On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Brian France wrote:
I have created a patch for two new .ini directives:
include_ini = filename ; relative or full path
include_ini_dir = full directory path
I prefer to use large single config file if it's not
too large. I didn't like
Tables work a *lot* better for aligning the text. Otherwise, how many
spaces are you going to pad line numbers with? 6? No matter how
rediculous it seems, I know a person with a 1 million+ line script
(though I have absolutely no clue what it does).
IMHO, tables just allow for much better
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Devon O'Dell wrote:
Not to be a troll, but weren't srm.conf and access.conf deprecated for a
reason?
I think it was the reason that it made configuration less clear. Three
files for one thing isn't just 'right'.
Derick
You should report this to the PHP team. Perhaps it's even fixed in PHP 4.2.3.
Zitat von Iain [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I seem to have found a work around for this. I recompiled the PHP4 debian
packages with the option:
export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug nostrip
which is equivalent to
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:47:12AM +0100, James Cox wrote:
Stefan,
is this really worth it? I think this will break too many scripts.
-- james
My change only changes parse_url() to remove characters that
are invalid in urls. If such characters occur in an url that
is passed to
hi,
i tried to run php4-head + ZE2 but both CLI and apache(1.3)-sapi
segfault for me.
the steps i did were:
cvs co php4
cd php4
mv Zend ZE1
cvs co -d Zend ZendEngine2
./cvsclean
./buildconf
'./configure' \
'--prefix=/usr/local/php4' \
'--with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs' \
i want to the best so i will choose the best so
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
i have to use zend execute statement into PHP api. how can i use this
function to interpret php code?
thanks
MAX
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
e i have to use zend execute statement into PHP api. how can i use this
e function to interpret php code? thanks MAX
If you need just to execute PHP code, you have eval() in PHP. zend_execute
is to be used by Zend engine, and needs various preparations (like,
zend_compile, etc.) before it can
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:14:24PM +0200, eminent wrote :
i have to use zend execute statement into PHP api. how can i use this
function to interpret php code?
Have a look at main/main.c (php_execute_script) and traverse
the called zend API functions from it. Try lxr:
Could you be a little more specific?
Regards,
Lukas
-Original Message-
From: Simone Grassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: sigi
Join PEAR to develop:
- improvement of existing
Shoot me down if this should go on the gen list but I think this question
would get a better answer on this list.
I am running a large PHP/MySQL/Apache driven website and I am finding that
the apache Processes get larger and larger as the days go on. When I
stop/start apache the processes are
Oooops.
We are running Apache/1.3.26, PHP/4.2.2 mod_ssl/2.8.9 under FreeBSD 4.6.
Apache modules:
mod_php4, mod_ssl, mod_setenvif, mod_so, mod_auth, mod_access, mod_alias,
mod_userdir, mod_actions, mod_imap, mod_asis, mod_cgi, mod_dir,
mod_autoindex, mod_include, mod_status, mod_negotiation,
Shoot me down if this should go on the gen list but I think this
question
would get a better answer on this list.
I am running a large PHP/MySQL/Apache driven website and I am finding
that
the apache Processes get larger and larger as the days go on. When I
stop/start apache the processes
what version of mod_ssl are you using ?
your situation looks very familiar since I experienced the same problem,
the issue was mod_ssl, there is a new version available to fix this bug.
(buffer overflow).
Thanks.
Xavier Spriet.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 08:58, John Wards wrote:
After switching to PHP 4.2.3 for awhile, it seems the url_rewriter bug
is still present at some level (though much less than before).
Some users reported some errors during parsing of long URLs.
I have been trying to see if I could fix this problem myself or at least
identify it but with no
Hmm... in the apache world, the srm.conf and access.conf were deprecated,
but the Include directive in the configuration file is still maintained.
That is, by default, people use a single apache configuration file.
However, for specialized cases, like Brian's, people have the ability to use
Looks ok to me.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 4:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Win32 project files
A while ago I started working on main/config.w32.h beeing generated
from
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 09:20:03AM -0700, David Viner wrote :
Hmm... in the apache world, the srm.conf and access.conf were deprecated,
but the Include directive in the configuration file is still maintained.
That is, by default, people use a single apache configuration file.
However, for
ok, so we should write a mini-language for the ini? or should we just make
it php? then we just need to scan/interpret it.
if we want to make the ini file more powerful, there are *many* things that
can be done... it just really depends how powerful it needs to be
(especially since php works
The last time we had this discussion a few People didn't
liked that kind of flex^H^H^H^Hcomplexity in the include
file.
Hell, you even could just use an PHP source-file for it ... :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 12:34:30PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
ok, so we should write a
Thats what I was talking about (or should we just make it in php?)
Now, should we start an ini-project?
heh
Devon
Original Message:
-
From: Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:39:03 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL
HI,
While adding SNMPv3 support I noticed that number 5 to 8 are reserved.
These are numbers used to map (for instance) from the PHP_FUNCTION(snmpget)
to the internal php_snmp function.
(Example code)
PHP_FUNCTION(snmpget)
{
php_snmp(INTERNAL_FUNCTION_PARAMETERS_PASSTHRU, 1);
}
The number
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, so we should write a mini-language for the ini? or should we just make
it php? then we just need to scan/interpret it.
Nope, sounds like a bad idea for something simple as a .ini file.
Derick
--
PHP Development Mailing List
Am Donnerstag, 12. September 2002 18:20 schrieb David Viner:
Hmm... in the apache world, the srm.conf and access.conf were deprecated,
but the Include directive in the configuration file is still maintained.
That is, by default, people use a single apache configuration file.
However, for
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, so we should write a mini-language for the ini? or should we just
make it php? then we just need to scan/interpret it.
Nope, sounds like a bad idea for something simple as a .ini file.
For what it's worth, here's my +1 on enabling a
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Matthew Walker wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, so we should write a mini-language for the ini? or should we just
make it php? then we just need to scan/interpret it.
Nope, sounds like a bad idea for something simple as a .ini file.
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Matthew Walker wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, so we should write a mini-language for the ini? or should we
just make it php? then we just need to scan/interpret it.
Nope, sounds like a bad idea for something simple as a .ini file.
Jason T. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The biggest thing I would like to have complete *by 4.3* is good solid
docs on this extension (There is some already done). I am planning on
working on this, and I have had one volunteer to help out.
Where are the current docs? I'd like to have a
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:41:47AM -0700, Brian Lalor wrote :
Where are the current docs?
[...]
php.net/sockets
--
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
- It's not a fug, it's a beature. -
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:41:47AM -0700, Brian Lalor wrote :
Where are the current docs?
[...]
php.net/sockets
By which you mean the source? I asked if there was documentation outside of
the source files.
--
Brian Lalor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For what it's worth, my posts were intended to be taken sarcastically :)
Devon
Original Message:
-
From: Matthew Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 11:24:12 -0600 (MDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] include_ini and include_ini_dir
On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:54:14AM -0700, Brian Lalor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:41:47AM -0700, Brian Lalor wrote :
Where are the current docs?
[...]
php.net/sockets
By which you mean the source? I asked if there was documentation outside of
the source files.
Yes,
I just grabbed PHP from CVS and tried to go through the procedure outlined in
README.SELF-CONTAINED-EXTENSIONS and found that it doesn't work. Can someone
help? I'm looking at revision 1.10 of the README.
The php4 module's checked out into my ~/devel directory. So under CONVERTING
AN
I dunno the solution to the warnings from phpize, (since i havent figured a
way to fix that),
But I think they are benign warnings.
The error message...
You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal. seems bogus.
It would be great if someone here can comment on it.
Anycase, you
On 12 Sep 2002, Brian Lalor wrote:
Jon Parise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By which you mean the source? I asked if there was documentation outside of
the source files.
Yes, the documentation is at http://www.php.net/sockets (which
redirects to the manual entry).
Thanks for
I have seen the configure error before. Don't know if this is what
you are doing, but for me it was using phpize from 4.2.x and trying
to build 4.3 extensions.
Hope this helps,
Brian
At 11:27 AM -0700 9/12/02, Brian Lalor wrote:
I just grabbed PHP from CVS and tried to go through the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for bringing that up, Jon. How do I know which version of the
documentation applies to a particular released version of PHP? We're still
using php 4.0.6 where I work, but the documentation for the sockets library
(for example) reflects some newer
As long as the extension is marked EXPERIMENTAL so are the
docs and so they may be out of date for current version and
also up to date with current versions and not reflect the
behaviour of any of the older versions.
As it has been mentioned numerous times, volunteers are
On 09/12/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Matthew Walker wrote:
For what it's worth, here's my +1 on enabling a php-parsed .ini file.
And to
maintain backwards compatibility, if the file had no php tags in it, it
could be parsed as per the old .ini method.
I'm -1 on
Jon Parise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:54:14AM -0700, Brian Lalor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:41:47AM -0700, Brian Lalor wrote :
Where are the current docs?
[...]
php.net/sockets
By which you mean the source? I asked if there was
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:13:03PM -0700, Brian Lalor wrote :
Jon Parise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:54:14AM -0700, Brian Lalor wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 10:41:47AM -0700, Brian Lalor wrote :
Where are the current docs?
[...]
Using latest CVS HEAD there are no problems:
cd ext/sockets phpize ./configure make make install
$ php -r 'dl(sockets.so); socket_create();'
Command line code(1) : Warning - socket_create() expects exactly 3 parameters, 0
given
$ autoconf --version
Autoconf version
So is it fair to say that we (Brian and others who are interested) should persue a
robust patch that will allow for an Include directive in PHP's ini file that functions
like Apache's Include directive?
dave
-Original Message-
From: Wez Furlong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As long as the extension is marked EXPERIMENTAL so are the
docs and so they may be out of date for current version and
also up to date with current versions and not reflect the
behaviour of any of the older versions.
*sigh*
I should
On 12 Sep 2002, Brian Lalor wrote:
It should be released in conjunction with PHP and a new version put up when
bugs are fixed and the old versions should be available just like the old
versions of PHP are. I don't know what the stats are for how many people are
using older versions of PHP
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:29:41PM -0700, Brian Lalor wrote :
Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As long as the extension is marked EXPERIMENTAL so are the
docs and so they may be out of date for current version and
also up to date with current versions and not reflect
Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cd ext/sockets phpize ./configure make make install
The file README.SELF-CONTAINED-EXTENSIONS walks through copying the source
into /tmp/newext and then running the commands. There's no mention of needing
the PHP source, and in fact states that
On 12 Sep 2002, Brian Lalor wrote:
Markus Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As long as the extension is marked EXPERIMENTAL so are the
docs and so they may be out of date for current version and
also up to date with current versions and not reflect the
behaviour of any
I would have to say that I would be +1 for the include feature in the
php.ini file, but -1 for the PHP parsing of the file... I see no need for
that
The include feature could be very usefull so I don't see anything wrong
with the idea since the newbies could just stay away from it?
I see
On 12 Sep 2002, Brian Lalor wrote:
phpize gives some warnings:
aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBPATH' defined in acinclude.m4 but never used
aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBRARY' defined in acinclude.m4 but never used
aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBRARY_WITH_PATH' defined in acinclude.m4
I see very little point in having include /without/ some kind of parsing.
The idea of include is that it lets you dynamically load different pieces
based on some condition.
Yes, it can make adding little pieces to the config easier to manage, but in
my opinion, that's not enough to make me want
phpize gives some warnings:
aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBPATH' defined in
acinclude.m4 but never used
aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBRARY' defined in
acinclude.m4 but never used
aclocal: macro `AC_ADD_LIBRARY_WITH_PATH' defined in
acinclude.m4 but never used
On 09/12/02, Matthew Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see very little point in having include /without/ some kind of parsing.
The idea of include is that it lets you dynamically load different pieces
based on some condition.
Me either, but...
Yes, it can make adding little pieces to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Tom Sommer wrote:
Devon O'Dell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Maybe, but then we're assuming Apache ;)
.phps does not work on IIS
phps may not work under Apache 1.3.x also.
Any
55 matches
Mail list logo
