Right, but I think he needs the it's not easy, here's the whole
workflow overview first.
Ross
--
Ross Reedstrom, Ph.D. reeds...@rice.edu
Systems Engineer Admin, Research Scientistphone: 713-348-6166
Connexions http://cnx.org
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
I've already implemented some simple qual pushdown in the redis FDW,
and am planning to do something similar for MySQL - however I won't be
surprised if I have to rewrite redisGetQual in
2011/6/13 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com:
Thanks for the review.
(2011/06/12 13:21), Robert Haas wrote:
2011/6/9 Shigeru Hanadahan...@metrosystems.co.jp:
Attached patch includes fixes for FOREIGN TABLE documents:
I committed the changes to ALTER FOREIGN TABLE, but I think the
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, are you planning to revive the PostgreSQL FDW for 9.2?
That would be a killer feature.
Even more killer would be that it could be built/packaged as an
extension, and use for 9.1 too ;-)
a.
--
Aidan
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, are you planning to revive the PostgreSQL FDW for 9.2?
That would be a killer feature.
Even more killer would be that it could be
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, are you planning to revive the PostgreSQL FDW for 9.2?
That would be a killer feature.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, are you planning to
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Don't hold your breath. We'll probably be making enough changes in the
FDW infrastructure (particularly planner support) that making an FDW
work on both 9.1 and 9.2 would be an exercise in
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Don't hold your breath. We'll probably be making enough changes in the
FDW infrastructure (particularly planner support)
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally, are you planning to
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Oh, that's by no means a waste of time --- we need some examples to help
us figure out where the pain points are. I'm just saying that the best
ways to do things will probably change quite
On 06/13/2011 10:25 AM, Dave Page wrote:
Don't hold your breath. We'll probably be making enough changes in the
FDW infrastructure (particularly planner support) that making an FDW
work on both 9.1 and 9.2 would be an exercise in frustration, if it's
even possible.
Oh joy. There's a GSoC
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 06/13/2011 10:25 AM, Dave Page wrote:
Don't hold your breath. We'll probably be making enough changes in the
FDW infrastructure (particularly planner support) that making an FDW
work on both 9.1 and 9.2 would be
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
Yeah - MySQL is one of the ones I've been hacking on. It's hard to be
motivated if its going to need a complete rewrite within a year
though. I'll still have to work on it, as I've committed to giving
talks on it, but others
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
Yeah - MySQL is one of the ones I've been hacking on. It's hard to be
motivated if its going to need a complete rewrite within a year
though. I'll still
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
Yeah - MySQL is one of the ones I've been hacking on. It's hard to be
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Aidan Van Dyk ai...@highrise.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
Yeah
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
BTW; it seems to me this should be documented, as it could really hack
off developers. I can't see anything in the docs to imply the API
might be radically redesigned.
And I'm still
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
BTW; it seems to me this should be documented, as it could really hack
off developers. I can't see anything in the
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
BTW; it seems to me this should be documented, as it could really hack
off developers. I can't see anything in the
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think we're talking past each other.
Hmm, I wonder if you're correct (as usual :-p). I thought you were
talking about the API as defined here:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
But my point is: any FDW code Dave rights now is not going to have
major dependencies on the planner that will potentially require
extensive reworking in the future because it won't have any real
dependencies on the planner at all. It's not like we
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
But my point is: any FDW code Dave rights now is not going to have
major dependencies on the planner that will potentially require
extensive reworking in the future because it won't have any real
dependencies on the
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
I've already implemented some simple qual pushdown in the redis FDW,
and am planning to do something similar for MySQL - however I won't be
surprised if I have to rewrite redisGetQual in
https://github.com/dpage/redis_fdw/blob/master/redis_fdw.c for
(2011/06/13 21:30), Robert Haas wrote:
Committed, with some additional word-smithing.
Thanks.
Incidentally, are you planning to revive the PostgreSQL FDW for 9.2?
That would be a killer feature.
Yes, I would like to work on pgsql_fdw and other SQL/MED issues in 9.2
development cycle. I'm
Thanks for the review.
(2011/06/12 13:21), Robert Haas wrote:
2011/6/9 Shigeru Hanadahan...@metrosystems.co.jp:
Attached patch includes fixes for FOREIGN TABLE documents:
I committed the changes to ALTER FOREIGN TABLE, but I think the
changes to CREATE FOREIGN TABLE need more thought. The
2011/6/9 Shigeru Hanada han...@metrosystems.co.jp:
Attached patch includes fixes for FOREIGN TABLE documents:
I committed the changes to ALTER FOREIGN TABLE, but I think the
changes to CREATE FOREIGN TABLE need more thought. The first of the
two hunks you've proposed to add doesn't seem
Hi hackers,
At first I've posted to pgsql-docs but there is no reply at present.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2011-06/msg6.php
So I post revised patch to pgsql-hackers, because the patch is for
documents under development for 9.1 beta2. Please let me know if this
was wrong
28 matches
Mail list logo
