K bharathan put forth on 2/2/2010 10:49 AM:
thanks for all
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All of that said, I don't find
Hi!
Sorry for keeping the off-topic... but I had to answer
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Kay put forth on 2/1/2010 11:49 AM:
In my job (hosting company) I see boxes exploited via roundcube all the
time. Squirrelmail? Not one so far. Part of
On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my current
version of Roundcube.
Then you haven't looked at it... the new features are really nice...
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my current
version of Roundcube.
Then you haven't looked at it... the new features are really nice...
thanks for all
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Carlos Williams carlosw...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-02-01 7:17 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
All of that said, I don't find I'm lacking any functionality with my
On 02/01/2010 06:49 PM, Kay wrote:
On 01/02/10 17:09, j debert wrote:
it seems that roundcube is popular.
It seems to be most popular among bots as well, according to what my
apache logs say. I don't have roundcube but there are frequent
attempts to get to php scripts down in the roundcube
Kay put forth on 2/1/2010 11:49 AM:
In my job (hosting company) I see boxes exploited via roundcube all the
time. Squirrelmail? Not one so far. Part of the reason is that
squirrelmail comes with RHEL, so it's kept up to date automatically,
while customers install their own roundcube and
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
Debian package:
[02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
Package: roundcube
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 0.2.2-1~bpo50+1
Eh? 0.3.1 is
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:17:49 -0500, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
Debian package:
[02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
Package: roundcube
New: yes
* fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu:
Eh? 0.3.1 is the current version, so how is 0.2.2 'up to date'?
attention
0.3.1 is the current version , so 0.2.2 is 'up to date'
That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
Charles Marcus put forth on 2/1/2010 4:17 PM:
On 2010-02-01 4:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My Roundcube package is currently up to date, and it is a standard
Debian package:
[02:21:52][r...@greer]/$ aptitude show roundcube
Package: roundcube
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/1/2010 4:31 PM:
That's probably some sort of twisted Debian humor .)
I wish it was humor... Debian Stable always lags pretty seriously behind the
cutting edge release versions of a lot of packages. Then again, from what I
understand, so do RHEL, CentOS, SLES,
12 matches
Mail list logo
