On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
This looks like you're using an old version of the parser. preproc.y was
changed to handle empty database names and the the error you report is
due to an empty db name.
I think the problem is that the latest version of
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
The buildfarm script is supposed to complain about unexpected files in
the repository --- I wonder if it is fooled by the .cvsignore entries
for these files?
Yes, we do. A patch made in July 2005 has this comment:
ignore files listed in cvsignore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes:
Chris Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I touch preproc.y and pgc.l, the .c files get regenerated, and all
is well.
If I don't, they get left alone, and I see compilation errors.
It seems to me you need to rebuild the C files and commit them.
No,
Chris Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes:
No, because those derived files are not in CVS at all. What you
are describing sounds to me like a clock skew problem. Is your
machine's system clock showing the correct date?
Odd, odd. NOT a clock problem. The
Tom Lane wrote:
Chris Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes:
No, because those derived files are not in CVS at all. What you
are describing sounds to me like a clock skew problem. Is your
machine's system clock showing the correct date?
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 03:35:14PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
Ah. So this would have caused a bunch of problems in compiling
src/interfaces/ecpg/test/connect/test1.pgc???
Not the compilation errors I would think.
i'm seeing this error when compiling HEAD (updated at ago 29 15:16)
...
On 8/30/06, Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 03:35:14PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
i'm seeing this error when compiling HEAD (updated at ago 29 15:16)
...
This looks like you're using an old version of the parser. preproc.y was
changed to handle empty database
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Meskes) writes:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 03:35:14PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
Ah. So this would have caused a bunch of problems in compiling
src/interfaces/ecpg/test/connect/test1.pgc???
Not the compilation errors I would think.
i'm seeing this error when
Chris Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I touch preproc.y and pgc.l, the .c files get regenerated, and all
is well.
If I don't, they get left alone, and I see compilation errors.
It seems to me you need to rebuild the C files and commit them.
No, because those derived files are not in CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Meskes) writes:
Second try committing the path changes.
Ah, this looks better. I get clean passes on both HPPA in-tree and
Fedora x86_64 VPATH builds, so I think you've finally fixed all the
issues. Congrats!
regards, tom lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Meskes) writes:
Second try committing the path changes.
Ah, this looks better. I get clean passes on both HPPA in-tree and
Fedora x86_64 VPATH builds, so I think you've finally fixed all the
issues. Congrats!
Ah. So this
On 8/29/06, Chris Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Meskes) writes:
Second try committing the path changes.
Ah, this looks better. I get clean passes on both HPPA in-tree and
Fedora x86_64 VPATH builds, so I think you've finally
12 matches
Mail list logo
