trying to address here. > > &g

Re: [HACKERS] PL/Python adding support for multi-dimensional arrays

2016-10-10 Thread Dave Cramer
t think it would be too painful to adjust existing >> application. >> >> We could continue to accept a Python list for a plain composite type, >> this would only affect arrays of composite types. >> >> I don't use PL/python much myself, so I don't feel qualified to make the >> call, though. Any 3rd opinions? > > Can't you determine the correct output based on the function output definition ? For instance if the function output was an array type then we would return the list as an array if the function output was a set of then we return tuples ? Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] building HEAD on macos fails with #error no source of random numbers configured

2016-12-09 Thread Dave Cramer
That will teach me to copy and paste a config from somewhere ... Thanks Dave Cramer On 9 December 2016 at 10:43, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Dave Cramer <davecra...@gmail.com> writes: > > Looking at src/port/pg_strong_random.c this would be a bug in autoconf &

[HACKERS] building HEAD on macos fails with #error no source of random numbers configured

2016-12-09 Thread Dave Cramer
--with-libraries=/usr/local/opt/openssl/lib --with-includes=/usr/local/opt/openssl/include/ --no-create --no-recursion I am using openssl-1.0.2j Regards, Dave Cramer

Re: [HACKERS] Retiring from the Core Team

2017-01-12 Thread Dave Cramer
with, and ultimately outlast, venture-funded startups. > Thanks for your hard work. PostgreSQL has come a long way since then! Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback

2017-03-07 Thread Dave Cramer
You have to turn it on using the autosave parameter. it's not on by default, and apparently not documented Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com On 7 March 2017 at 17:15, legrand legrand <legrand_legr...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thanks ! > > that's a very good

Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback

2017-03-07 Thread Dave Cramer
llback-explained.html > > JDBC has it since 9.4.1210 (2016-09-07), unless I am mistaken: > > https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/commit/adc08d57d2a9726309ea80d574b1db > 835396c1c8 I thought he meant we have to play with savepoints. Yes, we do it for you now Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com

[HACKERS] JDBC 42.1.4 released

2017-08-01 Thread Dave Cramer
869> Thanks, Dave Cramer

[HACKERS] question about replication docs

2017-05-29 Thread Dave Cramer
log when log_replication_commands is enabled. Passing database as the value instructs walsender to connect to the database specified in the dbname parameter, which will allow the connection to be used for logical replication from that database. Dave Cramer

Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes

2017-09-14 Thread Dave Cramer
encourage them to do so. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I have added this as an open item because we will have to wait to see >>>> where we are with driver support as the release gets closer. >>>> >>> >>> With the release near, I'm promo

Re: [HACKERS] PSA: don't be in a hurry to update to XCode 9.0

2017-09-21 Thread Dave Cramer
Too late I just stumbled over this as well! Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com On 20 September 2017 at 14:34, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > It seems to install some libraries that depend on > /usr/lib/system/libsystem_darwin.dylib, which doesn't exist

Re: [HACKERS] PSA: don't be in a hurry to update to XCode 9.0

2017-11-12 Thread Dave Cramer
Tom, Did you ever find a solution to this without updating ? Dave Cramer da...@postgresintl.com www.postgresintl.com On 21 September 2017 at 13:01, Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > Too late I just stumbled over this as well! > > Dave Cramer > > d

<    1   2   3   4