As it is a compile first, execute later interpreter it will in practice not
slow down your code.
Of course if your script has only a very small amount of flat code (no
loops/function calls) and a huge amount of comments (tens of KB) then it
could theoretically make a difference but in reality
I think the code itself should be fixed (with #ifdef or add it to the
socket abstraction). It's dangerous to redefine errno because other code
uses it too.
Andi
At 01:01 PM 1/14/2001 -0800, Christophe Thibault wrote:
I just came across a bug still present in the latest php 4 release. i have
Looks like this was my bad :)
Sorry,
Andi
At 01:47 AM 1/17/2001 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Yep, you're right. Fixed.
Thanks,
Zeev
At 23:24 16/1/2001, Steven Roussey wrote:
OK. Look at a quick report. I've just installed php4-200101152345. It runs
with mysql-3.23.27-beta. Apache 1.3.12,
Hey,
A couple of guys here said they are working on creating a popen()
alternative solution for Win32.
Any progress?
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list
At 05:27 PM 1/21/2001 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
Hi,
A couple of guys here said they are working on creating a popen()
alternative solution for Win32.
Any progress?
I'm busy with it. I'm making progress indeed. I only have to bring the
code into the PHP source now. BUt it looks good.
At 05:43 PM 1/24/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:07:09PM +0100, Cynic wrote:
confuse folks. and the consensus (at least I got it it's agreed
on) is pdf_add_local_link-like names.
From the php point of view there should
Moshe,
It's quite difficult to exploit this vulnerability without knowing your
servers setup. It is possible, but personally I wouldn't worry too much
about it although you should urge your ISP to upgrade to 4.0.4pl1.
Andi
At 08:07 PM 1/27/2001 +, James Moore wrote:
No. the bug was
Reminder! :)
Andi
At 05:27 PM 1/21/2001 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
Hi,
A couple of guys here said they are working on creating a popen()
alternative solution for Win32.
Any progress?
I'm busy with it. I'm making progress indeed. I only have to bring the
code into the PHP source now.
To: "Andi Gutmans" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Andi,
I think that you should have enogh info to fix the problem now. Please
see the two attached messages and let me know if that is enough.
Edin
-Original Message-
From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, Janu
At 03:02 AM 2/7/2001 +0100, Cynic wrote:
with all respect to the people who develop the language, I
think this is nonsense:
$rs = mysql_query( 'select x, y, z from foo where ...' ) ;
$x = mysql_fetch_array( $rs , MYSQL_NUM ) ;
var_dump( $x[2] ) ;
var_dump( isset( $x[2] ) ) ;
NULL # well, the
I also tend to think it's kind of strange. It's about 800KB of source code
and as far as I understand this is an extension module which will be used
by almost no one (and everyone will be forced to dl an extra 800KB (300KB
compressed)).
Any of the Midgard people on this list? Is there any good
Well maybe we can have a function with another name? or pass an optional
second argument?
I'm not that sure it's a good thing to break backwards compatibility on
this one although I admit not knowing how many people actually use it. My
guess is that if it's been in a couple of versions of PHP
There is no good reason the BEGIN_EXTERN_C() haven't been included.
We'd welcome a patch. Check out the other places we do put these to get an
idea where they should be.
In any case, one thing I've wanted to do for a long time is get PHP to
compile with the freeware Borland C++ compiler.
not change the implementation. If you guys want it to be another
function could someone suggest a name for it? get_meta_tags_ex??
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 12:41 AM
To: Andr Langhorst; [EMAIL PROTE
At 09:31 AM 2/19/2001 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Hi,
what do people think about a PHP 4.0.5 release?
We have about 70 change entries in NEWS. Some of the changes
are fundamentally needed for some extensions to work
correctly or to compile at all.
Let me know
I can never remember who said they were mentioning on getting popen() to
work on Win32.
In any case, if someone's working on it any chance this can make it in for
4.0.5?
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
It seems like pack()/unpack() has it's own endianess code instead of using
htonl(), htons().
Is there a reason for this? It would be nice to fix this for 4.0.5 because
right now if you use pack() on Linux and unpack() on Solaris it doesn't
quite work.
It seems to me as if fixing this shouldn't
No problem.
By the way, any idea how well PHP runs on OS/390? Does it actually work
natively?
Does it run as an Apache module?
Andi
At 09:23 PM 2/23/2001 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Background: Apparently, OS/390 cannot handle files containing
dashes. Because almost all of our
Hopefully fixed now.
Andi
At 11:06 PM 2/24/2001 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
andiSat Feb 24 23:16:58 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/Zend modules.h zend_builtin_functions.c
Log:
- Add exports from Daniel Beulshausen
cgi_main.c
..\main
At 08:44 PM 2/25/2001 +, Wez Furlong wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Does Japanese actually work in a decent way with PHP?
From the zillions of Japanese sites I've seen running it I'd guess it
works :)
Theres a bunch of extensions that add multibyte support from
ftp
One of the below IMO.
Andi
At 10:26 AM 2/26/2001 +0100, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
RFC: what should their names be in 4.0.5?
( ) stay with ctype_alpha() ...
(X) switch to ctype_isalpha() ...
() switch to ctype_isalpha() ... and have ctype_alpha() aliases
(X) switch to
At 12:11 PM 2/26/2001 +, Sam Liddicott wrote:
I notice that usleep and sleep both clash on solaris with
Max-execution-time.
1) I notice various modules using sleep:
db, hyperwave, mysql, oci8, satellite
which seems to break max execution time.
Any idea why and where they are using sleep()?
Do you have time to map where in PHP we are currently using socket code?
I think according to how many places and how we are using it, it'll help us
decide how much redesigning we can do. Also keep Win32 in mind while
thinking of this.
I didn't have much time but I did read through your RFC
This sounds pretty good. I'll try and look at the code this weekend. Some
of the code is really ugly especially the legacy code.
When you say there are places which need a FILE * do you mean they just
need to check the id and check that it's a FILE * or do they convert
descriptors to FILE *
Too early in the morning. I just remembered fdopen() :)
Andi
At 07:14 AM 3/1/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
This sounds pretty good. I'll try and look at the code this weekend. Some
of the code is really ugly especially the legacy code.
When you say there are places which need a FILE * do you
We're probably best off staying with the status quo and trying to keep a
close look at any new modules which make it into the tree and modules which
have been added since 4.0.4 (or maybe a small time before).
It doesn't make much sense to go back and break old names and it doesn't
make lots of
Can you please send it as an attachment and I'll apply it. (It would also
be good if someone who is familar with the nsapi extension to take a look
at the patch).
BTW what are MALLOC() and FREE()?
Andi
At 05:14 PM 3/1/2001 -0600, Andrew Johnson wrote:
Someone said they'd commit the following
I commited your patch.
Andi
At 01:26 PM 3/2/2001 +0100, Whitehead Anthony wrote:
Hiyas,
I just tried to commit the attached patch to the NSAPI module but it seems my
CVS write
access has expired ;)
Here attached is the patch for NSAPI from Andrew Johnson, I've tested it on
several UNIX
I just reviewed the patch quickly. Are you sure that using MALLOC() for the
SG(request_info) variables is OK?
Are these all variables which are supposed to be freed by the SAPI module?
(I think they are but I don't have time to double check this). If the SAPI
module is in charge then it's OK
At 01:10 AM 3/3/2001 +0900, Rui Hirokawa wrote:
Currently, I am working to make some patch for php4/main/php_variables.c
to add the encoding translation capability using ext/jstring made by
Mr. Tsukada supporting japanese characters handling functions.
Great. Interesting to see what you guys can
At 10:29 AM 3/2/2001 -0600, Andrew Johnson wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I just reviewed the patch quickly. Are you sure that using MALLOC() for the
SG(request_info) variables is OK?
I think so. php4_execute() contains
nsapi_request_ctor(NSLS_C SLS_CC);
retval
Can you please resend :)
Andi
At 11:02 AM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Is anyone bold enough to comment on the suggested names besides Phil? I know
that you all have opinions...
Don't make me use humor again. This time, I'll make fun of people by name
(and by reference -
There is a problem with deeply places references (often objects) not being
full copy constructed but the reference is copied.
In order to change the behavior we would have to do a deep copy *everytime*
we copy a complex structure. This would be very bad performance wise so
except for thinking
For starters (too long of a list and not that easy to decide on each and
everyone of them) I'll give you what I can think of :)
I started making a list of what looks OK to me but it became too long so
I'll just mention what isn't OK in my opinion. Consider me pretty much pro
all the other
Hi,
We are aware of this limitation. I am trying to think of a good way to
solve this and it isn't trivial. I'll try and come up with something.
Andi
At 02:41 PM 3/6/2001 -0600, The Doctor What wrote:
I'm currently working on the DB project from h*ll. Why? Because
a lot of the tables of the
At 05:05 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Andi wrote:
[snip]
I don't have any complaints or helpful comments on what was above this.
3) Why change the imap ones to not include underscores? Looks as if you
did
the reverse here :)
Removing the underscores was the choice that meant the
At 05:26 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
[snip]
6) I think create_function() is OK. There was a long thread which
decided
upon this name. Same for function_exists().
Can't we call it lambda()? =)
That would make a sensible alias for it. :)
Nah no aliasing to
At 05:43 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Sterling wrote:
Overall I think this is very good. I have a few problems with it (all
prefixed with a large IMHO :)...
:)
array_multisort - array_multi_sort
nah, doesn't sound as good as array_multisort, multisort should be a
single
At 11:28 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Andi wrote:
At 05:05 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Andi wrote:
[snip]
I don't have any complaints or helpful comments on what was above this.
3) Why change the imap ones to not include underscores? Looks as if
you
did
At 11:07 AM 3/7/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
At 23:48 06/03/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Andi wrote:
[snip]
Yep. Let's start doing some damage. bzip2 is a very good victim.
bzclose - bz_close
bzcompress - bz_compress
bzdecompress - bz_decompress
bzerrno - bz_errno
bzerror
At 04:34 PM 3/7/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
At 17:22 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
*** What is the difference between error ad errstr ?
Maybe errstr should be changed to errmsg ? (Did I say that elsewhere ? ;-)
As the file extension is .bz2, maybe the prefix should be bz2_
At 10:20 AM 3/7/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
Andi wrote:
At 04:34 PM 3/7/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
At 17:22 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
*** What is the difference between error ad errstr ?
bzerror returns an array containing the error string and error number
At 02:20 PM 3/8/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote:
At 22:33 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Why not bzip2_?
*** Well, if bzip2_, then gzip_ !
If gz_ then bz_ or bz2_.
Am I wrong or too fastidious ?
No, because gz_ has existed for a long time. If we'd give it a name today
we'd probably
I'm not quite sure if it is related but in general popen() doesn't work on
non-console PHP under windows. I think your CGI is running without a
console and the same happens with ISAPI.
Someone is working on fixing this Windows issue but no results yet.
Andi
At 07:20 AM 3/9/2001 +0100, Andr
Yeah, it's supposed to be this way. We copied C++.
Andi
At 10:50 AM 3/9/2001 -0600, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Just ran into something (well, actually searching for it) and wanted to
know what everyone's thoughts on this were and whether it should stay
that way.
?php
class Foo {
function
00, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Fri, 09 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
We need to think of static class variables. I don't think it's very
easy to
do this in a way which wouldn't cause a general performance loss but I'll
put on my thinking cap.
Ok, I was gonna try to hack it in mysel
At 12:56 AM 3/10/2001 +0100, Andr Langhorst wrote:
Hi,
1) I am currently completing the php documentation to cover all
undocumented features and I have noticed that using a static method call
to the same class from on instanciated object exhibits the presence of the
instance within the static
At 01:30 AM 3/10/2001 +0100, Andr Langhorst wrote:
There are no static functions in PHP. This syntax is used to call a
method of the parent. It can be used to call other methods and thus have
parent::foo();
If you remember, it has been implemented *after*
[classname]::[functionname]() ...
I
At 08:49 PM 3/10/2001 +0100, Andr Langhorst wrote:
When you say that people shouldn't use references because of performance
what do you mean? I think you are right in general but when you are
passing around objects you should use references. for example:
function foo($obj)
{
}
foo($myobject);
I commited a patch but didn't test it.
Andrei, please make sure I don't have some dumb bug there.
Andi
At 10:12 AM 3/12/2001 -0600, Jason Greene wrote:
strlcpy, and strlcat are in the win32 build (main/strlcat.c main/strlcpy.c)
why dont you malloc a buffer that would fit the sprintf data, and
Because snprintf() sucks and what we did is faster :)
Andi
At 09:25 AM 3/12/2001 -0800, Shane Caraveo wrote:
Why not add a:
#define snprintf _snprintf
to the zend_config.w32.h file? That should take care of the mentioned
compile problem under windows.
- Original Message -
From:
If it's not an alias I think you probably want PHP_FE(member_function,
NULL) and use PHP_FUNCTION(member_function) in the function decleration.
Andi
At 12:06 PM 3/12/2001 -0600, Jason Greene wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the standard is for the builtin_functions
function_entry in OO,
should
Any idea what the problem could be? I doubt Mac OS X uses \r\n.
Andi
From: Lon Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Zeev Suraski" [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.5RC1
The source compiles and installs as a DSO under:
Mac OS X
I tried the following (command line):
?
$foobar-rfoo=$a;
$foobar-r2foo=$foobar-rfoo;
$foobar-rfoo=4;
print $a;
and it didn't crash.
Are you sure this reproduces a crash for you? On which platform? And any
other information you can give us.
Andi
At 03:27 AM 3/15/2001 +0100, Andr Langhorst
At 04:03 PM 3/13/2001 -0800, Lon Baker wrote:
The source compiles and installs as a DSO under:
Mac OS X 10.0 RC1
Apache 1.3.19
MySQL 3.23.34a
Config line used: ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs
--enable-track-vars --with-mysql=/usr/local/mysql --with-zlib
With the following issues:
This is extremely reproducible. Definitely a show stopper until Zeev fixes
this one.
Andi
At 01:38 AM 3/14/2001 +0100, Andr Langhorst wrote:
Hi Zeev,
chunked output buffering seems to work on Linux. Unfortunately several
things do not work (anymore) on win32 (tested CGI):
1)
Using
I'm not too familiar with Tuxedo but the first step would be for you to
actually write a PHP module which interfaces with Tuxedo. Once you're done
with it/tested it and you feel it's worth putting into PHP we can open you
a CVS account.
I don't think there are many people who will need this
It should be possible to do this. I'll look into it. But I also need to
think about how much sense it makes :)
Today you're asking for isset(...,...,...). Tomorrow you will ask to know
which one was not set if it failed.
So I hope what youreally want is only the first.
Andi
At 09:42 PM
Suraski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 19 March, 2001 7-04 aM
To: Phil Driscoll
Cc: Chris Newbill; Andi Gutmans; PHP DEV
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] feature request
Phil is right. The only thing that may be both useful and
practical would
be isset() on multiple variables
Newbill; Andi Gutmans; PHP DEV
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] feature request
Phil is right. The only thing that may be both useful and
practical would
be isset() on multiple variables, returning either true or false.
Zeev
At 11:31 19/3/2001, Phil Driscoll wrote:
$a = 1;
$b = 2
At 07:58 PM 3/19/2001 +, Phil Driscoll wrote:
My earlier post to the list doesn't seem to have arrived yet, so here it is
again. You'll note from the posting that I'm not keen on the patch staying
in. There are considerable efforts being made by several of us on the QA
team trying to make the
to handle
multi args,
we could offer things in the new function such as an optional argument
that passes back an array of results.
-Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Driscoll" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Chris Newbill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Zeev Suraski"
[EMAIL PRO
I think it makes sense to have empty() behave the same as isset() (they are
brother functions).
empty($a, $b, $c) would return 0 if non are empty and 1 if one of those
variables is empty.
Andi
At 12:22 AM 3/20/2001 -0500, Jon Parise wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:35:31PM +0200, Zeev
At 08:32 PM 3/20/2001 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
andi Tue Mar 20 10:13:21 2001 EDT
Added files: (Branch: PHP_4_0_5)
/php4/sapi/fastcgiCREDITS Makefile.in README.FastCGI config.m4
At 07:41 PM 3/20/2001 +0100, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 08:32 PM 3/20/2001 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
andi Tue Mar 20 10:13:21 2001 EDT
Added files: (Branch: PHP_4_0_5
At 07:57 PM 3/20/2001 +0100, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I couldn't find any indication that this can break any of the other sapi
builds so I don't think there's a problem with adding it.
Okay. But still I find it very annoying that we don't follow the
rules
, the error_reporting() pl1 in 4.0.1 was due to a bug which was
in the CVS a long time. It was not a spontaneous bug that was introduced.
Andi
At 07:50 PM 3/21/2001 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
A couple of these were buffer overflows IIRC which were security
Why do you need to rely on such behavior? Are you trying to do something
naught? :)
I think in general it's not a good idea to rely on the value and type of
resources (even though this is an integer).
I'm not quite sure why it returns integers and not resources. Looks like a
bad thing to me as
but in
the least it should be fixed not to leak fd's even if you go with the
integer fix implementation. But it is not very PHP to do that. You already
have an fd resource as far as I know in ext/standard so you can use that.
Andi
At 02:02 AM 3/29/2001 -0800, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
Andi
At 03:35 PM 3/29/2001 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Note that the situation isn't as bad as you thought - it's not that it's
not using the resource mechanism. It is, if it wasn't, we'd be getting
loads of complaints from people running out of descriptors very
quickly. It just uses old, PHP 3
I very much liked Andrei's implementation of Smary templates. It uses the
Zend (PHP) scripting language and caches templated scripts without messing
with the core of PHP.
I haven't used it but from reading the specs it looks like Andrei his
guys did a great job.
Andi
At 11:10 AM 4/1/2001
Do most servers and OS's (for example Windows) support the sending of a UDP
package to the echo port?
Andi
At 12:39 AM 4/2/2001 -0400, Dave Crawford wrote:
Before I ask for a PING function in a future build of PHP, is there a
way to ping a remote host using the existing PHP functions or
Andrei,
Can you please merge this to 4.0.5. I think it should be in and we better
release a final RC6.
I think it's better to have another quick RC (I can roll it today or
tomorrow) before we get 4.0.5 out of the door.
Andi
At 08:25 AM 4/2/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr
Thanks!
Does anyone else have any critical bug fixes which need to be in 4.0.5? (I
mean critical ones and not huge patches).
Andi
At 11:17 AM 4/2/2001 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
It's done.
On Mon, 02 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Andrei,
Can you please merge this to 4.0.5. I think
Maybe Dave will volunteer to implement this for 4.0.6 :)
Andi
At 10:42 AM 4/2/2001 +0200, Alexander Feldman wrote:
Do most servers and OS's (for example Windows) support the sending of a
UDP
package to the echo port?
Andi
Yeah,
What about a new ICMP extension - ping, traceroute,
At 05:37 PM 4/2/2001 +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Does anyone else have any critical bug fixes
which need to be in 4.0.5? (I mean critical ones and not
huge patches).
Zeev's output buffering fix hasn't been committed yet; it's a one-line
change, and it makes
At 03:18 PM 4/2/2001 +0100, James Moore wrote:
1. The function array_flip($array) puts one extra zero byte at
the end of
each element in the return array thus making the result non binary safe.
I've just fixed it in CVS.
How critical is this? does it need to also be in 4.0.5 (sorry
You can get RC6 at http://cvs.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.5RC6.tar.gz (no time to
commit to phpweb cvs and wait for it to update, if someone has time then
even better, I need some sleep :)
In case you're testing it within the next few hours you might need to
"touch *" the files in the php4/
Anyone have an idea why this happens?
Andi
At 05:37 PM 4/3/2001 +0200, Andrew Sitnikov wrote:
Hello php-qa,
test.php
?
echo $test;
?
http://host/test.php?test=1;2;3
4.0.4pl1
Result: 1;2;3
4.0.5RC6
Result: 1
Best regards,
Andrew Sitnikov
e-mail : [EMAIL
'' and ';' are valid
delimiters in a URL, so the new 4.0.5 behaviour is actually the valid one, I
believe. Refer to the XHTML specification, or check out the bugs db for
this.
Anil
- Original Message -
From: "Andi Gutmans" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Andrew Sitnikov" [EMAIL PROTECTE
:21 3/4/2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Anyone have an idea why this happens?
Andi
At 05:37 PM 4/3/2001 +0200, Andrew Sitnikov wrote:
Hello php-qa,
test.php
?
echo $test;
?
http://host/test.php?test=1;2;3
4.0.4pl1
Result: 1;2;3
4.0.5RC6
Result: 1
James,
You have to be aware that now PHP has such a big user base we need to be
very careful in the changes we make especially when we can be pretty
certain that it might burn quite a lot of people. We can break
compatibility more easily when we have a major release (as from PHP 3 to
PHP 4)
At 09:52 PM 4/3/2001 +0100, James Moore wrote:
Well, I dont think any of us really know how much damage it will cause. But
on the other hand we can do this for years and just say well we mustn't
break backwards compatibility and we will end up with somthing looking and
behaving like perl. When we
At 02:46 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrote:
Just wanted to toss in my .02 here...
Anyone who wrote scripts in the past expecting: foo.php?a=1;2;3 to get
"$a=1;2;3" was relying on a bug, or at the very LEAST an undocumented
feature. So if it goes away, it goes away. It should never have worked
At 03:18 PM 4/3/2001 -0600, Joey Smith wrote:
Speaking of this, I think we need to collect all of these types of
issues that are waiting for a "4.1" release somewhere, so we can get a
clear idea of when 4.1 is appropriate. Anyone know of any off-hand? If
not, I can go search the archives...
In
By the time we close in on 2038 and UNIX is still around (*smile*) then
most UNIX systems will most probably have moved to 64bit timestamps, thus
requiring in the best place just a recompilation of your PHP binary and in
the worse case if you saved binary file stamps to a file, some kind of
OK guys,
I feel VERY uncomfortable releasing 4.0.5 with this arg_separators problem.
Let's brainstorm and try to think of a nice, clean and constructive way of
solving this problem. Let's try to ditch the "screw the user because he
didn't read RFC foo.bar approach :)
The issue is with the
At 05:40 PM 4/4/2001 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I feel VERY uncomfortable releasing 4.0.5 with this arg_separators problem.
Let's brainstorm and try to think of a nice, clean and constructive way of
solving this problem. Let's try to ditch the "
At 07:11 PM 4/4/2001 +0200, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
But commercial companies aside, the plethora of configuration options
(like
magic_quotes_gpc) can and does make life harder for people writing code
libraries (like PEAR) that are meant to be dropped in anywhere, or for
people
trying to
This was fixed to be consistent with ?.
One line comments end at a new line or at a closing bracket (? or %)
Andi
At 05:54 PM 4/4/2001 -0700, Steven Roussey wrote:
Hi,
I found our problem. In 4.0.5, comments seem to be parsed differently. We
have ASP style tags enabled so we can use % as well
At 10:22 AM 4/5/2001 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote:
sniperWed Apr 4 13:46:27 2001 EDT
Modified files:
/php4 php.ini-dist php.ini-optimized NEWS
/php4/ext/standardurl_scanner.c url_scanner_ex.re
Yes, what you're saying definitely makes sense and I think it should be fixed.
Andi
At 09:20 PM 4/5/2001 +0200, Carsten Gehling wrote:
One of the IMHO stranger behaviors in PHP is what happens to the
$HTTP_SESSION_VARS array when changing register_globals from off to on.
If register_globals is
At 01:40 AM 4/12/2001 -0400, Stig Sther Bakken wrote:
["Brian Foddy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've been looking everywhere for a good reference of how to read and
update arrays. The Zend documentation
(www.zend.com/apidoc) has descriptions of how to create
an array, and how to add elements to
Well I have been abroad and been reading Emails very slowly via
international calls so I might have missed a few (no need for the sarcasm).
What I describe is the situation I would like to see. I will try and catch
up will the zillions of Email I have and see why this can't be achieved.
Andi
At 03:33 AM 4/19/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Guys,
Over the years, there's always been a tendency to think about things which
are 10 steps ahead. It never worked, and I don't think it would work here
either. Moreover, I don't see any advantage in discussing this now - on
the contrary -
At 08:03 AM 4/19/2001 -0400, Stig Sther Bakken wrote:
[Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At 06:53 PM 4/18/2001 -0400, Stig Sther Bakken wrote:
*BLAM*
That's the sound of someone shooting himself in the foot. The PEAR
installer needs the XML extension. :-)
What do you mean? Has
At 08:13 AM 4/19/2001 -0400, Stig Sther Bakken wrote:
[Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Right but if we chose XML this makes it much harder to have C clients
(even Perl because the module might not be installed). I don't think
Over my dead body. Take a look at all
At 02:59 PM 4/20/2001 -0700, Andrew Sitnikov wrote:
Hello Zeev,
neljapev, 19.04.2001, you wrote:
ZS I rolled RC7 - if there are no surprises (there'd better not be! :), it
ZS can finally go out early next week.
ZS Zeev
Where i can get it ?
At 09:59 AM 4/23/2001 -0700, Frank M. Kromann wrote:
These have to be defined on Win32 as well. In order to compile I can just
put some default definitions in config.w32.h.
I'm getting another error though:
D:\php\php4\main\php_ini.c(190) : error C2065: 'llist_dtor_func_t' :
undeclared
At 03:59 PM 4/24/2001 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
A reproducible crash bug in a mainstream module is a show stopper IMHO...
I think you mean in a mainstream module and in a situation which has a high
chance of happening.
Crash bugs which are 1 in a million don't necessarily need to be show
1 - 100 of 939 matches
Mail list logo
