Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and
so we don't get shunned on by people like that.
- Brad
--- Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
btw, not my personal opinion :) I just wanted to let you know
this was discussed so you can search the archives for it.
to the
api have it easier' or did I miss something else?
- Markus
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote :
--- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and
so we don't get shunned on by people like
something else?
- Markus
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0700, Brent R. Matzelle wrote :
--- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't we just add alias... so it will be BC and
so we don't get shunned on by people like that.
That would fit the bill nicely
I was looking at the functionality of session_unset. Currently if register
globals is on it will get rid of all variables and it also clears out
PS(http_session_vars).. should it also get rid of PS(vars)?
I have a script that changes the session id a few times thruought the live of
the script.
Cant we do both.. keep the scaner token and introduce the function?
- Brad
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Markus Fischer wrote:
Hi,
can someone state the technical problems we're facing? I'ld
rather see this documented (whether it works or no, but
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
Cant we do both.. keep the scaner token and introduce the function?
What would you reach by introducing such a mess?
I dont' think its too much of a mess
PHP_FUNCTION(echo)
{
char *mess;
int mess_len
Hello,
This patch does two things.
Allows for php new/constructors to all of the dom nodes..
ex
- new
$var = new DomDocument(some.file, true);
- old
$var = xmldoc(some.file, true);
// small example how you would use it
$var = new DomDocument(some.file, true);
$var = new DomElement(name);
Hello,
I have a patch for DomXML that does 2 things. It allows you to use new and
constructors to create dom elements.
Ex.
$doc = new DomDocument(some.file, true);
$ele = new DocElement(name);
$doc-append_child($ele);
insetead of
$doc = xmldoc(some.file, true);
$ele =
--- Christian Stocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 6 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
Hello,
I have a patch for DomXML that does 2 things. It allows you to use new and
constructors to create dom elements.
Ex.
$doc = new DomDocument(some.file, true);
$ele = new
--- Lukas Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 03:54:34PM +0200, Christian Stocker wrote:
$doc = new DomDocument(some.file, true);
$ele = new DocElement(name);
$doc-append_child($ele);
as i said before, this is not according to the DOM-Standard, so i would
--- Christian Stocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 6 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
--- Christian Stocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 6 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
Hello,
I have a patch for DomXML that does 2 things. It allows you to use new
Hello,
My extension uses php_start_ob_buffer() i am trying to cross compile it from
php-4.1.2 and php-4.2.0. Well the number of parameters in php_start_ob_buffer
changed and PHP_API_VERSION stayed the same between the two. Is there a way
that i can detect this at compile time.
- Brad
Hello,
I was wondering who was maintaing the dom xml extension.
I was just testing out some stuff.
-
$xml = new DomElement('asdf');
just doesn't work..
$xml = new DomElement('asdf');
$real_element = $xml-domelement('asdf');
works...
I looked into
--- Christian Stocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 5 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering who was maintaing the dom xml extension.
I was just testing out some stuff.
-
$xml = new DomElement('asdf');
just doesn't
Is there a cleaner way to find out if a parameter that was passed into a
function is a certin type. Currently i use.
strcmp(Z_OBJCE_P(val)-name, class)
- Brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
:24AM -0700, brad lafountain wrote :
Is there a cleaner way to find out if a parameter that was passed into a
function is a certin type. Currently i use.
strcmp(Z_OBJCE_P(val)-name, class)
- Brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health
--- Christian Stocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Yeah but i don't have a $xml
alls i want to do is
$node = new DomElement('blah');
I'm not sure, why you want this, but it doesn't make much sense to me and
is not in the sense of the DOM-Standard:
Objects implementing some
* to the class you want to check again
then ce-refcount will be unique-per-class. In Engine 2 ce itself will be
unique.
Andi
At 10:03 05/05/2002 -0700, brad lafountain wrote:
Im looking for the exact type.. not if is an object or not.
I want to know that is a class of type myClass
i just
I get this error:
f:\php-4.2.0\zend\zend_execute.c(1503) : Freeing 0x00DDD278 (11 bytes),
script=test2.php
f:\php-4.2.0\zend\zend_variables.c(106) : Actual location (location was
relayed)
Last leak repeated 1 time
i took alook at the code..
here is where it creates the memory
tmp =
Ignore the patch
I really should compile and test the patch before i submit it..
It sill is a leak tho.. Ill repatch... Ill also test it this time :)
- brad
--- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get this error:
f:\php-4.2.0\zend\zend_execute.c(1503) : Freeing 0x00DDD278 (11
Ya know.. i might just give up here...
Ignore this.. i realized that my handler should free this memory..
- Brad
i hate people like me!
--- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignore the patch
I really should compile and test the patch before i submit it..
It sill is a leak tho
--- Thies C. Arntzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 01:50:01AM +0100, Wez Furlong wrote:
Hi Thies,
I did raise this issue a while back, but got no response (happens
quite a lot on php-dev).
I think bumping the API number would be the best course of action;
a lot
--- phpsurf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi !
I just started to play with your new extension as soon as I saw your mail
this morning on PHP-DEV !
It's really a good job and I am very impatient to play with the final
release ...
here are a few suggestions/bugs/requests to help you make
Acually it does behave the same way.. but it WAS by design. for my testing.
I'll change it to the correcty way. It's just a default option setting.
Thanks for reminding me.
- Brad
--- SDiZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the extension have any problem simliar to this?
Hello all,
http://phpsoaptoolkit.sourceforge.net/
I'd like to introduce you all to ext/soap. I started this project over a year
ago. I got into it very very heavily then summer came and it got put on the
back burner. With recent inquires on this board and with more interest at my
work. I
Yeah it was disscuessed that the session modules could define and handle
$_APP so that would be globals for all sessions.
a work around would be to do something like this
$oldsession_id = sessoin_id();
session_id(1);
session_start();
$var = $_SESSION['var'];
session_desetroy();
--- Sam Liddicott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My overloaded classes are now registered in MINIT with:
INIT_OVERLOADED_CLASS_ENTRY()
zend_register_internal_class()
..zend_register_list_destructors_ex
And all seems mostly fine;
except the second time apache serves a request, one of the
Ok,
I ran across an issue with having mod_perl and mod_php compiled on the same
machine. As soon as i run any mod_perl scrips any php scripts that use any of
the 'system' (shell_exec, system, popen) calls will only pass one parameter to
them. Has anyone run into this problem?
- Brad
you probally need to define
#define COMPILE_DL_(MODULENAME)
- brad
--- Igal Raizman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I switched back to PHP 4.1.2 to see if it works there and it still doesnt.
I will try to recompile the lib file on my own, but I've come across another
problem.
If I only one
Hello,
I know im not sposta send posts here for help.. but this is on a live server..
i just upgraded my 4.0.6 server to 4.1.2 when i call system or shell_exec
functions it parses out all but one parameter. this only happens in the
mod_php4 as a cgi it works fine.
so
shell_exec(php -q
And next week i have a special C# traning for PHP developers. Offered free by
Microsoft.
alls i have to say is WOW. This is one pathetic attempt by Microsoft.
- Brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
--- Dave Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:27:06AM -0700, brad lafountain wrote:
And next week i have a special C# traning for PHP developers. Offered
free by
Microsoft.
alls i have to say is WOW. This is one pathetic attempt by Microsoft.
Yeah
what about..
class Beer
{
...
}
$a = new Beer();
define('BaseBeer', $a-__clone());
$b = BaseBeer;
or
class Beer
{
...
}
$a = new Beer();
define('BaseBeer', $a);
$b = BaseBeer-__clone();
- Brad
--- Medvitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I was hoping for is that when it was
Hello,
I have a php extension and I was working on a website. I copyied/stole the
layout/code from qa.php.net. The extension is opensource and leaves the
copyright (Copyright © 1997 - 2002 PHP Group All rights reserved.) on the site.
Can I do this or does this break the liscence?
I like the
--- Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct me if i am wrong:
We have a macros that garantees thread safety for module globals TSRMG.
But if we use this on strings or structures that is not thread safe because
then the lock only occurs for copying the pointer. But another thread
After a full day of looking into a bug on a script i have i found this problem.
basically if you invoke a method from a member object it adds a ref instead of
keeping it 'non ref'.
Is this by design or is it a bug.
?
class foo
{
var $bar;
function foo()
{
...
Andrey
- Original Message -
From: brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:37 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] object refrences (POSSIBLE MAJOR BUG)
After a full day of looking into a bug on a script i have i found this
problem
- Original Message -
From: brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] object refrences (POSSIBLE MAJOR BUG)
--- Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I receive
.
- Brad
is feature of Z2 or not?
Till today I didn't know that my 4.1.1(or 2) not sure can do this kind of
dereferencing.
Andrey
- Original Message -
From: brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 11
--- Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrey Hristov wrote:
But dereferncing like this
$foo-bar()-fubar
is feature of Z2 or not?
Till today I didn't know that my 4.1.1(or 2) not sure can do this kind of
dereferencing.
The above quote dereference involves an intermediate
--- Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
brad lafountain wrote:
As far as references go... I believe when you copy an object it is a
shallow copy, in otherwords, the object is copied, but not its members.
This behaviour is preferrable as far as I'm concerned. If you want
How much COW does php do?... I saw a post that it does it for arrays? what else
does it do it for.
I was thinking that a COW per zval would be good. expecially when you get into
large arrays.
$a = array(/*1 items*/);
$b = $a;
$b[999] = false;
will this copy all elements or just copy one?
--- Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:14 11/04/2002 -0700, brad lafountain wrote:
--- Andrey Hristov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But dereferncing like this
$foo-bar()-fubar
its not
$foo-bar()-fubar
its
$foo-bar-fubar
4.1.2 can't derefrence objects from functions
I personally would like to see $_APP defined for all session modules.
Cause I would like $_APP variable across multiple machines and then i could use
msession for that.
- Brad
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
PS: I've already added $_APP to
--- Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I still haven't finished reading the looong thread on aggregation vs.
MI because you guys write so much :)
I would like to make a proposal for a solution which I think would fit PHP
very nicely.
My main concern with MI is that
I have a script that has an array of objects and the objectes have an array of
objects
so
$obj = $test['0']-members['0'];
$obj-blah();
It's acting up when i chnage $obj sometimes $test['0']-members['0'] reflects
the changes i make to $obj. Is there any way that i can test to see if it is a
ref
--- Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:46 10/04/2002 -0700, brad lafountain wrote:
--- Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
I still haven't finished reading the looong thread on aggregation vs.
MI because you guys write so much :)
I would like to make
BTW:
Have you looked at my patch to handle method calls differently?
Yes and I don't like it. I haven't had time to do timings yet. I was very
busy and will try and do it in the next few days.
hmm
The patch wasn't just for speed it was more for sloving 2 main problems.
class a
--- Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:51 09/04/2002, brad lafountain wrote:
But do you see my point that having ONLY aggregate means that in 90% of the
case where people will use it its probally a bad idea. They are only using
it
becuase of the lack of MI. How does aggregation
--- Lauri Liinat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
I'm personally in favour of having MI in PHP, with the serious alternative
being interfaces. I have failed to understand what interfaces would mean
in a language such as PHP, though, while I can see the clear hands-on use
for MI.
--- Kristian Köhntopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
brad lafountain wrote:
Unless someone could give me a real reason that
aggerate is better than MI.
Aggregation does at runtime what MI does at compile time.
Delaying the decision to do something is usually an enable for
specific
--- Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 02:50, brad lafountain wrote:
--- Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 20:35, brad lafountain wrote:
What would be wrong with having the *_SQL_* objects be a member
--- Kristian Koehntopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:59:39AM -0700, brad lafountain wrote:
class A;
class B;
class C;
$c = new C;
aggergate($c, A);
aggergate($c, B);
Just because they can.
Yes of course, but how is this better than
class D extends
--- Joseph Tate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in the copy_zend_constant function it reads:
void copy_zend_constant(zend_constant *c)
{
c-name = zend_strndup(c-name, c-name_len);
if (!(c-flags CONST_PERSISTENT)) {
zval_copy_ctor(c-value);
if (c-flags
hmm
ok
zend_constant *c, *b;
char *sname = myname;
c-name = name; // the c-name is just a pointer to the sname
//c-name = strdup(sname); // c-name would have it's own memory
b = c; //now b-name points to sname
free(b-name); // would try and free b-name which can't be done, segfault!
necessary to include MI
too.
- brad
At 18:59 08/04/2002, brad lafountain wrote:
--- Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 02:50, brad lafountain wrote:
--- Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 20:35, brad lafountain wrote
--- Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 00:44 09/04/2002, brad lafountain wrote:
If aggregation is included then i see it is absoulty necessary to include MI
too.
In my opinion, only one of them (at most) has room in PHP. Having both is
messy. My personal preference is MI, which
developer less than a weeks time to do.
- Brad
Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 00:44 09/04/2002, brad lafountain wrote:
If aggregation is included then i see it is absoulty necessary to include
MI too.
In my opinion, only one of them (at most) has room in PHP. Having both is
messy. My personal
--- Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 00:55 09/04/2002, brad lafountain wrote:
Well i would have totally agreed with you yesterday.. but i have convinced
myself that there is use for aggregation. Me personally i would never use
it.
But i can see somepeople using it.
It doesn't
be emulated using aggregation, how hard would it be to add the
syntax for MI to the language, but have it implement it using aggregation?
Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 00:44 09/04/2002, brad lafountain wrote:
If aggregation is included then i see it is absoulty necessary to
include
MI
--- Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 23:40, brad lafountain wrote:
--- Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MI is compile-time, aggregate is runtime. That's a big enough reason
for me.
I know the difference but how does this benifit you
--- Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 20:35, brad lafountain wrote:
What would be wrong with having the *_SQL_* objects be a member of the
*_Connection* classes?
What you're describing here is object aggregation.
What do you mean... Im saying that the SQL
--- Yasuo Ohgaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brad Lafountain wrote:
I keep on hearing that we are totally against MI but we want the
aggergate
function.
Can someone PLEASE explain the reasoning behind such a decision?
I can't think of one example when aggergate would be better
I posted this a while back and got no feed back.
Can someone look at it?
http://lists.php.net/article.php?group=php.devarticle=81608
#brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
--
PHP
--- Stig S. Bakken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 11:21, brad lafountain wrote:
--- Yasuo Ohgaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brad Lafountain wrote:
I keep on hearing that we are totally against MI but we want the
aggergate
function.
Can someone PLEASE
I keep on hearing that we are totally against MI but we want the aggergate
function.
Can someone PLEASE explain the reasoning behind such a decision?
I can't think of one example when aggergate would be better than using MI.
- Brad
__
Do You
IMHO,
This is acually the first ive heard of aggergate. I don't like it at all. I
never liked overload ither. If you are defining a class libary you need some
procedural code just to define the class libary. even for things like
auto-documentors like php-doc. They no nothing about the aggerated
. So i will send you the patch
against 4.1.2.
/* brad */
--- Yasuo Ohgaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad,
I would like to try your patch.
Where did you post? I searched ze2 list messages, I couldn't find one.
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
Brad Lafountain wrote:
Ok...
These benchmarks
is fatal. Especially those who are
experienced with other OO languages, such as C++/Java.
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
Brad Lafountain wrote:
This bug is eaisly fixable. This is also something that i have been trying
to
push on a couple of threads now. You would need to do 3 things.
1) change
My bad i forgot to attach the scripts.
--- Yasuo Ohgaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brad,
How about post detailed benchmarks for your patch?
IMHO. This bug is fatal. Especially those who are
experienced with other OO languages, such as C++/Java.
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
Brad Lafountain wrote
I responded to a thread on php-dev i never got the email but
i checked the archive and it's in there.
Im talking about #82030.
- Brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://http://taxes.yahoo.com/
--
PHP
This bug is eaisly fixable. This is also something that i have been trying to
push on a couple of threads now. You would need to do 3 things.
1) change the compiler so that inherited objects don't copy the opcodes
of the functions. it will just store the parent's ce.
2) change the executor
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So have we discussed this enough, can I just apply it and be done with it?
+1
+1
/* Brad */
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for
There are two parts to this patch...
1) it changes zend_execute_API.c/call_user_function_ex to allow
overloaded object to handle this callback.
2) Takes advantage of the change above allowing java object to
be searlized and/or sessionable
here are two examples...
?
$java = new
I was wondering if anyone has ever thought of comming up with a different way
of handling the code below. I know that you can use shared memory, but that
wont work for win and it wont work for web cluseters using db's to handle their
sessions. Also sessions will automatically handle locking of
--- Richard Heyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has ever thought of comming up with a different
way
of handling the code below. I know that you can use shared memory, but
that
wont work for win and it wont work for web
?
$str = Hello World;
echo mb_strlen($str) . \n;
echo mb_strlen(mb_convert_encoding($str, BASE64), BASE64);
?
the code above prints out
11
16
... is this correct??? If so why does it work this way.
- Brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo!
Has it ever been disscuesd to make php
support different char encodings internally?
- Brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
Ok,
I know ive already posted this but no responded. So I'll do it again.
Currently call_user_function() doesn't call overloaded class methods.
I hacked together a function to get around this. Does anyone want to look at it
and see if it's gunna mess anything up as far as zend execution. if
Where would i find out how to create
the necessary xml docs so my extension
docs would flow into php's website?
- Brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List
I was wondering why call_user_function doens't handle calling methods of
objects for an incomplete_class_entry.
call_user_function(NULL, incomplete_class, function_name, return, 0, NULL);
i took a look at the code and it assumes that the function that you want to
call is in the
/how to fill that
structure with.
- Brad
--- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering why call_user_function doens't handle calling methods of
objects for an incomplete_class_entry.
call_user_function(NULL, incomplete_class, function_name, return, 0, NULL);
i took a look
--- Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Hunter, Ray wrote:
How do I compile php to get the executable file?
Is he talking about cgi/cli? or having php compile executeable files...
compile php as cgi..
./configure
there will be a php executable in the working
and have a question:
What is the difference between cgi and sapi or the other ways to compile
php?
Ray Hunter
Firmware Engineer
ENTERASYS NETWORKS
-Original Message-
From: brad lafountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL
The magic
#!/usr/local/bin/php -c local.ini
already works
- brad
--- J Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I understand, starting with PHP 4.2.x, PHP is going to
automatically build with a CLI executable by default. This means that even
when you install as, say, an Apache SAPI
Ok...
I have hashtables in global memory and when i read from them
i am getting some random crashing proplems
apache seems to be segfaulting when my application does a
zend_hash_find();
well it doesn't segfault right away..
it segfaults at the end of the php script the only way
i can tell
Sorry i forgot to attach the extension
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
test.tar.gz
Description: test.tar.gz
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe,
CFLAGS when running configure) and fire gdb over it.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 11:03:55AM -0800, brad lafountain wrote :
Ok...
I have hashtables in global memory and when i read from them
i am getting some random crashing proplems
apache seems to be segfaulting when my
);
zend_hash_add(test_globals-global_hash, mykey, strlen(mykey),
myvalue, strlen(myvalue), NULL);
}
/* }}} */
[snip]
shouldnt module globals be malloc'ed as opposed to emalloc'ed.all
emalloced memory is automagically reclaimed at the end of a request.
Brad Lafountain [EMAIL
Question..
why doens't the destructor get called on shutdown with the following line...
ZEND_INIT_MODULE_GLOBALS(soap, php_init_globals, php_del_globals);
- Brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
Well how do i properly delete my global memory with without having
zts enabled
- Brad
--- Yasuo Ohgaki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brad Lafountain wrote:
Question..
why doens't the destructor get called on shutdown with the following
line...
ZEND_INIT_MODULE_GLOBALS(soap
Well the class needs to be declared before the session is started...
so make sure that you don't call session_start before
your User class is defined and... make sure sessions_auto_start in you
php.ini is set to false
- Brad
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with just minor differences in
semantics but it's an option.
Andi
At 10:35 AM 2/8/2002 -0800, brad lafountain wrote:
Yeah it has bit me too...
I would totaly be for getting rid of the default namespace
and force developers to use $this- it pretty much has become
normal practice... i really don't
Hello all who have been following this thread..
I just found it.. i have been working on a php/soap extension
for a while now.. and it's nearing completion..
it's is fully functional right now im just adding options and
features. It's damn fast too :) i benchmarked it agains some other
soap
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: N/A
PHP version: 4.1.1
PHP Bug Type: Feature/Change Request
Bug description: A C-like comma operator would be useful
A C-like comma operator would be useful, to string together series of
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: N/A
PHP version: 4.1.1
PHP Bug Type: Feature/Change Request
Bug description: Subscripting into strings would be useful
The now very old North Star BASIC had a wonderful feature that I'd love to
--- brad lafountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating system: N/A
PHP version: 4.1.1
PHP Bug Type: Feature/Change Request
Bug description: A C-like comma operator would be useful
A C-like comma operator
--- Mauricio Sthandier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I'm new in php development... I was wondering how can I attach a Word
(.doc) Document in an email sent with the mail() function (if I can do it
just with it).
I know it has to see with the additional headers of the email, but I would
be
i have a question.
would making a wrapper extension around pthreads work?
or would this break alot of stuff conserning tsrm and other memory/execution
that im not positive about.
- Brad
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo!
--- Rasmus Resen Amossen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am quite unsatisfied with the fact that I currently have to BUY a
product, to be
able to protect my self from others, wanting to steal my php-source. Due
to
the fact that I want to be able to scramble my sources (for free), I now
intend
101 - 200 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
