Hi Ali
i had problems using login, plain, cram-md5 and digest-md5 (all
toghether) through saslauthd. At this site, all mail parameters are in
LDAP, so i had to tell saslauthd to get the authentication parameters
from LDAP. For the tests, i had inserted the passwords in plaintext into
LDAP.
Patrick,
Hi
Thanks for your mail. I use the following options in smtpd.conf:
mech_list: gssapi plain
pwcheck_method: saslauthd
saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux
keytab: /etc/krb5.keytab
and I am able to use GSSAPI and PLAIN (Over PAM using pam_krb5.so)
mechanisms. How is it possible to add
Suomi,
Thanks for your mail. I do not use LDAP, instead I use PAM and I want to
have the following authentication mechanisms together:
PLAIN (over PAM, pam_krb5.so and saslauthd)
GSSAPI
CRAM-MD5
Currently, two of these work fine together; plain and gssapi, but I am not
able to get cram-md5
Hi,
Last night we had a issue with our mail server which went unnoticed till
this morning. Our spam filter crashed and postfix couldn't feed mails for
check to localhost:10024. The mails stayed in the queue till we noticed
that we didn't received any mail this morning. I restarted the spam filter
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Martijn de Munnik
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:54 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Test e-mailservice
Does anybody have such a test setup?
Thanks,
Martijn
Hi,
We have a server outside Our network which will send an mail every 5 minutes to
a specific mailbox on Our exchange system. This has a limit on 0 which means
that
it will bounce the mail back to the sender.
We use this to document a baseline.
When sending we generate a Uniq Message-id -
2009/11/11 Martijn de Munnik mart...@youngguns.nl:
remote host. Does anybody use a check which checks the complete mail loop?
I was thinking of sending a mail from a remote host (with webmin) to a test
mail account and see if I can download the mail with imap and then with pop
which removes
Hello There,
I have to configure my postfix mail server in following way so plese
help me to accomplish the configuration.
1] Is it possible to configure my postfix mail server without a DNS entry
for mail.mydomain.com.?
i] The reason behind it is that can only send mail. Mail server will
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:08:34 +0100, Peter Sørensen mas...@sdu.dk wrote:
Hi,
We have a server outside Our network which will send an mail every 5
minutes to
a specific mailbox on Our exchange system. This has a limit on 0 which
means that
it will bounce the mail back to the
Hi Martin,
I will do that. I probably have to do a little bit of cleanup/docs before
I send it. Will do that in the next couple of days. Hope this is OK for you.
Best regards
Peter
-Original Message-
From:
On 2009-11-11 Manoj Burande wrote:
I have to configure my postfix mail server in following way so plese
help me to accomplish the configuration.
1] Is it possible to configure my postfix mail server without a DNS
entry for mail.mydomain.com.?
Yes. MX records tell the world which server
Manoj Burande:
Hello Wietse,
Thanks for your reply.
Can you please guide me on how to use postfix newaliases?. I have
Yes. Deinstall SENDMAIL.
Wietse
already stopped sendmail on the server. And still it is using sendmail
newaliases. Can you please tell me how to do that?
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:17:01 +0100, Peter Sørensen mas...@sdu.dk wrote:
Hi Martin,
I will do that. I probably have to do a little bit of cleanup/docs
before
I send it. Will do that in the next couple of days. Hope this is OK for
you.
Sure that's fine with me.
Thank you very much!
Best
* Ali Majdzadeh ali.majdza...@gmail.com:
Patrick,
Hi
Thanks for your mail. I use the following options in smtpd.conf:
mech_list: gssapi plain
pwcheck_method: saslauthd
saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux
keytab: /etc/krb5.keytab
and I am able to use GSSAPI and PLAIN (Over PAM using
Patrick,
Thanks for your reply. So if I have concluded correctly, the following
configuration is the one which should bring together gssapi, plain and
cram-md5 authentication mechanisms:
pwcheck_method: saslauthd auxprop
mech_list: gssapi plain cram-md5
saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 06:14:08
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Quoting Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
You should be concentrating your focus on the Senders by
message count section.
Wouldnt the logwatch from the server list top users by emails?
Perhaps, but I
On 11/11/2009 12:34 AM, coofucoo zhang wrote:
Hi Noel:
I just want to control the sending speed of postfix. Because some of ISP
complain me that my speed is too fast. So I want to make postfix send a
little slowly. I am not sure how can I accomplish this target, so I set up a
test ENV to do
On 11/10/2009 11:15 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Hi Folks,
The current discussion re. Verizon blacklisting has been very
interesting in terms of log analysis suggestions. It leads me to ask
what seems to be a related question re. a problem I've been having lately.
Over the past couple of weeks
On 11/11/09 7:55 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 06:14:08
dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Quoting Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
You should be concentrating your focus on the Senders by
message count section.
Wouldnt the logwatch from
* Ali Majdzadeh ali.majdza...@gmail.com:
Patrick,
Thanks for your reply. So if I have concluded correctly, the following
configuration is the one which should bring together gssapi, plain and
cram-md5 authentication mechanisms:
It should. I have never done this myself.
pwcheck_method:
On 11/10/2009, Alex (mysqlstud...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'm still using postfix-1.x,
Most people here would stop reading there and press/click delete (or
some might simply click 'Reply' and add the words 'upgrade').
So... UPGRADE. It is time.
is there going to be significant configuration changes
Greetings postfixers
I have a address-rewriting issue that I cannot find a golden solution for
in ldap (shortened for clairty) I have the following attributes:
uid: abc123
mail: abc...@example.com
alias: alias...@example.com
forward: forward...@anotherexample.com
keep: abc...@example.com
when
On 11/11/09 7:55 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
Senders by message count is ENVELOPE SENDER, in the case of spam,
completely useless. If the OP has, as I might guess, a compromised
httpd + PHP script, for example, the envelope sender will probably
change for EACH spam it sends.
/bin/ps
On one instance of an email gateway there are two files ...
[r...@mg05 log]# ls -l /var/spool/postfix/corrupt
total 4660
-rwx-- 1 postfix postfix 2183168 2009-08-30 21:06 2C9ED9BB*
-rwx-- 1 postfix postfix 2588672 2009-10-02 06:46 939DD23CA*
The postcat of them show unexpected EOF in data
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Martijn de Munnik mart...@youngguns.nlwrote:
Hi,
Of course I don't want this to happen again in the future. How do people
test their mail server periodically? So far we use webmin which tries to
connect to port 25, 110 and 143 and checks if the greeting is
Dear All,
I need to know how to reduce the sending speed or put in a delay of like 2
seconds before delivery to some of the domains.
Namely yahoo, hotmail and a few others.
Please help me and tell me how i can achieve this in postfix.
Rgsd
Dhiraj
Stephen
Howdy,
I have sasl installed and postfix uses it for its outbound relay just
fine. I need now for a smart phone or two to use postfix to send
mail. Am I correct that there's no mechanism like
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_password for smtpd?
Just need a quick and dirty one
Robert Lopez:
On one instance of an email gateway there are two files ...
[r...@mg05 log]# ls -l /var/spool/postfix/corrupt
total 4660
-rwx-- 1 postfix postfix 2183168 2009-08-30 21:06 2C9ED9BB*
-rwx-- 1 postfix postfix 2588672 2009-10-02 06:46 939DD23CA*
You can find the history of
Rick Zeman wrote:
Howdy,
I have sasl installed and postfix uses it for its outbound relay just
fine. I need now for a smart phone or two to use postfix to send
mail. Am I correct that there's no mechanism like
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_password for smtpd?
Just need a
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Rick Zeman wrote:
Howdy,
I have sasl installed and postfix uses it for its outbound relay just
fine. I need now for a smart phone or two to use postfix to send
mail. Am I correct that there's no mechanism like
Hi,
I'm still using postfix-1.x,
Most people here would stop reading there and press/click delete (or
some might simply click 'Reply' and add the words 'upgrade').
So... UPGRADE. It is time.
Thanks for hitting me with the well-deserved clue-bat. Advice well taken.
Now, what if I said I
Dhiraj Chatpar:
Dear All,
I need to know how to reduce the sending speed or put in a delay of like 2
seconds before delivery to some of the domains.
Namely yahoo, hotmail and a few others.
Please help me and tell me how i can achieve this in postfix.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:21:33AM +0330, Ali Majdzadeh wrote:
mech_list: gssapi plain
pwcheck_method: saslauthd
saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux
keytab: /etc/krb5.keytab
and I am able to use GSSAPI and PLAIN (Over PAM using pam_krb5.so)
mechanisms. How is it possible to add
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Rick Zeman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
Rick Zeman wrote:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL
Whoops...been so long since I set that up
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:30:47AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
In your main.cf, set default_destination_rate_delay = 1s and
leave all those other parameters at their default.
This will instruct postfix to send no more than 60 messages
per minute.
This will apply to all transports, not just
Dear Sir,
I have tried default concurrency =1 and initial concurrency =1. but both of
them dont reduce the speed of delivering the emails. Can you please guide me
with a way by which i can reduce the sending of emails to very slow..
Please help
Rgds
Dhiraj
Ted Turner
Ted Turner http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/t/ted_turner.html -
Sports is like a war without the killing.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 00:04, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:30:47AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
In your main.cf,
Hello,
When entering smtp and smtps in transport I am getting an error:
postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/transport.db: duplicate entry: example.com
example.com smtp:[10.2.4.7]
example.com smtps:[10.2.4.7]
What is the correct syntax to have both?
Thank you,
Cameron
On 11/11/2009 2:53 PM, Cameron Smith wrote:
Hello,
When entering smtp and smtps in transport I am getting an error:
postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/transport.db: duplicate entry:
example.com http://example.com
example.com http://example.com smtp:[10.2.4.7]
example.com http://example.com
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:53:05PM -0800, Cameron Smith wrote:
Hello,
When entering smtp and smtps in transport I am getting an error:
postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/transport.db: duplicate entry: example.com
example.com smtp:[10.2.4.7]
example.com smtps:[10.2.4.7]
What is the
Patrick,
Thanks a lot for your help. I will test the mentioned configuration and will
post the results to the list. I hope it works. Unfortunately, I do not have
so much knowledge about LDAP, but I do know that it is possible to store
Kerberos principals in an LDAP structure. Well, I don't know
I have a mail server on my lan and I want it to route mail sent from it
through my mail gateway. It was working with smtp and mail headers were
showing that route.
Then I tried to move to smtps and I can send but the mail is no longer
routing to the gateway, it is sending directly from the
Viktor,
Thanks for your attention. You are right, but unfortunately we have got some
in-house developed mail clients which are bound to use cram-md5
authentication mechanism. Well, I think I should investigate on integrating
LDAP to our architecture and figure out the new opportunities.
Thanks
On 11/11/2009 3:03 PM, Cameron Smith wrote:
I have a mail server on my lan and I want it to route mail sent from it
through my mail gateway. It was working with smtp and mail headers were
showing that route.
Then I tried to move to smtps and I can send but the mail is no longer
routing to the
2009/11/12 Michael Saldivar mike.saldi...@advocatecreditrepair.com:
I use the open-source monitoring tool http://www.nagios.org/ combined with
NRPE to monitor all my servers and services.
+1
NRPE allows you to connect to the system being monitored, and execute
any command on the local system,
Phillip Smith wrote:
2009/11/12 Michael Saldivar mike.saldi...@advocatecreditrepair.com:
I use the open-source monitoring tool http://www.nagios.org/ combined with
NRPE to monitor all my servers and services.
+1
NRPE allows you to connect to the system being monitored, and execute
any
* Ali Majdzadeh ali.majdza...@gmail.com:
Patrick,
Thanks a lot for your help. I will test the mentioned configuration and will
post the results to the list. I hope it works. Unfortunately, I do not have
so much knowledge about LDAP, but I do know that it is possible to store
Kerberos
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote:
My original issue is still existing in that mail is no longer routing
through my mail gateway but is being sent directly from the mail server.
Any pointers in how to trouble shoot this?
transport maps:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote:
Phillip Smith wrote:
2009/11/12 Michael Saldivar mike.saldi...@advocatecreditrepair.com:
I use the open-source monitoring tool http://www.nagios.org/ combined
with
NRPE to monitor all my servers and services.
+1
Cameron Smith wrote:
Fixed!
The solution was to set in the mail servers:
relayhost = your.server.com http://your.server.com/
All the instructions when setting up behind a firewall seemed to say
leave that at relayhost = but adding my gateway IP makes it work so I
am happy :)
Yes, that is
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server
(running MailScanner spamassassin and postfix).
Lists:
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server
(running MailScanner spamassassin
Maybe you can tell spam filter postfix to HOLD all mails to your domains
and then just remove hold and postsuper -H ALL ?
like this:
http://wiki.zimbra.com/index.php?title=Irfan-Notes#Holding_the_Postfix_Queue_at_time_of_server_migration.2Fmaintenance
and
man 5 access and look for HOLD ?
Wietse Venema wrote:
Lists:
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server
(running
Lists:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Lists:
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching
Eero Volotinen wrote:
Lists wrote:
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server
(running
On 11/11/2009 7:14 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Lists:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Lists:
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent
Hi,
I hoped someone could clarify for me the difference between
check_sender_access and check_client_access? I don't know why the docs
are unclear to me.
When is a sender_access restriction used and when is a client_access
restriction used? I thought the client_access was based on the
envelope
Alex wrote:
Hi,
I hoped someone could clarify for me the difference between
check_sender_access and check_client_access? I don't know why the docs
are unclear to me.
Both restrictions look up something in an access table, and return a
result. With check_client_access, the thing that is
On 11/11/2009 8:18 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I hoped someone could clarify for me the difference between
check_sender_access and check_client_access? I don't know why the docs
are unclear to me.
When is a sender_access restriction used and when is a client_access
restriction used? I thought the
Yes, that is what I mentioned before. It looks like concurrency setting not
work.
Best regrads!
Coofucoo
-邮件原件-
发件人: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.
org] 代表 Wietse Venema
发送时间: 2009年11月12日 3:16
收件人: Dhiraj Chatpar
抄送: postfix-users@postfix.org;
Lists wrote:
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server
(running MailScanner spamassassin
Hi,
But commas do make it prettier to look at.
My reality has been shaken, and everything I previously thought I knew drawn
into question.
Yeah, crazy. I always had the smtpd_recipient_restrictions separated
by a comma, all on one line, until recently when I saw so many others
using it
Noel Jones put forth on 11/11/2009 10:16 PM:
But commas do make it prettier to look at.
Pfft. I removed all my commas recently to improve aesthetics. Now
you're telling me I have to put 'em back in? Sheesh. :P
--
Stan
Hi Magnus,
Thanks for replying...
Yup, I know about spoofing and I'm taking care of it in my system.
So let's assume that user is not spoofed.
Now I have scenario: Only some users can send email to particular user.
When I receive email on postfix, I just want to query: Is this sender can send
65 matches
Mail list logo
