>From ooma.com's fee estimator, for 97225:
Regulatory compliance fee: $1.87
911 service fee: $1
Local interconnect recover fee: $2.69
State, local taxes, fees, surcharges: $2.23
Total: $7.79.
https://www.ooma.com/home-phone-service/
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 3:35 PM Russell Senior
wrote:
>
>
>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 3:27 PM Keith Lofstrom wrote:
>
> [...] OOMA is free
> forever, after purchasing the interface box.
>
I think Ooma is not quite free. You still need to pay for the various line
charges and taxes. At least, that's what I remember the deal being when I
signed up. It
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:46:57AM -0700, Johnathan Mantey wrote:
> I agree with Russell.
I agree with Russell as well, which is why I tried my 8 pin
low speed scan-the-LEDs cable tester /first/, end to end,
from the cable end near the ONT, through perhaps-too-many
8 pin plugs and sockets and
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 1:25 PM Russell Senior
wrote:
>
> ALL run on some approximation of 12V DC. Yay!
>>
>
> FYI: Pascal, the PC Engines guy, warned me that the APU took "precisely
> 12V", or at least it didn't have the high end margin that many 12V devices
> do. You should investigate that
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 6:07 PM Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> keithl wrote:
> ...
> > to the new optical network terminal ... about the size
> > of a large paperback book, and powered by a 12V/2A
> > wallwart (wallwart wire down the preexisting cable
> > tray, cat5e cable using the same armored tray).
I agree with Russell.
It was common practice for installers to only connect a minimum of wires.
That allowed 100Mbps speeds.
You may be able to fix the problem by dressing the final wires in.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:37 PM Russell Senior
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 4:34 PM Keith Lofstrom
keithl wrote:
...
> to the new optical network terminal ... about the size
> of a large paperback book, and powered by a 12V/2A
> wallwart (wallwart wire down the preexisting cable
> tray, cat5e cable using the same armored tray).
...
Good news!
The Ziply optical network terminal is actually a
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 4:34 PM Keith Lofstrom wrote:
>
> Using the house network (4 cables, two gigabit switches,
> and a patch panel) 90/95 Mbps, as reported earlier.
>
> Cabling DOES matter.
>
Most of my house is cat5 (including ~50ft runs from basement to second
floor) and I routinely get
On 4/12/24 01:17, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
>The technician tested the service with his laptop; he got
>330/330 mbps test results. I'm only getting 95/95 mbps
>after my 24 port gigabit switch, but there may be some
>slow cat5 somewhere on the path. I'll debug that soon.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at
Clackamas County also got money from the 2009 stimulus bill to build a
publicly-owned middle mile network that runs from Government Camp to the
west end of the county near Lake Oswego and all the way to downtown
Portland. This has made extending local networks much more affordable.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 9:43 AM Aaron Burt wrote:
> Fiber from the local telecom co-op isn't much more here in Eagle Creek,
> just west of Sandy.
>
> It feels like a dam has opened up and flooded rural America with
> Universal Service Fee money, in addition to the Infrastructure Act.
> Reliance
Fiber from the local telecom co-op isn't much more here in Eagle Creek,
just west of Sandy.
It feels like a dam has opened up and flooded rural America with
Universal Service Fee money, in addition to the Infrastructure Act.
Reliance has been begging people to get fiber; they had to bore and
https://www.ci.sandy.or.us/sandynet/page/residential-services
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:23 PM Russell Senior
wrote:
> In Sandy, you can get gigabit fiber for $60/month.
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:22 PM Michael Barnes
> wrote:
>
>> Something to be said for small town living. Here in
In Sandy, you can get gigabit fiber for $60/month.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:22 PM Michael Barnes
wrote:
> Something to be said for small town living. Here in Dallas we have
> Willamette Valley Fiber. 200/200 with static IP for <$70/mo. Not only is
> tech support speaking English, it is within
Something to be said for small town living. Here in Dallas we have
Willamette Valley Fiber. 200/200 with static IP for <$70/mo. Not only is
tech support speaking English, it is within walking distance. Fiber comes
right into my home office to the ONT. Outages are extremely rare. Plenty
adequate
On 4/12/24 08:24, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2024, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
>
>> Bottom line: after we cancel Comcast, we will pay $60 per month for
>> very fast internet, and $0 per month for a voice phone and a fax
>> phone. Much better than $170 per month for slow and intermittent
>>
On 4/12/24 01:17, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> Ziply offers 100/100 consumer grade service for $45
> per month (first year is $20 per month), with support
> from an Asian call center.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 01:27:51AM -0700, Russell Senior wrote:
> Fwiw, every time I've called Zipy support (for my
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
Bottom line: after we cancel Comcast, we will pay $60 per month for
very fast internet, and $0 per month for a voice phone and a fax
phone. Much better than $170 per month for slow and intermittent
Comcast. I hope - failure is (sadly) always an
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024, Russell Senior wrote:
Fwiw, every time I've called Zipy support (for my mom's residential
account), I've talked to someone with a southeastern USian accent.
Me, too. I've had better service from the Ziply business account customer
reps than I did with Frontier or Verizon.
On 4/12/24 01:17, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
The technician tested the service with his laptop; he got
330/330 mbps test results. I'm only getting 95/95 mbps
after my 24 port gigabit switch, but there may be some
slow cat5 somewhere on the path. I'll debug that soon.
Cat5 can handle gigabit
On 4/12/24 01:17, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
Ziply offers 100/100 consumer grade service for $45
per month (first year is $20 per month), with support
from an Asian call center. I wanted "no surprises"
pricing and local phone support, so instead I signed
up for 200/200 business service for $60
Decades ago, I connected to the internet through a Telebit
modem and GTE pone lines. GTE became Verizon, which offered
offered fiber. Verizon became Frontier, and service went to
hell. So, I transitioned to Comcast cable - which went to
deeper hell a few years later, bad mistake. Currently,
On 10/03/2017 10:40 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> <...>
>
> My wife has had Comcast Business in her current office
> building for 18 months.
>
> <...>
>
> Which the
> Comcast tech found and fixed quickly,
>
> <...>
We had some problems last year in the September time frame (I think).
Eventually
I am retitling this for those who still care
about subject lines
"Paul" == Paul Heinlein writes:
> I'll note that if you rent a cable modem from Comcast, but would
> rather use your own routing and/or wireless gear, you can ask the
> installer to disable wifi and use
Yesterday the technician asked a colleague for an opinion. He suggested
removing cookies, which we did (I thought it was a stupid idea). This
morning, Thursday, the connection was functional. But before I credit the
stupid idea, I note that I received a message from Comcast saying that our
new
I don't have any answers for you on the Comcast front, but I can explain
why Google gives you an error screen rather than an activation screen.
It's because Google (as a company) insists on using SSL encryption for all
web traffic. Encrypted traffic is more difficult to redirect, and Comcast
On Saturday 5/6 we could not reach the internet. After much conversation
w/comcast they sent a technician out on Sunday. He arrived early, seemed
knowledgeable. I had an old (rented) modem beyond eol. I had received in
the mail a replacement modem from Comcast many months ago, still in the
> On Jan 6, 2017 11:52 PM, "Dick Steffens" wrote:
>
> <...>
>
> Before going through that process I ran the test at speedtest.net on two
> machines in the house:
>
> Machine Ping Download Upload
> Wife's Win97 17 ms 91.29 Mbps6.1 Mbps
> My Ubuntu 14.04
On 01/07/2017 09:30 PM, Bill Barry wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2017 11:52 PM, "Dick Steffens" wrote:
>
> An email arrived this afternoon from xfinity (Comcast) telling me that
> they are upping my speed from 75 Mbps to "up to 100 Mbps" after I
> reboot. These are download speeds.
On Jan 6, 2017 11:52 PM, "Dick Steffens" wrote:
An email arrived this afternoon from xfinity (Comcast) telling me that
they are upping my speed from 75 Mbps to "up to 100 Mbps" after I
reboot. These are download speeds. They provided directions:
1.
Shut down your
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 08:51:35PM -0800, Dick Steffens wrote:
> An email arrived this afternoon from xfinity (Comcast) telling me
> that they are upping my speed from 75 Mbps to "up to 100 Mbps" after
> I reboot. These are download speeds. They provided directions:
...
> My Ubuntu 14.04 20 ms
Docsis modems will broadcast a request for configuration on initial boot.
Think of it like DHCP/bootp configuration for computers.
You may get more bandwidth on the outbound than you have now.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Denis Heidtmann
wrote:
> You might ask
You might ask them "What else are you doing?"
-Denis
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Dick Steffens wrote:
> An email arrived this afternoon from xfinity (Comcast) telling me that
> they are upping my speed from 75 Mbps to "up to 100 Mbps" after I
> reboot. These are
An email arrived this afternoon from xfinity (Comcast) telling me that
they are upping my speed from 75 Mbps to "up to 100 Mbps" after I
reboot. These are download speeds. They provided directions:
1.
Shut down your computer &
unplug your modem from the outlet
2.
Wait 10 seconds, then plug
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 14:29 -0700, wes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.uswrote:
I'm doing a bit of research.
For those of you who have have bothered to track it, how often does
Comcast change your IP address?
I don't do dynamic DNS. every
I'm doing a bit of research.
For those of you who have have bothered to track it, how often does
Comcast change your IP address?
--
Michael Rasmussen
http://www.jamhome.us/
Be Appropriate Follow Your Curiosity
___
PLUG mailing list
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.uswrote:
I'm doing a bit of research.
For those of you who have have bothered to track it, how often does
Comcast change your IP address?
I don't do dynamic DNS. every time comcast changes my IP, I update it in my
zone
Mine has not changed in over a year and a half.
On Jun 12, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
I'm doing a bit of research.
For those of you who have have bothered to track it, how often does
Comcast change your IP address?
Russell Johnson
r...@dimstar.net
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Russell Johnson wrote:
Mine has not changed in over a year and a half.
Mine has similarly remained very stable. I've had to update my DNS
configuration perhaps three times over the past five years.
--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6'
On Jun 12, 2012 3:19 PM, Russell Johnson r...@dimstar.net wrote:
Mine has not changed in over a year and a half.
Me too. Maybe 6 times in the past 5 years.
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
I use vitelity.net, with an old pc asterisk server. They have rates
published on their site. It also works with only a good viop (e.g. $100
Cisco SPA942) phone. Not like your fathers phone though, it takes some
fiddling...
-- Pat
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Larry Brigman
I'm on a double play and I'm only 2 months in. What can people tell me
about VOIP and the alternatives I have to going with Comcast Digital
Voice? I've heard about something call Eeks for example. At $45/month
normal price, Comcast Digital Voice seems expensive.
A question about lower cost
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Michael C. Robinson
plu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
I'm on a double play and I'm only 2 months in. What can people tell me
about VOIP and the alternatives I have to going with Comcast Digital
Voice? I've heard about something call Eeks for example. At
I have been using Viatalk over the top of FIOS. The pricing has for
this has dropped
to 10.95 a month with no contract. The only problem that I had was
when I was using the voip ATA device
outside of my firewall.
___
PLUG mailing list
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Michael C. Robinson
plu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
I have been using Viatalk over the top of FIOS. The pricing has for
this has dropped
to 10.95 a month with no contract. The only problem that I had was
when I was using the voip ATA device
outside of my
On Jan 21, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Larry Brigman wrote:
http://www.viatalk.com/
I'm using the residential unlimited lite package.
What are you using for an adapter? I have a Motorola adapter I got from Vonage
(I think).
Russell Johnson
r...@dimstar.net
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Russell Johnson r...@dimstar.net wrote:
On Jan 21, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Larry Brigman wrote:
http://www.viatalk.com/
I'm using the residential unlimited lite package.
What are you using for an adapter? I have a Motorola adapter I got from
Vonage (I think).
The advanced tab seems to be password locked and apparently I wasn't
given the password. Question is, how do I get around the fact the the
cable modem wants
to set a global ip address on the host via dhcp? This clearly would
mess up my Linux based routers. In Linux, can I limit what dhcp
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:58 PM, someone plu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
The advanced tab seems to be password locked and apparently I wasn't
given the password. Question is, how do I get around the fact the the
cable modem wants
to set a global ip address on the host via dhcp? This clearly
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 20:59 -0800, drew wymore wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:58 PM, someone plu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
The advanced tab seems to be password locked and apparently I wasn't
given the password. Question is, how do I get around the fact the the
cable modem wants
to
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Someone plu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 20:59 -0800, drew wymore wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:58 PM, someone plu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
The advanced tab seems to be password locked and apparently I wasn't
given the password.
Denis == Denis Heidtmann denis.heidtm...@gmail.com writes:
Denis A friend uses Inmotionhosting.com and finds that Comcast is rejecting
Denis all mail from this host claiming high incidence of spam from Inmotion.
Denis Anybody here have information about this? Is Comcast just trying
Denis
Denis Heidtmann wrote:
A friend uses Inmotionhosting.com and finds that Comcast is rejecting
all mail from this host claiming high incidence of spam from Inmotion.
Anybody here have information about this? Is Comcast just trying
harass the small hosting outfits, or is there some substance
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Carlos Konstanski
ckonstan...@pippiandcarlos.com wrote:
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/05/1926257/Comcast-the-Latest-ISP-To-Try-DNS-Hijacking?art_pos=11
Carlos
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:45 AM, drew wymoredrew.wym...@gmail.com wrote:
Qwest as the ISP does this as well and has been doing it for quite awhile.
It is incredibly annoying.
I still find this preferable to Clearwire's method of contacting you
with important account alerts: they redirect
There aughtta be a law...
chaz
-Original Message-
From: plug-boun...@lists.pdxlinux.org
[mailto:plug-boun...@lists.pdxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Konstanski
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 8:47 PM
To: Portland Linux Users Group
Subject: [PLUG] comcast customers beware
http
In the slashdot article they were saying that OpenDNS does the same
thing as what Comcast is doing. Is there a way to opt out of the
OpenDNS version as well? Are there other advantages to OpenDNS vs.
Comcast?
if you're running linux (which the list somewhat implies :-), just run
named on
Scott Garman wrote:
http://www.opendns.com
It's a free alternative that I find nicer than going though Comcast's one.
4.2.2.[1-6] are open DNS servers that work as they should.
I use 4.2.2.2 for a temporary DNS server if I need one. Easy to remember and
works great.
--
I'm just a packet
Maybe it hasn't come to Portland yet because all I see is a text-only
page with some search suggestions, with a line at the top in bold that
says:
Sorry, we can't find www.xyzzyplugh.com. We suggest that you check
the spelling of the web address or search above.
Disable this error service
if you're running linux (which the list somewhat implies :-), just run
named on your local box. no need to use anybody else's recursive dns
server.
Or better yet, dnscache (a part of djbdns). It's fast, lightweight,
and hasn't needed any security updates in a long time. Note that
you
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Denis Heidtmann
den...@dslnorthwest.net wrote:
I seem to recall comments here about people's experience with Comcast, not all
of them good. I am currently using Qwest dsl and dslnorthwest, and am very
pleased with the support from the isp. The only reason I am
Paul == Paul Mullen p...@nellump.net writes:
Paul On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:10:59PM -0700, Denis Heidtmann wrote:
Tell me again why unregulated capitalism is so wonderful?
Paul How exactly does a government-enforced monopoly qualify as
Paul unregulated capitalism?
Which government-enforced
The biggest issues I have ever experienced when dealing with Comcast is
their unwillingness to provide you support when you inform them that
your system is NOT directly connected to their cable modem (shame on
anyone that does that). For example if you tell them that you have a
hardware based
I seem to recall comments here about people's experience with Comcast, not all
of them good. I am currently using Qwest dsl and dslnorthwest, and am very
pleased with the support from the isp. The only reason I am even considering
Comcast is cost.
I would love to hear of your good/bad
Denis,
I've had them only since August of last year, but so far they have
been good. Initial installation in an old condo was trouble for them,
due to some signal issues with the existing cable, but they got it
sorted after a week or so by replacing the line.
Chris Daniel
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009
Denis,
I think I instigated the last discussion. I'm still using Comcast due to
inertia. The problem I was initially complaining about (bad voip service
using Vonage), seemed to have cleared somewhat. 90% of the time, I really
have nothing to complain about. I'm also not a heavy user of
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Denis Heidtmann
den...@dslnorthwest.net wrote:
I seem to recall comments here about people's experience with Comcast, not all
of them good. I am currently using Qwest dsl and dslnorthwest, and am very
pleased with the support from the isp. The only reason I am
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:58, Denis Heidtmann den...@dslnorthwest.net wrote:
I seem to recall comments here about people's experience with Comcast, not all
of them good. I am currently using Qwest dsl and dslnorthwest, and am very
pleased with the support from the isp. The only reason I am
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, chris (fool) mccraw wrote:
Is any big name service any better in regards to linux? I've had more
than my share of broadband providers in my many years, and none of them
were linux-savvy at the consumer level (time warner, att, grandecom,
comcast, charter). not that i
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:01, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, chris (fool) mccraw wrote:
Is any big name service any better in regards to linux? I've had more
than my share of broadband providers in my many years, and none of them
were linux-savvy at the
I'm now in a Qwest area and much happier that I can sign up with a
third party ISP. I really hope this model never dies because at least
I get the *option* of using competent non-evil ISPs, even if I have to
pay a bit more.
unfortunately it is dieing. qwest's new fiber to the node (fttn)
Tim wrote:
After 2 weeks of running my mail server on their line, they blocked
port 25.
Their contract, even B2B, prohibits customer-end servers of any kind. I
suppose blocking the port is akin to measures up to termination.
For my own experience, my only dislike is the cost. I don't measure
Joe Pruett wrote:
I'm now in a Qwest area and much happier that I can sign up with a
third party ISP. I really hope this model never dies because at least
I get the *option* of using competent non-evil ISPs, even if I have to
pay a bit more.
unfortunately it is dieing. qwest's new fiber
Denis == Denis Heidtmann den...@dslnorthwest.net writes:
I'm now in a Qwest area and much happier that I can sign up with a
third party ISP. I really hope this model never dies because at
least I get the *option* of using competent non-evil ISPs, even if
I have to pay a bit more.
JP
Russell Senior wrote:
... I happen to think that the public (the
users of the network) needs to seize control of the last mile
infrastructure (either by purchase or by building its own). The
current ownership/regulation model is broken.
I concur. How might it be accomplished? And once
75 matches
Mail list logo