Re: [HACKERS] initdb initalization failure for collation "ja_JP"

2017-06-21 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 20/06/2017 17:37, Tom Lane wrote: I wrote: Marco Atzeri <marco.atz...@gmail.com> writes: Building on Cygwin latest 10 beta1 or head sourece, make check fails as: ... performing post-bootstrap initialization ... 2017-05-31 23:23:22.214 CEST [16860] FATAL: collation "ja_JP&qu

Re: [HACKERS] initdb initalization failure for collation "ja_JP"

2017-06-20 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 18/06/2017 16:48, Tom Lane wrote: Marco Atzeri <marco.atz...@gmail.com> writes: Building on Cygwin latest 10 beta1 or head sourece, make check fails as: ... performing post-bootstrap initialization ... 2017-05-31 23:23:22.214 CEST [16860] FATAL: collation "ja_JP" for

[HACKERS] initdb initalization failure for collation "ja_JP"

2017-06-17 Thread Marco Atzeri
Building on Cygwin latest 10 beta1 or head sourece, make check fails as: -initdb.log - The database cluster will be initialized with locales COLLATE: en_US.UTF-8 CTYPE:en_US.UTF-8 MESSAGES: C MONETARY: en_US.UTF-8 NUMERIC:

Re: [HACKERS] Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy

2016-05-31 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 31/05/2016 08:10, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: From: Michael Meskes [mailto:mes...@postgresql.org] Yes, but Windows users probably don't understand or know it. So, I suggested explicitly describing the application binary compatibility policy in the PostgreSQL manual. What do you think about

Re: [HACKERS] Removing service-related code in pg_ctl for Cygwin

2016-01-19 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 18/01/2016 18:32, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 01/14/2016 12:38 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: Hi all, Beginning a new thread seems more adapted regarding $subject but that's mentioned here as well:

Re: [HACKERS] Removing service-related code in pg_ctl for Cygwin

2016-01-14 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 14/01/2016 06:38, Michael Paquier wrote: Hi all, Beginning a new thread seems more adapted regarding $subject but that's mentioned here as well: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQXghm_SdB5iniupz1atzMxk=95gv9a8ocdo83sxcn...@mail.gmail.com It happens based on some investigation

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22

2015-07-13 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 7/13/2015 5:36 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 07/12/2015 05:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes: On 07/04/2015 11:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote: It's not apparent to me how that works at all. BTW, the .a files being linked to above are not like Unix .a static archives

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22

2015-07-06 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 7/5/2015 11:35 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 07/04/2015 11:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote: I wondered how come we had not seen this problem in the buildfarm, but the answer appears to be that our only working Cygwin critter (brolga) doesn't build any of the optional PLs, so it skips these modules

[HACKERS] postgresql-9.5alpha1 packaging

2015-07-04 Thread Marco Atzeri
As there are additional or moved binaries in comparison to 9.4 -usr/bin/pg_archivecleanup.exe -usr/bin/pg_rewind.exe -usr/bin/pg_test_fsync.exe -usr/bin/pg_test_timing.exe -usr/bin/pg_upgrade.exe -usr/bin/pg_xlogdump.exe -usr/bin/pgbench.exe any suggestion where to fit them ? Current split on

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22

2015-07-04 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 7/3/2015 2:31 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 7/3/2015 8:19 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/2/2015 5:16 PM, Dave Page wrote: -lldap hstore_plperl.o: In function `hstore_to_plperl': /pub/devel/postgresql/prova

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22

2015-07-03 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 7/3/2015 8:19 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/2/2015 5:16 PM, Dave Page wrote: -lldap hstore_plperl.o: In function `hstore_to_plperl': /pub/devel/postgresql/prova/postgresql-9.5alpha1-1.i686/src/postgresql

[HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5 Alpha 1 build fail with perl 5.22

2015-07-02 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 7/2/2015 5:16 PM, Dave Page wrote: The PostgreSQL Global Development Group announces that the alpha release of PostgreSQL 9.5, the latest version of the world's leading open source database, is available today. This release contains previews of all of the features which will be available in

Re: [HACKERS] About that re-release ...

2015-05-28 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 5/28/2015 7:10 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: On 05/28/2015 02:37 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 5/28/2015 5:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Assuming that we can get a fix for the fsync-failure-during-restart problem committed by the end of the week, there will be a new set of back-branch minor releases next

Re: [HACKERS] test failure on latest source

2014-06-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 16/04/2014 18:55, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 16/04/2014 17:40, Tom Lane wrote: The bigger picture though is that this code isn't failing on the buildfarm. So what we need to ask is what's different about Marco's machine. good question. I checked again and I found that the fault is only

Re: [HACKERS] test failure on latest source

2014-04-16 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 13/04/2014 18:09, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-04-12 16:35:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: In principle, that commit shouldn't have affected behavior for pg_hba entries with numeric address fields ... Hm. getaddrinfo.c has this bit: /*

Re: [HACKERS] test failure on latest source

2014-04-16 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 16/04/2014 17:14, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Marco Atzeri wrote: On 13/04/2014 18:09, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-04-12 16:35:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: In principle, that commit shouldn't have affected behavior for pg_hba entries with numeric address

Re: [HACKERS] test failure on latest source

2014-04-16 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 16/04/2014 17:40, Tom Lane wrote: The bigger picture though is that this code isn't failing on the buildfarm. So what we need to ask is what's different about Marco's machine. good question. I checked again and I found that the fault is only on the cygwin 64 bit build but not on the

[HACKERS] test failure on latest source

2014-04-12 Thread Marco Atzeri
Anyone seeing similar failure ? testing on latest $ git log |head commit 3c41b812c5578fd7bd5c2de42941012d7d56dde2 Author: Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us Date: Thu Apr 10 17:16:22 2014 -0400 docs: psql '--' comments are not passed to the server C-style block comments are passed to

Re: [HACKERS] test failure on latest source

2014-04-12 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 12/04/2014 19:11, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Why can't it resolve localhost? That's a local issue you need to fix. cheers andrew Andrew, just to be clear - localhost is resolved to 127.0.0.1 - 127.0.0.1 is pingable - same test on 9.3.4 works All 135 tests passed. - same test, few

Re: [HACKERS] test failure on latest source

2014-04-12 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 12/04/2014 19:48, Andres Freund wrote: On 2014-04-12 19:45:59 +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote: - same test, few days ago, on trunk was fine so it is only failing on recent trunk Does it work on a commit before fc752505a99a4e2c781a070d3d42a25289c22e3c? E.g

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-16 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 16/02/2014 15:43, Andres Freund wrote: Marco, Andrew: On 2014-02-15 22:11:37 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: ../../src/timezone/localtime.o ../../src/timezone/strftime.o ../../src/timezone/pgtz.o ../../src/port/libpgport_srv.a ../../src/common/libpgcommon_srv.a -lintl -lssl -lcrypto -lcrypt

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 12/02/2014 17:39, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-12 11:26:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Hm. So if we're giving up on the idea of ever getting rid of PGDLLIMPORT, we ought to actually remove that, so that the Cygwin build works more like the other

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 15/02/2014 21:54, Andres Freund wrote: Please pull and retry, that already might fix it. The reason it's probably failing is the warnings about declspec you reported earlier. See 60ff2fdd9970ba29f5267317a5e7354d2658c1e5 Greetings, Andres Freund that is fine. there is a different one,

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-15 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 15/02/2014 23:37, Andres Freund wrote: On 2014-02-15 17:26:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-15 22:11:37 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: ../../src/timezone/localtime.o ../../src/timezone/strftime.o ../../src/timezone/pgtz.o ../../src/port

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-12 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 12/02/2014 17:26, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-12 10:58:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Anybody know *exactly* what --enable-auto-import does? The name is, um, suggestive. My ld(1)'s manpage has three screen's worth of details... Most of it seems to

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-12 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 12/02/2014 19:19, Andres Freund wrote: On 2014-02-12 19:13:07 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 12/02/2014 17:26, Tom Lane wrote: Hm. So if we're giving up on the idea of ever getting rid of PGDLLIMPORT, we ought to actually remove that, so that the Cygwin build works more like the other

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-12 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 13/02/2014 00:17, Craig Ringer wrote: On 02/13/2014 12:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 2014-02-12 11:26:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Hm. So if we're giving up on the idea of ever getting rid of PGDLLIMPORT, we ought to actually remove that, so that

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-11 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 11/02/2014 18:15, Tom Lane wrote: Marco Atzeri marco.atz...@gmail.com writes: On 09/02/2014 14:10, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 02/09/2014 01:12 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: we should have get rid of dlltool on cygwin. At least it is not used on my build The send in a patch. The patch you sent

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-09 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 09/02/2014 14:10, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 02/09/2014 01:12 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 09/02/2014 00:06, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 02/08/2014 05:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp writes: Though I'm not a MINGW expert at all, I know dllwrap is a deprecated tool

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-08 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 09/02/2014 00:06, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 02/08/2014 05:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Hiroshi Inoue in...@tpf.co.jp writes: Though I'm not a MINGW expert at all, I know dllwrap is a deprecated tool and dlltool is almost a deprecated tool. Cygwin port is removing the use of dllwrap and dlltool

Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

2014-02-01 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 01/02/2014 22:57, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 01/25/2014 01:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: * isolation tests fail with an indefinite hang on newer Cygwin * prepared_xacts test fails with an indefinite hang on newer Cygwin if run in parallel with other tests * tsearch tests fail

Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

2014-01-25 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 25/01/2014 19:23, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 01/24/2014 07:50 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: Those two issues need to be fixed. And yes, they are regressions from my Cygwin 1.7.7 setup where they pass consistently, just about every day. See http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm

Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

2014-01-25 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 25/01/2014 22:42, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 25/01/2014 19:23, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 01/24/2014 07:50 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: * LDAP libraries - the way you have proposed surely isn't right. What we want is something more like this in the Makefile.global.in: ifeq

Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

2014-01-24 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 24/01/2014 12:56, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 01/24/2014 01:20 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: AFAICT the regression is in Cygwin. The buildfarm passes because it's using an oldish Cygwin release, 1.7.7 rather than the current 1.7.27. I have brought the regression the athe attention of the Cygwin

Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

2014-01-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 24/01/2014 05:28, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 01/23/2014 10:50 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: Andrew, should this configuration/code patch be applied to 9.4?

Re: [HACKERS] install libpq.dll in bin directory on Windows / Cygwin

2013-07-26 Thread marco atzeri
Il 7/25/2013 11:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera ha scritto: Andrew Dunstan wrote: Jeff Janes asked me about this, and Bruce just tripped up on it. Usually on Windows it's necessary to have libpq.dll/cygpq.dll either in the PATH or in the same directory as client .exe files. The buildfarm client has for

[HACKERS] Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd

2013-06-10 Thread marco atzeri
Il 3/6/2013 11:46 PM, Andrew Dunstan ha scritto: Excellent. Will test it out soon. cheers andrew Andrew, please find attached a full patch for cygwin relative to 9.3beta1 : - DLLTOLL/DLLWRAP are not used anymore, replaced by gcc also for postgres.exe (*) - DLL versioning is added Check