On 25 April 2010 09:31, Per Jessen wrote:
>
> >> Doesn't WoW need DirectX and all that? I have some old Windows games
> >> (Diablo, Alpha Centauri, Railroad Tycoon, Wolfenstein) I'd love to
> >> play under Wine, but so far I've not managed to make them work.
> >>
> >>
> > The best way to run old
Michiel Sikma wrote:
> On 24 April 2010 16:14, Per Jessen wrote:
>
>> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> Is there an actual WoW client for Linux or you run in Wine like
>> >> environment?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Tommy
>> >>
>> >
>> > I run it under Wine. Wine has come a long way since my fi
On 24 April 2010 16:14, Per Jessen wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Is there an actual WoW client for Linux or you run in Wine like
> >> environment?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tommy
> >>
> >
> > I run it under Wine. Wine has come a long way since my first
> > encounters with it a few year
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 16:14 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Is there an actual WoW client for Linux or you run in Wine like
> >> environment?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tommy
> >>
> >
> > I run it under Wine. Wine has come a long way since my first
> > encounters wit
Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>>
>> Is there an actual WoW client for Linux or you run in Wine like
>> environment?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tommy
>>
>
> I run it under Wine. Wine has come a long way since my first
> encounters with it a few years back and run a surprising amount of
> Windows-based software.
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 15:44 +0200, Michiel Sikma wrote:
> On 23 April 2010 16:16, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
>
> >
> > I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere around here; I use
> > it for audio recording. Someone (possibly even me) renamed most
> > of the desktop icons ... OE's shortcut is "O
On 23 April 2010 16:16, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
>
> I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere around here; I use
> it for audio recording. Someone (possibly even me) renamed most
> of the desktop icons ... OE's shortcut is "Outluck Depress". :-)
>
> Kevin D. Kinsey
>
>
Say what you will about
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> I run it under Wine. Wine has come a long way since my first encounters
> with it a few years back and run a surprising amount of Windows-based
> software. I don't know how far its support for Flash has come, but I do
> remember running a v
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:12 -0700, Tommy Pham wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk]
> > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:04 AM
> > To: Dan Joseph
> > Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
> > Subject: Re: [
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> > As a desktop system, it's my personal choice. Both KDE 4 and Gnome 3
> > (released in Sept 2010) offer better flashiness than Windows 7 and
> > arguably better than the latest Mac OSX too, and the tools are as stable
> > as anything I've eve
> -Original Message-
> From: Ashley Sheridan [mailto:a...@ashleysheridan.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:04 AM
> To: Dan Joseph
> Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: replying to list (I give up)
>
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:57 -0400, Dan
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:57 -0400, Dan Joseph wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Adam Richardson wrote:
>
> > Contrary to my experiences a few years ago, there is no real loser
> > anymore,
> > they all are very nice and have their advantages.
> >
>
> Well, I still believe that Linux is
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Adam Richardson wrote:
> Contrary to my experiences a few years ago, there is no real loser
> anymore,
> they all are very nice and have their advantages.
>
Well, I still believe that Linux is the better suitor for a server, but some
companies don't. So you real
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 13:20, Ashley Sheridan
> wrote:
> >
> > I have heard good things about Windows 7, but I've not used it myself
> > yet (and don't really plan to)
>
> Wise.
>
>[Sent from a Win7 PC.]
>
> --
>
> daniel.br...@par
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 13:20, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
>
> I have heard good things about Windows 7, but I've not used it myself
> yet (and don't really plan to)
Wise.
[Sent from a Win7 PC.]
--
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotp
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:24 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 5:06 PM +0100 4/23/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 09:16 -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
> >
> >> I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere
> >
> >
> >My commiserations to you, I used that for a couple of years.
> >
> >I sup
At 5:06 PM +0100 4/23/10, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 09:16 -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere
My commiserations to you, I used that for a couple of years.
I suppose it could be worse though. It might have been WinME or Vista.
Thank
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 09:16 -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
> I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere
My commiserations to you, I used that for a couple of years.
I suppose it could be worse though. It might have been WinME or Vista.
Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
Bobby Pejman wrote:
I must say, I never heard or even thought of the idea of calling it
> LookOut. Hahaha. It made me laugh for a good 10 minutes and
> if that term is open source, I will be using it ;)
I've still got a Win98 box in service somewhere around here; I use
it for audio recording.
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:35 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
> Which is worse, one person having to
> check the answer by looking at the mailing list archive or the rest of
> the list not benefiting at all from the answer?
Well, as that one person was the one who needed the help enough to ask
the questi
On 22 April 2010 17:05, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:06 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
>
> On 22 April 2010 12:14, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > I believe Dan Brown mentioned a very good reason why this is not as
> > simple an issue as just changing the reply-to. Not everyone who po
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:06 +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 22 April 2010 12:14, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> > I believe Dan Brown mentioned a very good reason why this is not as
> > simple an issue as just changing the reply-to. Not everyone who posts to
> > the list subscribes to the list, so being
On 22 April 2010 12:14, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> I believe Dan Brown mentioned a very good reason why this is not as
> simple an issue as just changing the reply-to. Not everyone who posts to
> the list subscribes to the list, so being copied into the emails is good
> for them. Suddenly changing t
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:52, Mitul Modi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to install on embedded device. Please help me to reduce the
> binary footprint.
You sent two messages to the Install list and then hijacked this
thread. Send a new message to php-general@lists.php.net and ask for
help.
Hi,
I am planning to install on embedded device. Please help me to reduce the
binary footprint.
thanks,
Mitul modi
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 12:16:28 O. Lavell wrote:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Hello David McGlone,
> >
> > Am 2010-04-21 08:27:18, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> >> I give up. trying to reply to messages on this list is tedious. I can't
> >> pinpoint whether it's because the list is set up
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 15:55 -0500, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
>
> > Then write an interface (using PHP of course) that
> > only responds to the list when you generate a reply.
>
> LOL
> WT??
>
> WHY would we want to do that? Much unnecessary work
om: "Bob McConnell"
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:01:55
> To: Michelle Konzack;
>
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: replying to list (I give up)
> From: Michelle Konzack
>
> > Hello Peter Lind,
> >
> > Am 2010-04-21 15:47:54, hacktest Du folgendes heru
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 19:15 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Can you not adapt the toolbar?
I did find
http://www.mail-archive.com/evolut...@lists.ximian.com/msg01302.html but
it looks to be Linux-only. I would assume there's an equivalent method
out there for Windows and Macs.
Thanks,
Ash
http
On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
Then write an interface (using PHP of course) that
only responds to the list when you generate a reply.
LOL
WT??
WHY would we want to do that? Much unnecessary work when an admin
could set a reply-to and all would be solved.
With all due res
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 20:38 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello David McGlone,
>
> Am 2010-04-21 09:37:48, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > Yes. but if it was so harmful, why does the 40, 50 or so lists that I've
> > been on, simply let you hit the reply and it goes back to the list?
>
> Ca
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 13:51 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]tons of stuff[/snip]
>
> C'mon folks! You're programmers! Don't like the way your mail client
> handles the list? Then write an interface (using PHP of course) that
> only responds to the list when you generate a reply.
I wish I was
Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: replying to list (I give up)
From: Michelle Konzack
> Hello Peter Lind,
>
> Am 2010-04-21 15:47:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> And waste time every single time you post to the list ... why do
>> people become programmers/developers a
All the lists I am on, when I hit reply, the lists email comes up.
The PHP email lists are the only ones that do not for me. I end up
(every time I send a message)
deleting the Op email and typing in the list email, or hit reply-all
and delete all emails except the list email.
I do this as a
From: Michelle Konzack
> Hello Peter Lind,
>
> Am 2010-04-21 15:47:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> And waste time every single time you post to the list ... why do
>> people become programmers/developers again? To end creating technical
>> solutions they can then avoid using by doing extra
On 21 April 2010 20:09, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Peter Lind,
Hi Michelle
> Am 2010-04-21 15:47:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> And waste time every single time you post to the list ... why do
>> people become programmers/developers again? To end creating technical
>> solutions they
36 matches
Mail list logo
