Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-08 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote: > > > > > >>Vince Vielhaber wrote: > >> > >>>Because of this taken from the above quoted text: > >>> > >>&g

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-08 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 7 Dec 2002, Rod Taylor wrote: > > > What too many people fail to realize is that in a commercial environment > > many companies want another company to point the finger at in case of > > disaster. Sybase failed, or HP failed, or IBM failed, or Microsoft > > failed. They feel they can do somet

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-08 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > That's what I thought. You have no argument so your just typing. > > Hi Vince, > > Was more hoping you'd care to share your basis for stating Robert's > employers clients wante

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-08 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 8 Dec 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote: > On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 20:52, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > Why do you say that? > > > > Because of this taken from the above quoted text: > > > > "they were under constant assault from their clients to use oracle or

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-08 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 8 Dec 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote: > On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 22:27, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On 8 Dec 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > > > If something is familiar, it feels safe. We need to make PostgreSQL > > > familiar. That's why we need marketing. > &

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-08 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote: > On Saturday 07 December 2002 11:10 pm, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote: > > > On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 03:28, Dave Page wrote: > > > > www is a closed group consisting of a few of us who actually do

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-09 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Josh Berkus wrote: > But once Postgres has been packaged, we need to have a group making a > loud enough noise to get the world to pay attention. I'm not asking > everyone on this list to participate, but I am asking everyone on this > list to recognize the utility of the eff

Re: [HACKERS] Let's create a release team

2002-12-10 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> --- for example: Marc owns, runs, and pays for the > >> postgresql.org servers. > > > Is the cvs repo mirrored? > > Anyone running cvsup would have a complete copy of the source CVS, > I believe. It would be mo

Re: [HACKERS] 7.3.1 documentation updates

2002-12-17 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have not been aggressive about backpatching documentation improvements > into 7.3.1. Is that something I should check? > > As I remember, we didn't update the official docs for minor releases. > Is that still true? They say hydergine helps the memory

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Marc G. Fournier writes: > > > I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out > > and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a > > little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the >

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > Marc G. Fournier writes: > > > > > > > I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote: > This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads. > > What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc. FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth. WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there. On www/ftp.us I don't e

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 7 Jan 2003, Greg Copeland wrote: > On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 16:46, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote: > > > > > This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads. > > > > > > What do we need in the form of

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth. > > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there. > > Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for? Any given day. It's disk space, not traffic. > > On www/ftp.us I don't even notice

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth. > > > > WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what t

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:01:38AM -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > > > > > On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EM

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16 > > To: Vince Vielhaber > > Cc: Dan Langille; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [H

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > Total Hits 1339547 > > > Total Files 1064536 > > > Total Pages 324346 > > > Total Visits 58178 > > > Total KBytes 2712883 > > > > > > In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days. > > > > > > I'm not sure I'd call tha

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote: > > > > In all honesty, I do not *want* Windows people to think that they're not > > running on the "poor stepchild" platform.If we go down that path, > > they'll start trying to run production databases on Windows, and then > > we'll get blamed for the

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, James Hubbard wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > > > >>>The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you > >>>actually think that can be considered conclusive by any

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2003 16:27 > > To: Katie Ward > > Cc: Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re:

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > hammering the betas is a far cry from an "industrial-strength > > solution". > > Have you a better suggestion? Seems a bit catch 22 if testing won't > prove it's good and we can't use it until we know it's good... Still, > industrial strength testing or no

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vince Vielhaber > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM > > To: Dave Page > > Cc: Katie Ward; Tom Lane; Curtis

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > I would be interested to know how many windows servers those that are > against a windows port of PostgreSQL have or do manage, and how > experienced they are with that platform... At this point I'm not for or against. But you're going to have to do more t

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you > > actually think that can be considered conclusive by any standard? > > Public beta testing (but closed source) has been going on for some > months. So you've been running these unscientific test

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-30 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ron Mayer wrote: > > Cool irony in the automated .sig on the mailinglist software... > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > ... > > hammering the betas is a far cry from an "industrial-strength solution". > > ... &

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Katie Ward wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > > > > > hammering the betas is a far cry from an "industrial-strength > > > > > > solution". > > > > > > > > > > Have you a better suggestion? Seems a bit

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 29 January 2003 17:10 > > To: Dave Page > > Cc: Katie Ward; Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE:

Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - My final thoughts

2003-01-30 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Dave, Lamar and Katie can cheer now 'cuze this is the last comment I'm going to make on this. All others will be ignored, probably. The one thing I haven't seen from Dave, Lamar or Katie on this is reputation. You're all for the PostgreSQL name going on it but I have yet to see any of you so su

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-30 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 30 January 2003 19:20 > > To: Lamar Owen > > Cc: Tom Lane; Dave Page; Ron Mayer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re:

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-31 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, mlw wrote: > Like it or not, if PG releases a very good Win32 port, ALL the unixoids > combined will be out numbered by the windoze users. Now that's certainly something to look forward to. Vince. -- Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-30 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ron Mayer wrote: > > > > > > > > Cool irony in the automated .sig on the mailinglist software... > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > ... > >

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-30 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > Vince, I would say that we, the developers of PostgreSQL, are then not > qualified to test our own releases for the reasons you mentioned that Katie > should not test her own releases. Of course that's ridiculous -- often the > developers can do a better

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-30 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday 30 January 2003 13:17, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > > > Vince, I would say that we, the developers of PostgreSQL, are then not > > > qualified to test our own releases for the

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Powerfail testing - results

2003-02-03 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Dave Page wrote: > Well the results are finally in. Hopefully we can concentrate on putting > them right, rather than having a round of "told you so's" :-) > > I modified the test program slightly to improve the consistency checks. > The updated version is attached. [...] > >

Re: [HACKERS] [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.3.2 Released

2003-02-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Laurette Cisneros wrote: > > Well this isn't any good...the primary site is hugely busy and it is not on > any of the mirrors. Perhaps it did not get copied over to the mirrors even > though this announcent says it is there? ftp.us.postgresql.org has had it for a day or two n

Re: [HACKERS] location of the configuration files

2003-02-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 13 Feb 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote: > On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 18:45, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Oliver Elphick wrote: > > > On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 17:52, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > Seems to me that if FHS allows such a mess, it's reason enough to avoid > &

Re: [HACKERS] location of the configuration files

2003-02-14 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 14 Feb 2003, Martin Coxall wrote: > > > > If you are interested in reading a contrary position, you can read > > > Berstein's arguments for his recommended way to install services at: > > > http://cr.yp.to/unix.html > > But since DJB is a class-A monomaniac, he may not be the best person to > l

Re: [HACKERS] location of the configuration files

2003-02-14 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 14 Feb 2003, Martin Coxall wrote: > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 14:21, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On 14 Feb 2003, Martin Coxall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If you are interested in reading a contrary position, you can read > > > > > Berstein'

Re: [HACKERS] location of the configuration files

2003-02-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 13 Feb 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote: > What your comments strongly suggest to me is that projects like > PostgreSQL and pine, along with everything else, should comply with FHS; > then there will be no confusion because everyone will be following the > smae standards. Messes arise when people ig

Re: [HACKERS] location of the configuration files

2003-02-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thursday 13 February 2003 18:07, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > Actually FHS says the opposite. If the distribution installs PostgreSQL > > then the config files belong in /etc/postgresql. If the admin does then > > they bel

Re: [HACKERS] location of the configuration files

2003-02-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 13 Feb 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote: > On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:00, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > Which means if the the vendor installed Postgresql (say, the > > > Red Hat Database) you'd expect config files to be in /etc. > > > If the postgresql is compiled fr

Re: [HACKERS] location of the configuration files

2003-02-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, J. M. Brenner wrote: > > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Okay, here's one: most Unix systems store all of the configuration > > > files in a well known directory: /etc. These days it's a hierarchy of > > > directories with /etc as the root of the

Re: [HACKERS] RC3 ...

2001-04-06 Thread Vince Vielhaber
apple so I want to avoid another full mailbox. I'll probably wait till tomorrow evening (if you announce tonite) just to be sure. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4

Re: [HACKERS] RC3 ...

2001-04-06 Thread Vince Vielhaber
next Friday ... *cross fingers* *grin* So does RC3 have the docs and the odbc thing mentioned earlier rolled in? Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide

Re: [HACKERS] RC3 ...

2001-04-06 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > > > The Hermit Hacker writes: > > &

[HACKERS] Re: RC3 ...

2001-04-06 Thread Vince Vielhaber
n the tarball as a separate set (alone). A number of other packages are done this way. If we want to include a be-all-end-all we can do that too. Of course other doc formats/sets will also be available. Vince. -- ====== Vi

Re: [HACKERS] A more useful way to split the distribution

2001-04-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
d > > things. As long as there's still the FULL tarball with everything in it available. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo

Re: [HACKERS] Re: HOLD THE PRESSES!! ... pg_dump from v7.0.3 can'timport to v7.1?

2001-04-11 Thread Vince Vielhaber
when Marc moved the server away from hub.org and to db.hub.org. I couldn't import the database I exported from 7.0.x into it without first creating the sequences. Could this be something related - although I thought that had gotten fixed. Vince. --

Re: [HACKERS] Re: 7.1 RPMs

2001-04-14 Thread Vince Vielhaber
se the make/config stuff can impact so many different parts of PostgreSQL, that stuff should probably remain on hackers. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo

Re: [HACKERS] Hey guys, check this out.

2001-04-14 Thread Vince Vielhaber
; Systems Administrator @ hub.org > primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- =

[HACKERS] Fast Forward (fwd)

2001-04-14 Thread Vince Vielhaber
escriptive word) that Bruce has not already done so. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online

[HACKERS] Thankyou!

2001-04-14 Thread Vince Vielhaber
be where it is at all. Knowing the both of you as I've been fortunate of, I know you're both rather modest but nonetheless are still deserving of my heartfelt thanks. Sincerely, Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CS

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Hey guys, check this out.

2001-04-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
t speculation. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directoryhttp://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftsh

Re: [HACKERS] No printable 7.1 docs?

2001-04-16 Thread Vince Vielhaber
lease docs are apparently > made by hand anyway). > > Am I missing something? > -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at

Re: [HACKERS] broken web server?

2001-04-17 Thread Vince Vielhaber
n get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.

Re: [HACKERS] Re: No printable 7.1 docs?

2001-04-19 Thread Vince Vielhaber
. There's really only 486, the other three are gifs. :) Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking

[HACKERS] Re: Docs on web site

2001-04-20 Thread Vince Vielhaber
erhaps that is the reason. hub.org (which may > actually be a different machine) is quite fast otherwise. We're working on that too. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ww

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Hardcopy docs available

2001-04-23 Thread Vince Vielhaber
omeone wants to run the A4 docs through a PDF converter, send 'em to > me and I'll post them too. Tom, ps2pdf is on hub. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.

Re: [HACKERS] Comment about PostgreSQL on Epinions.com

2001-04-25 Thread Vince Vielhaber
and trust his opinions. Go figure! Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directoryhttp://

Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on load ...

2001-04-25 Thread Vince Vielhaber
implementation, which we'd have > license problems with using. It's part of the standard C library in FreeBSD. Any other platforms have it built in? Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PR

Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on load ...

2001-04-26 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Autoconf has a 'LOADAVG' check already

Re: [HACKERS] refusing connections based on load ...

2001-04-26 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Tom Lane wr

[HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: Hardcopy docs available

2001-04-26 Thread Vince Vielhaber
f > > Do you want me to do the rest of them? Or we can probably have the > > makindex script do it for us. > > Sure. Anything is fine. Already done. a42ps in the doc index. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber

[HACKERS] Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives

2001-04-27 Thread Vince Vielhaber
t came back in 0.151 secs. But it only found 104 matches, have you been that quiet Marc? I'll add it over the weekend. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net

[HACKERS] Re: The new, the improved ... FTS Searching of Mailing List Archives

2001-04-27 Thread Vince Vielhaber
1 where I knew I'd get alot of hits. Very impressive speeds! > > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > > > > > Morning all ... > > > > > > I'm going to do a

Re: [HACKERS] While we're on the subject of searches...

2001-04-27 Thread Vince Vielhaber
someone writing the docs make them clearer then it's definitely desirable. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Ne

[HACKERS] While we're on the subject of searches...

2001-04-27 Thread Vince Vielhaber
27;re available at: http://odbc.postgresql.org/docs/ Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Onlin

Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conventions, and count()

2001-04-30 Thread Vince Vielhaber
gt; meant reading the pg_class file raw. Of course, that would be really > hard because there is no way to know what numeric file is pg_class! But would it work on a crashed database that won't come up or doesn't the direct connect care about any other tables in this usage? Vince. --

[HACKERS] typo in psql's help

2001-05-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
KEY } [ ... ] ] ^ This should be a ] | Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Network

Re: [HACKERS] Search

2001-05-11 Thread Vince Vielhaber
a browser and what mirror are you using? I just tried from the main site (www.ca) with Netscape 4.76, Netscape 6, Opera and Mozilla and all of them do the redirect to the search page. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH

[HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: Hardcopy docs available

2001-04-26 Thread Vince Vielhaber
f them? Or we can probably have the makindex script do it for us. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking

[HACKERS] I know there are few hams on this list...

2001-05-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Ok, so this is off topic, but I know there are a few hams on this list. I'm wondering if any of them are going to Dayton this weekend? Probably better to contact me off list. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- K

[HACKERS] miswording in pg_dump

2001-05-23 Thread Vince Vielhaber
t supplied, then the PGDATABASE environment variable value is used. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking

Re: [HACKERS] Mirrors not tracking main ftp site?

2001-06-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ostgresql-test-7.1.2.tar.gz.md5 226-Transfer complete. 226 Quotas off What is it you find missing about 7.1.2? What were you actually looking at? Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]h

Re: [HACKERS] Mirrors not tracking main ftp site?

2001-06-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Also, some of the mirrors claimed to be up-to-date by > >> http://www.postgresql.org/index.html aren't. Fr instance, > >>

[HACKERS] importing from sybase

2001-06-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
can bring this data in without having to write something to read from the sybase table and write to the postgres table? I'd like to use copy to keep things simple. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAI

[HACKERS] grant and SQL92

2001-06-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Workarounds? Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directoryhttp://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftsho

[HACKERS] create user problem

2001-06-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
[ VALID UNTIL 'abstime' ] This line: [ CREATEDB | NOCREATEDB ] [ CREATEUSER | NOCREATEUSER ] does say I can do both, right? Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://w

Re: [HACKERS] create user problem

2001-06-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > mydb=# create user foo NOCREATEUSER NOCREATEDB in group bar; > > ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "NOCREATEDB" > > > This line: > > [ CREATEDB | NOCRE

Re: [HACKERS] Encrypting pg_shadow passwords

2001-06-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> More to the point, how does the postmaster know that it's now dealing > >> with encrypted passwords and must use the double-salt auth method? > > > The first three ch

Re: [HACKERS] Encrypting pg_shadow passwords

2001-06-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> More to the point, how does the postmaster know that it's now dealing > > >> with encrypted pas

[HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] v7.1.1 Branched, Packaged and Released ...

2001-05-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy > > > Systems Administrator @ hub.org > > > primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org > > > > > > > > > ---(end of broadcast)--

Re: [HACKERS] typo in psql's help

2001-05-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ady fixed it. In fact, I think I remember seeing the fix a while > ago. Did someone delete this one from the database? I just went to close it out and it's gone. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PR

Re: [HACKERS] typo in psql's help

2001-05-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
| NOT NULL ] [ UNIQUE ] [ DEFAULT value ] [column_constraint_clause | PRIMARY KEY } [ ... ] ] [, ... ] [, PRIMARY KEY ( column [, ...] ) ] [, CHECK ( condition ) ] [, table_constraint_clause ] ) [ INHERITS ( inherited_table [, ...] ) ] --- as just seen on hub a few minutes ago. Vince

Re: [HACKERS] typo in psql's help

2001-05-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yeah, I got a note from Peter saying it was fixed in 7.1. Silly me, I > > thought hub was running 7.1, psql must be 7.0.x. > > Looks like there's an older psql in your PATH.

[HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Oracle to Pg tool

2001-05-10 Thread Vince Vielhaber
rib/ > > When the web copy updates, it will be in: > > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/docs/pgsql/contrib/oracle > > but as separate files, not as a tarball. Right, I should be able to just point to the directory but let me think on that as I may cron a tarball cre

Re: [HACKERS] Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak...

2001-05-23 Thread Vince Vielhaber
t; TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- == Vince Vielhaber -- K

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Interesting Atricle

2001-06-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ashes about 1% as often as it used to. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directoryhttp

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Interesting Atricle

2001-06-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
nt and colors on some sites gets a bit out of whack. Datek's website has text on top of other text, but still works. I trashed the style sheets on the PostgreSQL website long ago and never used them on other sites I write. Vince. -- =========

Re: [HACKERS] grant and SQL92

2001-06-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Vince Vielhaber writes: > > > I can grant a series of privileges (comma separated) on a series of > > objects (comma separated) to either a user, group or public NOT a > > comma separated list of users or groups. Yet at t

Re: [HACKERS] grant and SQL92

2001-06-09 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Vince Vielhaber writes: > > > I can grant a series of privileges (comma separated) on a series of > > objects (comma separated) to either a user, group or public NOT a > > comma separated list of users or groups. > > I s

Re: [HACKERS] Baby girl

2001-06-09 Thread Vince Vielhaber
:) Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directoryhttp://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstorehttp://www.cloudnine

Re: [HACKERS] Encrypting pg_shadow passwords

2001-06-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
strator knows that there are no old clients left > around. That way it can be run _after_ initdb. Which clients actually read pg_shadow? I always thought that only the postmaster read it. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8

Re: [HACKERS] Encrypting pg_shadow passwords

2001-06-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ruce. The auth stuff starts looking at the 4th character of the password column in pg_shadow. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/

Re: [HACKERS] Now it's my turn...

2001-07-01 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Vadim Mikheev wrote: > Baby girl on Jun 27. Congrats Papa!! Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo

Re: [HACKERS] grant and SQL92

2001-07-09 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > Vince Vielhaber writes: > > > > > > > I can grant a series of privileges (comma separated) on a series of > > > > objects (comma separated)

Re: [HACKERS] grant and SQL92

2001-07-10 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > > > Vince Vielhaber writes: > > > > > > > > > I can grant a series of privileges (comma separated) on a

Re: [HACKERS] grant and SQL92

2001-07-10 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > > > > > On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Vince Vielhab

Re: [HACKERS] grant and SQL92

2001-07-10 Thread Vince Vielhaber
> > comment. > > > > That was Peter saying he was going to have it finished 'today or > > tomorrow'. gram.y wasn't as bad as it at first looked as evidenced > > by the patch I submitted today. > > Oh, sorry. OK. > > Yes, that was a sizable p

<    1   2   3   4   >