Hi Jérémy,
Daniel is interested in browserify-lite and I have completed and packaged
up some feature requests that he had. He has offered to upload the new
version this time.
Daniel, I have done all the packaging and created the tag etc. All that
remains is for you to check out the code from
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:51 AM Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
can you check if that goes well with reverse build dependencies please ?
Yes. Fortunately the only reverse build dependencies are node-leveldown
(which I am working on) and node-ws, which is supposed to be on nan version
Hi Jérémy,
I'm working on updating node-leveldown to the new upstream release and I
need a newer node-nan release to do so. Want some help with node-nan?
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
:16.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+node-findit2 (2.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * remove build dependency on buggy dependency: node-tap
+
+ -- Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:25:08 +
+
node-findit2 (2.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Initial release (Closes
Jérémy,
Thank you for fixing node-serve-static. I have filed a bug for an unblock
on the package: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778566
Could you do the same for node-tap? Perhaps even by deleting the failing
test? Then I will file an unblock on node-tap.
Regards,
Andrew
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package node-tap
The bug that caused this package to be scheduled for autoremoval is
fixed with this small patch which disables a single test.
This does not affect the
Leo,
The upstream maintainer of serve-static is going to release 1.6.5 (1.6.4
currently in danger of getting removed from debian) with the bug fix in it:
https://github.com/expressjs/serve-static/commit/0399e399935bab99530d6926094b4451438c2d50#commitcomment-9590955
When that happens will you go
It seems I have been unsubscribed from pkg-javascript-devel for some reason
and I did not see
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2015-January/009894.html
until now.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Leo,
The upstream
On Oct 17, 2014 4:11 PM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Good idea. Done.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Maybe it can be written in the long description of the package ?
This module is a backward-compatible rewrite of node-findit
I found one
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Debian FTP Masters
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
binary:node-findit2 is NEW.
source:node-findit2 is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process.
Hi FTP masters,
This module,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
What should I do?
Since both have same API, i'd add your patches as quilt patches to
node-findit that is already in debian and add a binary
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le jeudi 16 octobre 2014 à 14:17 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
What should I do?
Since both have same API, i'd add your patches as quilt
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le vendredi 17 octobre 2014 à 15:04 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le jeudi 16 octobre 2014 à 14:17 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 15
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le vendredi 17 octobre 2014 à 15:04 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le
Good idea. Done.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le vendredi 17 octobre 2014 à 16:03 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
Alright, node-findit2 is packaged up and ready for review and upload. I
think we should send a note to the FTP masters
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
What should I do?
Since both have same API, i'd add your patches as quilt patches to
node-findit that is already in debian and add a binary package
node-findit2 (symlinking /usr/lib/nodejs/findit to findit2).
Or the
See
https://github.com/andrewrk/node-multiparty/commit/11780f4a6e3e8c6d439639794c795bb5fdaefe97#commitcomment-8163898
According to this, if a package depends on readable-stream 1.1.x, then it
is actually puling in node 0.11 stream API. This means that patching it to
use built-in v0.10.29 stream
I fixed all the bugs in node-findit and submitted the patch to upstream:
https://github.com/substack/node-findit/pull/34
But I am afraid that upstream will not accept my code and I do not have
time to wait. So I have forked findit to findit2 and started using that in
my modules, because it fixes
On Oct 2, 2014 11:49 PM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2014 à 20:57 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
To provide a possible alternative for upstream projects which depend on
browserify, which is a heavy dependency dragging many things along with
it,
I have created
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Thorsten Alteholz
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
I marked your package for accept, but please remove the samples and test
directories from the source tarball (or take care of the minified files
in it).
Thank you. I will do that right away.
By the
To provide a possible alternative for upstream projects which depend on
browserify, which is a heavy dependency dragging many things along with it,
I have created a module called browserify-lite:
https://github.com/andrewrk/browserify-lite
My question, should I package this module for Debian? Or
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
* npm actually discourages npm install -g in favor of
cd thismodule; npm link
cd thatmodule; npm link thismodule
I think npm encourages using `npm install` which would put dependencies in
a local folder called
I am working on packaging jsondiffpatch:
https://github.com/benjamine/jsondiffpatch
This would be:
Source package: jsondiffpatch.js
Node package: node-jsondiffpatch
libjs package: libjs-jsondiffpatch
Node package part is done. The hard part is the libjs package. The
repository ships with
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
i think method 2 of
https://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
applies here. Can you do it, then i'll review and upload ?
All done and ready
OK.
Thorsten,
Please feel free to reject node-errno as well. The upstream repository that
I am ultimately trying to get all the dependencies uploaded for is now
updated to have less dependencies, and among others, node-errno is no
longer required. I am unaware of any other projects that intend
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Moving to pkg-javascript
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2014 à 10:03 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
node-mv
nodemodules-fs
Looks like this is not started yet, so I will start it.
node-connect-static
i know it's easier
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
i think method 2 of
https://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
applies here. Can you do it, then i'll review and upload ?
All done and ready for review.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
node-connect-static
i know it's easier said than done, but can you consider doing a PR to
serve-static with the feature(s) you're missing ?
if not, then yes, bundle it inside groovebasin.
I hadn't considered
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Thorsten Alteholz
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
danse.ogg seems to be created by Kevin MacLeod. Normally he licenses his
stuff under CC BY. Can you please confirm that he is the author and then
add an entry to debian/copyright.
Good catch Thorsten.
Thorsten,
My apologies for not noticing this. Good catch. I will be more careful in
the future.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Thorsten Alteholz
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
Hi Andrew,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
The license in LICENSE does not match the
The proper package for upstream to depend on is uuid:
https://www.npmjs.org/package/uuid
I'd rather patch upstream sources that incorrectly do require('node-uuid')
instead of patching upstream sources (mine included) that correctly do
require('uuid').
As an upstream author I'm happy to switch to using uid-safe. I don't know
what you're referring to with 'mz'.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 5 July 2014 00:16, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Leo Iannacone l
,
debug 1.0.2)
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Updated ready-for-sponsorship list. I'll try to keep this email to one per
day from now on.
node-abstract-leveldown
node-ansi-regex
node-ansi-styles
node-bindings
node-bl
node-connect-static
-index (depends on diacritics)
node-mv (depends on ncp)
node-ncp
node-pend
node-prr
node-strip-ansi (depends on ansi-regex)
node-stylus
node-supports-color
node-tar-stream (depends on bl and end-of-stream)
node-zfill
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Andrew
from #debian-multimedia
fsateler andrewrk: why did you remove the ncp binary?
andrewrk fsateler, it clutters up the global bin namespace, and why would
you ever use it instead of plain old cp ?
andrewrk it seems common for node module authors to include useless
binaries with their libraries
(but it works only for two
objects), see node-through2 for a patch
[error] readable-stream: Only nodejs = 0.10.x is in debian, see
node-multiparty for a patch
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello pkg-javascript-devel team,
I am andrewrk from the pkg
Hello pkg-javascript team,
I have completed many Node.js packages and more are on the way. I'm looking
for someone to sponsor these packages:
node-abstract-leveldown
node-ansi-regex
node-ansi-styles
node-bindings node-leveldown depends on this one
node-bl
node-crc32-stream
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st
wrote:
Hi andrewrk,
Let us know if you need more information.
A couple questions for you:
1. Should I create ITPs for each and every one of the new modules (about
65)?
2. How does one package up modules that contain
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org wrote:
Le vendredi 27 juin 2014 à 21:28 +0200, Emilien Klein a écrit :
2014-06-27 17:34 GMT+02:00 Andrew Kelley superjo...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Emilien Klein
emilien+deb...@klein.st
wrote:
2. How
39 matches
Mail list logo
