From: Daniel P. Brown
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:51, Robert Cummings
wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, that and some Gateway with a Common Interface.
>
> So any language that could pre-process pre-hypertext would either
> have the unique ability to foresee the future, the mundane ability to
> "pre-proces
On 11/11/10 12:04 PM, Michael Shadle wrote:
> Not to discredit this long post but the media here is now calling
> kids who text often "hypertexting teens" which really irked me
> even more...I bet some non-technical news guy thinks he is
> awesome for coming up with that one.
LOL! I too thought
Not to discredit this long post but the media here is now calling kids who text
often "hypertexting teens" which really irked me even more...
I bet some non-technical news guy thinks he is awesome for coming up with that
one.
On Nov 11, 2010, at 9:54 AM, "Daniel P. Brown"
wrote:
> On Thu, No
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:51, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> Yeah, that and some Gateway with a Common Interface.
My point was that there is now and never was any such PHP project
known as pre-hypertext preprocessor. It originated as Personal Home
Page Tools (PHP Tools) and Forms Interpreter (F
On 10-11-11 03:49 AM, David Robley wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 10-11-11 02:20 AM, David Robley wrote:
Daniel P. Brown wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 20:59, Nathan Rixham
wrote:
I went back to using a pre hypertext processor, seemed like a
really powerful templatin
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On 10-11-11 02:20 AM, David Robley wrote:
> > Daniel P. Brown wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 20:59, Nathan Rixham
wrote:
> >>> I went back to using a pre hypertext processor, seemed like a
> >>> really powerful templating engine that was v famili
On 10-11-11 02:20 AM, David Robley wrote:
Daniel P. Brown wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 20:59, Nathan Rixham wrote:
I went back to using a pre hypertext processor, seemed like a really
powerful templating engine that was v familiar to use :p
Pre-hypertext preprocessor? Perl?
Pre
Daniel P. Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 20:59, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>>
>> I went back to using a pre hypertext processor, seemed like a really
>> powerful templating engine that was v familiar to use :p
>
> Pre-hypertext preprocessor? Perl?
>
Pre Hypertext Processor - the acronym
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 20:59, Nathan Rixham wrote:
>
> I went back to using a pre hypertext processor, seemed like a really
> powerful templating engine that was v familiar to use :p
Pre-hypertext preprocessor? Perl?
--
Dedicated Servers, Cloud and Cloud Hybrid Solutions, VPS, Hosting
(8
Daniel P. Brown wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 16:41, Hansen, Mike wrote:
I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you use? Why?
For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you use them?
I chose to write two of my own over the years: one procedural, one
At 11:38 AM -0500 11/9/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 10-11-09 11:18 AM, tedd wrote:
At 10:57 AM -0500 11/9/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 10-11-09 10:42 AM, tedd wrote:
I don't have to try them all, just the most popular. If the most
popular doesn't work for me, then I don't need to try any ot
I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do
you use? Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't
you use them?
Hi Mike
I am still so new at PHP that i do not get a real valid vote here...
(I have never used any templating engine).. BUT I know myself
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Hansen, Mike wrote:
> I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you use?
> Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you use them?
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://ww
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 00:20:52 -0500
Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:41:12PM -0700, Hansen, Mike wrote:
>
> Here's why I don't use a templating engine.
>
> First, You're taking an embedded language and writing a templating
> engine in it. Seriously?
>
> Second, you're painting a
On 10-11-09 10:42 AM, tedd wrote:
At 12:23 AM -0500 11/9/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 10-11-09 12:20 AM, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:41:12PM -0700, Hansen, Mike wrote:
I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you
use? Why? For those that don't use
At 10:57 AM -0500 11/9/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 10-11-09 10:42 AM, tedd wrote:
I don't have to try them all, just the most popular. If the most
popular doesn't work for me, then I don't need to try any others.
That's all well and good, but the argument being used is a
generalization whi
On 10-11-09 11:18 AM, tedd wrote:
At 10:57 AM -0500 11/9/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 10-11-09 10:42 AM, tedd wrote:
I don't have to try them all, just the most popular. If the most
popular doesn't work for me, then I don't need to try any others.
That's all well and good, but the argument
At 12:23 AM -0500 11/9/10, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 10-11-09 12:20 AM, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:41:12PM -0700, Hansen, Mike wrote:
I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you
use? Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you
At 12:20 AM -0500 11/9/10, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:41:12PM -0700, Hansen, Mike wrote:
I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you
use? Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you
use them?
Here's why I don't use a templ
At 10:24 PM -0500 11/8/10, Matt Giddings wrote:
I have to agree with David here. Smarty may be an added layer to the whole
mix, but it makes maintaining the template and application much simpler.
Much better than mixing html/php all together in a single file. That and a
single template is eas
At 10:00 PM -0500 11/8/10, David McGlone wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 23:36 +0100, k...@bitflop.com wrote:
> IMHO - If you have to jump in and out of HTML and template syntax you
might as well jump in and out of HTML and PHP.
There is truth to this, but for me, its helping me learn in a muc
On 9 November 2010 06:20, Paul M Foster wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:41:12PM -0700, Hansen, Mike wrote:
>
>> I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you
>> use? Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you
>> use them?
>>
>
> Here's why I don't u
On 10-11-09 12:20 AM, Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:41:12PM -0700, Hansen, Mike wrote:
I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you
use? Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you
use them?
Here's why I don't use a templating en
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:41:12PM -0700, Hansen, Mike wrote:
> I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you
> use? Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you
> use them?
>
Here's why I don't use a templating engine.
First, You're taking an embedde
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:39 PM, David McGlone wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 16:51 -0500, Steve Staples wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 14:41 -0700, Hansen, Mike wrote:
> > > I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you
> use? Why? For those that don't use templating eng
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 23:36 +0100, k...@bitflop.com wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:41:12 -0700
> "Hansen, Mike" wrote:
>
> > I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you
> > use? Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you
> > use them?
>
> PHP is in
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 16:51 -0500, Steve Staples wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 14:41 -0700, Hansen, Mike wrote:
> > I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you use?
> > Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you use them?
> >
> >
>
> for the long
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:41:12 -0700
"Hansen, Mike" wrote:
> I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you
> use? Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you
> use them?
PHP is in itself a template language and I find that the template
engines just get i
i would point someone in the direction of XHP too if they really wanted to
https://github.com/facebook/xhp/wiki/
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 8 November 2010 22:59, Michael Shadle wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Hansen, Mike wrote:
>>> I really like the idea
On 8 November 2010 22:59, Michael Shadle wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Hansen, Mike wrote:
>> I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you use?
>> Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you use them?
>
> smarty is everyone's favorite usual
On 10-11-08 05:02 PM, Bastien Koert wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
On 10-11-08 04:51 PM, Steve Staples wrote:
all of my projects now consist of smarty, pear mdb2, phpmailer, jquery,
fpdf (if needed), and pchart (again, if needed). these are my personal
choices
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Robert Cummings wrote:
> On 10-11-08 04:51 PM, Steve Staples wrote:
>>
>> all of my projects now consist of smarty, pear mdb2, phpmailer, jquery,
>> fpdf (if needed), and pchart (again, if needed). these are my personal
>> choices, and I have been happy with them
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Hansen, Mike wrote:
> I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you use?
> Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you use them?
smarty is everyone's favorite usually but i find it a bit annoying.
not to mention php its
On 10-11-08 04:51 PM, Steve Staples wrote:
all of my projects now consist of smarty, pear mdb2, phpmailer, jquery,
fpdf (if needed), and pchart (again, if needed). these are my personal
choices, and I have been happy with them so far ;)
pchart... *shudder*.
I recently had to add support for
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 14:41 -0700, Hansen, Mike wrote:
> I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you use?
> Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you use them?
>
>
for the longest time, i didn't know about them, and was breaking in and
out of php
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 16:41, Hansen, Mike wrote:
> I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you use?
> Why? For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you use them?
I chose to write two of my own over the years: one procedural, one
OOP. That said, the m
I really like the idea of using a templating engine. Which one do you use? Why?
For those that don't use templating engines, why don't you use them?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
37 matches
Mail list logo
