On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 12:30:32PM -0700, Bryan Arenal wrote:
> I have ~1000 emails that were previously sent from a different
> platform (but failed due to a system error) and I've been asked to see
> if we can re-send them with our Postfix server.
Do you have accurate records of the intended
the sendmail(1) man
page for usage.
http://www.postfix.org/sendmail.1.html
If these files are some format other than text, you'll need to
decide if it's worthwhile to find some way to convert them. If
you're lucky there is some existing tool to do that.
The postfix queue file format
dropping a test file
> into /var/spool/postfix/hold and trying to move it into deferred and
> then flush the queue but neither of those seemed to work. Is this
> even possible?
Postfix queue files MUST be written by Postfix. You can't put
non-Postfix files there.
The only support
Hi there,
I have ~1000 emails that were previously sent from a different
platform (but failed due to a system error) and I've been asked to see
if we can re-send them with our Postfix server.
I've looked into postfix's 'sendmail' as well as dropping a test file
into /var/spool/postfix/hold and
> On Feb 12, 2021, at 2:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> sendmail -G -i -f "sender" -- recipient... < file
>
> The -G will prevent Postfix from rewriting/adding message headers.
> It will still prepend a Received: header, but if that breaks DKIM,
> then the sender is at fault.
>
> However,
Tobi:
> Wietse,
>
> On 2/11/21 1:49 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > sendmail -f sender recipient... < file
>
> We could debug and solve the issue just wonder for next time: does
> delivery via sendmail command not change the msg by one bit? Especially
> no new or changed headers. Because we found
Wietse,
On 2/11/21 1:49 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> sendmail -f sender recipient... < file
We could debug and solve the issue just wonder for next time: does
delivery via sendmail command not change the msg by one bit? Especially
no new or changed headers. Because we found our problem to be the
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 07:49:30AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > So we thought it could be possible to somehow "import" such an affected
> > message directly into postfix queue to leave out swaks which may fix
> > something in the message. Is there such a postfix co
Tobi:
> So we thought it could be possible to somehow "import" such an affected
> message directly into postfix queue to leave out swaks which may fix
> something in the message. Is there such a postfix command to "import" a
> file as message directly into pos
ere in the content filter, so to avoid this
cases our filter returns 450 to postfix for such mail.
So we thought it could be possible to somehow "import" such an affected
message directly into postfix queue to leave out swaks which may fix
something in the message. Is there such a postfix comma
On 10/28/20 2:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
One possible way out is to skip the Postfix sendmail command, and
to use a "mini sendmail" program that submits mail via SMTP.
adding an msmtp sender as the VirusAction script in clamav milter, though a bit
of 'extra', certainly is the simplest.
easy
On 10/28/20 2:38 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
One possible way out is to skip the Postfix sendmail command, and
to use a "mini sendmail" program that submits mail via SMTP.
i've typically got msmtp rattling around.
Obviously that will fail when Postfix is down.
noted.
not ideal, but not
PGNet Dev:
> my clamav-milter.conf includes
>
> VirusAction /usr/local/etc/clamav/scripts/virus-alert.sh
>
> where that script _does_ invoke sendmail.
>
> found this process
>
> ps ax | grep virus
> 15670 ?S 0:00 /bin/bash
>
On 10/28/20 11:36 AM, PGNet Dev wrote:
On 10/28/20 11:30 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
You might start with:
# grep -r NoNewPrivileges /etc/systemd
i couldn't find any direct, relevant postdrop/maildrop, or NoNewPrivileges,
references i chased sendmail usage instances instead.
i've
On 10/28/20 11:30 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
You might start with:
# grep -r NoNewPrivileges /etc/systemd
and all other directories with systemd unit files.
yup. already done.
nothing --other than the now "=false" (need to double check if that's the same
as _removing_ it ) in
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:22:55AM -0700, PGNet Dev wrote:
> On 10/28/20 10:32 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > Indeed a process with "no_new_privs" will not be able to run sendmail(1)
> > to submit new email.
>
> noted.
>
> that said, this _just_ reappeared here,
>
>postfix/postdrop[15673]:
On 10/28/20 10:32 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Indeed a process with "no_new_privs" will not be able to run sendmail(1)
to submit new email.
noted.
that said, this _just_ reappeared here,
postfix/postdrop[15673]: warning: mail_queue_enter: create file
maildrop/678088.15673: Permission
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 06:19:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Barring interference from SELinux or AppArmour, ... this should not
> > happen unless file permissions change.
>
> Maybe this was true ten years ago, but it is not longer. The OP even
> mentioned something called "no new
Hi Viktor
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 01:00:35PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 09:01:38AM -0700, PGNet Dev wrote:
> > Oct 28 15:02:40 svr019 postfix/postdrop[64624]: warning:
> > mail_queue_enter: create file maildrop/553726.64624: Permission denied
> > Oct 28
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:13:23AM -0700, PGNet Dev wrote:
> > For reference, on my system:
> >
> > $ postconf setgid_group
> > setgid_group = maildrop
> > $ ls -ld /var/spool/postfix/maildrop
> > drwx-wx--- 2 postfix maildrop 2 Oct 28 12:52
> >
On 10/28/20 10:00 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 09:01:38AM -0700, PGNet Dev wrote:
Oct 28 15:02:40 svr019 postfix/postdrop[64624]: warning:
mail_queue_enter: create file maildrop/553726.64624: Permission denied
Oct 28 15:02:45 svr019
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 09:01:38AM -0700, PGNet Dev wrote:
> Oct 28 15:02:40 svr019 postfix/postdrop[64624]: warning:
> mail_queue_enter: create file maildrop/553726.64624: Permission denied
> Oct 28 15:02:45 svr019 postfix/postdrop[32688]: warning:
> mail_queue_enter: create file
on a new, from-distro-pkgs install of Postfix, i've noted an intermittent perms
problem
it'll run just fine for quite awhile, then I start seeing a steady stream of
...
Oct 28 15:02:40 svr019 postfix/postdrop[64624]: warning:
mail_queue_enter: create file
I am generally using postfix-logwatch for tracking log files.
However, I was thinking about something that is working in real time,
scripts can be run by cron in some period time.
Then the best solution could be write some syslog phraser or redirect
syslog to some
application eg. written in Java
hing goes wrong. That means it should be working with Postfix queue.
>
> You can use "postqueue -j" to get a machine-readable queue listing
> with arrival time, and why mail is still in the queue.
>
> However for historical information of past deliveries you will have
> to rely on Postfix logs.
>
> Wiietse
>
j.emerlik:
> I would like have policy service that will be able to write do data base
> some information eg. when exactly message was sent, message ID, DSN if
> soemthing goes wrong. That means it should be working with Postfix queue.
You can use "postqueue -j" to get a mac
Viktor Dukhovni:
>
>
> > On Feb 12, 2018, at 10:06 AM, j.emerlik <j.emer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It is possible to write some policy service that will be working with
> > postfix queue ?
>
> No. That's a bad idea anyway. To track message flo
On 12.02.2018 16:44, j.emerlik wrote:
> I would like have database and there information : Message ID, Sent
> Date (or last date of send trying), DSN, number of send attempts,
> Mail_From, RCPT_TO.
That type of information should be extracted from the Postfix logs,
as existing tools like
es wrong. That means it should be working with
> > Postfix queue.
>
> That's not really a specific description of your needs or design goals,
> so you can expect answers to be similarly vague. ;-) Have you looked
> into postqueue(1) and/or showq(8) yet?
>
> -Ralph
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2018, at 10:06 AM, j.emerlik <j.emer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It is possible to write some policy service that will be working with postfix
> queue ?
No. That's a bad idea anyway. To track message flow, parse the logs.
--
Viktor.
@postfix.org
Subject: Postfix queue
Lately I wrote in python postfix policy service that can do something for me
what I want.
Now I am thinking about next service butI don't know maybe it is not possible.
That is my question:
There is posssible write some service similar to eg.
check_policy_service
On 12.02.2018 16:06, j.emerlik wrote:
> I would like have policy service that will be able to write do data
> base some information eg. when exactly message was sent, message ID,
> DSN if soemthing goes wrong. That means it should be working with
> Postfix queue.
That's not reall
It is possible to write some policy service that will be working with
postfix queue ?
I would like have policy service that will be able to write do data base
some information eg. when exactly message was sent, message ID, DSN if
soemthing goes wrong. That means it should be working with Postfix queue
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:14:17AM -0800, Robert Wolfe wrote:
> "I read that postifx will retry emails for 5 days before it will stop and
> email will be removed from the queue. That is too much.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.4.1
Retries continue until the message is
Hi all. Saw this posted on the iRedMail forum and thought I would post
it here in the hopes that I could give a decent response to this
poster's question:
"I read that postifx will retry emails for 5 days before it will stop
and email will be removed from the queue. That is too much.
"I
Peter:
> Hi lads (and girls),
>
> Is there an easy way to set the auto-replies (or answers, not sure how
> are they called) in postfix like greylist does "come back later", or
> "try the next available MX gateway" when my queue size reaches a certain
> amount? It often happens that my primary MX
Hi lads (and girls),
Is there an easy way to set the auto-replies (or answers, not sure how
are they called) in postfix like greylist does "come back later", or
"try the next available MX gateway" when my queue size reaches a certain
amount? It often happens that my primary MX servers are busy
ah got it (always late). Maximal and bounce queue liftemes.
On 2014-12-20 09:16, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
Dear friends,
Sometimes I have similar issues in the que:
(connect to hotel-patrizietta.ch[185.53.177.20]:25: Connection
timed out)
Istvan Prosinger skrev den 2014-12-20 09:16:
Is there a way to limit this time or the number of attempts?
what if ?, you should not maintain remote problem resolving, since its
not your postfix that have problems
but if you really like to test, you can change queue lifetime from
default
Istvan Prosinger skrev den 2014-12-20 09:24:
ah got it (always late). Maximal and bounce queue liftemes.
it would be your fail if you set them lower then default
Hello,
I have an application that during its operation it generates lots of RFC-822
format emails.
My task is to send them to a single remote email address, and I've decided that
I rely on
postfix to do the job.
I wouldn't use a regular smtp chat with the postfix smtpd daemon, because I
Kov?cs Albert:
I wouldn't use a regular smtp chat with the postfix smtpd daemon,
because I don't want to block the application until smtpd receives
the message.
There is no need to block the application. Use parallism.
My next idea is to just modify the application, and drop (with the
link()
Hello Wietse,
thanks for the clarification, I'd stick to a stable and supported method.
On the QSHAPE_REAME page you say that try to keep the volume of local mail
injection to a moderate level.
Can you give me a rough estimation on moderate level for such an environment
where the only source
Kov?cs Albert:
Hello Wietse,
thanks for the clarification, I'd stick to a stable and supported
method.
Thanks. And I with I had a better answer.
Speaking which, Postfix supports QMQP. This protocol is simpler
than SMTP, designed by Dan Bernstein, and is based on netstrings.
Netstrings are
On 10/23/2013 6:22 AM, Kovács Albert wrote:
On the QSHAPE_REAME page you say that try to keep the volume of
local mail injection to a moderate level.
Can you give me a rough estimation on moderate level for such an
environment where the only source of messages
is the local injection? I mean
On 06/08/2013 08:17 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeroen Geilman:
On 06/04/2013 02:20 PM, Erwan David wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:44:46PM CEST, Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net said:
On 06/04/2013 01:22 PM, Antonio Guti?rrez Mayoral wrote:
Hi Wietse,
Yes, its a solution, but these emails
If he can just use a (sender-dependent) transport to send his
newsletter to, that would take care of the blockage, wouldn't it ?
Yes, provided that he does not saturate the active queue. There
is, however, no need to cripple this transport with single-recipient
deliveries. If one delivery
Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral skrev den 2013-06-04 13:22:
Maybe you can automatically HOLD all his mail and then automatically
release all his mail in the evening.
Yes, its a solution, but these emails should be delivered in
bussines-time :-(
(it doesnt matter if it takes 2 hours... but in
On 06/04/2013 02:20 PM, Erwan David wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:44:46PM CEST, Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net said:
On 06/04/2013 01:22 PM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
Hi Wietse,
Yes, its a solution, but these emails should be delivered in
bussines-time :-(
(it doesnt matter if it
Jeroen Geilman:
On 06/04/2013 02:20 PM, Erwan David wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:44:46PM CEST, Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net
said:
On 06/04/2013 01:22 PM, Antonio Guti?rrez Mayoral wrote:
Hi Wietse,
Yes, its a solution, but these emails should be delivered in
bussines-time
Hi all!
My name is Antonio I am currently managing a system with postfix+
spamassassin and Maia.
First of all, sorry for my bad english.
I would like to ask a question. Once in a month, more or less, I have a
user who sends
a LOT of mails (mailing) to a group of recipients. This list could have
Maybe you can automatically HOLD all his mail and then automatically
release all his mail in the evening.
Wietse
* Wietse Venema postfix-users@postfix.org:
Maybe you can automatically HOLD all his mail and then automatically
release all his mail in the evening.
I even have a script for that...
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der
Hi Wietse,
Yes, its a solution, but these emails should be delivered in bussines-time
:-(
(it doesnt matter if it takes 2 hours... but in bussiness time...)
thank you so much!
2013/6/4 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Maybe you can automatically HOLD all his mail and then automatically
On 06/04/2013 01:22 PM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
Hi Wietse,
Yes, its a solution, but these emails should be delivered in
bussines-time :-(
(it doesnt matter if it takes 2 hours... but in bussiness time...)
thank you so much!
You could run a script as a cronjob that queues x
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:44:46PM CEST, Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net said:
On 06/04/2013 01:22 PM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
Hi Wietse,
Yes, its a solution, but these emails should be delivered in
bussines-time :-(
(it doesnt matter if it takes 2 hours... but in bussiness
Hi.
I'm running out of space for my postfix's spool directory and I'm planning
to create a new 30GB partition and mount it over the current spool dir
(/var/spool/postfix).
How do I re-generate the queue after mounting the new partition and having
an emtpy /var/spool/postfix/ ?
In squid,
Santiago Romero:
Hi.
I'm running out of space for my postfix's spool directory and I'm planning
to create a new 30GB partition and mount it over the current spool dir
(/var/spool/postfix).
How do I re-generate the queue after mounting the new partition and having
an emtpy
Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.comwrote:
On 4/12/2012 11:51 PM, kshitij mali wrote:
my postfix queue data got increased to 850MB in size that is
/data/postfix/queue directory
all mail in this directory got stuck because the server hardware is down
i
had removed that hard drive and attached
kshitij mali:
Hi All,
I am in condition of worst and had bad luck .
my postfix queue data got increased to 850MB in size that is
/data/postfix/queue directory
all mail in this directory got stuck because the server hardware is down i
had removed that hard drive and attached to another
Hi All,
I am in condition of worst and had bad luck .
my postfix queue data got increased to 850MB in size that is
/data/postfix/queue directory
all mail in this directory got stuck because the server hardware is down i
had removed that hard drive and attached to another linux server
On 4/12/2012 11:51 PM, kshitij mali wrote:
my postfix queue data got increased to 850MB in size that is
/data/postfix/queue directory
all mail in this directory got stuck because the server hardware is down i
had removed that hard drive and attached to another linux server and
configured
Hello,
Is there any way, in which we could see Return-Path for a mail in postfix
queue via any command or referring to any file.
Using *postcat -q queueid* one can see the From address, sender:, but no
Return-Path
Also when is the Return-Path added into the postfix ?
I was referring to one
Am 23.03.2012 09:25, schrieb Anirudha Patil:
Hello,
Is there any way, in which we could see Return-Path for a mail in postfix
queue via any command or referring to
any file.
Using *postcat -q queueid* one can see the From address, sender:, but no
Return-Path
the MTA
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 23.03.2012 09:25, schrieb Anirudha Patil:
Hello,
Is there any way, in which we could see Return-Path for a mail in
postfix queue via any command or referring to
any file.
Using *postcat -q queueid* one
AND DO NOT REPLY MULTIPLE TIMES TO PREVENT
OFFLIST- ANSWERS LIKE MINE BY REPLY TO
THE WRONG DUPLICATE
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: To find Return-Path from postfix queue
Datum: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:39:59 +0100
Von: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Organisation: the lounge
In an older episode, on 2012-03-23 09:33, Anirudha Patil wrote:
Also any thoughts on if the Return-Path is added by postfix in header
or its the same as the envelope sender.
The envelope sender is written into the mail as Return-Path by the
MDAs (Mail Delivery Agents) when the mail is
In an older episode, on 2012-03-23 09:57, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
The envelope sender is written into the mail as Return-Path by the
MDAs (Mail Delivery Agents) when the mail is finally delivered.
So yes, they are the same, but the Return-Path is only a reflection of
the envelope sender.
See
Anirudha Patil:
Hello,
Is there any way, in which we could see Return-Path for a mail in postfix
queue via any command or referring to any file.
Use the mailq command. This shows the envelope sender (and
still to be delivered recipients).
Wietse
On 23/3/2012 10:33 πμ, Anirudha Patil wrote:
Also any thoughts on if the Return-Path is added by postfix in
header or its the same as the envelope sender.
See also:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/postfix-users/message/283690
Nick
Em 15/09/11 19:16, mouss escreveu:
in that scenario, is it OK to backup the /var/spool/postfix folder
on the old machine and simply drop it on the new machine ?
please stay with us. you said I do nt have a spare machine then ...
on the nwe machine?? do you mean the new disk?
sorry
Hi,
I need to change the disks on my postfix machine and i do not have
a spare machine, so i'll basically take out the old disk, put the new
ones and reinstall the machine.
in that scenario, is it OK to backup the /var/spool/postfix folder
on the old machine and simply drop it
Le 15/09/2011 17:17, Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit :
Hi,
I need to change the disks on my postfix machine and i do not have a
spare machine, so i'll basically take out the old disk, put the new ones
and reinstall the machine.
in that scenario, is it OK to backup the
Hi List
I don't know if this is possible
But we have developed a website for a customer with a CRM backend,
without around 72,000 subscribers.
We want to update and manage the subscriber list on the webserver and
generate the weekly mailshot, all these processes are running fine.
Our
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Jon Harris j.har...@digital-ink.co.uk wrote:
Hi List
I don't know if this is possible
It's not. Search the list archives, and there are plenty of people
wanting an API for dropping mail straight into the postfix queue.
I thought if I could generate
On 12/09/2011 14:37, Jon Harris wrote:
Hi List
I don't know if this is possible
But we have developed a website for a customer with a CRM backend,
without around 72,000 subscribers.
We want to update and manage the subscriber list on the webserver and
generate the weekly mailshot, all
email from web server to postfix queue
On 12/09/2011 14:37, Jon Harris wrote:
Hi List
I don't know if this is possible
But we have developed a website for a customer with a CRM backend,
without around 72,000 subscribers.
We want to update and manage the subscriber list on the webserver
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Jon Harris j.har...@digital-ink.co.uk wrote:
Hi Mark
I know this does sound odd, but the middleware uses its SQLite and its
own SMTP queue management.
Bypass it. Tell it that the smart relay host is your postfix box. It
is trying to do something it shouldn't.
Jon Harris:
Hi List
I don't know if this is possible
But we have developed a website for a customer with a CRM backend,
without around 72,000 subscribers.
We want to update and manage the subscriber list on the webserver and
generate the weekly mailshot, all these processes are
On 08/20/2011 12:27 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/19/2011 10:50 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
But from the volume you've described, you'll have trouble without
using specialized hardware.
Or a small outbound relay farm comprised of, say, 4 relatively low end
boxen, each with a low power dual core
with multiple connections
The biggest bottleneck to this system is the disk I/O. ( 15k rpm SAS
drives )
To avoid the double write to disk can I write to postfix queue directly
using some postfix library
I dont want to make smtpd connections in the app because that slows down
the app significantly
Am 19.08.2011 16:05, schrieb Ram:
I dont want to make smtpd connections in the app because that slows down the
app significantly
and also this is a serialized process.
So sending mails serially slows down the general delivery
it is a bad design sending hughe bulk and normal mail-traffic
ONE COPY of the report with multiple recipients?
To avoid the double write to disk can I write to postfix queue directly
using some postfix library
Direct Postfix queue access is not and will never be supported.
Wietse
?) business requirement.
The biggest bottleneck to this system is the disk I/O. ( 15k rpm SAS
drives )
Why not send ONE COPY of the report with multiple recipients?
These are personalized. Every partner gets his own data.
To avoid the double write to disk can I write to postfix queue
On 08/19/2011 07:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.08.2011 16:05, schrieb Ram:
I dont want to make smtpd connections in the app because that slows down the
app significantly
and also this is a serialized process.
So sending mails serially slows down the general delivery
it is a bad design
Am 19.08.2011 17:33, schrieb Ram:
On 08/19/2011 07:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.08.2011 16:05, schrieb Ram:
I dont want to make smtpd connections in the app because that slows down
the app significantly
and also this is a serialized process.
So sending mails serially slows down the
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
On 08/19/2011 07:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.08.2011 16:05, schrieb Ram:
I dont want to make smtpd connections in the app because that slows down
the app significantly
and also this is a serialized process.
So sending
On 8/19/2011 10:27 AM, Ram wrote:
To avoid the double write to disk can I write to postfix queue
directly
using some postfix library
Direct Postfix queue access is not and will never be supported.
I think I will have to make my app parallel processing.
But is there a reason why you should
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:42:02AM -0400, Peter Blair wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ram r...@netcore.co.in wrote:
On 08/19/2011 07:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 19.08.2011 16:05, schrieb Ram:
I dont want to make smtpd connections in the app because that
slows down the app
from
# Postfix queue. Matches either sender or recipient address.
#
# Usage: pfdel email_address
#
use strict;
# Change these paths if necessary.
my $LISTQ = /opt/zimbra/postfix/sbin/postqueue -p;
my $POSTSUPER = /opt/zimbra/postfix/sbin/postsuper;
my $email_addr = ;
my $qid = ;
my $euid
On 2010-12-29 10:14 AM, Joan Moreau wrote:
But I have no car to fix . What is that story about ?
In your first post, you vaguely described a 'problem':
the postfix queue manager (qmgr) is taking far too much resources when
the number of email pending is growing.
Now, I did not rule out
On 2010-12-29 Joan Moreau wrote:
Well, I am surprised by the tone of those emails.
I, on the other hand, am very surprised, how you're consistently avoid
giving this list any details about your configuration or your actual
problem.
Please either supply the information you've been asked for
Le 29/12/2010 12:38, Ansgar Wiechers a écrit :
On 2010-12-29 Joan Moreau wrote:
Well, I am surprised by the tone of those emails.
I, on the other hand, am very surprised, how you're consistently avoid
giving this list any details about your configuration or your actual
problem.
Please
But I have no car to fix . What is that story about ?
Now, I did
not rule out anything in any email.
Can you just tell me how to put
the mailing queue in a DB (mysql database in my case) ?
On Wed, 29 Dec
2010 18:04:45 +1100, James Gray wrote:
On 29/12/2010, at 4:02 PM,
Joan Moreau
On 12/29/10 4:14 PM, Joan Moreau wrote:
But I have no car to fix . What is that story about ?
Now, I did not rule out anything in any email.
Can you just tell me how to put the mailing queue in a DB (mysql
database in my case) ?
Exactly which part of NO YOU CAN NOT PUT THE QUEUE IN A
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:14:49 -0500, Joan Moreau j...@grosjo.net wrote:
Can you just tell me how to put
the mailing queue in a DB (mysql database in my case) ?
you may simply deploy MySQLfs (FUSE+MySQL) if you do not mind
speeds, loads,...etc.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mysqlfs/
On 12/29/2010 9:14 AM, Joan Moreau wrote:
Can you just tell me how to put the mailing queue in a DB
(mysql database in my case) ?
Yes, rewrite postfix to use a DB as a backend rather than a
file system. This will be a major redesign and not just a
plugin. No one else is working on such a
Hi,
the postfix queue manager (qmgr) is taking far too much
resources when the number of email pending is growing.
Is there a wait
to move /var/spool/postfix in a MySQL database ?
(dont tell me
dbmail, I want to keep my dovecot imap/pop sever)
Thanks
Joan
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 08:28:48AM -0500, Joan Moreau wrote:
the postfix queue manager (qmgr) is taking far too much
resources
What does too much resources mean? CPU? disk I/O? RAM?
when the number of email pending is growing.
Treat the disease not the symptoms, why is the deferred queue
Joan Moreau:
Hi,
the postfix queue manager (qmgr) is taking far too much
resources when the number of email pending is growing.
Sorry, you are jumping to conclusions.
There are many reasons why mail can pile up in the queue, and you
have not given a shred of information that allows people
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
