Am 29.06.2010 10:15, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
-SHLIBS_VERSION := 4:0.6~svn20100505-1
+SHLIBS_VERSION := 4:0.6~
Above is not a tightening, but a loosing up, I believe.
Technically, yes. I think 4:0.6-1~ would be better.
- Fabian
___
Am 29.06.2010 12:38, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Hmm, just curious (I won't waste time on discussing further): is it
tightening by some other aspect than technical?
It's philosophical, but by removing the svn revision, which points to
a date a few weeks before the release, from the version
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 01:05:18PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 29.06.2010 12:38, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Hmm, just curious (I won't waste time on discussing further): is it
tightening by some other aspect than technical?
It's philosophical, but by removing the svn revision, which
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:05:18 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 29.06.2010 12:38, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Hmm, just curious (I won't waste time on discussing further): is it
tightening by some other aspect than technical?
It's philosophical, but by removing the svn revision, which
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:33:19 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
- Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with
librtmp-dev depending on libgnutls-dev and remove this build-depends
from ffmpeg?
I recommend to use d-shlibs to auto-resolve library dependencies.
AFAIUI, this does
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 01:39:40PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:05:18 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Reinhard, let's do the next upload with 4:0.6-1~ and be done with it.
I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough
for this. If you
Am 29.06.2010 14:26, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
I suggest to then state in changelog that it is loosened, not
tightened, as I believe most users expect the technical aspect when
reading such notes.
I't not even mentioned in debian/changelog and I have just corrected
the shlibs version in git,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:26:10AM -0400, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
Since the 'audacity' upstream does not allow individuals to create their
own Bugzilla accounts, and I doubt that I'll be touching much 'audacity'
code in the near future, I was hoping that one of you on the Debian team
could use
rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rtmpdump_2.2e-4.dsc
rtmpdump_2.2e-4.diff.gz
rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.deb
librtmp-dev_2.2e-4_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
Accepted:
librtmp-dev_2.2e-4_i386.deb
to main/r/rtmpdump/librtmp-dev_2.2e-4_i386.deb
rtmpdump_2.2e-4.diff.gz
to main/r/rtmpdump/rtmpdump_2.2e-4.diff.gz
rtmpdump_2.2e-4.dsc
to main/r/rtmpdump/rtmpdump_2.2e-4.dsc
rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.deb
to main/r/rtmpdump/rtmpdump_2.2e-4_i386.deb
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:15:35PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:33:19 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
- Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with
librtmp-dev depending on libgnutls-dev and remove this build-depends
from ffmpeg?
I recommend to use
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 14:51:46 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:15:35PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:33:19 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
- Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with
librtmp-dev depending on
I just forwarded your patch to audacity-devel with a link to our BTS.
Thanks for all your work, it was a pleasure to hunt this bug. ;)
Hmmm, when I looked at the upstream website and noticed they had a
Bugzilla, I assumed that would be the most appropriate way to share my
info. I didn't
Am 29.06.2010 13:33, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
I recommend to use d-shlibs to auto-resolve library dependencies.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is it true that d-devlibdeps
simply prints out the corresponding -dev packages for the libraries
that the given shared library is linked
Accepted:
jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-6.debian.tar.gz
to
main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-6.debian.tar.gz
jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-6.dsc
to
main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_0.118+svn3796-6.dsc
Accepted:
jackd-defaults_1.dsc
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_1.dsc
jackd-defaults_1.tar.gz
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_1.tar.gz
jackd-firewire_1_all.deb
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-firewire_1_all.deb
jackd_1_all.deb
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd_1_all.deb
Accepted:
jackd-defaults_2.dsc
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_2.dsc
jackd-defaults_2.tar.gz
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_2.tar.gz
jackd-firewire_2_all.deb
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-firewire_2_all.deb
jackd_2_all.deb
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd_2_all.deb
Accepted:
jackd-defaults_3.dsc
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_3.dsc
jackd-defaults_3.tar.gz
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_3.tar.gz
jackd-firewire_3_all.deb
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-firewire_3_all.deb
jackd_3_all.deb
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd_3_all.deb
Accepted:
jackd-defaults_4.dsc
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_4.dsc
jackd-defaults_4.tar.gz
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_4.tar.gz
jackd_4_all.deb
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd_4_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
jackd-defaults_4.dsc - source sound
Accepted:
jackd-defaults_5.dsc
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_5.dsc
jackd-defaults_5.tar.gz
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd-defaults_5.tar.gz
jackd_5_all.deb
to main/j/jackd-defaults/jackd_5_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
jackd-defaults_5.dsc - source sound
Accepted:
jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb
to main/j/jackd2/jackd2-firewire_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb
jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14.debian.tar.gz
to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14.debian.tar.gz
jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14.dsc
to main/j/jackd2/jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14.dsc
jackd2_1.9.5~dfsg-14_i386.deb
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 29.06.2010 13:39, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for
this. If you want to change it, go ahead.
I'll change it, just to make sure...
If the objective
Hi guys!
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
wrote:
What's the motivation for the split? To avoid a dependency on pulseaudio
or on jack respectively?
Yes, that is the reason. I made that split to allow users (who don't
want JACK) to use mhwaveedit without
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 29.06.2010 13:33, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
I recommend to use d-shlibs to auto-resolve library dependencies.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is it true that d-devlibdeps
simply prints out the corresponding -dev
Try vlc -I qt
It's possibly a bad skin or abug in the skin engine
--
Xtophe
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:06:58PM +, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
+Standards-Version: 3.9.0.0
Please use only 3 digits in Standards-Version: 4th digit is reserved for
typos and similar so need not be tracked.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 15:14, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 07:06:58PM +, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org
wrote:
+Standards-Version: 3.9.0.0
Please use only 3 digits in Standards-Version: 4th digit is reserved for
typos and similar so need not be
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 17:19, Jonas Smedegaard jo...@jones.dk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:44:31PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:34:05PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:00, Jonas Smedegaard jo...@jones.dk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:44:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 29.06.2010 13:39, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for
this. If you want to change it,
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:08, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:44:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
Am 29.06.2010 13:39, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I don't have a strong opinion
audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
audacity_1.3.12-4.dsc
audacity_1.3.12-4.debian.tar.bz2
audacity_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb
audacity-data_1.3.12-4_all.deb
audacity-dbg_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
audacity-data_1.3.12-4_all.deb
to main/a/audacity/audacity-data_1.3.12-4_all.deb
audacity-dbg_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb
to main/a/audacity/audacity-dbg_1.3.12-4_amd64.deb
audacity_1.3.12-4.debian.tar.bz2
to main/a/audacity/audacity_1.3.12-4.debian.tar.bz2
audacity_1.3.12-4.dsc
to
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:02:28 +
with message-id e1otkl2-ld...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#584605: fixed in audacity 1.3.12-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #584605,
regarding audacity: segfault with multiple ALSA devices
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 20:03, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 03:34:18PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 17:19, Jonas Smedegaard jo...@jones.dk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:44:31PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:31:39PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 20:03, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 03:34:18PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 17:19, Jonas Smedegaard jo...@jones.dk
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at
I'm sorry if I'm being annoying with this thing, but I'm trying to
really understand the issue here.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 20:49, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
We only have detailed copyright information for the few scripts we
already have documented. What do you propose to do?
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 23:16:52 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:08, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:44:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com
wrote:
Am 29.06.2010
37 matches
Mail list logo
