Re: libav_0.6.2-1_i386.changes is NEW
Hi Reinhard, thanks for the insightful summary! In related news, I have read that CrystalHD support has now been merged into ffmpeg and mplayer: http://intr.overt.org/blog/?p=125 If this has also already been done in libav, then you really need to advertise yourself a bit more. ;) - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
Am 24.03.2011 19:46, schrieb Faheem Mitha: I backported ffmpeg 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable to squeeze. On running it, I see the following warning This requires quite a few steps. Could you please elaborate what exactly you did? Do you still have other or older ffmpeg library packages installed (i.e. what gives 'dpkg -l libav\*')? - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: libav_0.6.2-1_i386.changes is NEW
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 09:06:46 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote: Hi Reinhard, thanks for the insightful summary! BTW, the Libav announcement is now online: http://libav.org/about.html In related news, I have read that CrystalHD support has now been merged into ffmpeg and mplayer: http://intr.overt.org/blog/?p=125 If this has also already been done in libav, then you really need to advertise yourself a bit more. ;) Well, I don't have the hardware to test the patch, but I'll make sure that we'll have it for Libav 0.7. Currently the patch is pending AFAIUI. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619885: ITP: vo-aacenc -- Free AAC encoder
Package: wnpp Owner: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Severity: wishlist * Package name: vo-aacenc Version : 0.1.0-rc1 Upstream Author : Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st * URL or Web page : http://opencore-amr.git.sourceforge.net/ * License : Apache License 2.0 Description : Free AAC encoder I received the following message from Martin: From: Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st Subject: vo-aacenc, vo-amrwbenc prerelease To: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de, Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:24:15 +0300 (EEST) Hi, As discussed on irc earlier, I've added the vo-aacenc and vo-amrwbenc libraries into the opencore-amr project on sourceforge, http://opencore-amr.git.sourceforge.net/. I've got a prerelease of the libraries up on http://albin.abo.fi/~mstorsjo/vo-aacenc-0.1.0-rc1.tar.gz and http://albin.abo.fi/~mstorsjo/vo-amrwbenc-0.1.0-rc1.tar.gz. I'd appreciate if you'd give it a look and let me know if there's any issues with packaging these. If everything goes well, I'll release this version soon and announce them. The libraries include small encoding apps for testing the basic library functionality, but they don't need to be included in any .deb at least, I'd say. Patches for using them from libav are available at https://github.com/mstorsjo/ffmpeg. // Martin Martin, Andres, or any other pkg-multimedia team member, would you be willing to co-maintain this package with me? Same question for vo-amrwbenc, which ITP will be following shortly. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
lv2core_4.0-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Accepted: lv2core_4.0-2.debian.tar.gz to main/l/lv2core/lv2core_4.0-2.debian.tar.gz lv2core_4.0-2.dsc to main/l/lv2core/lv2core_4.0-2.dsc lv2core_4.0-2_amd64.deb to main/l/lv2core/lv2core_4.0-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: lv2core_4.0-2.dsc - source sound lv2core_4.0-2_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
Am 28.03.2011 11:10, schrieb Faheem Mitha: ii libavcodec0d 0.cvs20060823-8 ffmpeg codec library rc libavcodec51 3:20080706-0.3lenny2 library to encode decode rc libavcodeccvs51 3:20070329-0.0etch1 library to encode decode ii libavformat0d 0.cvs20060823-8 ffmpeg file format library rc libavformatcvs51 3:20070329-0.0etch1 ffmpeg file format library ii libavutil49 4:0.5.2-6 ffmpeg utility library rc libavutilcvs49 3:20070329-0.0etch1 avutil shared libraries As a first step, please remove the packages in the lines starting with ii above. For the others, I think rc means removed but not purged, but I am not sure. Purging them won't hurt, though. Please do also check the list for libswscale\* and libpostproc\*. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 24.03.2011 19:46, schrieb Faheem Mitha: I backported ffmpeg 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable to squeeze. On running it, I see the following warning This requires quite a few steps. Could you please elaborate what exactly you did? Do you still have other or older ffmpeg library packages installed (i.e. what gives 'dpkg -l libav\*')? Forgetting about the backport, this is still reproducible if I just install packages directly from unstable, which is what I currently have installed. Squeeze and unstable are apparently close enough that this does not pull in any additional dependencies other than the packages from the ffmpeg source package. Pretty much everything below with version number is 4:0.6.1-5 is from unstable, I think. Of course, it is entirely possible I screwed up when switching from my locally compiled packages to the packages in unstable. If you want me to give you information about my backport of the ffmpeg packages I built from the unstable ffmpeg source, I'd have to do it over, because I don't remember the details, but it was comparatively straightforward. Can you tell me if this problem shows up on unstable? If not, it is just a problem at my end, and, frankly I'd expect you to close this immediately. :-) Output given below. # dpkg -l libav\* Question: is there an easy way to obtain a list like below, but with the origin of the packages? Regards, Faheem Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++--- ii libavahi-client-dev 0.6.27-2+squeeze1 Development files for the Avahi client library ii libavahi-client3 0.6.27-2+squeeze1 Avahi client library ii libavahi-common-data 0.6.27-2+squeeze1 Avahi common data files ii libavahi-common-dev 0.6.27-2+squeeze1 Development files for the Avahi common library ii libavahi-common3 0.6.27-2+squeeze1 Avahi common library ii libavahi-compat-libdnssd10.6.27-2+squeeze1 Avahi Apple Bonjour compatibility library un libavahi-core3 none (no description available) rc libavahi-core5 0.6.23-3lenny2 Avahi's embeddable mDNS/DNS-SD library ii libavahi-core7 0.6.27-2+squeeze1 Avahi's embeddable mDNS/DNS-SD library ii libavahi-glib1 0.6.27-2+squeeze1 Avahi glib integration library ii libavahi-gobject00.6.27-2+squeeze1 Avahi GObject library ii libavahi-qt3-1 0.6.27-2+squeeze1 Avahi Qt 3 integration library ii libavalon-framework-java 4.2.0-7 Common framework for Java server applications un libavalon-framework-java-doc none (no description available) ii libavc1394-0 0.5.3-1+b2 control IEEE 1394 audio/video devices ii libavcodec-dev 4:0.6.1-5 Development files for libavcodec un libavcodec-extra-52 none (no description available) un libavcodec-unstripped-51 none (no description available) ii libavcodec0d 0.cvs20060823-8 ffmpeg codec library rc libavcodec51 3:20080706-0.3lenny2 library to encode decode multimedia streams - runtime files ii libavcodec52 4:0.6.1-5 FFmpeg codec library rc libavcodeccvs51 3:20070329-0.0etch1 library to encode decode multimedia streams - runtime files un libavcore0 none (no description available) un libavdevice-dev none (no description available) un libavdevice-extra-52 none (no description available) ii libavdevice524:0.6.1-5 FFmpeg device handling library un libavfilter-dev none (no description available) un libavfilter-extra-1
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 28.03.2011 11:10, schrieb Faheem Mitha: ii libavcodec0d 0.cvs20060823-8 ffmpeg codec library rc libavcodec51 3:20080706-0.3lenny2 library to encode decode rc libavcodeccvs51 3:20070329-0.0etch1 library to encode decode ii libavformat0d 0.cvs20060823-8 ffmpeg file format library rc libavformatcvs51 3:20070329-0.0etch1 ffmpeg file format library ii libavutil49 4:0.5.2-6 ffmpeg utility library rc libavutilcvs49 3:20070329-0.0etch1 avutil shared libraries As a first step, please remove the packages in the lines starting with ii above. For the others, I think rc means removed but not purged, but I am not sure. That is correct. Purging them won't hurt, though. Removing the packages listed above does not change the WARNING: library configuration mismatch Please do also check the list for libswscale\* and libpostproc\*. See below. You didn't say whether this problem is reproducible in stable. Faheem # dpkg -l libswscale\* ||/ Name Version Description +++--- un libswscale-dev none (no description available) un libswscale-extra-0 none (no description available) ii libswscale0 4:0.6.1-5 FFmpeg video scaling library # dpkg -l libpostproc\* ||/ Name Version Description +++--- un libpostproc-dev none (no description available) un libpostproc-extra-51 none (no description available) un libpostproc0 none (no description available) ii libpostproc0d0.cvs20060823-8 ffmpeg video postprocessing library ii libpostproc514:0.6.1-5 FFmpeg video postprocessing library rc libpostproccvs51 3:20070329-0.0etch1 postproc shared libraries ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619891: ITP: vo-amrwbenc -- AMR encoder
Package: wnpp Owner: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de Severity: wishlist * Package name: vo-amrwbenc Version : 0.1.0-rc1 Upstream Author : Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st * URL or Web page : http://opencore-amr.git.sourceforge.net/ * License : Apache License 2.0 Description : VisualOn AMR-WB encoder library This library contains an encoder implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate Wideband (AMR-WB) audio codec. The library is based on a codec implementation by VisualOn, part of the Stagefright framework from the Google Android project. Similar to the sister ITP (Debian Bug #619885) I solicit for co-maintainers in the pkg-multimedia team for this package. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
Am 28.03.2011 11:39, schrieb Faheem Mitha: Removing the packages listed above does not change the WARNING: library configuration mismatch Which version of the ffmpeg frontend do you use? Does this error message only appear when you run the ffmpeg binary? Do you run the one installed on the system or from your build tree? See below. You didn't say whether this problem is reproducible in stable. I don't know. I do not have Debian stable running anywhere and I would not install software from unstable as a plain drop-in replacement, either. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:13:49 (CEST), Faheem Mitha wrote: On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:39:06 (CEST), Faheem Mitha wrote: WARNING: library configuration mismatch Please note that this is just a warning. It also happens in ubuntu when one installs the libavcodec-extra-52 package. Hmm. I'm still getting the error here, but libavcodec-extra-52 is not installed. That's because there is no libavcodec-extra-52 package in Debian (yet). TBH, I'm considering applying a distro patch that just disables this error message, as its not much of use for Debian and Ubuntu. According to the ffmpeg developers, this reflects a mismatch of versions. Assuming they are correct, and this is not just blowing smoke, then my feeling is that this is caused by insufficiently tight package dependencies, so my suggestion would be to track it down, though this would probably be a comparatively difficult and thankless task even if successful. Well, that's right, but I still strongly assume it's a local configuration error and not a serious problem in the package itself. It is unfortunate that the warning gives no real indication of where the problem lies. I think the error message is perfectly clear. Espc. if you read the code around it. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
Am 28.03.2011 12:13, schrieb Faheem Mitha: According to the ffmpeg developers, this reflects a mismatch of versions. Assuming they are correct, and this is not just blowing smoke, then my feeling is that this is caused by insufficiently tight package dependencies, so my suggestion would be to track it down, though this would probably be a comparatively difficult and thankless task even if successful. This warning does not occur on a clean Debian unstable system, so it is clearly caused by a version mismatch on your system. If you have already removed all obsolete library packages that are not version 4:0.6.1-5, as I told you, I do not have any idea what else could cause this warning. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:25:23 (CEST), Faheem Mitha wrote: On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 28.03.2011 12:13, schrieb Faheem Mitha: According to the ffmpeg developers, this reflects a mismatch of versions. Assuming they are correct, and this is not just blowing smoke, then my feeling is that this is caused by insufficiently tight package dependencies, so my suggestion would be to track it down, though this would probably be a comparatively difficult and thankless task even if successful. This warning does not occur on a clean Debian unstable system, so it is clearly caused by a version mismatch on your system. If you have already removed all obsolete library packages that are not version 4:0.6.1-5, as I told you, I do not have any idea what else could cause this warning. Yes, I've removed all packages you told me to remove. In that case, feel free to close the bug. I still think the version mismatch should not occur with sufficiently tight dependencies, but I also don't think it would be time usefully spent to try to track it down. Sorry for the noise. I'd prefer to use this bug for tracking my proposed change to disable the warning and close it when the package with this change enters Debian automatically. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 28.03.2011 12:13, schrieb Faheem Mitha: According to the ffmpeg developers, this reflects a mismatch of versions. Assuming they are correct, and this is not just blowing smoke, then my feeling is that this is caused by insufficiently tight package dependencies, so my suggestion would be to track it down, though this would probably be a comparatively difficult and thankless task even if successful. This warning does not occur on a clean Debian unstable system, so it is clearly caused by a version mismatch on your system. If you have already removed all obsolete library packages that are not version 4:0.6.1-5, as I told you, I do not have any idea what else could cause this warning. Yes, I've removed all packages you told me to remove. In that case, feel free to close the bug. I still think the version mismatch should not occur with sufficiently tight dependencies, but I also don't think it would be time usefully spent to try to track it down. Sorry for the noise. Regards, Faheem ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I'd prefer to use this bug for tracking my proposed change to disable the warning and close it when the package with this change enters Debian automatically. Well, as long as you're sure disabling the bug won't mask real problems. How do the ffmpeg developers feel about it? Regards, Faheem ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:39:06 (CEST), Faheem Mitha wrote: WARNING: library configuration mismatch Please note that this is just a warning. It also happens in ubuntu when one installs the libavcodec-extra-52 package. TBH, I'm considering applying a distro patch that just disables this error message, as its not much of use for Debian and Ubuntu. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
Am 28.03.2011 12:39, schrieb Faheem Mitha: Well, as long as you're sure disabling the bug won't mask real problems. How do the ffmpeg developers feel about it? I still don't understand how this warning could occur on your system in the first place if all libraries are installed from the same source, i.e. unstable. You really didn't rebuild anything yourself? ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
Am 28.03.2011 12:53, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: I still don't understand how this warning could occur on your system in the first place if all libraries are installed from the same source, i.e. unstable. You really didn't rebuild anything yourself? Sorry, I was wrong! I see this in unstable as well, I just didn't find the warning itself in the very verbose output of the library configurations (mis-interpreted this as a normal output). It seems the culprit is that the shared library build is configured with additional --disable-ffmpeg --disable-ffplay flags, whereas the ffmpeg frontend obviously isn't. These two flags are common to all arch-optimized library builds, so it is quite expected that the frontend and the shared library (that the dynamic linker chose to link against) differ in their configuration. It is, however, IMHO pointless to explicitely point this fact out whenever the frontend is run, so I agree with Reinhard that this feature should be disabled on systems which allow for combinations of regular frontend and optimized shared libraries. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619235: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: mixxx |1.7.2-2 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 --- Reason --- ROM; Unsupported architectures -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package was superseded by another one. The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 619...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/619235 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619653: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: creox | 0.2.2rc2really0.2.2rc2-1 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc creox | 0.2.2rc2really0.2.2rc2-1+b1 | hurd-i386 --- Reason --- RoQA; kde3-cruft -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 619...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/619653 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 28.03.2011 12:53, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: I still don't understand how this warning could occur on your system in the first place if all libraries are installed from the same source, i.e. unstable. You really didn't rebuild anything yourself? Sorry, I was wrong! I see this in unstable as well, I just didn't find the warning itself in the very verbose output of the library configurations (mis-interpreted this as a normal output). That very verbose output is part of the warning. :-) It seems the culprit is that the shared library build is configured with additional --disable-ffmpeg --disable-ffplay flags, whereas the ffmpeg frontend obviously isn't. These two flags are common to all arch-optimized library builds, so it is quite expected that the frontend and the shared library (that the dynamic linker chose to link against) differ in their configuration. It is, however, IMHO pointless to explicitely point this fact out whenever the frontend is run, so I agree with Reinhard that this feature should be disabled on systems which allow for combinations of regular frontend and optimized shared libraries. Hmm. Did you confirm this was the problem by changing the config flags? If so, perhaps point out to the ffmpeg people that their warning is (at least in some cases) a red herring (alternatively, produces a false positive), and ask if it could be made more intelligent. I am sorry I did not have an unstable installation handy, as then I could have provided a better bug report. Maybe I'll do a virtualbox unstable installation, or make an unstable chroot or upgrade one of my vserver installations. Regards. Faheem ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
Am 28.03.2011 13:18, schrieb Faheem Mitha: That very verbose output is part of the warning. :-) Yes, but you omitted it from your initial mail, which didn't make it easier to find. ;) Hmm. Did you confirm this was the problem by changing the config flags? Yes, the culprit is that the ffmpeg frontend and the optimized shared libraries are build with different configuration flags, which is quite reasonable and obvious in this case. If so, perhaps point out to the ffmpeg people that their warning is (at least in some cases) a red herring (alternatively, produces a false positive), and ask if it could be made more intelligent. The warning is only printed if the configurations differ. It does not tell anything different, nor does it try to guess or suggest what may be the cause of this. so again, I agree with siretart that on systems that support differently configured shared libraries to work with the same backend, this warning should be disabled, because it is a red herring and does not add anything insightful. - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 28.03.2011 13:18, schrieb Faheem Mitha: That very verbose output is part of the warning. :-) Yes, but you omitted it from your initial mail, which didn't make it easier to find. ;) No I didn't. Look again. It is all there. I wouldn't truncate such a warning. I said I backported ffmpeg 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable to squeeze. On running it, I see the following warning WARNING: library configuration mismatch inter alia. The complete output of ffmpeg is given below The complete output then follows. :-) Hmm. Did you confirm this was the problem by changing the config flags? Yes, the culprit is that the ffmpeg frontend and the optimized shared libraries are build with different configuration flags, which is quite reasonable and obvious in this case. If so, perhaps point out to the ffmpeg people that their warning is (at least in some cases) a red herring (alternatively, produces a false positive), and ask if it could be made more intelligent. The warning is only printed if the configurations differ. It does not tell anything different, nor does it try to guess or suggest what may be the cause of this. so again, I agree with siretart that on systems that support differently configured shared libraries to work with the same backend, this warning should be disabled, because it is a red herring and does not add anything insightful. Ok. So pointing this out to the ffmpeg people is a waste of time, in your opinion? Regards, Faheem ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 13:54:12 (CEST), Faheem Mitha wrote: If so, perhaps point out to the ffmpeg people that their warning is (at least in some cases) a red herring (alternatively, produces a false positive), and ask if it could be made more intelligent. The warning is only printed if the configurations differ. It does not tell anything different, nor does it try to guess or suggest what may be the cause of this. so again, I agree with siretart that on systems that support differently configured shared libraries to work with the same backend, this warning should be disabled, because it is a red herring and does not add anything insightful. Ok. So pointing this out to the ffmpeg people is a waste of time, in your opinion? If it assures you, I'm Upstream Release Manager for both Libav and FFmpeg :-) I'm happy that Fabian agrees with me. I'll see if I can propose some configure switch for 0.7, but TBH, the trick with building the libraries in different flavors is a very Debian specific trick that cannot be upstreamed easily. Nor am I convinced that this should go upstream. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
Am 28.03.2011 13:54, schrieb Faheem Mitha: No I didn't. Look again. It is all there. I wouldn't truncate such a warning. I said My fault, sorry. I am tired today. ;) Ok. So pointing this out to the ffmpeg people is a waste of time, in your opinion? siretart is already one of the ffmpeg (i.e. libav) people. :) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#619530: ffmpeg: backport of 4:0.6.1-5 from unstable produces WARNING: library configuration mismatch
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 13:54:12 (CEST), Faheem Mitha wrote: If so, perhaps point out to the ffmpeg people that their warning is (at least in some cases) a red herring (alternatively, produces a false positive), and ask if it could be made more intelligent. The warning is only printed if the configurations differ. It does not tell anything different, nor does it try to guess or suggest what may be the cause of this. so again, I agree with siretart that on systems that support differently configured shared libraries to work with the same backend, this warning should be disabled, because it is a red herring and does not add anything insightful. Ok. So pointing this out to the ffmpeg people is a waste of time, in your opinion? If it assures you, I'm Upstream Release Manager for both Libav and FFmpeg :-) Ok, no offense intended. I just feel more comfortable with upstream's blessing. Thank you and thank you to Fabian for your patience with this bug report. I'm happy that Fabian agrees with me. I'll see if I can propose some configure switch for 0.7, but TBH, the trick with building the libraries in different flavors is a very Debian specific trick that cannot be upstreamed easily. Nor am I convinced that this should go upstream. Ok. Regards, Faheem ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of lv2core_4.0-3_amd64.changes
lv2core_4.0-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lv2core_4.0-3.dsc lv2core_4.0-3.debian.tar.gz lv2core_4.0-3_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
lv2core_4.0-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Accepted: lv2core_4.0-3.debian.tar.gz to main/l/lv2core/lv2core_4.0-3.debian.tar.gz lv2core_4.0-3.dsc to main/l/lv2core/lv2core_4.0-3.dsc lv2core_4.0-3_amd64.deb to main/l/lv2core/lv2core_4.0-3_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: lv2core_4.0-3.dsc - source sound lv2core_4.0-3_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#602050: ITP: supercollider -- A real time audio synthesis programming language
2011/3/28 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org: I've pushed a commit to that branch that apparently solves the issue. Great, works here, thanks. Someone else started the supercollider packaging (on ubuntu) and he had reasons for going with --install-sandbox. He is bcc'ed here - Artem please send me (or deb-mm) a mail if you have objections. I'll merge that branch into master, and send the change upstream (for inclusion in 3.4.2). Remember to include the change in master as a patch instead of directly modifying SConstruct! Ping? Thanks for the nudge - now committed. Any feedback welcome - this was the first time I used quilt properly Dan ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of lv2core_4.0-4_amd64.changes
lv2core_4.0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lv2core_4.0-4.dsc lv2core_4.0-4.debian.tar.gz lv2core_4.0-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Problem with commit-mailing_list?
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote: the repository was misconfigured, i.e., there was no /git/pkg-multimedia/lv2core.git/hooks/post-receive script. I just fixed it for you by copying from libav.git The problem has come back, could anyone help me in solving it? -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Problem with commit-mailing_list?
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 06:19:26PM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
the repository was misconfigured, i.e., there was no
/git/pkg-multimedia/lv2core.git/hooks/post-receive script. I just fixed
it for you by copying from libav.git
The problem has come back, could anyone help me in solving it?
The post-receive hook was again missing.
Just copied it from the ecasound repo, should work now.
Cheers
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;inidehG ordnasselA;eg;say~~reverse'
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
lv2core_4.0-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
Accepted: lv2core_4.0-4.debian.tar.gz to main/l/lv2core/lv2core_4.0-4.debian.tar.gz lv2core_4.0-4.dsc to main/l/lv2core/lv2core_4.0-4.dsc lv2core_4.0-4_amd64.deb to main/l/lv2core/lv2core_4.0-4_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: lv2core_4.0-4.dsc - source sound lv2core_4.0-4_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Request for an open dialog between projects
Hi, I recently noticed the link in the Debian Multimedia Wiki to AV Linux which I maintain. It is no secret that the excellent work you guys do here is a huge factor in the growing acceptance of the project. I have also noted a couple of names of maintainers here are also members of the AV Linux forum. To give an idea of the relative scope, AV Linux ISO's see about 10,000 accesses per month, of course this does not indicate actual successful downloads or end users it simply indicates there is measurable interest in the project. About 80% of the packages in AV Linux are of pkg-multimedia origin. The remaining packaging is done by me and includes some commercial Linux Audio software demos that would not meet Debian's criteria. I can guess there may be some question as to why I don't just join pkg-multimedia for the other packaging I do, and the simple answer is my packaging is narrowly focused and would not meet all Debian standards and more importantly maintaining a distro by myself has become all I can currently handle and then some! The point of all this background is to pose a question about maintaining pkg-multimedia packages in AV Linux. My custom packages in AV Linux all have an 'avlinux' suffix appended to them to differentiate them from your packages, these packages of course I maintain myself. When users have an issue with one of your packages I find it a little 'politically' awkward to handle. I would very much like an open dialog with pkg-multimedia so we can have a good working relationship and I would like to be able to openly send users and bug reports that pertain to you without masking the true origin of where these reports are coming from. Although I am an arms length project that may politically differ from Debian ideals I think we have far more in common than these minor differences. I know there is discussion of reviving demudi and I also know AV Linux would not be a candidate to evolve or adapt into demudi however currently AV Linux is the only actively maintained Debian non-Ubuntu multimedia distro out there. I make it a priority with every release to promote and give pkg-multimedia the attribution you most certainly deserve. I am also willing to allocate donated funds upstream, for instance to assist with the proposed Squeeze backports or other purposes, I certainly do not expect this to be a one-sided relationship. To summarize I don't expect you to endorse or assist AV Linux only to be open to maintaining and fixing the pkg-multimedia content within it. Thanks for taking to time to read and consider this, whatever you may decide I am grateful for all your efforts and truly and sincerely hope to increase our collaborative efforts. Best Regards, Glen MacArthur - AV Linux maintainer. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
E.U driving licence in only 5 days! Car, bike, trailer, HGV, you pick the category.
E.U driving licence in only 5 days! Car, bike, trailer, HGV, you pick the category. BEAT THE SYSTEM WITH THEIR OWN RULES. Are you going to be disqualified? Medical renewal coming up? Have you failed your test because of nerves on the day. Have you been convicted of traffic offences where the judge has unfairly taken your licence away. Have you reached the age when you have to retake your test. Do you want to have more categories on your licence, ride a motorcycle for example or become a truck driver? This service is for any resident or non-resident of the U.K or E.U. to obtain a full driving licence without any tests. So no matter what country you are resident or citizen of, we can help. Even if you live outside of the U.K or E.U! Once you have a driving licence through us, you can exchange it in your OWN country for a local licence. E.U. driving licences are accepted 'as is' worldwide for driving and exchange. It does not matter what nationality you are! WWW.DLTRANSFER.COM Yours Sincerely, DLTransfer Team Paralegal Driving Exchange Service ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
E.U driving licence in only 5 days! Car, bike, trailer, HGV, you pick the category.
E.U driving licence in only 5 days! Car, bike, trailer, HGV, you pick the category. BEAT THE SYSTEM WITH THEIR OWN RULES. Are you going to be disqualified? Medical renewal coming up? Have you failed your test because of nerves on the day. Have you been convicted of traffic offences where the judge has unfairly taken your licence away. Have you reached the age when you have to retake your test. Do you want to have more categories on your licence, ride a motorcycle for example or become a truck driver? This service is for any resident or non-resident of the U.K or E.U. to obtain a full driving licence without any tests. So no matter what country you are resident or citizen of, we can help. Even if you live outside of the U.K or E.U! Once you have a driving licence through us, you can exchange it in your OWN country for a local licence. E.U. driving licences are accepted 'as is' worldwide for driving and exchange. It does not matter what nationality you are! WWW.DLTRANSFER.COM Yours Sincerely, DLTransfer Team Paralegal Driving Exchange Service ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
