Thanks Per,
well here is a short translation of this article:
http://www.tech-nerds.de/blog/2009/02/apache2-mit-mehreren-ssl-virtualhosts/
If you havn't installed apache2-threaded-dev:
You need the current verion of gnutls (download from gnu.org)
Download, unpack, compile and install as usual. T
Per Jessen wrote:
> Jochen Schultz wrote:
>
>> AFAIK Apache 2 doesn't support virtual hosts for SSL.
>>
>
> I think it does now - there was even a c't article on the topic not
> long ago. I'll see if I can find it.
http://www.heise.de/kiosk/archiv/ct/2009/23/174_kiosk (download for a
fee)
Jochen Schultz wrote:
> AFAIK Apache 2 doesn't support virtual hosts for SSL.
>
I think it does now - there was even a c't article on the topic not long
ago. I'll see if I can find it.
/Per
--
Per Jessen, Zürich (-4.0°C)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, vi
AFAIK Apache 2 doesn't support virtual hosts for SSL.
But you may use one cert per socket, e.g it is possible to set one cert
up on port 447 and one on 8080.
https://example1.com
https://example2.com:8080
regards
Jochen Schultz
Manuel Lemos schrieb:
Hello,
on 03/08/2010 07:13 PM Skip Evan
mike wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Micah Gersten
>
>
>> OP asked for PHP. Trac is python and Redmine is Ruby. They've added
>> twitter support, VCS support, and wiki support lately and are working on
>> the major 1.2 upgrade now.
>
> i am the OP :) i know. i was just adding trac as
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Micah Gersten
> OP asked for PHP. Trac is python and Redmine is Ruby. They've added
> twitter support, VCS support, and wiki support lately and are working on
> the major 1.2 upgrade now.
i am the OP :) i know. i was just adding trac as another example.
--
PHP
mike wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Jan G.B. wrote:
>> Mantis is a pain in the a*** (for non technical persons).
>
> +1
>
> had some annoying bugs, too.
>
> it's only really a bug tracker last i checked anyhow.
>
> trac or redmine is more what would be beneficial.
OP asked for PHP.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Jan G.B. wrote:
> Mantis is a pain in the a*** (for non technical persons).
+1
had some annoying bugs, too.
it's only really a bug tracker last i checked anyhow.
trac or redmine is more what would be beneficial.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net
Mantis is a pain in the a*** (for non technical persons).
We (we as in 'the IT department') are using mantis, but all other
persons in the firm fail to do so.
Not very useful. Most persons doesn't even get how the filters work.
byebye
2009/3/17 Micah Gersten :
> mike wrote:
>> http://www.redmin
Congratulations and good luck to the PHP 5.0.0 team!!
Alberto Brea
-Original Message-
From: "John W. Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ben Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:44:06 -0400
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Anyone knows when PH
Ben Ramsey wrote:
Aidan Lister wrote:
"When it's ready"
Hopefully we'll see the stable release in the next 24 hours.
There was a post to the internals@ list yesterday. Andi announced a
test roll of 5.0.0 saying that he would release PHP 5 within the next 24
hours "if all goes well." Keep your
PHP is secure, it's upto the programmer to make sure the script they write
is secure.
I'd guess the reason that no one has replied is because we hate reading 75+
lines of code.
In my experience on this list, the best answers come when you ask a specific
question about a specific problem... NOT w
Just FYI, I read your previous two messages and decided not to answer them
for the following (very subjective) reasons:
1. Your commenting style () made my head hurt.
2. The question was a little too open-ended yet the answer would be very
specific. I'm happy to write a long-winded
-288-1515
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Adam Voigt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:22 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Anyone?
> >
> >
> > Yes, PHP is a secure programming language
m Voigt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Anyone?
>
>
> Yes, PHP is a secure programming language.
>
> On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 13:18, Jas wrote:
> > I cannot believe that no one with alot o
Sorry, never thought about using a search on forms to check my existing
security measures... I am currently employing the use of SSL, however I am
not that familiar with "securing forms" in the traditional sense so I do
appreciate your comments. And also, I am not trying to "show off" my code,
si
D]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Anyone?
Ok, so you have pointed out an problem, now that you have been so kind to do
this could please recommend how to resolve this?
Thanks,
Jas
"Jay Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
002201c20d80$552be430$8102a8c0@niigziuo4ohhdt">n
[snip]
Ok, so you have pointed out an problem, now that you have been so kind to do
this could please recommend how to resolve this?
[/snip]
You may want to do some research on securing plain text transmission.
http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue5/securing-forms/
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=
Ok, so you have pointed out an problem, now that you have been so kind to do
this could please recommend how to resolve this?
Thanks,
Jas
"Jay Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
002201c20d80$552be430$8102a8c0@niigziuo4ohhdt">news:002201c20d80$552be430$8102a8c0@niigziuo4ohhdt...
> [sn
[snip]
I cannot believe that no one with alot of PHP and MySQL experience has not
replied to this post yet. Is PHP not a secure scripting language? I would
really like a little insight into this question, anyone?
[/snip]
[rant warning!]
I'll bite! ;-(
A. You gave so much code that those of us
Yes, PHP is a secure programming language.
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 13:18, Jas wrote:
> I cannot believe that no one with alot of PHP and MySQL experience has not
> replied to this post yet. Is PHP not a secure scripting language? I would
> really like a little insight into this question, anyone?
On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 13:54, Erik Price wrote:
> Hm... I don't know why I thought otherwise. I checked with the spec
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.4), and it really doesn't say yes or
> no to this. But I'm sure you're right, since some attributes contain
> quoted content, which is why y
On Friday, February 1, 2002, at 03:05 PM, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
>>> Everything is correct 'cept the 'double quotes' bit--XML accepts
>>> attribute values enclosed in either single or double quotes.
>>
>> Yes, and to extend on that: you need to stick to one convention or the
>> other throug
On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 10:48, Erik Price wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 1, 2002, at 05:07 AM, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
>
> > Everything is correct 'cept the 'double quotes' bit--XML accepts
> > attribute values enclosed in either single or double quotes.
>
> Yes, and to extend on that: you ne
On Friday, February 1, 2002, at 05:07 AM, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
> Everything is correct 'cept the 'double quotes' bit--XML accepts
> attribute values enclosed in either single or double quotes.
Yes, and to extend on that: you need to stick to one convention or the
other throughout the en
* Lars Torben Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 05:07]:
> On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 01:33, Brian Clark wrote:
> > XHTML isn't too different. There are different `rules' -- like tags
> > and attributes must be lower case, values must be surrounded by
> > double quotes, tags without closing tag
On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 01:33, Brian Clark wrote:
> * hugh danaher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 04:21]:
>
> > Not familiar with anything but php and html.
>
> XHTML isn't too different. There are different `rules' -- like tags
> and attributes must be lower case, values must be surrounded by
l PHP to end that string.
Torben
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PHP is not a drug." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Anyone Up?
>
>
>
o use htmlspecialchars() to correct that.
Niklas
-Original Message-
From: hugh danaher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 1. helmikuuta 2002 11:21
To: Php-General
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: Anyone Up?
Not familiar with anything but php and html. I know that in a type=text
(obviously not a chec
* hugh danaher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 04:21]:
> Not familiar with anything but php and html.
XHTML isn't too different. There are different `rules' -- like tags
and attributes must be lower case, values must be surrounded by double
quotes, tags without closing tags: , ,
Etc..
> I kn
r' in 'Your' as a break and is
looking at Name # as the next instruction, which it isn't. My two cents for
the evening.
Hugh
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PHP is not a drug." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
* hugh danaher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 03:48]:
> I think you'll need something like this:
> VALUE=\'Your Name1\' / /single quote marks I believe (and I certainly
> could be wrong).
> otherwise it'll truncate at 'Your'
> of course, if this is what you want...
(Not trying to pick o
You're wrong here, my friend. You can have any value you like.
value="@£$ASDFSDF ASDP fosifu @}{$#%/&@ " would work.
Niklas
-Original Message-
From: hugh danaher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 1. helmikuuta 2002 10:48
To: Luke Welling
Cc: Php-General
Su
I think you'll need something like this:
VALUE=\'Your Name1\' / /single quote marks I believe (and I certainly
could be wrong).
otherwise it'll truncate at 'Your'
of course, if this is what you want...
Hugh
- Original Message -
From: "Luke Welling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PR
34 matches
Mail list logo
