Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-23 Thread Fabian Greffrath

Am 22.11.2010 20:06, schrieb Adrian Knoth:

Anyway, there's still the code, and we can at least try and compile on
our own. Like chromium-browser or openoffice: Debian provides
self-compiled versions, but the user is always free to pick up the
upstream provided one.


Well, I consider it one of the basic principles of FLOSS in general 
and especially Debian that software packages are recompiled from their 
source code. If the source is not available, the software could hardly 
be called free and if the source does not compile, there are bugs 
either in the software itself or in Debian's toolchain that need to be 
fixed.


I just wanted to get this statements right, although I am sure you all 
knew this already. ;)


 - Fabian

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread Fabian Greffrath

Dear Glen,

Am 21.11.2010 14:23, schrieb i...@bandshed.net:

I'm not sure if libraw1394 falls under your jurisdiction or not but the


No, it does not: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libr/libraw1394.html


latest release (November 1) supports daisy chaining multiple firewire


A bug requesting upgrading to the latest upstream version has already 
been filed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602215



devices on the new firewire stack when used with Kernel 2.6.36. Testing by
AV Linux users has confirmed this.


Squeeze will ship with linux 2.6.32.


Note daisy chaining was previously only possible with the legacy firewire
stack.

I've seen some Squeeze exception requests for this that have been flatly
denied (as Squeeze for multimedia slides hopelessly further into


Sure, these changes are not targeted at the kernel considered for 
squeeze release anyway and some changes do simply come too late...



obsolescence) but there seems to be no updates to libraw1394 2.0.6


Thanks for declaring our team effort for multimedia support in Squeeze 
obsolete!



available in Sid or experimental either. Use of the new stack makes ffado
supported Audio devices plug and play, the addition of 2.0.6 would further
that to multiple firewire devices being plug and play.

Thought I'd pass that along.


Thanks anyway.

 - Fabian

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread rosea grammostola
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 2:23 PM, i...@bandshed.net wrote:

 Hi

 I'm not sure if libraw1394 falls under your jurisdiction or not but the
 latest release (November 1) supports daisy chaining multiple firewire
 devices on the new firewire stack when used with Kernel 2.6.36. Testing by
 AV Linux users has confirmed this.

 Note daisy chaining was previously only possible with the legacy firewire
 stack.

 I've seen some Squeeze exception requests for this that have been flatly
 denied (as Squeeze for multimedia slides hopelessly further into
 obsolescence)



Sure,still lots to improve, but there are some good developments imho and
some people work hard to make it as good as possible. You can ask yourself
what you're doing to improve the state of multimedia in Debian and/ or
squeeze...

Best regards,

\r
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:12:11PM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote:

  I've seen some Squeeze exception requests for this that have been flatly
  denied (as Squeeze for multimedia slides hopelessly further into
  obsolescence)
 
 Sure, still lots to improve, but there are some good developments imho and
 some people work hard to make it as good as possible. You can ask yourself
 what you're doing to improve the state of multimedia in Debian and/ or
 squeeze...


Honestely? I think i...@bandshed is right, at least to some degree. Back
at DC10, Debian unstable was more up-to-date than Ubuntu 10.04. With
Ubuntu 10.10 released, they're now on par, and within some months,
Squeeze will be more or less outdated.

We already knew this back in July: multimedia upstream's pace is so much
faster than Debian's release cycle that we need to come up with a better
solution. CUT (constantly usable testing) seemed to be such an option,
though I've never heard about it again.

I have the very same problem: there are a couple of important fixes in
the FFADO firewire drivers, but RT denied their inclusion. It's somewhat
frustrating to know that we'll ship with broken software, but that's the
game.

I was close to entirely ignoring this release thing and start uploading
updated packages to unstable again, but then decided to obey the
project's goal and stick to the idea of a freeze.

From a pro-audio point of view, we would need jack-session, updated
ffado, updated calf plugins and probably some more. No chance to get
this into Squeeze, and even if so, within a few weeks, even more stuff
will show up that'd be nice to be included.

I'm inclined to say, at least for my packages, they've reached a state
that's safe to ship with Squeeze. Not updating unstable atm is a
conservative thing just in case we do really need another upload for
Squeeze. Otherwise, it'd now be time to upload new stuff again. Strictly
speaking, the freeze is about testing, not about unstable. ;) SCNR

So for the very group of audio producers, Squeeze (and unstable) is
already outdated, that's where i...@bandshed is right. OTOH, this
statement doesn't necessarily holds true for all the other packages we
maintain, e.g., video players.


Just my €0.02

-- 
mail: a...@thur.de  http://adi.thur.de  PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

USER, n.: The word computer professionals use when they mean idiot.

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread info
Fabian,

Please don't misunderstand, Your (the pkg-multimedia team's) work here is
nothing short of incredible during the past Squeeze development phase, I
as a user/3rd party distributor am certainly aware of that as much as
anyone else, I also know that the freeze is beyond the control of
pkg-multimedia and I know the 'Debian' way of doing things. Because SO
much has been accomplished it is frustrating to see Squeeze unreleased
still missing key things like JACK Session and latest ffado, which will
seriously hamper efforts for keen multimedia users to move forward with
Ardour 3 and other important developments which will more than likely
occur before Squeeze is even released.

My complaint was never about your work, it was a frustrated comment on the
unfortunate timing of the freeze in cutting off your work before a more
sustainable plateau was reached. If you or any of the team percieved my
comments to be otherwise I apologize and hope this clarifies my intent.

-GLEN


 Dear Glen,

 Am 21.11.2010 14:23, schrieb i...@bandshed.net:
 I'm not sure if libraw1394 falls under your jurisdiction or not but the

 No, it does not: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libr/libraw1394.html

 latest release (November 1) supports daisy chaining multiple firewire

 A bug requesting upgrading to the latest upstream version has already
 been filed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602215

 devices on the new firewire stack when used with Kernel 2.6.36. Testing
 by
 AV Linux users has confirmed this.

 Squeeze will ship with linux 2.6.32.

 Note daisy chaining was previously only possible with the legacy
 firewire
 stack.

 I've seen some Squeeze exception requests for this that have been flatly
 denied (as Squeeze for multimedia slides hopelessly further into

 Sure, these changes are not targeted at the kernel considered for
 squeeze release anyway and some changes do simply come too late...

 obsolescence) but there seems to be no updates to libraw1394 2.0.6

 Thanks for declaring our team effort for multimedia support in Squeeze
 obsolete!

 available in Sid or experimental either. Use of the new stack makes
 ffado
 supported Audio devices plug and play, the addition of 2.0.6 would
 further
 that to multiple firewire devices being plug and play.

 Thought I'd pass that along.

 Thanks anyway.

   - Fabian




___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:55:10 (CET), Adrian Knoth wrote:

 So for the very group of audio producers, Squeeze (and unstable) is
 already outdated, that's where i...@bandshed is right. OTOH, this
 statement doesn't necessarily holds true for all the other packages we
 maintain, e.g., video players.

Is experimental up-to-date?

If yes, would it be worth (and more importantly, do we have a volunteer)
to copy them to a 'special Add-on archive' so that users can easily
upgrade to them and get 'better' packages than currently in the archive?

This 'special Add-on archive' could be:
 a) squeeze-backports
 b) debimedia
 c) some extra archive (on alioth or somewhere else)


-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:21:53PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

  So for the very group of audio producers, Squeeze (and unstable) is
  already outdated
 Is experimental up-to-date?

Not in my case, mostly because as a DM I cannot upload to experimental
without prior DD upload. At least I think so. ;)

But if need be, I could prepare updated packages for experimental.

I could also imagine to keep testing the way it is now and directly
upload to unstable, especially wrt your idea:

 to copy them to a 'special Add-on archive' so that users can easily
 upgrade to them and get 'better' packages than currently in the archive?
 
 This 'special Add-on archive' could be:
  a) squeeze-backports

I like this idea for the packages I maintain: jackd1, jackd2 and ffado
can easily be provided as backports.

Of course, ffmpeg is a little bit different. ;)


Cheers

-- 
mail: a...@thur.de  http://adi.thur.de  PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:58:42PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:21:53PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

 So for the very group of audio producers, Squeeze (and unstable) is 
 already outdated

Is experimental up-to-date?


Not in my case, mostly because as a DM I cannot upload to experimental 
without prior DD upload. At least I think so. ;)


I believe you can, by same rules as to unstable (e.g. no change in names 
of binary packages).




But if need be, I could prepare updated packages for experimental.


That you can for sure :-D


I could also imagine to keep testing the way it is now and directly 
upload to unstable, especially wrt your idea:


As I mentioned earlier today in another thread, unstable should be kept 
available as a take-off ramp for bugfixes targeted testing and thus 
Squeeze.


Yes, the freeze period is a frustrating time for us all, but if ignoring 
it passively (e.g. not participating in bug squashing parties) or 
actively (e.g. not respecting the unstable→testing→stable pipeline) the 
freeze will be *longer*.


Ongoing maintainance of the packaging in Git does not disturb the 
release process, and uploads to experimental does not either, so both 
are great ways to make the frustrating freeze period bearable.



 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:39:37PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

  So for the very group of audio producers, Squeeze (and unstable) is 
  already outdated
 Is experimental up-to-date?

 Not in my case, mostly because as a DM I cannot upload to experimental  
 without prior DD upload. At least I think so. ;)
 I believe you can, by same rules as to unstable (e.g. no change in names  
 of binary packages).

Oh, didn't know that. You were right, I just uploaded kmidimon and ffado
to experimental.

I'll go on with both, jackd1 and jackd2, so we at least have
jack-session and jackd suspend/resume.

It's then possible to package Ardour3 for experimental, and I think I
will do once alpha1 will be released.


Cheers

-- 
mail: a...@thur.de  http://adi.thur.de  PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread rosea.grammostola

On 11/22/2010 06:33 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote:


It's then possible to package Ardour3 for experimental, and I think I
will do once alpha1 will be released.
   


Alpha software... do you also provide a 'debug' package for it?

\r

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
 Od: Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de

 We already knew this back in July: multimedia upstream's pace is so much
 faster than Debian's release cycle that we need to come up with a better
 solution. CUT (constantly usable testing) seemed to be such an option,
 though I've never heard about it again.

CUT is still living idea I think.
http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/10/04/can-debian-offer-a-constantly-usable-testing-distribution/

http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/11/people-behind-debian-joey-hess-of-debhelper-fame/
question: What are your plans for Debian Wheezy?

regards

mira

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread info
Hi,

I don't pretend to be as 'in the loop' as you guys but speaking to Paul
Davis on Ardour IRC a few weeks ago it seemed Ardour was going to migrate
to a self contained binary model (like Renoise or EnergyXT has). If this
coincides with an alpha A3 release then the dependencies etc will be
radically different and compilation not required. I know this is in the
works but not when it will appear.


 On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 07:08:50PM +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:

 It's then possible to package Ardour3 for experimental, and I think I
 will do once alpha1 will be released.
 Alpha software... do you also provide a 'debug' package for it?

 Would probably make sense. Not that the official ardour version will
 still be ardour2, but outside a freeze, I think we should provide users
 a convenient way to try upcoming stuff.

 This way, we'll also have time to get the packaging right. ;)


 Cheers

 --
 mail: a...@thur.dehttp://adi.thur.de  PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

 ___
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
 pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers




___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:00:47AM -0800, i...@bandshed.net wrote:

 Hi,

Hi!

 I don't pretend to be as 'in the loop' as you guys but speaking to Paul
 Davis on Ardour IRC a few weeks ago it seemed Ardour was going to migrate
 to a self contained binary model (like Renoise or EnergyXT has).

Could you elaborate on this? I've seen a single line like we're going
to provide the binary, so we don't have to rely on the distro, but I
don't know how much work has already been put into this.

Anyway, there's still the code, and we can at least try and compile on
our own. Like chromium-browser or openoffice: Debian provides
self-compiled versions, but the user is always free to pick up the
upstream provided one.


For your convenience: I just uploaded updated FFADO and jackd2
(including jack-session) to experimental. I'll also update jackd1 soon,
but Paul said something about an upcoming release, so I'll wait a couple
of days.

We then try to get this into squeeze-backports, so squeeze-users won't
need to recompile everything.


-- 
mail: a...@thur.de  http://adi.thur.de  PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread info
Adi, Well hmmm

I can't elaborate much more than that unfortunately, it was not discussed
in specifics but a standalone binary (like the others you mentioned) was
the general idea, Seablade also said something similar on the Ardour forum
recently again without any detail.

A sincere and heartfelt THANK-YOU!!! for the updated JACK and FFADO
stuff, I am still shipping JACK1 to satisfy some 3rd party dependencies
but I'll look forward to it whenever you get to it.

At the risk of sounding stupid (well perhaps stupid-er), I have this
'experimental' line in my sources.list:

#Experimental
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ experimental main non-free contrib
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ experimental main non-free contrib

However there doesn't seem to be any of the pkg-multimedia stuff in there
I'm looking for, am I missing another or different experimental
repository?

Guidance appreciated, and thanks again for your attention to JACK, FFADO,
and Ardour packaging!

Best -GLEN

 On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:00:47AM -0800, i...@bandshed.net wrote:

 Hi,

 Hi!

 I don't pretend to be as 'in the loop' as you guys but speaking to Paul
 Davis on Ardour IRC a few weeks ago it seemed Ardour was going to
 migrate
 to a self contained binary model (like Renoise or EnergyXT has).

 Could you elaborate on this? I've seen a single line like we're going
 to provide the binary, so we don't have to rely on the distro, but I
 don't know how much work has already been put into this.

 Anyway, there's still the code, and we can at least try and compile on
 our own. Like chromium-browser or openoffice: Debian provides
 self-compiled versions, but the user is always free to pick up the
 upstream provided one.


 For your convenience: I just uploaded updated FFADO and jackd2
 (including jack-session) to experimental. I'll also update jackd1 soon,
 but Paul said something about an upcoming release, so I'll wait a couple
 of days.

 We then try to get this into squeeze-backports, so squeeze-users won't
 need to recompile everything.


 --
 mail: a...@thur.dehttp://adi.thur.de  PGP/GPG: key via keyserver




___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-22 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:43:48AM -0800, i...@bandshed.net wrote:

 #Experimental
 deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ experimental main non-free contrib
 deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ experimental main non-free contrib
 
 However there doesn't seem to be any of the pkg-multimedia stuff in there
 I'm looking for, am I missing another or different experimental
 repository?

No, it is the right one, but it takes a couple of hours until the new
packages will be compiled, installed and synced to your mirror.


HTH

-- 
mail: a...@thur.de  http://adi.thur.de  PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Kernel 2.6.36 and libraw1394 2.0.6 wrt Firewire Audio Devices

2010-11-21 Thread info
Hi

I'm not sure if libraw1394 falls under your jurisdiction or not but the
latest release (November 1) supports daisy chaining multiple firewire
devices on the new firewire stack when used with Kernel 2.6.36. Testing by
AV Linux users has confirmed this.

Note daisy chaining was previously only possible with the legacy firewire
stack.

I've seen some Squeeze exception requests for this that have been flatly
denied (as Squeeze for multimedia slides hopelessly further into
obsolescence) but there seems to be no updates to libraw1394 2.0.6
available in Sid or experimental either. Use of the new stack makes ffado
supported Audio devices plug and play, the addition of 2.0.6 would further
that to multiple firewire devices being plug and play.

Thought I'd pass that along.

Regards -GLEN


___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers