Jim Nasby wrote:
People have suggested different trackers that have varying amounts of
email capability, but I don't think any of them have had the full
capability that we'd need. At best they might accept comments on a
bug/issue via email, but to work for the community they'd need to go
On May 7, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Jim Nasby wrote:
And you describe current processes based on email communication.
But if we setup some tracker some process will be changed. I think
first step is determine what we really want and after we can
discuss how to reach it.
If
On May 5, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Dave Page wrote:
snip tracker outline
Barring a few trivial details, that sounds almost identical to
what I
proposed.
Well, Andrew says everyone he talks to doesn't want it. They want a
more comprehensive solution that goes from bug to patch.
I don't recall
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: 05/05/07, 03:00:25
Subject: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
As for #3, again, I don't want us to take on a burdensome patch tracking
process that is
Dave Page wrote:
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: 05/05/07, 03:00:25
Subject: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
As for #3, again, I don't want us to take on a burdensome patch
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: 05/05/07, 03:00:25
Subject: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
As for #3, again, I don't want us to take on a
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: 05/05/07, 03:00:25
Subject: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
As for #3,
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: 05/05/07, 03:00:25
Subject: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
As
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: 05/05/07, 03:00:25
Subject:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Barring a few trivial details, that sounds almost identical to what I
proposed.
Well, Andrew says everyone he talks to doesn't want it. They want a
more comprehensive solution that goes from bug to patch.
Dave can speak for his own views, but I think
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PostgreSQL-development pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: 05/05/07, 03:00:25
I would like to add one point:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch committers check several things before applying a patch:
1) Follows the SQL standard or community agreed-upon behavior
2) Style merges seamlessly into the surrounding code
3) Written as simply and efficiently as possible
4) Uses
OK, item modified to:
liPasses all regression tests, and if needed, adds new
ones/li
---
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
I would like to add one point:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch committers check several
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05/05/07, 11:06:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
snip tracker outline
Barring a few trivial details, that sounds almost identical to what I
proposed
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have already responded to all the email comments. Here is my idea of
moving forward. There are basically three interrelated issues:
1) bug tracking
2) getting more people to review complex patches
3) patch tracking
I am not going to go into #1, except to say
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I will say publicly what I have said to others privately. Forgive me if
I'm a bit blunter than usual. I do not see any value in this at all.
What we need to track are problems to be solved, be they bugs or
features, not particular patches. Tracking patches simply comes
16 matches
Mail list logo
