Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

Hi - SuperCollider 3.5.x is now out - 3.5.2 just released. (Curently the sid package is 3.4.5.) I've imported it into pkg-multimedia git. I'd be grateful if someone could have a look, and upload if ok: Thanks Dan _

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

2012/5/9 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Dan S wrote: >>> Hi - >>> >>> SuperCollider 3.5.x is now out - 3.5.2 just released. (Curently the >>> sid package is 3.4

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

2012/5/10 Felipe Sateler : > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/5/9 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Dan S wrote: >>>>> Hi - >>>>>

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

2012/5/14 Felipe Sateler : > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/5/10 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2012/5/9 Felipe Sateler : >>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Felipe Sateler >&g

Bug#674386: supercollider: FTBFS: scons: *** No SConstruct file found.

Hi - Thanks for reporting this. The problem seems to be something to do with dh's automatic invocation of scons to perform cleaning - if you look at the log you'll see that the package successfully builds (calling scons on the directory "./common"), but the clean step invokes scons on the "." dire

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

2012/5/31 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Dan, There are some breaks/replaces missing: >> >> >> Preparing to replace supercollider-common 1:3.4.5-1 (using >> supercollider-common_3.5.2-1_all.deb) ... >> Unpacking replacement supercollider-common ... >>

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

2012/5/31 Felipe Sateler : > Dan, There are some breaks/replaces missing: > > > Preparing to replace supercollider-common 1:3.4.5-1 (using > supercollider-common_3.5.2-1_all.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement supercollider-common ... > dpkg: error processing supercollider-common_3.5.2-1_all.deb (--in

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

2012/5/31 Felipe Sateler : > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/5/31 Felipe Sateler : >>> Dan, There are some breaks/replaces missing: >>> >>> >>> Preparing to replace supercollider-common 1:3.4.5-1 (using >>> supercollider

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

2012/6/1 Jonas Smedegaard : > Hi Dan, > > On 12-06-01 at 08:56am, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/5/31 Felipe Sateler : >> > I see that MathJax is included in the binary packages. Can't we use >> > libjs-mathjax? >> >> I don't really know mathjax myself

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

2012/6/1 Felipe Sateler : > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> On Jun 1, 2012 7:04 AM, "Dan S" wrote: >>> >>> 2012/6/1 Jonas Smedegaard : >>> > Hi Dan, >>> > >>> > On 12-06-01 at 08:56am

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

2012/6/14 Felipe Sateler : > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/6/1 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jun 1, 2012 7:04 AM, "Dan S" wrote: >>>>> >>&g

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.2 new version

2012/6/15 Dan S : >>>>> Another option is to create a linkfarm pointing to the real mathjax >>>>> sources. >>>>> This would avoid the problem, wouldn't it? >>>>> >>>>> I think Raphael Hertzog wrote a tool preci

Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.3 new version

Hi all, SuperCollider 3.5.3 is now out. This comes very soon after we got 3.5.2 into the debian repo, so no rush - but this release fixes a couple of bugs and upstreams most of our patches (hooray). The diff against 3.5.2 is fairly simple so I don't foresee controversy. If anyone feels like pushin

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.3 new version

2012/6/24 Felipe Sateler : > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On 12-06-24 at 11:05am, Dan S wrote: >>> SuperCollider 3.5.3 is now out. This comes very soon after we got >>> 3.5.2 into the debian repo, so no rush - but this release fix

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Fix upstream tarball download

2012/6/25 Felipe Sateler : > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On 12-06-24 at 06:23pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> > On 12-06-24 at 06:14pm, fsate...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: >>> >>     We are using a + for

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Fix upstream tarball download

2012/6/25 Jonas Smedegaard : > On 12-06-24 at 08:06pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> > On 12-06-24 at 06:23pm, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Jonas Smedegaard >> >> wrote: >> >> > On 12-06-24 at 06:14pm, fsate...

Bug#679229: src:supercollider: bouncing mail address for Dan Stowell

Hi - Works for me. It's my email address. I received the original email no problem. Thanks Dan 2012/6/27 Ansgar Burchardt : > Source: supercollider > X-Debbugs-Cc: fsate...@debian.org > > The address listed in Uploaders (and Changed-By for the last upload) for > Dan Stowell bounces, see below.

Bug#679229: src:supercollider: bouncing mail address for Dan Stowell

2012/6/27 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:53 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 2012-06-27 15:02, Dan S wrote: >>> Hi - >>> >>> Works for me. It's my

Re: Supercollider fails to build

2012/7/3 Felipe Sateler : > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Supercollider is failing to build everywhere except i386 and amd64. >> Boost.Lockfree seems to be the culprit everywhere. >> I think the problem is that BOOST_LOCKFREE_DCAS_ALIGNMENT is only >> defined in a few s

Re: Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy

Hi - It's easy to fix #654506 because supercollider never used waf so the file can simply be deleted in repacking a ~dfsg version, and build will still work fine. I don't want to work on #674386 because working on the scons build is a waste of time when we've junked it long ago, and the bug is ap

Re: Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy

2012/7/11 Fabian Greffrath : > Am 11.07.2012 14:20, schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: > >> We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we >> are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the >> changes are quite large. Usually, we ask the maintainer to prepare an >>

Re: Supercollider fails to build

2012/7/11 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Dan S wrote: >> >> A fix for issue 2 will be along in a week or two, after the developer >> has integrated an updated source file. > > Any temporary fix we can apply? The longer we take to fix this, th

Re: Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy

2012/7/11 Mehdi Dogguy : > Hi, > > We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we > are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the > changes are quite large. Usually, we ask the maintainer to prepare an > upload based on testing's source package and ta

Re: Supercollider fails to build

2012/7/10 Felipe Sateler : > OK, so we have more build failures, but this time different on > different architectures: > > 1. Arm*: qreal is not double but float. Patch is in the repository. > 2. PowerPc64: Undefined variable order. It seems that there is a bogus > call in line 255 of > external_li

Re: Bug#681187: supercollider-emacs: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)

2012/7/11 Andreas Beckmann : > Package: supercollider-emacs > Version: 1:3.5.3~repack-1 > Severity: important > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on > the system after purge, which is a violation o

Re: Supercollider fails to build

2012/7/21 Felipe Sateler : > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/7/21 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Dan S wrote: >>>> >>>> 2012/7/10 Felipe Sateler : >>>> > OK, so we have more build failures,

Bug#679695: fixed in supercollider 1:3.5.3~repack-2

2012/7/29 Dan S : > ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#681187: fixed in supercollider 1:3.5.3~repack-2

___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: Fixing SC in testing

2012/8/5 Felipe Sateler : > We currently have a broken supercollider in testing, and the freeze > means 3.5.3 will not migrate automatically. > > Dan, since you are the most knowledgeable on SC matters, could you > prepare a message on why do we prefer 3.5.x instead of 3.4.x for > wheezy? I can thi

Re: Fixing SC in testing

2012/8/5 Dan S : > 2012/8/5 Felipe Sateler : >> We currently have a broken supercollider in testing, and the freeze >> means 3.5.3 will not migrate automatically. >> >> Dan, since you are the most knowledgeable on SC matters, could you >> prepare a message on why

Re: Fixing SC in testing

2012/8/5 Felipe Sateler : > On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/8/5 Dan S : >>> 2012/8/5 Felipe Sateler : >>>> We currently have a broken supercollider in testing, and the freeze >>>> means 3.5.3 will not migrate automatically. >>&

Re: Bug#674386: supercollider: FTBFS: scons: *** No SConstruct file found.

2012/8/12 peter green : >> >> I'd like to mark this as "won't fix" because we're dropping the scons >> build system. The latest version of supercollider 3.5.x (which I'm >> currently asking debian-multimedia maintainers to upload) uses cmake >> instead which is much less mess. >> > > Supercollider

Re: Bug#674386: supercollider: FTBFS: scons: *** No SConstruct file found.

2012/8/13 Felipe Sateler : > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/8/12 peter green : >>>> >>>> I'd like to mark this as "won't fix" because we're dropping the scons >>>> build system. The latest version of

Re: Fixing SC in testing

2012/8/12 Felipe Sateler : > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> request SC to be >> removed from testing and consider 3.5 as a good target for >> wheezy-backports. > > Dan, what do you think? Do you prefer 3.4 in wheezy if 3.5 cannot > migrate, or would you prefer to provi

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Convert upstream's post-hoc 3.5.4 tweak into a patch

2012/8/15 Felipe Sateler : > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:38 AM, > wrote: >> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: >> commit 3c1278c9f79054a1d80ec96fbcb6e44946a771cb >> Author: Dan Stowell >> Date: Mon Aug 13 14:14:53 2012 +0100 >> >> Convert upstream's post-hoc 3.5.4 twea

Re: Supercollider is FTBFS

2013/9/30 Felipe Sateler : > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Dan S wrote: >> 2013/9/11 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>>> In all archs except i386 and amd64 :( >>>> >>>> So far I have the f

Re: Bug#728573: supercollider: FTBFS on sparc and ppc but built there in the past

Thanks. As discussed previously on pkg-multimedia-maintainers, I propose that we restrict archs for one package "supercollider-supernova". The package is optional for users (it's a non-default drop-in alternative to "supercollider-server") and there is very little upstream support for getting it wo

Re: Bug#728573: supercollider: FTBFS on sparc and ppc but built there in the past

2013/11/6 Felipe Sateler : > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Dan S wrote: >> >> Thanks. As discussed previously on pkg-multimedia-maintainers, I >> propose that we restrict archs for one package >> "supercollider-supernova". The package is optional for

supercollider 3.6.6 import, git-buildpackage

Hi all, Just trying to import the latest version of supercollider. I'm having a problem with git-buildpackage failing to pick up the correct version number, and I have failed to find clues online. Here's the error: % git-buildpackage -S --git-verbose --git-export-dir=../buildarea gbp:debug: ['gi

Re: supercollider 3.6.6 import, git-buildpackage

> On 10 Sep 2014 06:43, "Dan S" wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Just trying to import the latest version of supercollider. I'm having > > a problem with git-buildpackage failing to pick up the correct version > > number, an

Re: supercollider 3.6.6 import, git-buildpackage

2014-10-01 4:18 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Dan S wrote: >>> On 10 Sep 2014 06:43, "Dan S" wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > Just trying to import the latest version of supercollider. I

Re: supercollider 3.6.6 import, git-buildpackage

2014-10-03 0:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Dan S wrote: >> 2014-10-01 4:18 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Dan S wrote: >>>>> On 10 Sep 2014 06:43, "Dan S" wrote: >>>>> &

Re: supercollider 3.6.6 import, git-buildpackage

2014-10-03 12:59 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dan S wrote: >> 2014-10-03 0:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2014-10-01 4:18 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>>>>

Bug#766630: supercollider: ftbfs on ppc64el -- error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic

Hi all - Felipe has covered most of the reviewing already. Just noting here that I have proposed to send the nova-simd part of this patch upstream: , plus: 2014-10-24 16:55 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Konstantino

boost problem while packaging SuperCollider 3.8

Hi I'm trying to get the new release 3.8 of SuperCollider into the debian-multimedia repository. I've done an import to git here (not pushed yet). The problem is SC's dependency on boost. The upstream includes boost in the download, and so to be Debian-like, we strip that out and use system boost

Re: boost problem while packaging SuperCollider 3.8

2017-09-25 13:48 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Dan S wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I'm trying to get the new release 3.8 of SuperCollider into the >> debian-multimedia repository. I've done an import to git here (not

Re: boost problem while packaging SuperCollider 3.8

2017-09-25 16:36 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Dan S wrote: >>> >>> 2017-09-25 13:48 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> > >>> > >>> >

Re: boost problem while packaging SuperCollider 3.8

2017-09-26 9:26 GMT+01:00 Dan S : > 2017-09-25 16:36 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Dan S wrote: >>>> >>>> 2017-09-25 13:48 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>&g

Re: boost problem while packaging SuperCollider 3.8

2017-09-26 9:49 GMT+01:00 Dan S : > 2017-09-26 9:26 GMT+01:00 Dan S : >> 2017-09-25 16:36 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Felipe Sateler >>> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Dan S wrote: >>>&g

Re: boost problem while packaging SuperCollider 3.8

2017-09-28 23:54 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Dan S wrote: >> >> 2017-09-26 9:49 GMT+01:00 Dan S : >> > 2017-09-26 9:26 GMT+01:00 Dan S : >> >> 2017-09-25 16:36 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >> >>> On Mon, Sep

gcc 5 internal error, building supercollider 3.7.0

Hi all, I'm importing the new version of SuperCollider (3.7.0). http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/supercollider.git/log/ However, current status on my debian box is that GCC 5.3.1 dies on an internal error while trying to compile supernova. g++: internal compiler error: Killed (p

supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

Hi all, There's a new release of SuperCollider out (3.7) and I've imported and updated the packaging at pkg-multimedia/supercollider.git . It builds and works for me (on x64), and I'd like to ask others to have a look at it and consider testing/uploading it. Thanks Dan __

Re: supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

2016-04-26 19:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On 25 April 2016 at 18:12, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On 20 March 2016 at 12:52, Dan S wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> There's a new release of SuperCollider out (3.7) and I've imported and >&g

Re: supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

2016-05-04 16:09 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On 4 May 2016 at 11:57, Dan S wrote: >> 2016-04-26 19:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> On 25 April 2016 at 18:12, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>>> On 20 March 2016 at 12:52, Dan S wrote: >>>>> >&

Re: supercollider is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-05-09 14:21 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On 9 May 2016 at 06:11, Hanno Zulla wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 02.05.2016 um 06:39 schrieb Debian testing autoremoval watch: >>> supercollider 1:3.6.6~repack-2-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on >>> 2016-06-07 >>> >>> It is affected by these RC b

Re: supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

2016-05-10 18:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On 6 May 2016 at 13:32, Dan S wrote: >> 2016-05-04 16:09 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> On 4 May 2016 at 11:57, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2016-04-26 19:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>>>> On 25 April 2016 at 18:

Re: supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

2016-05-10 21:33 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On 10 May 2016 at 17:05, Dan S wrote: >> 2016-05-10 18:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> On 6 May 2016 at 13:32, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2016-05-04 16:09 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>>>> On 4 May 2016 at 11:57,

Re: supercollider 3.7.0 in alioth to try

2016-05-10 22:02 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On 10 May 2016 at 17:43, Dan S wrote: >> 2016-05-10 21:33 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> On 10 May 2016 at 17:05, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2016-05-10 18:23 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>>>> On 6 May 2016 at 13:32,

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Restrict (optional) supernova to its target archs

2016-05-18 0:24 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On 17 May 2016 at 18:34, wrote: >> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: >> commit 837440f53425195c71a63651856e1717678bd4b5 >> Author: Dan Stowell >> Date: Tue May 17 23:05:00 2016 +0100 >> >> Restrict (optional) supernova t

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Restrict (optional) supernova to its target archs

2016-05-18 17:41 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : > On 18 May 2016 at 03:46, Dan S wrote: >> 2016-05-18 0:24 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler : >>> On 17 May 2016 at 18:34, wrote: >>>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: >>>> commit 837440f534

supercollider 1:3.7.0~repack-2: how to deactivate oscpack

Hi Felipe and all, Thanks for tweaking and uploading 1:3.7.0~repack-2 of supercollider. Now we're down to one single build error appearing on a few archs... The error is caused by attempting to compile the bundled "oscpack". However, the problem shouldn't be there, because on those platforms supe

Re: supercollider 1:3.7.0~repack-2: how to deactivate oscpack

2016-05-21 14:23 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill : > Hi, > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 14:05 +0100, Dan S wrote: >> Hi Felipe and all, >> >> Thanks for tweaking and uploading 1:3.7.0~repack-2 of supercollider. >> Now we're down to one single build error appearing on a few

Re: supercollider 1:3.7.0~repack-2: how to deactivate oscpack

2016-05-21 14:42 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill : > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 14:26 +0100, Dan S wrote: >> 2016-05-21 14:23 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill : >> > I posted an alternative to doing this disabling on the bug: >> > https://bugs.debian.org/82458 >> >> Ah thanks

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: supernova compile fix on x86

2012/12/25 Felipe Sateler : > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:03 PM, > wrote: >> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: >> commit b0855e79951393de8d0e044af3abd679b463a20f >> Author: Dan Stowell >> Date: Fri Dec 21 17:42:31 2012 + >> >> supernova compile fix on x86 >> >> di

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Imported Upstream version 3.6.1~repack

2012/12/25 Felipe Sateler : > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:12 PM, > wrote: >> >> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: >> commit b058aafc3bfcd2b94317654ff3306700f558c61b >> Author: Dan Stowell >> Date: Thu Dec 20 19:29:29 2012 + >> >> Imported Upstream version 3.6.1~re

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Imported Upstream version 3.6.1~repack

2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/12/25 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:12 PM, >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: >>>> c

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: supernova compile fix on x86

2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/12/25 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:03 PM, >>> wrote: >>>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: >>>> commit b0855e79951393

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: supernova compile fix on x86

2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : > >>> Could you elaborate a >>> bit on the relationship between sc-server and sc-supernova? Is >>> supernova picked up automatically when installed?

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Imported Upstream version 3.6.1~repack

2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2012/12/25 Felipe Sateler : >>>>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:12 PM, >>>>>

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Imported Upstream version 3.6.1~repack

2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : >>>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Dan S wrote: >

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Imported Upstream version 3.6.1~repack

2012/12/27 Felipe Sateler : > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Dan S wrote: >> 2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2012/12/26 Felipe Sateler : >>>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Dan S wrote: >

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Imported Upstream version 3.6.1~repack

2013/1/2 Felipe Sateler : > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Dan S wrote: >> >>> and it rejected the non-fast-forward. Seems pretty certain that I >>> cannot rewrite remote history; perhaps because I&#

Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.3 new version

Dear all, SuperCollider 3.6.3 is recently out, and the 3.6.x is getting good and stable. The latest upload in debian is 3.5.3, so please could I request upload? I've imported 3.6.3 today. Best Dan _

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.5.3 new version

2013/2/25 Felipe Sateler : > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Dan S wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> SuperCollider 3.6.3 is recently out, and the 3.6.x is getting good and >> stable. The latest upload in debian is 3.5.3, so please could I >> request upload? I've imp

Re: Bug#713670: supercollider: FTBFS: sndfile_backend_test.cpp:46:34: error: expected unqualified-id before numeric constant

Hi - Thanks for the report. The "testsuite" does not need to be built for packaging, so actually we disable it in the most recent version in debian-git and in experimental (which is supercollider 3.6.3). We can do this for 3.5.3 as well, which will fix this issue.* However, I'm not sure what the

Re: Bug#713670: supercollider: FTBFS: sndfile_backend_test.cpp:46:34: error: expected unqualified-id before numeric constant

2013/6/23 Felipe Sateler : > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Dan S wrote: >> Hi - >> >> Thanks for the report. The "testsuite" does not need to be built for >> packaging, so actually we disable it in the most recent version in >> debian-git and in expe

Re: Supercollider is FTBFS

2013/9/11 Felipe Sateler : > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> In all archs except i386 and amd64 :( >> >> So far I have the following that works, > > Hmm, turns out it doesn't. sclang needs atomic too. Well, FWIW the patch certainly looks tolerable to me. I understand you

Bug#722430: supercollider: Should use system yaml-cpp

Ah, that's useful. Actually, though, I don't believe porting is required. The yaml-cpp website says that the old 0.3 API "will continue to be supported, and will still receive bugfixes", and debian has libyaml-cpp0.3 available everywhere. Fixed in 5f4d0fb Thanks Dan 2013/9/10 Felipe Sateler :

Re: Bug#722430: supercollider: Should use system yaml-cpp

2013/9/13 Felipe Sateler : > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Dan S wrote: >> Ah, that's useful. Actually, though, I don't believe porting is >> required. The yaml-cpp website says that the old 0.3 API "will >> continue to be supported, and will still receive

Bug#644976: [supercollider] server fails to start

Hi - Firstly, it is better to start jackd manually - that's what sc users normally do, and in particular for bug reports it would be clearer because jackd's startup procedure doesn't have to be included in the output. (It should work, though.) But the more fundamental issue is that booting the se

Bug#644976: [supercollider] server fails to start

2011/10/11 Simon Wenner : > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Ok,I see. Thanks for the quick reply. > > I tried it interactively and the error looks the same: > ... > sc3> s.boot; > > booting 57110 > localhost > sc3> Cannot connect to server socket err = Connection refus

Bug#644977: [supercollider] please add 'swing' as dependency

2011/10/11 Simon Wenner : > Package: supercollider > Version: 1:3.4.4-1 > Severity: normal > > Supercollider has an optional GUI to manage the server. It requires > SwingOSC. Please add this dependency. > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/swingosc/ Hi - SwingOSC is optional and is a separate proj

Bug#648782: FTBFS due to undefined symbols

2011/11/15 Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre : > Package: supercollider > Version: 1:3.4.4-2 > > A recent rebuild test in Ubuntu for supercollider 1:3.4.4-2 shows that > it fails to build [1], due to restrictions imposed at linking time: > > g++ -o build/sclang -Wl,-rpath-link,build -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/lib

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Fix build, due to restrictions imposed at linking time. Author: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre

2011/11/19 Reinhard Tartler : > On Di, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:07:19 (CET), > danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > >> The following commit has been merged in the master branch: >> commit fd5913d30c0aa53f4666cc4af6e0def3f6eaa8df >> Author: Dan Stowell >> Date:   Tue Nov 15 09:52:40 2011 +0

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Fix build, due to restrictions imposed at linking time. Author: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre

2011/11/19 Reinhard Tartler : > On Sa, Nov 19, 2011 at 14:30:30 (CET), Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:28, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>> On Di, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:07:19 (CET), >>> danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: >>> The following commit has been merged in

Bug#648866: supercollider: FTBFS on powerpc

2011/11/15 Michael Terry : > Package: supercollider > Version: 1:3.4.4-2 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu precise ubuntu-patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > In Ubuntu, supercollider is FTBFS on powerpc.  This seems to be an old > problem,

Request for upload: supercollider 3.4.5 new version

Hi - SuperCollider just released bugfix release 3.4.5. I've imported it into the debian-multimedia git. Unless there are queries, could I request someone to upload a package please? http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/supercollider.git;a=summary Thanks Dan

Re: Request for upload: supercollider 3.4.5 new version

2012/1/22 Felipe Sateler : > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 15:00, Dan S wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> SuperCollider just released bugfix release 3.4.5. I've imported it >> into the debian-multimedia git. Unless there are queries, could I >> request

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Update changelog and copyright hints

Hi - Thanks for all these tweaks. A question about "copyright_hints": there are quite a few entries in there saying "License: UNKNOWN, FIXME" -- many image files, which have always been part of the SC distribution and were generated within the SC project and are under the same license as the sourc

Re: SuperCollider package

Hi Alexandre, Felipe et al, Looking at the lintian issues for supercollider, I found the source of problem for the most important error (sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname). I've fixed it in the upstream build script: http://supercollider.svn.sourceforge.net/supercollider/?rev=10372&

Re: SuperCollider package

2010/10/6 Felipe Sateler : > Hi all, (Dan CCed because I'm not sure if you are subscribed to the list) > > I managed to take a few minutes to take a look at the package and it is > not in a very good shape (it was still using simple-patchsys!). I have > worked a bit on it, but it still has a long w

Re: SuperCollider package

2010/10/9 Alexandre Quessy : > Hello Felipe and the team, > > 2010/10/6 Felipe Sateler : >> On 09/21/2010 01:40 PM, Alexandre Quessy wrote: >>> There are quite a few lintian warnings, but I tried the vim plugin and >>> it works. >> >> Yes, quite a bit. The package needs a lot of work. First of all,

Re: SuperCollider package

2010/10/19 Felipe Sateler : > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:15, Dan S wrote: >> 2010/10/9 Alexandre Quessy : >>> Hello Felipe and the team, >>> >>> 2010/10/6 Felipe Sateler : >>>> On 09/21/2010 01:40 PM, Alexandre Quessy wrote: >>>>> The

Re: SuperCollider package

2010/10/19 Felipe Sateler : > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:09, Dan S wrote: >> 2010/10/6 Felipe Sateler : >>> Hi all, (Dan CCed because I'm not sure if you are subscribed to the list) >>> >>> I managed to take a few minutes to take a look at the package a

Re: SuperCollider package

2010/10/20 Felipe Sateler : > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:22, Dan S wrote: >> 2010/10/19 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:09, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2010/10/6 Felipe Sateler : >>>>> Hi all, (Dan CCed because I'm not sure if you are subsc

Re: SuperCollider package

2010/10/20 Felipe Sateler : > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:02, Dan S wrote: >> 2010/10/19 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:15, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2010/10/9 Alexandre Quessy : >>>>> Hello Felipe and the team, >>>>> &g

Re: SuperCollider package

2010/10/20 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:23, Dan S wrote: >> 2010/10/20 Felipe Sateler : >>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:02, Dan S wrote: >>>> 2010/10/19 Felipe Sateler : >>>>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:15, Dan S wrote: >>>

Re: SuperCollider package

2010/10/20 Felipe Sateler : > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 13:07, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> I'll import rev2 now. Please review the copyright statements after >> I've done this, to prune the files only found in the with-extras >> version. > > I've uploaded it. Since supercollider has not been released

Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Can build against jack2 as well as jack1

2010/10/21 Jonas Smedegaard : > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:15:01PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 20:07, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:14:15PM +, >>> danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: >>>   Can build against jack2 as w

Re: SuperCollider package

2010/10/31 Felipe Sateler : > Артём, you are CCed because I don't know if you are subscribed to the list. > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:09, Dan S wrote: >> >> 2010/10/6 Felipe Sateler : >> > Hi all, (Dan CCed because I'm not sure if you are subscribed to

  1   2   >