Subscribe

2011-07-18 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Hello Amit Kulkarni :-) You are now subscribed subscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

request for porting help for OpenBSD 64 bits

2011-07-24 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Hi, I am new to lisp. Searched for very small dialect and new/pico came up first. Reading about both, and exploring what I would like to use. I am looking into packaging PicoLisp for OpenBSD ports. I can get miniPicoLisp to work, but would like to see the full package, and in both 32/64 bits & for

Re: request for porting help for OpenBSD 64 bits

2011-07-25 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Amit, > >> first. Reading about both, and exploring what I would like to use. I >> am looking into packaging PicoLisp for OpenBSD ports. I can get > > Great! I think its easier to package just the C version, without the -m32/m64 switch

Re: picolisp on openbsd amd64

2011-08-08 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Edwin, Since picoLisp 64bit is pure assembly, Alex has already ported to am64, ppc64. I sent a email asking pretty much the same question within the last two weeks, see Alex's responses. Thanks On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > Hi Edwin, > >> tried compiling picolisp on an

Re: Building the full 64-bit version (Was: httpGate and libssl

2011-08-22 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Hi, > Hi all, > > for completeness, let me list three options for building a full > PicoLisp-64 system, using Debian-amd64 as an example: > > > 1. Stand-alone bootstrap, using a temporary 32-bit version: > >   # apt-get install libc6-dev-i386 libssl-dev libx11-dev libxext-dev > >   $ (cd src; make

Re: Building the full 64-bit version (Was: httpGate and libssl

2011-08-24 Thread Amit Kulkarni
>> Moreover, they can be easily cross-generated. If we have proper a >> "src64/sys/x86-64.openBsd.code.l" and "src64/sys/x86-64.openBsd.defs.l" > > To generate the "src64/sys/*.defs.l" files, I always used the attached > "def.c". If you like, you could compile it on OpenBSD, and send me the > outpu

Fwd: OpenBSD (Was: Building the full 64-bit version)

2011-08-25 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Hi, Background: I am trying to port picoLisp with Alex's help, its written in assembly for 64 bit architectures and C for 32 bit arches. He is ported to amd64, ppc64 and sparc64 is on his roadmap. Can somebody please weigh in on Alex's comment? thanks -- Forwarded message -- Fro

Re: Building the full 64-bit version

2011-08-25 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> I set most values as they are in your output. However, there are also > some values not covered by def.c, because I took them directly from the > include files. These concern the ranges > >   ENOENT   .. ECONNRESET >   O_RDONLY .. O_APPEND >   SIGHUP   .. SIGNALS >   TM_SEC   .. TM_YEAR > > Could

Re: Building the full 64-bit version

2011-08-27 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 07:10:06PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: >> Great, thanks! Got "code.s" ... will analyze it on Sunday. > > Good, just now I found the time! :) > > > So I constructed a new "src64/sys/x86-64.openBsd.code.l" from what I > found in your "code.s". I can't test it, but I hope

Re: Building the full 64-bit version

2011-08-31 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Hi Alex, I am writing the changed values hereWherever possible I refer to these docs which are automatically updated within 10 mins of each commit and follow -current. They pull up the latest revision from cvs. > I set most values as they are in your output. However, there are also > some val

Re: Building the full 64-bit version

2011-09-06 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Amit, > > thanks for the fixes! > > I've put them into "src64/sys/x86-64.openBsd.defs.l" so far, and made a > new release. > > >> SIGIO is a killer, on Linux it is equivalent to SIGPOLL but its BSD >> thing which was copied over by Linu

Re: Building the full 64-bit version

2011-09-07 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Jakob Eriksson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:39:51PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:22:33AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: >> > Mathias used OpenBSD 5.0, and the interpreter works (at least partially). >> > >> > I'm not sure how w

Re: Building the full 64-bit version

2011-09-15 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Amit, > > thanks for the fixes! > > I've put them into "src64/sys/x86-64.openBsd.defs.l" so far, and made a > new release. > > >> SIGIO is a killer, on Linux it is equivalent to SIGPOLL but its BSD >> thing which was copied over by Linu

Re: picolisp on openSolaris

2011-09-30 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> I tried to compile picolisp on openSolaris and I got a message: > > 'make: Fatal error in reader: Makefile, line 14: Badly formed macro > assignment' > > These msg I get on both openSolaris 2008.05 and 2009.06. > > I tried 'gmake' the same msg. > > I tied gcc and I got: 'command not found'. It se

Re: Removed OpenBSD 64-bit

2011-10-09 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> OK, the OpenBSD version seems dead :( hi Alex, Sorry for not replying earlier. > So I have removed the half-baked fragments from the release-TGZ and > source repository. Sorry about that, but I don't have the time and > resources to do it myself. > I will look itno it. Please put the stuff ba

unsubscribe

2012-11-26 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Good bye Amit Kulkarni :-( You are now unsubscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe