php-general Digest 15 Aug 2005 13:42:04 -0000 Issue 3626
php-general Digest 15 Aug 2005 13:42:04 - Issue 3626 Topics (messages 220620 through 220636): Re: Large forms to Mysql table... 220620 by: Miles Thompson ? PHP in XML document 220621 by: Labunski 220625 by: Torgny Bjers 220627 by: Satyam 220628 by: Torgny Bjers 220631 by: Satyam which operating system? 220622 by: Sebastian 220624 by: mikespook 220626 by: Torgny Bjers 220629 by: Jochem Maas Re: header redirect not working 220623 by: Chris Shiflett wsdl cache? 220630 by: Victor Alvarez Re: one more mysql question 220632 by: John Nichel 220636 by: John Nichel Re: PHP User Group in San Francisco 220633 by: John Nichel Re: PHP and Active Directory 220634 by: Rory Browne Re: 'God' has spoken... :-) 220635 by: John Nichel Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: php-general@lists.php.net -- ---BeginMessage--- At 10:33 PM 8/14/2005, mikespook wrote: Like this: $str = print_r($_POST, true); then insert $str into db. It`s easy way~~right? Andras Kende [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I have a html page with 70+ form fields some like 40 fields are only used for entering quantity numbers Is it a good idea to put this 50 fields of the form fields into a single text mysql field? Somehow process it with php before, put inside of some kind of xml structure? Just dont want to do Mysql table with 70 fields One of the advantages of relational databases is that you do not have to know the structure of the data. Why break that? Why subject yourself, and the developer who follows you and has to maintain your code, to parsing hell? Why do you not want to do a MySQL table with 70 fields? MySQL is designed for this sort of thing. Given the tone of these comments, your database design may be questionable. Is a lot of data in a given table redundant; and if so the design likely needs work. Regards - Miles Thompson ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hello, Is it possible to write some PHP code lines in the XML document? e.g. I want to add ?php require_once(read_database.php); ? to the xml document, but I don't know the right syntax to do this. Btw, I need this, cause I'm trying to make CMS system for Flash page. Thanks a lot! Roman ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Labunski wrote: Hello, Is it possible to write some PHP code lines in the XML document? e.g. I want to add ?php require_once(read_database.php); ? to the xml document, but I don't know the right syntax to do this. Btw, I need this, cause I'm trying to make CMS system for Flash page. The easiest way to do this in Flash is to call a PHP script instead of an XML file in Flash, that way you can render the XML document however you want with PHP and load data directly from the database into XML or whatever you wish. So, replace the XML filename for your PHP script, and that way you should be able to add querystrings and whatnot too. Regards, Torgny ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Whatever starts with ? immediatly followed by an identifier is called a Processing Instruction, which ends with a ? XML doesn't care what is within those tags, as long as it doesn't contain a ? Satyam Labunski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Is it possible to write some PHP code lines in the XML document? e.g. I want to add ?php require_once(read_database.php); ? to the xml document, but I don't know the right syntax to do this. Btw, I need this, cause I'm trying to make CMS system for Flash page. Thanks a lot! Roman ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Well, in this case, XML would care, since you'd be using a or inside a tag, so, in order for that to work, if what he meant was that he wanted to store PHP code directly inside the XML document, and not actually EXECUTE code INSIDE the XML file, he would have to use ![CDATA[bla]] syntax around the PHP code for it not to break the XML file. So, in this case that would be: root data![CDATA[?php require_once(read_database.php); ?]]/data /root Which works fine as long as he doesn't have ]] somewhere in the code. :) Satyam wrote: Whatever starts with ? immediatly followed by an identifier is called a Processing Instruction, which ends with a ? XML doesn't care what is within those tags, as long as it doesn't contain a ? Satyam Labunski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Is it possible to write some PHP code lines in the XML document? e.g. I want to add ?php require_once(read_database.php); ? to the xml document, but I don't know the right syntax to do this. Btw, I need this, cause I'm trying to make CMS system for
php-general Digest 16 Aug 2005 02:45:36 -0000 Issue 3627
php-general Digest 16 Aug 2005 02:45:36 - Issue 3627 Topics (messages 220637 through 220668): Re: one more mysql question 220637 by: Jochem Maas 220640 by: Jochem Maas 220645 by: Shaw, Chris - Accenture 220646 by: John Nichel 220647 by: Jim Moseby 220648 by: Torgny Bjers Re: WAY OT NOW one more mysql question 220638 by: John Nichel Re: 'God' has spoken... :-) 220639 by: Jochem Maas 220641 by: John Nichel 220644 by: Jim Moseby 220654 by: l0t3k 220657 by: Miles Thompson Problem using Metabase 220642 by: Pablo Gosse 220643 by: Manuel Lemos Re: OT one more mysql question 220649 by: John Nichel Re: which operating system? 220650 by: Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Printing Error Help 220651 by: Chirantan Ghosh 220652 by: John Nichel 220653 by: Chirantan Ghosh 220656 by: John Nichel Generating Reports 220655 by: JM Migrating PHP4 to PHP5 (WAS: 'God' has spoken... :-)) 220658 by: Torgny Bjers Differences with imap_headerinfo() between PHP 4.3.11 and 4.4.0? 220659 by: Mike Walsh preg_split function. 220660 by: João Cândido de Souza Neto 220661 by: João Cândido de Souza Neto 220662 by: John Nichel mssql 20020429 220663 by: Daniel Baughman 220664 by: Daniel Baughman 220665 by: Daniel Baughman [Way OFF] Amazing picture of Helios Flight 522 220666 by: Brian Dunning Be careful! Look at what this spammer did. 220667 by: Dotan Cohen Problem when encoding non-english into UTF-8 220668 by: Wong HoWang Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To post to the list, e-mail: php-general@lists.php.net -- ---BeginMessage--- John Nichel wrote: Jochem Maas wrote: snip while were not on the subject John I have a question about your wife ... She's 7 months pregnant, and down right mean at the moment. been there (http://iamjochem.com/baby) - kind of - congrats anyhow, and good luck! oh shit wrong list ;-) Doesn't seem to matter here, eh? no no I meant to ask about sand - how do I make a CPU using the stuff? Allright, now that was totally off-topic and uncalled for. Pistols at Dawn!!! isnt't it the [n]etiquette that if you demand a duel I get to decide on weapons? that'll be Wooden Spoons at dawn if you please. ;-) ;) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Sebastian wrote: they are just grumpy old men i guess.. I'm niether - I believe John Nichel is a little older than I. he for one has been on this list fielding questions longer than you have been writing php code sebastian. complete noobs often get some slack, even with offtopic questions + a gentle nudge - lazy people get a kick in the ass. people who have been asking questions (primarily) for a while (e.g. afan) will eventually run out of credit and find themselves on the shortend of a bit John Nichel humor (for instance). yes humor - at least I thought his comment was funny - which is part of what makes this list fun to be on. it is not like you asked a windows question on a linux list.. i've seen stupid html questions here.. yet they get answered. HyperTextMarkupLanguage PhpHypertextProcessor you might see a reason why 'stupid HTML' question are possibly a little more relevant, generally speaking, than pure SQL syntax questions. i always try to help when i can and if i cant offer help i dont say anything because that wasnt the way i was raised. it is rude. rude is lying about 9-11 to the whole world, or invading a country in order to boost your country's weapons oil industry, or gang-raping 12yo's (dutch news) those are rude - maybe a bit of relativity is in order sebastian. at least if it was too offtopic for the list someone could of just nicely said ask on the mysql list but that wasn't case. anyway, consider this a done deal as you already received help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey! Stop it! I put a question on wrong place. I was nailed for it by John. I accepted I was wrong. I apologized. What do you want now? Sebastian wanted to help – in difference to you and John. Even it’s “wrong place”. I guess you would never stop and help to car in trouble on highway because you are IT or “it’s not your department”, ha? not if it was Dubya's car. although I might swerve to catch him with a big puddle of water ;-). actually I can't fix cars for shit but I have helped complete strangers push their cars to the edge of the road before ... aren't I great ;-) C’mon… It’s really not place to be sarcastic… I was having a joke with John - if you took yourself a little less seriously afan you might have been able to laugh too - besides I grew up in england... where
[PHP] Re: which operating system?
debian is my choice~ but usually, we use freebsd in our corp. high traffic I think distribution system is best way~ only php not enough~ Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I will be building a new server and wondering what would be a good choice for php/mysql/apache other than redhat. I was thinking either Debian or CentOS. can anyone share their thoughts on them for php environment? does anyone use them on high traffic php sites? or is there not a difference in what distro you run php on? sorry these may sound like stupid questions but i mostly used redhat since i started using php and thought i'd try something different. thanks. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.8/71 - Release Date: 8/12/2005 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] ? PHP in XML document
Labunski wrote: Hello, Is it possible to write some PHP code lines in the XML document? e.g. I want to add ?php require_once(read_database.php); ? to the xml document, but I don't know the right syntax to do this. Btw, I need this, cause I'm trying to make CMS system for Flash page. The easiest way to do this in Flash is to call a PHP script instead of an XML file in Flash, that way you can render the XML document however you want with PHP and load data directly from the database into XML or whatever you wish. So, replace the XML filename for your PHP script, and that way you should be able to add querystrings and whatnot too. Regards, Torgny -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] which operating system?
Sebastian wrote: I will be building a new server and wondering what would be a good choice for php/mysql/apache other than redhat. I was thinking either Debian or CentOS. can anyone share their thoughts on them for php environment? does anyone use them on high traffic php sites? or is there not a difference in what distro you run php on? sorry these may sound like stupid questions but i mostly used redhat since i started using php and thought i'd try something different I can recommend CentOS. We've been running it for some time now on several of our hosting machines with Plesk setups. But, as far as that goes, it doesn't make a lick of difference if you're running Debian, CentOS, or another flavor, as long as you've got a 2.6 kernel and a decently optimized setup for your PHP sites. The 2.6 kernel makes a lot of difference when it comes to scaling Apache. With the 2.4 kernel our Apache 2.0 was somewhat sensitive to DOS attacks, mostly on the memory side, but with 2.6 and grsec it runs like a dream. Regards, Torgny -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: ? PHP in XML document
Whatever starts with ? immediatly followed by an identifier is called a Processing Instruction, which ends with a ? XML doesn't care what is within those tags, as long as it doesn't contain a ? Satyam Labunski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Is it possible to write some PHP code lines in the XML document? e.g. I want to add ?php require_once(read_database.php); ? to the xml document, but I don't know the right syntax to do this. Btw, I need this, cause I'm trying to make CMS system for Flash page. Thanks a lot! Roman -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: ? PHP in XML document
Well, in this case, XML would care, since you'd be using a or inside a tag, so, in order for that to work, if what he meant was that he wanted to store PHP code directly inside the XML document, and not actually EXECUTE code INSIDE the XML file, he would have to use ![CDATA[bla]] syntax around the PHP code for it not to break the XML file. So, in this case that would be: root data![CDATA[?php require_once(read_database.php); ?]]/data /root Which works fine as long as he doesn't have ]] somewhere in the code. :) Satyam wrote: Whatever starts with ? immediatly followed by an identifier is called a Processing Instruction, which ends with a ? XML doesn't care what is within those tags, as long as it doesn't contain a ? Satyam Labunski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Is it possible to write some PHP code lines in the XML document? e.g. I want to add ?php require_once(read_database.php); ? to the xml document, but I don't know the right syntax to do this. Btw, I need this, cause I'm trying to make CMS system for Flash page. Thanks a lot! Roman -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] which operating system?
Sebastian wrote: I will be building a new server and wondering what would be a good choice for php/mysql/apache other than redhat. I was thinking either Debian or CentOS. can anyone share their thoughts on them for php environment? does anyone use them on high traffic php sites? or is there not a yahoo not big enough?? difference in what distro you run php on? if you can remember as long ago as 24 hours you might remember the mini tutorial by Rasmus - IN REPLY TO _YOUR_ 'FEAR' POST. was that not enough? sorry these may sound like stupid questions but i mostly used redhat since i started using php and thought i'd try something different. thanks. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] wsdl cache?
Hello, I am experiencing a lot of difficulties working with Apache 5.0.4 and wsdl. I can publish a wsdl and work with it, but as soon as I want to add a new method to the wsdl, I have to change the directory to be able to use it. In some way, Apache kept the information for the wsdl and I am not able to update it! Could anybody explain me why and how could I avoid this problem? Thanks. Kind Regards, Victor.
Re: [PHP] Re: ? PHP in XML document
I went googling for XML validators and tried your sample in both forms, as you sugest with CDATA and my way: root data?php require_once(read_database.php); ?/data /root Both are valid. The relevant paragraph can be found in: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/#sec-pi Notice that while ?php is a valid start tag the shorthand ? is not since it is missing what the standard calls the Processing Instruction Target, or PITarget, for short. This PITarget is the application that is supposed to understand this PI. The XML standard says nothing about the contents and syntax of whatever is within the PI tags, only that it cannot contain a ? Satyam Torgny Bjers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, in this case, XML would care, since you'd be using a or inside a tag, so, in order for that to work, if what he meant was that he wanted to store PHP code directly inside the XML document, and not actually EXECUTE code INSIDE the XML file, he would have to use ![CDATA[bla]] syntax around the PHP code for it not to break the XML file. So, in this case that would be: root data![CDATA[?php require_once(read_database.php); ?]]/data /root Which works fine as long as he doesn't have ]] somewhere in the code. :) Satyam wrote: Whatever starts with ? immediatly followed by an identifier is called a Processing Instruction, which ends with a ? XML doesn't care what is within those tags, as long as it doesn't contain a ? Satyam Labunski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Is it possible to write some PHP code lines in the XML document? e.g. I want to add ?php require_once(read_database.php); ? to the xml document, but I don't know the right syntax to do this. Btw, I need this, cause I'm trying to make CMS system for Flash page. Thanks a lot! Roman -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] one more mysql question
Jochem Maas wrote: snip while were not on the subject John I have a question about your wife ... She's 7 months pregnant, and down right mean at the moment. oh shit wrong list ;-) Doesn't seem to matter here, eh? no no I meant to ask about sand - how do I make a CPU using the stuff? Allright, now that was totally off-topic and uncalled for. Pistols at Dawn!!! ;) -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP User Group in San Francisco
Catenare LLC wrote: Are there any PHP user groups currently meeting in San Francisco? http://www.phpusergroups.org/groups.phtml?country=United+Statesmenu=groups -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP and Active Directory
On 8/11/05, xfedex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My non-sense answers pointed you to the LDAP functions for use with Active Directory. That is very constructive until you ask for something more specific. Jay, I was specting something like: Yes, i have php to authenticate against AD, and i can say that is easy/hard. I make it work using LDAP (http://www.php.net/ldap) or something like that. Instead, WE lost time figuring out what would be a smart question or a non-asked answer. Really, is so hard to understand my original question?? Please, dont answer unless you sometime get it working (PHP + AD). (and sorry again for my ugly english) No need to apologise for your english. It is perfectly understandable. What you should apologise for however is your attitude. We don't appreciate being told when to and when not to send a mail to our mailing list. You don't own this mailing list, and while I grant that neither myself, Jay, nor John own this list either, we'd appreciate if you would show a bit of respect when you send a message to it. If you don't have time to read the manual, and show don't some evidence that you have made some attempt to answer your own question or find the answer yourself, then we begin to think that you want to be spoon fed. We don't like spoon feeding people. If you want to be spoonfed buy a support contract. Saludos! pancarne. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] 'God' has spoken... :-)
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: * Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED] : snip anyway, i think i will be with php4 for a long time to come. Please tell the list why -- what does PHP4 offer over PHP5 for you? I honestly want to know, and I'm sure there are others who would be interested to see why people are not making the switch. /snip I'm (we're) still using PHP4. Mainly because there's been no reason for us to upgrade. ie, we're not doing anything that requires PHP5 (and if there is no feature in PHP6 that we have to have, we won't be upgrading to that either). -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] one more mysql question
Sebastian wrote: they are just grumpy old men i guess.. it is not like you asked a windows question on a linux list.. i've seen stupid html questions here.. yet they get answered. Not by me. They'll get the same response from the 'grumpy old men' group as this topic did. i always try to help when i can and if i cant offer help i dont say anything because that wasnt the way i was raised. it is rude. How nice. at least if it was too offtopic for the list someone could of just nicely said ask on the mysql list but that wasn't case. It was 'too offtopic'...and he's been around long enough to know that he should ask MySQL questions on the MySQL list. anyway, consider this a done deal as you already received help. You've got my vote for sainthood. -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] one more mysql question
John Nichel wrote: Jochem Maas wrote: snip while were not on the subject John I have a question about your wife ... She's 7 months pregnant, and down right mean at the moment. been there (http://iamjochem.com/baby) - kind of - congrats anyhow, and good luck! oh shit wrong list ;-) Doesn't seem to matter here, eh? no no I meant to ask about sand - how do I make a CPU using the stuff? Allright, now that was totally off-topic and uncalled for. Pistols at Dawn!!! isnt't it the [n]etiquette that if you demand a duel I get to decide on weapons? that'll be Wooden Spoons at dawn if you please. ;-) ;) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] WAY OT NOW one more mysql question
Jochem Maas wrote: /snip She's 7 months pregnant, and down right mean at the moment. been there (http://iamjochem.com/baby) - kind of - congrats anyhow, and good luck! /snip Number 3 coming up here. At 37, I wasn't supposed to become a father again. ;) snip Allright, now that was totally off-topic and uncalled for. Pistols at Dawn!!! isnt't it the [n]etiquette that if you demand a duel I get to decide on weapons? that'll be Wooden Spoons at dawn if you please. ;-) Yeah, but if you notice, Dawn is captialized in my post...meaning we need to shoot Dawn (my neighbor), as she's just needs to be shot. ;) -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] 'God' has spoken... :-)
John Nichel wrote: Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: * Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED] : snip anyway, i think i will be with php4 for a long time to come. Please tell the list why -- what does PHP4 offer over PHP5 for you? I honestly want to know, and I'm sure there are others who would be interested to see why people are not making the switch. /snip I'm (we're) still using PHP4. Mainly because there's been no reason for us to upgrade. ie, we're not doing anything that requires PHP5 (and if there is no feature in PHP6 that we have to have, we won't be upgrading to that either). my gut feeling is that php4 will remain on most large hosting systems for now, ... that php 5 is for people who enjoy the bleeding edge just a little and what to play/use newer functionality... by the time php6 comes out and has stabilized the majors will be more interested in moving direct to 6 from 4. pyschologically its also in line with the way the linux kernel is numbered - i.e. 2.x where x is even indicates a 'truely' stable/production release. that said php5 is in my mind a great improvement - I really enjoy the new OO functionality and speed increase bue to object referencing - that said I have most of my code aimed specifically at php5. the biggest gain in php6 will be transparent unicode support - that is awesome, a really big plus - I'm crap at encoding et al and would really love it if php could handle all those funny characters without me having to think about it too much (and without having to using mb_string or iconv) - I run a couple of multi-lingual sites - right now I just pray every night that nobody asks me to implement japanese, or something, there ;-) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] one more mysql question
Sebastian wrote: they are just grumpy old men i guess.. I'm niether - I believe John Nichel is a little older than I. he for one has been on this list fielding questions longer than you have been writing php code sebastian. complete noobs often get some slack, even with offtopic questions + a gentle nudge - lazy people get a kick in the ass. people who have been asking questions (primarily) for a while (e.g. afan) will eventually run out of credit and find themselves on the shortend of a bit John Nichel humor (for instance). yes humor - at least I thought his comment was funny - which is part of what makes this list fun to be on. it is not like you asked a windows question on a linux list.. i've seen stupid html questions here.. yet they get answered. HyperTextMarkupLanguage PhpHypertextProcessor you might see a reason why 'stupid HTML' question are possibly a little more relevant, generally speaking, than pure SQL syntax questions. i always try to help when i can and if i cant offer help i dont say anything because that wasnt the way i was raised. it is rude. rude is lying about 9-11 to the whole world, or invading a country in order to boost your country's weapons oil industry, or gang-raping 12yo's (dutch news) those are rude - maybe a bit of relativity is in order sebastian. at least if it was too offtopic for the list someone could of just nicely said ask on the mysql list but that wasn't case. anyway, consider this a done deal as you already received help. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey! Stop it! I put a question on wrong place. I was nailed for it by John. I accepted I was wrong. I apologized. What do you want now? Sebastian wanted to help – in difference to you and John. Even it’s “wrong place”. I guess you would never stop and help to car in trouble on highway because you are IT or “it’s not your department”, ha? not if it was Dubya's car. although I might swerve to catch him with a big puddle of water ;-). actually I can't fix cars for shit but I have helped complete strangers push their cars to the edge of the road before ... aren't I great ;-) C’mon… It’s really not place to be sarcastic… I was having a joke with John - if you took yourself a little less seriously afan you might have been able to laugh too - besides I grew up in england... where sarcasm is is part of national curriculum ;-) an art form no less. which might account for something. -afan Jochem Maas wrote: John Nichel wrote: Sebastian wrote: while were not on the subject John I have a question about your wife ... oh shit wrong list ;-) no no I meant to ask about sand - how do I make a CPU using the stuff? take what other say with a grain of salt.. im sure you're using php to pull info from mysql anyway.. And he might be using Apache on Linux like the majority of PHP users. More than likely outputting some HTML and maybe some JavaScript. Probably using a PC too. So what? the fact is without mysql php would be nowhere where it is today.. its like peanut butter w/o the jelly.. The fact is, without IBM, PHP would be nowhere it is today. Say, here's an idea, let's just make this the IBM and anything which relates to it list. see my reply in the other email.. im sure it will work for you. I'll be sure to tell everyone on the MySQL list that they can shut it down, since you have it covered over here. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] 'God' has spoken... :-)
Jochem Maas wrote: John Nichel wrote: snip I'm (we're) still using PHP4. Mainly because there's been no reason for us to upgrade. ie, we're not doing anything that requires PHP5 (and if there is no feature in PHP6 that we have to have, we won't be upgrading to that either). my gut feeling is that php4 will remain on most large hosting systems for now, ... that php 5 is for people who enjoy the bleeding edge just a little and what to play/use newer functionality... by the time php6 comes out and has stabilized the majors will be more interested in moving direct to 6 from 4. pyschologically its also in line with the way the linux kernel is numbered - i.e. 2.x where x is even indicates a 'truely' stable/production release. /snip The thing that is probably going to push us from 4 to 5 or 6 will be MySQL. We just hired a new CEO here who is very into advancing our backend (to describe how much of a cluster-f**k it is would take twenty emails). One of our moves in the next year or so will be moving from MySQL 4.0 to 4.1 or greater. snip the biggest gain in php6 will be transparent unicode support - that is awesome, a really big plus - I'm crap at encoding et al and would really love it if php could handle all those funny characters without me having to think about it too much (and without having to using mb_string or iconv) - I run a couple of multi-lingual sites - right now I just pray every night that nobody asks me to implement japanese, or something, there ;-) /snip Yeah, that will probably be a big gain for us in the future too. The tiny bit of encoding we do is just merely a pain right now, but when we branch out to selling to the rest of Europe (we just sell to the UK and Canada outside of the US right now), the unicode support will come in real handy. -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Problem using Metabase
Hi, folks. I've recently decided to use Manuel's Metabase instead of
ADOdb as ADOdb doesn't support transactions for MS Access, however I'm
getting the following error when running the sample code:
Fatal error: Class metabase_manager_odbc_class: Cannot inherit from
undefined class metabase_manager_database_class in
C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\etrakFE\classes\metabase\metabase_odbc.php on line 13
Obviously this means that the metabase_manager_odbc_class is being
defined before metabase_manager_database_class, thus throwing an error,
but the problem is I'm not calling this manually, and have used the
sample code exactly as it is in the manual.
Here's my code:
require(classes/metabase/metabase_database.php);
require(classes/metabase/metabase_interface.php);
$error=MetabaseSetupDatabaseObject(array(Type=odbc-msaccess,
IncludePath=classes/metabase), $db);
if($error!=) {
echo Database setup error: $error\n;
exit;
}
$db-SetDatabase(etrakADB);
Does anyone have any idea why I might be getting this error? As I said
I'm using the sample code exactly as it is in the tutorial, and am not
calling the metabase_manager_odbc_class myself.
Cheers and TIA,
Pablo
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: Problem using Metabase
Hello,
on 08/15/2005 11:32 AM Pablo Gosse said the following:
Hi, folks. I've recently decided to use Manuel's Metabase instead of
ADOdb as ADOdb doesn't support transactions for MS Access, however I'm
getting the following error when running the sample code:
Fatal error: Class metabase_manager_odbc_class: Cannot inherit from
undefined class metabase_manager_database_class in
C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\etrakFE\classes\metabase\metabase_odbc.php on line 13
Obviously this means that the metabase_manager_odbc_class is being
defined before metabase_manager_database_class, thus throwing an error,
but the problem is I'm not calling this manually, and have used the
sample code exactly as it is in the manual.
Here's my code:
require(classes/metabase/metabase_database.php);
require(classes/metabase/metabase_interface.php);
$error=MetabaseSetupDatabaseObject(array(Type=odbc-msaccess,
IncludePath=classes/metabase), $db);
if($error!=) {
echo Database setup error: $error\n;
exit;
}
$db-SetDatabase(etrakADB);
I tried that code here with PHP 4.3.11 and it works perfectly.
Which version of PHP are you using?
Are you using any PHP cache extension like APC or another?
Metabase loads the class files by the right order but it is possible
that a buggy caching extension may be causing that problem.
You may also try loading the classes as workaround right after the
includes you make in your script:
require('classes/metabase/metabase_odbc.php');
require('classes/metabase/metabase_odbc_msaccess.php');
require('classes/metabase/manager_odbc.php');
require('classes/metabase/manager_odbc_msaccess.php');
--
Regards,
Manuel Lemos
PHP Classes - Free ready to use OOP components written in PHP
http://www.phpclasses.org/
PHP Reviews - Reviews of PHP books and other products
http://www.phpclasses.org/reviews/
Metastorage - Data object relational mapping layer generator
http://www.meta-language.net/metastorage.html
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] 'God' has spoken... :-)
I'm (we're) still using PHP4. Mainly because there's been no reason for us to upgrade. ie, we're not doing anything that requires PHP5 (and if there is no feature in PHP6 that we have to have, we won't be upgrading to that either). I don't see the problem with this, unless it will be more difficult to upgrade from PHP4 to PHP6, than from PHP5 to PHP6. What I mean is, will upgrading to 5 now make the upgrade to 6 (or 7, or 9, or 11) easier in the future. So 5 has no features that I need right now. 6 probably doesn't either. But when PHP11 comes out and I must have it, will I be able to easily upgrade from 4? Will I expend less time/effort/risk making each upgrade as it is released that I would making a 5 version jump? Maybe its worth the time and effort to upgrade even if I don't need the features in the new release, just to make it easier to upgrade to the next one(s) down the line. Not only that, but as time goes by, community support (this list for instance) for 4 will likely diminish as others move on to later releases. Not only will the die-hard PHP4 users find it harder to get answers to their questions, but their answers to others will become less relevant to newer-version users. Just my .02 JM -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] one more mysql question
I agree with Sebastian, there is no excuse for being arrogant and rude. I understand the frustration, but is there any need for some of the replies people get? If I can, I will try to help anyone, even if the thread is OT. C. -Original Message- From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 August 2005 14:42 To: PHP Mailing Lists Subject: Re: [PHP] one more mysql question * This e-mail has been received by the Revenue Internet e-mail service. * Sebastian wrote: they are just grumpy old men i guess.. it is not like you asked a windows question on a linux list.. i've seen stupid html questions here.. yet they get answered. Not by me. They'll get the same response from the 'grumpy old men' group as this topic did. i always try to help when i can and if i cant offer help i dont say anything because that wasnt the way i was raised. it is rude. How nice. at least if it was too offtopic for the list someone could of just nicely said ask on the mysql list but that wasn't case. It was 'too offtopic'...and he's been around long enough to know that he should ask MySQL questions on the MySQL list. anyway, consider this a done deal as you already received help. You've got my vote for sainthood. -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php This message has been delivered to the Internet by the Revenue Internet e-mail service * -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] one more mysql question
Shaw, Chris - Accenture wrote: I agree with Sebastian, there is no excuse for being arrogant and rude. I understand the frustration, but is there any need for some of the replies people get? Not that you're judging, eh? If I can, I will try to help anyone, even if the thread is OT. Great, I'm happy for you. However, do those of us who would like this list to remain a PHP list a favor. Help those with OT questions off list. -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] one more mysql question
-Original Message- From: Shaw, Chris - Accenture [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 11:49 AM To: PHP Mailing Lists Subject: RE: [PHP] one more mysql question I agree with Sebastian, there is no excuse for being arrogant and rude. I understand the frustration, but is there any need for some of the replies people get? If I can, I will try to help anyone, even if the thread is OT. There is never any excuse for being rude. That said, there is considerable value in keeping this (or any) mailing list ON TOPIC. There is also considerable value for the end user to ask questions in relevant forums. The original poster would likely have gotten enthusiastic and helpful response from the MySQL list, whereas he got a generally cold response here. Not because the list members here are rude, but because HE was rude to have ignored generally known netiquette and posted the question anyway. JM -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] one more mysql question
Shaw, Chris - Accenture wrote: I agree with Sebastian, there is no excuse for being arrogant and rude. I understand the frustration, but is there any need for some of the replies people get? If I can, I will try to help anyone, even if the thread is OT. C. On that note I think we can agree to disagree on various topics and leave the beating of dead horses to another list, perhaps alt.flame or something? :P -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] OT one more mysql question
Torgny Bjers wrote: Shaw, Chris - Accenture wrote: I agree with Sebastian, there is no excuse for being arrogant and rude. I understand the frustration, but is there any need for some of the replies people get? If I can, I will try to help anyone, even if the thread is OT. C. On that note I think we can agree to disagree on various topics and leave the beating of dead horses to another list, perhaps alt.flame or something? :P Odo we really want to venture out onto USENET? *L* -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: which operating system?
* Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I will be building a new server and wondering what would be a good choice for php/mysql/apache other than redhat. I was thinking either Debian or CentOS. can anyone share their thoughts on them for php environment? does anyone use them on high traffic php sites? or is there not a difference in what distro you run php on? sorry these may sound like stupid questions but i mostly used redhat since i started using php and thought i'd try something different. Use an OS that either doesn't have an end-of-life for support, or which can be upgraded to a new version without breaking everything. I've used Redhat and Fedora, but will never use them for production servers again -- after a couple years getting out-of-date, it becomes next to impossible to find packages for them, and upgrading to a new version almost always requires an attended install, and usually down time. Debian and Gentoo are very nice in that you can upgrade packages as they become available, usually with no issues. You might also want to look into one of the BSDs, as the ports system many of them employ also allows seamless upgrades in most situations. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Zend Certified Engineer http://weierophinney.net/matthew/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] PHP Printing Error Help
Hi Guys, I am new to PHP coding but that is no excuse for the mess I am making here. The ideal page for my needs is: http://www.primarywave.com/BrokerOutpost_Contact.php (Simple form in PHP where all form values are mailed) I could not make the CHECK BOX work in PHP page so tried in this HTM page. I prints out part of the PHP code itself. http://www.primarywave.com/BrokerOutpost_Contact.htm Can anyone PLEASE tell me where I am making a buffoon of myself? I am a designer who is trying to understand the language so do pardon my ignorance. Thanks, C
Re: [PHP] PHP Printing Error Help
Chirantan Ghosh wrote: Hi Guys, I am new to PHP coding but that is no excuse for the mess I am making here. The ideal page for my needs is: http://www.primarywave.com/BrokerOutpost_Contact.php (Simple form in PHP where all form values are mailed) I could not make the CHECK BOX work in PHP page so tried in this HTM page. I prints out part of the PHP code itself. http://www.primarywave.com/BrokerOutpost_Contact.htm What isn't working with the check boxes? How are you retrieving the values upon processing the form? -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP Printing Error Help
Ho John, I put each check box with name tried to get the values as I get of Name, etc. Somehow it didn't send that info so, now I tried to get the info of the whole TABLE named InterestedNumber(which contains all check boxes) ? //after all codes $mailBody .= Full Name: $name\n; ... $mailBody .= Company Info: $Company Info\n; $mailBody .= Interested Numbers: $InterestedNumber\n; $mailBody .= Interested Area: $InterestedArea\n; $mailBody .= Comments: $comments\n\n\n; $mailBody .= $todaytime; /// THIS is where I put in the check box How ever the main problem for me is Interested Numbers: $InterestedNumber\n; part where I have no clue what \n stands for OR why is it repeated in the Comments section. The page is http://www.primarywave.com/BrokerOutpost_Contact.htm you can see the source code if you like. Thanks a lot for the input, C - Original Message - From: John Nichel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: php-general@lists.php.net Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 12:31 PM Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP Printing Error Help Chirantan Ghosh wrote: Hi Guys, I am new to PHP coding but that is no excuse for the mess I am making here. The ideal page for my needs is: http://www.primarywave.com/BrokerOutpost_Contact.php (Simple form in PHP where all form values are mailed) I could not make the CHECK BOX work in PHP page so tried in this HTM page. It prints out part of the PHP code itself. http://www.primarywave.com/BrokerOutpost_Contact.htm What isn't working with the check boxes? How are you retrieving the values upon processing the form? -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] 'God' has spoken... :-)
not only encoding support, but internationalized date/time/number formatting support (including spellout), collation, breakiteration and transliteration. in many respects we'll be on par with Java I18N support. To see what will be available, see http://icu.sourceforge.net/userguide/ and look at the topics on the left l0t3k Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] the biggest gain in php6 will be transparent unicode support - that is awesome, a really big plus - I'm crap at encoding et al and would really love it if php could handle all those funny characters without me having to think about it too much (and without having to using mb_string or iconv) - I run a couple of multi-lingual sites - right now I just pray every night that nobody asks me to implement japanese, or something, there ;-) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Generating Reports
Hi all, I'm wondering what report generators or routines are out there. I've not found anything worthwhile yet. What do you all use? I have a couple sql database tables I'm outputting into a tabular format. I'd like to find a system. My biggest issue is that some reports go off the screen and truncate at print time. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP Printing Error Help
Chirantan Ghosh wrote: Ho John, I put each check box with name tried to get the values as I get of Name, etc. Somehow it didn't send that info so, now I tried to get the info of the whole TABLE named InterestedNumber(which contains all check boxes) ? //after all codes $mailBody .= Full Name: $name\n; ... $mailBody .= Company Info: $Company Info\n; $mailBody .= Interested Numbers: $InterestedNumber\n; $mailBody .= Interested Area: $InterestedArea\n; $mailBody .= Comments: $comments\n\n\n; $mailBody .= $todaytime; /// THIS is where I put in the check box How ever the main problem for me is Interested Numbers: $InterestedNumber\n; part where I have no clue what \n stands for OR why is it repeated in the Comments section. The page is http://www.primarywave.com/BrokerOutpost_Contact.htm you can see the source code if you like. Thanks a lot for the input, C The \n is just a new line. Your checkboxes are all named things like 1-877-HOMECASH and 1-877-APPLY NOW, so '$InterestedNumber' isn't going to have any of their values. You probably want to move into the relm of array's. For each one of your checkboxes, you can do this... input type=checkbox name=InterestedNumber[] value=1-877-HOMECASH input type=checkbox name=InterestedNumber[] value=1-877-APPLY NOW So on, and so forth. By naming them in this way, it will pass the value to your form processor as a numerical array of all the selected items. When you want to process it, just loop thru the array. http://us2.php.net/manual/en/language.types.array.php -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] 'God' has spoken... :-)
At 11:59 AM 8/15/2005, Jim Moseby wrote: I'm (we're) still using PHP4. Mainly because there's been no reason for us to upgrade. ie, we're not doing anything that requires PHP5 (and if there is no feature in PHP6 that we have to have, we won't be upgrading to that either). I don't see the problem with this, unless it will be more difficult to upgrade from PHP4 to PHP6, than from PHP5 to PHP6. What I mean is, will upgrading to 5 now make the upgrade to 6 (or 7, or 9, or 11) easier in the future. So 5 has no features that I need right now. 6 probably doesn't either. But when PHP11 comes out and I must have it, will I be able to easily upgrade from 4? Will I expend less time/effort/risk making each upgrade as it is released that I would making a 5 version jump? Maybe its worth the time and effort to upgrade even if I don't need the features in the new release, just to make it easier to upgrade to the next one(s) down the line. Not only that, but as time goes by, community support (this list for instance) for 4 will likely diminish as others move on to later releases. Not only will the die-hard PHP4 users find it harder to get answers to their questions, but their answers to others will become less relevant to newer-version users. Just my .02 JM A good parallel is what happened with Visual FoxPro and with PageMaker. When VFP 3 came out it broke the mould of FoxPro development, and it was a huge leap to adjust; product was not really mature and VFP 5 was great. VFP6 was even better - but a leap from 3 to 6 was almost impossible because so much had been changed in the interface and feature set. At least MSFT is doing it properly now, and announcing that VFP10 will be it, then no more. PageMaker was worse, but it's so long ago now that my memory's faulty. I think it was around PM3 or PM4 that the file format changed; if you had the earlier version, PM4 and later could not read the older files, you had to obtain a crippled version of PM3, which could only open the old version and save in the new, and then work on those files in the newer version. Of course a lot of stuff got busted. And of course, there is Visual Basic - where development stopped at version 6 and a new .NET language, labelled Visual Basic was introduced. So much stuff in VB 6 was broken that moving the code to the .NET language named Visual Basic is well nigh impossible. The problem with PHP 5 is that the ISP's have to be so conservative. There's no tagging mechanism which says process these files with PHP5, use PHP 4 for everything else. So, based on experience, better to move early than later. I suspect a jump from PHP4 to PHP6 will be huge -- the problem is to move the ISPs. Regards - Miles -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Migrating PHP4 to PHP5 (WAS: 'God' has spoken... :-))
Miles Thompson wrote: The problem with PHP 5 is that the ISP's have to be so conservative. There's no tagging mechanism which says process these files with PHP5, use PHP 4 for everything else. That would be so wonderful. Just to be able to set what PHP .so to use based on VirtualHost/ or Directory/ in Apache would be bliss. Under Windows it's easier, of course, since you have specific configurations for each virtual host in IIS. I've tried running the CGI version of PHP5 on a PHP4 system, and of course it works, but it's slower than molasses in January. So, based on experience, better to move early than later. I suspect a jump from PHP4 to PHP6 will be huge -- the problem is to move the ISPs. A lot of ISPs run some form of enterprise Linux, or it could be just a control panel, that is dependent on the RPM version of PHP, which in most cases is still stuck arond 4.3.x somewhere, except in those cases where the ISP has taken the law in their own hands and compiled PHP from scratch, overwriting the RPM version, and hoping that this will not break anything too seriously when the control panel tries to upgrade itself the next time. ;) Others use scripts that are encoded with either IonCube or Zend, and are thus forced to stay with PHP4 since their software vendor hasn't made the leap yet. For instance, when encoding with Zend Encoder for PHP4, you can get some pretty nasty errors when running under PHP5. If the software vendors could make the leap RIGHT NOW and convert their godforsaken software to PHP5 and release two versions since there'll hardly be any difference in the code, we'd be a long way already. It's all mostly related to the encoder in these cases, for instance Zend. That's the way we do it with one of the applications I've written, it's shipped both as PHP4 and PHP5 Zend encoded, as well as IonCube encoded. Warm Regards, Torgny -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Differences with imap_headerinfo() between PHP 4.3.11 and 4.4.0?
I have an application which uses imap_headerinfo() to query an NNTP server and display some information as part of a web application. I am seeing a difference between 4.3.11 and 4.4.0 when the e-mail address in the article contains a spam block. I get the following notice: Notice: (null)(): Unterminated mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (errflg=3) in Unknown on line 0 Notice: (null)(): Must use comma to separate addresses: somedomain(dot.dot)com (errflg=3) in Unknown on line 0 I am unable to suppress the notice either with error_reporting() or the @ operator. Anyone else seeing anything similar? Any idea how to suppress the Notice? The oddly formed e-mail address isn't something I use so I don't really care how it is formatted but the IMAP library seems care enough to generate the notices. Thanks, Mike -- Mike Walsh - mike_walsh at mindspring dot com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] preg_split function.
I´m using the webmiau webmail system in a server with freebsd and php 4.4.0 but it´s not working. When i try to start the webmail server i get the error bellow: Fatal error: Call to undefined function: preg_split() in /usr/local/www/data-dist/webmail/smarty/Smarty.class.php on line 1609 Anyone can help me about this? Thanks. João Cândido. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] preg_split function.
I´m using the webmiau webmail system in a server with freebsd and php 4.4.0 but it´s not working. When i try to start the webmail server i get the error bellow: Fatal error: Call to undefined function: preg_split() in /usr/local/www/data-dist/webmail/smarty/Smarty.class.php on line 1609 Anyone can help me about this? Thanks. João Cândido. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] preg_split function.
João Cândido de Souza Neto wrote: I´m using the webmiau webmail system in a server with freebsd and php 4.4.0 but it´s not working. When i try to start the webmail server i get the error bellow: Fatal error: Call to undefined function: preg_split() in /usr/local/www/data-dist/webmail/smarty/Smarty.class.php on line 1609 Anyone can help me about this? Make a phpinfo page, and load it thru your browser... ?php phpinfo(); ? Look for PCRE (Perl Compatible Regular Expressions) Support. If it's not there, or not enabled, you won't be able to use those functions. -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] mssql 20020429
Hey guys, I'm looking for the php_mssql.dll with api version: 20020429 Does anyone know where I can translate that to a version release in order to find the release with that version dll or something? Or have a resource for finding modules based on API version? Regards, Dan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] mssql 20020429
Never mind I found it. It was 4.2.1 But... now I get IIS complaining the CGI module hasn't returned a full set of headers :( -Original Message- From: Daniel Baughman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 2:58 PM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] mssql 20020429 Hey guys, I'm looking for the php_mssql.dll with api version: 20020429 Does anyone know where I can translate that to a version release in order to find the release with that version dll or something? Or have a resource for finding modules based on API version? Regards, Dan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] mssql 20020429
The mssql_connect function with api# 20020429 does not do name resolution via the system get host by name?? Maybe that one of the reasons they upgraded -Original Message- From: Daniel Baughman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 3:02 PM To: 'Daniel Baughman'; php-general@lists.php.net Subject: RE: [PHP] mssql 20020429 Never mind I found it. It was 4.2.1 But... now I get IIS complaining the CGI module hasn't returned a full set of headers :( -Original Message- From: Daniel Baughman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 2:58 PM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP] mssql 20020429 Hey guys, I'm looking for the php_mssql.dll with api version: 20020429 Does anyone know where I can translate that to a version release in order to find the release with that version dll or something? Or have a resource for finding modules based on API version? Regards, Dan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] [Way OFF] Amazing picture of Helios Flight 522
http://www.briandunning.com/helios.shtml Sorry this is WAY OFF TOPIC, but it's a pretty darn scary picture. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Be careful! Look at what this spammer did.
I have a form that my visitors can email me from. Some jerk is trying to fool the mail() function into sending his spam, and I got this today: start asshole code [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=\===0110030565==\ MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: 7510b460 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===0110030565== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\us-ascii\ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit blrt --===0110030565==-- /start asshole code I just updated the code to stop this. I think that if anybody else has a form that goes to the mail() function, they should learn from this email and put up some code to block it. Dotan Cohen http://lyricslist.com/lyrics/artist_albums/367/n_sync.php N Sync Song Lyrics -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Problem when encoding non-english into UTF-8
Dear all, When I try to encode non-english char. such as big5 to UTF-8 with utf8_encode(), it always generate a wrong result, which is not readable. What can I do? Please help! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] RE: Problem using Metabase
[snip]
Here's my code:
require(classes/metabase/metabase_database.php);
require(classes/metabase/metabase_interface.php);
$error=MetabaseSetupDatabaseObject(array(Type=odbc-msaccess,
IncludePath=classes/metabase), $db);
if($error!=) {
echo Database setup error: $error\n;
exit;
}
$db-SetDatabase(etrakADB);
I tried that code here with PHP 4.3.11 and it works perfectly.
Which version of PHP are you using?
Are you using any PHP cache extension like APC or another?
Metabase loads the class files by the right order but it is possible
that a buggy caching extension may be causing that problem.
You may also try loading the classes as workaround right after the
includes you make in your script:
require('classes/metabase/metabase_odbc.php');
require('classes/metabase/metabase_odbc_msaccess.php');
require('classes/metabase/manager_odbc.php');
require('classes/metabase/manager_odbc_msaccess.php');
[/snip]
Thanks, Manuel. I tried what you suggested but it didn't work. The server
this project is housed on is an IIS server running PHP 4.4.0.
I installed the metabase package on a linux server, and was able to connect to
a postgres database with no troubles at all.
It must be something in our PHP configuration that's causing the problem, but
I'm pretty sure we have a cache extension installed. This PHP install was done
rather quickly, unless there's a cache extension installed by default (which
there is not as far as I understand, but I could be wrong ...) we likely didn't
install one.
Thanks,
Pablo
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Problem when encoding non-english into UTF-8
Wong HoWang wrote: Dear all, When I try to encode non-english char. such as big5 to UTF-8 with utf8_encode(), it always generate a wrong result, which is not readable. What can I do? From the manual [1]: utf8_encode -- Encodes an ISO-8859-1 string to UTF-8 You're using the wrong tool for the job. Take a look at the iconv extension[2]. Jasper [1] http://www.php.net/utf8_encode [2] http://www.php.net/iconv -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] RE: Problem using Metabase
[snip] It must be something in our PHP configuration that's causing the problem, but I'm pretty sure we have a cache extension installed. This PHP install was done rather quickly, unless there's a cache extension installed by default (which there is not as far as I understand, but I could be wrong ...) we likely didn't install one. [/snip] Sorry, I meant to say that we likely DO NOT have a cache extension installed. Can anyone think of any other reason why the order in which the class files are loaded would be changed on one server to the next? Cheers and TIA, Pablo -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] one more mysql question
In a message dated 8/13/2005 6:33:16 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: while were not on the subject John I have a question about your wife ... oh shit wrong list ;-) no no I meant to ask about sand - how do I make a CPU using the stuff? lol... I thought that was pretty funny too? I would have laughed if it were directed at me... ahhh well... - Clint
Re: [PHP] Be careful! Look at what this spammer did.
Yeah, I had this happen to me a while back... glad some of the biggest have been caught lately =) Original Message I have a form that my visitors can email me from. Some jerk is trying to fool the mail() function into sending his spam, and I got this today: start asshole code [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=\===0110030565==\ MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: 7510b460 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===0110030565== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\us-ascii\ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit blrt --===0110030565==-- /start asshole code
