Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 01/27/16 16:31, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: > This can be a major thing. I will open a ticket in > https://github.com/tada/pljava -- or is it already on the roadmap? Now that you mention it, it isn't officially in a ticket. Though it's not like I was going to forget. :) I can guarantee it won't

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 01/27/16 22:26, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: > If I can help with anything with the pl/Java project I'd love to help. Man, you do NOT know what you just walked into. :D The most imminent thing I see happening is s/1.5.0-SNAPSHOT/1.5.0-BETA1 which is not far off, so testing is always good. Maybe

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 1/27/2016 8:07 PM, Chapman Flack wrote: I guess getting some time in playing with PostgreSQL and installing PL/Java would be the right way to start. Discussion that's specific to PL/Java and might not interest all of -hackers can also happen on pljava-...@lists.pgfoundry.org. Sounds like a

[HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

Hi all, We have an open source scripting engine named Lucee that is used primarily for web application -- https://github.com/lucee/Lucee -- it is written in Java and is usually run as a servlet, but can be accessed in other ways (like JSR-223). You can think of the language as a combination

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

Why do you want that at the database level? Do you have end-to-end scenario that benefits from using Lucee? >I was wondering how difficult it would be to implement a Postgres extension >that will act as a wrapper around it and will allow to write functions in that >language? Have you checked

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 1/27/2016 8:40 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: Why do you want that at the database level? Do you have end-to-end scenario that benefits from using Lucee? Lucee is very intuitive and powerful, so it's more for ease of use than anything, and to attract more Lucee users to use PostgreSQL (most of

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 1/27/2016 9:57 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: That is a good question. ChakraCore has been open sourced recently. It might be easier to build under Windows. interesting. but now we will need to write an extension for that, e.g. PL/Chakra, which brings back my original question: are there any

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 01/27/2016 11:46 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: >> Have you checked PL/Java? > That seems like a good place to start, thanks. Are there also any docs > about the subject? I just did a quick search on Lucee and what I found suggests that it compiles to JVM bytecode and runs on a JVM. If that is

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

> If the pl/v8 was easily ported to Windows then I probably wouldn't even try > to add Lucee, That is a good question. ChakraCore has been open sourced recently. It might be easier to build under Windows. >That seems like a good place to start, thanks I am not sure you would be able to bind

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 1/27/2016 9:58 AM, jflack wrote: I just did a quick search on Lucee and what I found suggests that it compiles to JVM bytecode and runs on a JVM. If that is the case, and it can compile methods that will have the sort of method signatures PL/Java expects, and you can put the .class files in a

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

2016-01-27 19:21 GMT+01:00 Igal @ Lucee.org : > On 1/27/2016 9:57 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: > >> That is a good question. ChakraCore has been open sourced recently. It >> might be easier to build under Windows. >> > interesting. but now we will need to write an extension for

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 01/27/2016 01:17 PM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: > the next version of Lucee (currently in Beta) does support JSR-223, > which I actually mentioned as a viable solution in my first email in Sorry, I jumped in late. > this thread. That would be awesome if PL/Java would support JSR-223. Ok, if

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 1/27/2016 10:48 AM, Chapman Flack wrote: Ok, if your 233 support is already in beta, you'll get there before we do, but the paths should intersect eventually. :) Actually, once your support for JSR-223 is implemented (it's two-twenty-three, not thirty ;)), we will be able to use

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

2016-01-27 19:37 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule : > > > 2016-01-27 19:21 GMT+01:00 Igal @ Lucee.org : > >> On 1/27/2016 9:57 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: >> >>> That is a good question. ChakraCore has been open sourced recently. It >>> might be easier to build

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 1/27/2016 10:41 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: 2016-01-27 19:37 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule >: David Fetter wrote some presentation - some years ago was popular to write own PL me too

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 01/27/2016 02:06 PM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: > two-twenty-three, not thirty ;)), Thanks. :) On occasions in the past I have written it correctly ... there is evidence in the archives > we will be able to use Javascript > through that via the Nashorn project, Yes, that's an attraction

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 1/27/2016 11:47 AM, Chapman Flack wrote: Thanks. :) On occasions in the past I have written it correctly ... there is evidence in the archives I believe that! I actually never remember if it's 223 or 233 and I always google it before I post, so in a way I cheated ;) we will be

Re: [HACKERS] Implementing a new Scripting Language

On 1/27/2016 7:12 PM, Chapman Flack wrote: Now that you mention it, it isn't officially in a ticket. Though it's not like I was going to forget. :) I can guarantee it won't be in 1.5... Speaking of tickets, I should probably make actual tickets, for after 1.5.0, out of all the items now