the
"add new constraint" test.
---
Balazs Wellisch wrote:
>
> Nicely done!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Balazs
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomka
> Gergely
> Sent: Wednesday,
Nicely done!
Thanks,
Balazs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomka
Gergely
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Tests
http://mail.sth.sze.hu/~hsz/sql/
New, upgraded test results. As we
http://mail.sth.sze.hu/~hsz/sql/
New, upgraded test results. As we see, the developers works hard, and with
good results. Million thanks and congratulations.
Sorry *BSD-lovers, if you send a new hard drive, our tester can do bsd
tests also. Life is hard.
And last, but not least, thanks for the t
2003-08-25 ragyogó napján scott.marlowe ezt üzente:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Also another test I'd really like to see is hardware raid (Adaptec, LSI)
> > against Linux software raid, and 5-disk RAID 5 against 4-disk RAID 1+0.
>
> It would be nice to cross those, so you have
scott.marlowe wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
Also another test I'd really like to see is hardware raid (Adaptec, LSI)
against Linux software raid, and 5-disk RAID 5 against 4-disk RAID 1+0.
It would be nice to cross those, so you have RAID5 sw vs RAID5 hw, vs
RAID1+0 sw vs RAID1+
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Also another test I'd really like to see is hardware raid (Adaptec, LSI)
> against Linux software raid, and 5-disk RAID 5 against 4-disk RAID 1+0.
It would be nice to cross those, so you have RAID5 sw vs RAID5 hw, vs
RAID1+0 sw vs RAID1+0 hw.
Now if on
2003-08-22 ragyogó napján Josh Berkus ezt üzente:
> Tomka,
>
> Did you get my test suggestion? It never hit the lists, so I wonder if you
> got it
Yes, we got it, and we use your ideas. Thanks.
--
Tomka Gergely
"S most - vajon barbárok nélkül mi lesz velünk?
Ők mégiscsak megoldás voltak
Tomka,
Since this didn't post last time:
Another good test to do would be one that measures simultaenous steaming
read-write. For example:
create table_a, with at least 10,000 records, where field1 is the PK and
field2 is a text field.
create table_b, with 500,000 or more records, where f
Paul Thomas wrote:
On 22/08/2003 22:00 Bill Moran wrote:
[snip] Well, as much as I _am_ a die-hard BSD geek, I'm far more
interested in
knowing what platform is really best when I need a top-notch PostgreSQL
server.
I'm going to try to force some time this weekend to do some tests ...
we'll see
On 22/08/2003 22:00 Bill Moran wrote:
[snip] Well, as much as I _am_ a die-hard BSD geek, I'm far more
interested in
knowing what platform is really best when I need a top-notch PostgreSQL
server.
I'm going to try to force some time this weekend to do some tests ...
we'll see if I succeed ...
I,
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 16:54, Tomka Gergely wrote:
> 2003-08-22 ragyogó napján Robert Treat ezt üzente:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:16, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > >>>What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time
> > > >>>for other test.
> > > >>
> > > >>It's a shame you
Tomka,
Did you get my test suggestion? It never hit the lists, so I wonder if you
got it
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomka Gergely wrote:
2003-08-22 ragyogó napján Robert Treat ezt üzente:
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:16, Bill Moran wrote:
What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time
for other test.
It's a shame you didn't test ufs+softupdates. I'd be curious to see how
it stacked up a
2003-08-22 ragyogó napján Robert Treat ezt üzente:
> On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:16, Bill Moran wrote:
> > >>>What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time
> > >>>for other test.
> > >>
> > >>It's a shame you didn't test ufs+softupdates. I'd be curious to see how
> > >>it
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:16, Bill Moran wrote:
> >>>What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time
> >>>for other test.
> >>
> >>It's a shame you didn't test ufs+softupdates. I'd be curious to see how
> >>it stacked up against the others.
> >
> > Shame? I smell here a h
Tomka Gergely wrote:
2003-08-21 ragyogó napján Bill Moran ezt üzente:
Tomka Gergely wrote:
http://195.199.65.92/~horvaths/pgperformance.html
One of my friend do these tests. We think about the best filesystem for
the Linux/Postgres systems.
The four test was:
teszt1 - 10.000 inserts
teszt2 - 1
2003-08-21 ragyogó napján Bill Moran ezt üzente:
> Tomka Gergely wrote:
> > http://195.199.65.92/~horvaths/pgperformance.html
> >
> > One of my friend do these tests. We think about the best filesystem for
> > the Linux/Postgres systems.
> >
> > The four test was:
> >
> > teszt1 - 10.000 inserts
>
Tomka Gergely wrote:
http://195.199.65.92/~horvaths/pgperformance.html
One of my friend do these tests. We think about the best filesystem for
the Linux/Postgres systems.
The four test was:
teszt1 - 10.000 inserts
teszt2 - 10.inserts, 10 in one trans.
teszt3 - 14.000.000 inserts, 1.000 in one tra
On 21 Aug 2003 at 16:51, Tomka Gergely wrote:
> http://195.199.65.92/~horvaths/pgperformance.html
>
> One of my friend do these tests. We think about the best filesystem for
> the Linux/Postgres systems.
>
> The four test was:
>
> teszt1 - 10.000 inserts
> teszt2 - 10.inserts, 10 in one trans.
http://195.199.65.92/~horvaths/pgperformance.html
One of my friend do these tests. We think about the best filesystem for
the Linux/Postgres systems.
The four test was:
teszt1 - 10.000 inserts
teszt2 - 10.inserts, 10 in one trans.
teszt3 - 14.000.000 inserts, 1.000 in one trans.
teszt4 - "Select
20 matches
Mail list logo
