Hi,
I use the pretty large Library PHP Image Workshop
(http://phpimageworkshop.com/) at my project. It is about 75,5 KB.
Everything works fine but if I try to include a 15 KB file with country
codes, it fails.
With the other files I easily get over 100 KB inclusion size, so my
question;
Hi,it outputs a corrupt image (I think the function imagepng)Am 30.05.2013, 11:17 Uhr, schrieb Alex Pojarsky divine.ra...@gmail.com:Hey.Afaik - only in case if your PHP process instance exeeds allowed memory limit.Other then this - explain how does it fail exactly. Any error messages? Errorous
Good morning all:
I have recently purchased a computer and am using it as a dedicated server. A
friend helped me install PHP and configure. I am saying this because I wonder
if using a newer version of PHP (compared to my commercial web host) may be the
reasoning behind the error I am
Is the echo $mySQL_user; inside of a function? I believe you'll
need to say global $mySQL_user; to gain access to it if so.
On 29 May 2013 12:39, Ron Piggott ron.pigg...@actsministries.org wrote:
Good morning all:
I have recently purchased a computer and am using it as a dedicated server.
What do your performance measurements show so you have actual data
comparisons to make a valid decsion?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Adam Richardson simples...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Haluk Karamete
halukkaram...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, the question is... should you use a global include that
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, I believe [A] PHP is smart enough to not generate bytecode
for functions that are not used in the current file. Think about the
fact that you can write a function with errors, which will run fine
until you
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Adam Richardson simples...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Haluk Karamete
halukkaram...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:55 PM, David Harkness
davi...@highgearmedia.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, I believe [A] PHP is smart enough to not generate bytecode
for functions that are not used in the current file. Think about the
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Adam Richardson simples...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Adam Richardson simples...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Adam Richardson simples...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally, you're the first one that actually has measured something.
You should redo your test with real world files, because in real world
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:55 PM, David Harkness
davi...@highgearmedia.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, I believe [A] PHP is smart enough to not generate
With this question, I aim to understand the inner workings of PHP a
little better.
Assume that you got a 50K library. The library is loaded with a bunch
of handy functions that you use here and there. Also assume that these
functions are needed/used by say 10% of the pages of your site. But
your
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Haluk Karamete
halukkaram...@gmail.com wrote:
With this question, I aim to understand the inner workings of PHP a
little better.
Assume that you got a 50K library. The library is loaded with a bunch
of handy functions that you use here and there. Also assume
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Matijn Woudt tijn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Haluk Karamete
halukkaram...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, the question is... should you use a global include that points to
this library - across the board - so that ALL the pages ( including
On 20 Nov 2011 at 23:46, Tamara Temple tamouse.li...@tamaratemple.com wrote:
Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote:
At the moment I'm using an instance of apache to run PHP scripts, as
and when required via AJAX. Having got some understanding of web
sockets, I'm minded to look at having
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote:
On 20 Nov 2011 at 23:46, Tamara Temple tamouse.li...@tamaratemple.com wrote:
Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote:
At the moment I'm using an instance of apache to run PHP scripts, as
and when required via AJAX.
On 21 Nov 2011 at 11:10, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote:
I'm looking for confirmation that:
include $fn;
is an allowed form of the include statement.
RTFM [1] example #6 ;)
[1]
expressions.
?php
$fn=foo.ext;
include $fn;
include $fn;
include ($fn);
include ($fn);
?
are all equivalent, because php interpolates variable references in
double quoted strings.
?php
include '$fn';
?
however is not.
While it's certainly possible to rig up something using sockets, I don't
think
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote:
At the moment I'm using an instance of apache to run PHP scripts, as and when
required via AJAX. Having got some understanding of web sockets, I'm minded
to look at having a small server to execute these functions as
On 20 Nov 2011 at 10:36, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you're approaching this the wrong way.
1) have a clear understanding of PHP - syntax, capabilities, etc.
That's what I'm doing - gathering information about bits of PHP that I've not
used (or not used very much) before to
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote:
On 20 Nov 2011 at 10:36, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you're approaching this the wrong way.
1) have a clear understanding of PHP - syntax, capabilities, etc.
That's what I'm doing - gathering
Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote:
At the moment I'm using an instance of apache to run PHP scripts, as
and when required via AJAX. Having got some understanding of web
sockets, I'm minded to look at having a small server to execute these
functions as required. The scripts, some 50 or
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote:
On 20 Nov 2011 at 10:36, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you're approaching this the wrong way.
1) have a clear understanding of PHP - syntax, capabilities, etc.
That's what I'm doing - gathering
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Tim Streater t...@clothears.org.uk wrote:
On 20 Nov 2011 at 10:36, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
And here's another question. Can a child forked by pcntl_fork() use a socket
that the
At the moment I'm using an instance of apache to run PHP scripts, as and when
required via AJAX. Having got some understanding of web sockets, I'm minded to
look at having a small server to execute these functions as required. The
scripts, some 50 or so, are only about 300kbytes of source code,
. (Future theme updates would just overwrite any changes I
made.)
So, in my new actions.php, I put an include followed by the
replacement function definition, named identically to the one I want
to replace:
?php
include '../sometheme/functions/actions.php';
function foo($arg_1, $arg_2
/actions.php.
But I want to preserve ../sometheme/functions/actions.php unchanged
in any way. (Future theme updates would just overwrite any changes I
made.)
So, in my new actions.php, I put an include followed by the
replacement function definition, named identically to the one I want
to replace:
?php
Hi Thijs, :-)
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 18:18, Thijs Lensselink d...@lenss.nl wrote:
As far as I know it is not possible to overwrite functions in PHP (unless
you use runkit, apd). Inside classes this is possible. But that's not the
case here. Why do the functions have to be equally named?
If
You can check with function_exists to see if a function is already defined.
If not, create it.
Regards
Peter
On Nov 3, 2010 11:40 AM, David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz wrote:
Hi Thijs, :-)
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 18:18, Thijs Lensselink d...@lenss.nl wrote:
As far as I know it is not
Hi Peter, :-)
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 18:44, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
You can check with function_exists to see if a function is already defined.
If not, create it.
The function is definitely already defined, I just need to replace it
without touching the file in which it's
That's not going to happen. My point was you could check in the original
file if the function is defined and if not then define it.
On Nov 3, 2010 11:55 AM, David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz wrote:
Hi Peter, :-)
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 18:44, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
You can
Hi, :-)
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 19:29, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not going to happen. My point was you could check in the original
file if the function is defined and if not then define it.
OK, thanks, Thijs and Peter, it looks like I'm trying to do something
that is not
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:53:52 +0800, David Nelson
comme...@traduction.biz wrote:
Hi, :-)
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 19:29, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's not going to happen. My point was you could check in the
original
file if the function is defined and if not then define it.
Hi Thijs, :-)
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 20:38, Thijs Lensselink d...@lenss.nl wrote:
I re-read your original post. And noticed you include the function inside
your child action.php
Is there a special reason for that? You want to overwrite the original
function in a child theme.
probably to get
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 00:00 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
Hi Thijs, :-)
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 20:38, Thijs Lensselink d...@lenss.nl wrote:
I re-read your original post. And noticed you include the function inside
your child action.php
Is there a special reason for that? You want to
Hi guys, :-)
Just FYI, I got this answer from the theme dev:
David,
You don't need the include statement. If you create your function in
wp-content/themes/suffusion-child/functions.php it will get
automatically included.
Secondly, using the same function name wouldn't work, because it would
On Nov 2, 2010, at 12:37 AM, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers
k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
I need to basically grab the source of the page as text. Then I can
do a replace() on the link tag. Then insert the text into an
Iframe. In theory, this I thought
On Sunday, October 31, 2010, a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk
a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
This can only be done with javascript, as the iframe is client-side, which
php knows nothing about.
sounds to me like OP is building the page which will have the iframe
in it which means this is totally
I need to basically grab the source of the page as text. Then I can do
a replace() on the link tag. Then insert the text into an Iframe. In
theory, this I thought would be handled better server side. Is this
possible? I think the problem I'm having is that the domain I'm
requesting from is
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.comwrote:
I need to basically grab the source of the page as text. Then I can do a
replace() on the link tag. Then insert the text into an Iframe. In theory,
this I thought would be handled better server side. Is this possible?
This can only be done with javascript, as the iframe is client-side, which php
knows nothing about.
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
- Reply message -
From: Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com
Date: Sun, Oct 31, 2010 03:32
Subject: [PHP] include html
To: php-general php
Hello,
I am looking for a solution to inject some dynamic html into an
iframe and rework the css from the results.
Is there a way to do this in PHP? I am not talking about just using
the src attribute of the iframe either.
Basically,
I want to call on a web page, grab the html code, replace
On 18 April 2010 21:43, Micky Hulse mickyhulse.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Michiel Sikma mich...@thingmajig.org
wrote:
I would prefer to use include() since it runs the code in the same
context,
...snip...
with your data rather than printing it right away.
Hi Michiel!
One thing to keep in mind is that this one doesn't take eval() vs regular
include execution time into account, in case you were still considering
using it. According to this page, it's many times
I was still considering it... I mean, I am still exploring all my
options for the
.
Very good points. My goal was to write a plugin that would allow me to
include some static HTML template file and get the ?php include...?
tags out of my CMS template. With that said, I think the only people
using this code will be the developers of the templates, and not your
standard user.
I
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Michiel Sikma mich...@thingmajig.org wrote:
I would prefer to use include() since it runs the code in the same context,
...snip...
with your data rather than printing it right away.
Thanks for the reply Michiel, I really appreciate it. :)
For some benchmarks
On 16 April 2010 06:57, Micky Hulse mickyhulse.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
-snip-
The above code snippet is used in a class which would allow developers
(of a specific CMS) to include files without having to put php include
tags on the template view.
The include path will be using
to
include some static HTML template file and get the ?php include...?
tags out of my CMS template. With that said, I think the only people
using this code will be the developers of the templates, and not your
standard user.
I opted to use output buffering and readfile() for the speed, and
include() would
What do ya'll think? Any suggestions?
Sorry for the duplicate posting... I had some problems signing-up for
the list. :(
Also, I moved my test code to sniplr:
http://snipplr.com/view/32192/php-security-include-path-cleansing/
TIA!
Cheers
M
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
developers
(of a specific CMS) to include files without having to put php include
tags on the template view.
The include path will be using the server root path, and the include
files will probably be stored above the web root.
My question:
What would be the best way to clean and secure
();
=
The above code snippet is used in a class which would allow developers
(of a specific CMS) to include files without having to put php include
tags on the template view.
The include path will be using the server root path, and the include
files will probably be stored above the web
if allow_url_include is turned off, you don't have to worry much about http,
if '.' is a invalide char, you can't include *.php...
the include path probably should be the inc(whatever the name)
folder(not accessible from web) instead of the web root and '..'
should be disallowed
Hi Ryan!
allow developers
(of a specific CMS) to include files without having to put php include
tags on the template view.
The include path will be using the server root path, and the include
files will probably be stored above the web root.
My question:
What would be the best way to clean and secure
Ash,
Nice call. .htaccess was not being processed at all which led me to a
cname configuration error for the sub domain.
Thanks!.
On 4/5/2010 8:27 PM, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 19:40 -0400, ad wrote:
I have several virtual hosts on a dedicated server.
In a IFmodule
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 18:21 -0500, phphelp -- kbk wrote:
On Sep 4, 2009, at 5:03 PM, sono...@fannullone.us wrote:
Depends on what you are including. The only tags that can be
inside the
head are base, link, meta, script, style, and title.
Everything else is either body or prologue.
In my readings, I've run across examples showing include files being
called from within the head/head tags, and other examples showing
them called within body/body. I've always put them in the header
section myself, but I was wondering if one is better than the other,
or is it just
From: sono-io at fannullone.us
In my readings, I've run across examples showing include files
being
called from within the head/head tags, and other examples showing
them called within body/body. I've always put them in the header
section myself, but I was wondering if one is
Bob McConnell wrote:
From: sono-io at fannullone.us
In my readings, I've run across examples showing include files
being
called from within the head/head tags, and other examples showing
them called within body/body. I've always put them in the header
section myself, but I was
On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Bob McConnell wrote:
Depends on what you are including. The only tags that can be inside
the
head are base, link, meta, script, style, and title.
Everything else is either body or prologue.
I meant PHP includes like this one:
?php
- Original Message
From: sono...@fannullone.us sono...@fannullone.us
To: PHP General List php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2009 12:57:08 PM
Subject: [PHP] Include Files in HTML
In my readings, I've run across examples showing include files being
called
- Original Message
From: Tommy Pham tommy...@yahoo.com
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2009 4:11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Include Files in HTML
- Original Message
From: sono...@fannullone.us
To: PHP General List
Sent: Friday, September 4
On Sep 4, 2009, at 5:03 PM, sono...@fannullone.us wrote:
Depends on what you are including. The only tags that can be
inside the
head are base, link, meta, script, style, and title.
Everything else is either body or prologue.
I meant PHP includes like this one:
?php
I had a problem with the include and require paths when using AJAX. This I
have solved by using the document root. However since doing so I am
experiencing performance issues. Loading 20 records has suddenly turned into
something of a matter of a minute rather then seconds.
Has anyone ever
Could you post some of the code that you have used.
--
Conor
http://conormacaoidh.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Julian Muscat Doublesin
opensourc...@gmail.com wrote:
I had a problem with the include and require paths when using AJAX. This I
have solved by using the document root. However since doing so I am
experiencing performance issues. Loading 20 records has
SORRY BUT
I CAN'T GET OFF THIS LIST, I CAN'T GET OFF THIS LIST, I CAN'T GET OFF THIS LIST
I'VE TRIED. NO RESPONSE. IS THERE AN ADMIN OUT THERE? PLEASE GET ME
OFF THIS LIST!
This message has been scanned for
viruses and dangerous content by
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 12:03 -0400, Rick Duval wrote:
SORRY BUT
I CAN'T GET OFF THIS LIST, I CAN'T GET OFF THIS LIST, I CAN'T GET OFF THIS
LIST
I'VE TRIED. NO RESPONSE. IS THERE AN ADMIN OUT THERE? PLEASE GET ME
OFF THIS LIST!
This
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Ashley
Sheridana...@ashleysheridan.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 12:03 -0400, Rick Duval wrote:
SORRY BUT
I CAN'T GET OFF THIS LIST, I CAN'T GET OFF THIS LIST, I CAN'T GET OFF THIS
LIST
I'VE TRIED. NO RESPONSE. IS THERE AN ADMIN OUT THERE? PLEASE
Have you gone here:
http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Make sure you input the email address with which you registered:
r...@duvals.ca
It's really not very hard... my 10 month old baby could do it.
Cheers,
Rob.
Rick Duval wrote:
SORRY BUT
I CAN'T GET OFF THIS LIST, I CAN'T GET OFF
a rap song hihi haha
best comment I've ever read on a mailing list. reminds me that live is fun
thanks for making my day
thanks sheridan for ur shakespear like abbilities
thanks bastien for ur humor
GREAT
Bastien Koert phps...@gmail.com wrote in message
result is
achieved however, i don't want to change all the variables to global
scope (this file is includeded in other files where global scoped
variables is not desireable).
$vars = 'vars.php scope\n';
?
'scope.php'
?php
include('scope.class.inc
Hello,
I've cleaned up my question a bit.
I want the included file which is called within a method of a class to
have the same scope as the instantiation of the class's object. That
is, i want a class to include a file in the calling object's scope. How
would one do this?
'test.php'
?php
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Hello,
I've cleaned up my question a bit.
I want the included file which is called within a method of a class to
have the same scope as the instantiation of the class's object. That
is, i want a class to include a file in the calling object's scope. How
would one do
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
Daniel Kolbo wrote:
Hello,
I've cleaned up my question a bit.
I want the included file which is called within a method of a class to
have the same scope as the instantiation of the class's object. That
is, i want a class to include a file in the calling object's
then the desired result is
achieved however, i don't want to change all the variables to global
scope (this file is includeded in other files where global scoped
variables is not desireable).
$vars = 'vars.php scope\n';
?
'scope.php'
?php
include('scope.class.inc');
$object = new CScope;
$object-cinclude
How does one deal with tag completion from an include file to the
main(source)-file?
i.e. c should a tag, such as head or div be closed withing the
include file? Or can body be started in the include file and closed in
the main-file?
Crossing the border, so-to-speak, doesn't seem to matter; but
From: Patrick Moloney
I have a simple web site with a simple page that all works well,
although I have had a similar problem a couple of times that seems to
be
caused by Comment Lines in the included files. I wonder if I have it
entirely right.
All my files are .php files, but almost all
I have a simple web site with a simple page that all works well,
although I have had a similar problem a couple of times that seems to be
caused by Comment Lines in the included files. I wonder if I have it
entirely right.
All my files are .php files, but almost all the code is HTML.
The file
Patrick Moloney wrote:
Does PHP preprocess the file but treat the comments as text because I
never said it was HTML?
I've not had it do that.
Would PHP comments have to be inside PHP tags?
Yes. If you use a php comment it has to be inside a php tag.
One issue I have seen though is
Patrick Moloney wrote:
I have a simple web site with a simple page that all works well,
although I have had a similar problem a couple of times that seems to be
caused by Comment Lines in the included files. I wonder if I have it
entirely right.
All my files are .php files, but almost all the
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 08:53, Stuart stut...@gmail.com wrote:
1.) We use regular open tags to be compatible with all stock
PHP configurations.
2.) We echo out the response from dirname() so that it's
output to the HTML source.
3.) We use dirname() twice,
good morning all,
How can I include src and href in include files that will refer the
right paths from files in different hierarchies(directory tree levels)?
Example:
include dirname(_FILE_)./../lib/header1.php; ?
This does not work:
snippetysnip...
LINK href=dirname(_FILE_).'/../lib/index.css'
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 08:37, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
good morning all,
How can I include src and href in include files that will refer the
right paths from files in different hierarchies(directory tree levels)?
Example:
include dirname(_FILE_)./../lib/header1.php; ?
This does
2009/3/6 Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 08:37, PJ af.gour...@videotron.ca wrote:
good morning all,
How can I include src and href in include files that will refer the
right paths from files in different hierarchies(directory tree levels)?
Example:
include
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 08:53, Stuart stut...@gmail.com wrote:
1.) We use regular open tags to be compatible with all stock
PHP configurations.
2.) We echo out the response from dirname() so that it's
output to the HTML source.
3.) We use dirname() twice, so it gives the
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 08:53, Stuart stut...@gmail.com wrote:
1.) We use regular open tags to be compatible with all stock
PHP configurations.
2.) We echo out the response from dirname() so that it's
output to the HTML source.
3.) We use dirname()
Hello.
Supose that i have this script:
?php
require_once(lib.php);
lib_function();
?
I want to know if there is a way to call the lib.php library from the
.htaccess instead of the PHP script?
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:41 PM, R B rbp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
Supose that i have this script:
?php
require_once(lib.php);
lib_function();
?
I want to know if there is a way to call the lib.php library from the
.htaccess instead of the PHP script?
Thanks.
.htaccess won't
Am having this error in the apache log files WHat does it imply really. I
have no idea. Am trying to run Zf but my pages are all blank so i was
wondering if this has anything to do with it. Thanks will appreciate any
help:
[Wed Dec 10 11:15:03 2008] [warn] [client 190.30.20.221] mod_include:
as a standard php include every time
someone visits the given VirtualHost block.
Hope this helps.
--
Jim Lucas
Some men are born to greatness, some achieve greatness,
and some have greatness thrust upon them.
Twelfth Night, Act II, Scene V
by William Shakespeare
--
PHP General
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Include directive..
dele454 wrote:
Hi,
I am modifying the apache config file on my domain to include the path to
the Zend Framework on a specified location outside the public folder.
So in my http.conf file i simply include the path
Hi,
I am modifying the apache config file on my domain to include the path to
the Zend Framework on a specified location outside the public folder.
So in my http.conf file i simply include the path to where the includes file
is to customise the virtual host:
[CODE]
# To customize this
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:47 AM, dele454 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am modifying the apache config file on my domain to include the path to
the Zend Framework on a specified location outside the public folder.
So in my http.conf file i simply include the path to where the includes
dele454 schreef:
Hi,
I am modifying the apache config file on my domain to include the path to
the Zend Framework on a specified location outside the public folder.
So in my http.conf file i simply include the path to where the includes file
is to customise the virtual host:
[CODE]
On Dec 8, 2008, at 6:47 AM, dele454 wrote:
Hi,
I am modifying the apache config file on my domain to include the
path to
the Zend Framework on a specified location outside the public folder.
So in my http.conf file i simply include the path to where the
includes file
is to customise
Hello, firstly, sorry for my English...
I have class:
//---
class manageClassError{
private $errorsList=array();
private function addError($ex){
$errorsList[]=$ex;
}
public function isError(){
return (bool)(count($this-errorsList));
}
public
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Pavel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, firstly, sorry for my English...
I have class:
//---
class manageClassError{
private $errorsList=array();
private function addError($ex){
$errorsList[]=$ex;
}
public function isError(){
Pavel schreef:
Hello, firstly, sorry for my English...
I have class:
//---
class manageClassError{
private $errorsList=array();
private function addError($ex){
$errorsList[]=$ex;
}
public function isError(){
return (bool)(count($this-errorsList));
use a decorator pattern or wait till hell freezes over and the core devs
actually allow the Traits functionality into php.
I must read about patterns, thanks :)
--
===
С уважением, Манылов Павел aka [R-k]
icq: 949-388-0
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
А ещё говорят
1 - 100 of 950 matches
Mail list logo
