m: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: May 5, 2002 4:01 PM
> To: Sp
> Cc: Miguel Cruz; Pag; Luc Saint-Elie
> Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP compared to JSP
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Sp wrote:
>
>>Does anyone think caching should be built into php for it to edge out the
I find caching to be extremely helpful. I have a complex property layer for
my php based web engine/library. These properies have several levels of dependency
and inheritance which can take as many as 15 queries to build. Then I cache
the tree and it is reduced to a single query on subsequent page
Hello,
Sp wrote:
> Does anyone think caching should be built into php for it to edge out the
>competition?
> (like what smarty is doing)
>
> I mean a static page will always serve up faster then a dynamic one. Also even if
>you are
> getting 100 pages/sec on your database, you could cache it
ot;Pag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Luc Saint-Elie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 2:47 PM
Subject: RE: [PHP] PHP compared to JSP
> Does anyone think caching should be built into php for it to edge out the
competition?
> (like
Saint-Elie; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP compared to JSP
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Pag wrote:
>> Does PHP compile : NO
>> Does the user loading same page for 2nd time gets better response : YES
>> it can if caching is provided
>
> On a side not..isnt caching a bit like g
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Pag wrote:
>> Does PHP compile : NO
>> Does the user loading same page for 2nd time gets better response : YES
>> it can if caching is provided
>
> On a side not..isnt caching a bit like going against why PHP was built
> in the first place? I mean, information may get a bit o
Ilia A. wrote:
> Caching is not going against PHP as long as whenever the file is changed of
> the 1st access it would be cached, rather then caching php scripts based on
> some arbitrary timer.
>
> Ideally the caching script would on the 1st access of the script convert the
> script to binary
Caching is not going against PHP as long as whenever the file is changed of
the 1st access it would be cached, rather then caching php scripts based on
some arbitrary timer.
Ideally the caching script would on the 1st access of the script convert the
script to binary code which can then be exe
In PHP programming this can be a complex issue. An excellent example of
caching or re-handling data is the Smarty Template Engine,
http://www.phpinsider.com/php/code/Smarty/ . It may seem a rather
redundant idea to cache and create scripts in PHP which is already part
of the HTML documents, b
>
>Does PHP compile : NO
>Does the user loading same page for 2nd time gets better response : YES it
>can if caching is provided
On a side not..isnt caching a bit like going against why PHP was
built in the first place? I mean, information may get a bit out of date if
we get a page o
>But my question still remains the same ... does PHP alone (without ZEND)
>compile code into some .compiled_PHP file so that the user loading same page
>for 2nd time gets better response than the 1st time?
No, it doesnt. Every time a user accesses a page that has PHP, the
page will be
At 11:07 04/05/2002 -0500, Paras Mukadam wrote:
>Thanks for that !
>But my question still remains the same ... does PHP alone (without ZEND)
>compile code into some .compiled_PHP file so that the user loading same page
>for 2nd time gets better response than the 1st time?
Hello,
Both have nothin
Thanks for that !
But my question still remains the same ... does PHP alone (without ZEND)
compile code into some .compiled_PHP file so that the user loading same page
for 2nd time gets better response than the 1st time?
Regards,
Paras.
"Matt Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
001401
JSP does not ever run in the browser. JSP is a server side technology
designed to compete with ASP. PHP is similar in that it too is a server
side language and can be embedded into html pages. Java tends to be
considerably slower than PHP but the Java folks have made great strides
towards overcomi
14 matches
Mail list logo
