On 4/12/22 23:31, John Levine wrote:
For doing DMARC validation, I know about the opendmarc milter. Is that what
everyone uses? Is there anything else used in practice?
I know about perl and python libraries but they don't seem to have
milters or other ready to use integrations into MTAs.
For doing DMARC validation, I know about the opendmarc milter. Is that what
everyone uses? Is there anything else used in pratice?
I know about perl and python libraries but they don't seem to have
milters or other ready to use integrations into MTAs.
TIA,
John
> On April 10, 2022 Bill Cole
> wrote:
> Right, because you do not need to run 'postmap' on regex or pcre maps. The
> text
> format ios what Postfix uses for those types.
Thank you Bill! Knowing that now, I see where postmap(1) states:
| The postmap(1) command can query any
Dear roberts,
r r writes:
> Hello,
>
> My domain registrar has email forwarding for free. I plan to setup a
> authorized SMTP in my ubuntu VPS for sending email from this domain.
> I am newbie to email server and postfix.
> Do you have any suggestion on doing this?
Do you read rfc 8461? That
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 10:17:40 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Philippe Gramoull?:
> > Few stats from my mail server : i manage few personal domains,
> > little less that 100k email over a 2 years span.
> >
> > Over that period of time, i count 113 emails with "timeout after
> >
Hi Richard,
Op 12-04-2022 om 14:07 schreef Richard Rasker:
Op 11-04-22 om 18:34 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Hi Richard, ...
Eventually you could use my mailserver as a relayhost.
That is a very friendly offer, but if I do, that would of course only
be temporary, so that I can send e-mail
* Viktor Dukhovni:
> Perhaps dane-users then. I don't find Github to be a good forum for
> discussing design options.
I'm happy to use dane-us...@sys4.de if you don't mind it. I consider
that one pretty much *your* mailing list and did not mean to just barge
in, although I had obviously hoped
> On 12 Apr 2022, at 1:05 pm, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
> I invite you and other interested parties to discuss this on GitHub [1]
> rather than the Postfix mailing list. Release 1.0 is meant to provide
> core functionality, and follows the "release erly and often" approach.
> There is of course
* Erwan David:
> as you can see, let'sDNS would have to act in cooperation with the
> certificate update.
Which is exactly why I launch LetsDNS from a "dehydrated" hook whenever
the latter has obtained a new certificate, but before that certificate
is moved from staging into production. This
* Viktor Dukhovni:
> My first impression reading the docs is that "letdns" is not involved
> in certificate rollovers. Its job is solely to automate TLSA record
> updates.
Indeed.
> Are TLSA records matching the previous cert/key retained?
No, LetsDNS is stateless beyond the configuration
Le 12/04/2022 à 18:52, Ralph Seichter a écrit :
* Erwan David:
Does it handle restarting/reloading a program when changing the
certificate ? Postfix does not need it, but dovecot does.
LetsDNS does not obtain or change TLS certificates, because that's what
specialised ACME clients like
* Erwan David:
> Does it handle restarting/reloading a program when changing the
> certificate ? Postfix does not need it, but dovecot does.
LetsDNS does not obtain or change TLS certificates, because that's what
specialised ACME clients like "dehydrated" or "certbot" are for. A hook
function in
> On 12 Apr 2022, at 12:36 pm, Erwan David wrote:
>
> Does it handle restarting/reloading a program when changing the certificate ?
> Postfix does not need it, but dovecot does.
My first impression reading the docs is that "letdns"
is not involved in certificate rollovers. Its job
is solely
Le 12/04/2022 à 15:30, Ralph Seichter a écrit :
I'm happy to announce that LetsDNS release 1.0 is now available and
ready for public use.
Website: https://letsdns.org
GitHub : https://github.com/LetsDNS/letsdns
PyPI : https://pypi.org/project/letsdns/
LetsDNS is a utility to manage
* Ruben Safir:
> automated systems with root access are inherently not secure
Ah, nothing quite like shooting sweeping statements from the hip, is
there? :-) See paragraph one of https://letsdns.org/operation.html .
-Ralph
Hello,
This statement is at best off topic. Worst case scenario, it's toxic.
And you can be polite, too.
Thank you.
> On 12 Apr 2022, at 16:58, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
> automated systems with root access are inherently not secure
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 03:30:57PM +0200, Ralph Seichter
automated systems with root access are inherently not secure
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 03:30:57PM +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that LetsDNS release 1.0 is now available and
> ready for public use.
>
> Website: https://letsdns.org
> GitHub :
> On 12 Apr 2022, at 10:30 am, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> Most people do not need to run their own full-function mail server from the
> OS up. You can cause yourself major headaches by trying to do so, and as a
> 'newbie' you are likely to do so. If your registrar supports bi-directional
> relay
On 2022-04-12 at 08:35:30 UTC-0400 (Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:35:30 +0800)
r r
is rumored to have said:
Hello,
My domain registrar has email forwarding for free. I plan to setup a
authorized SMTP in my ubuntu VPS for sending email from this domain.
I am newbie to email server and postfix.
Do you
Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 15:03:40 Richard Rasker pisze:
>
> Sorry, I wasn't being clear here. What I mean to ask is if (and how)
> using a mail relay for sending mail could solve the problem that at
> the receiving end, reverse DNS does not match the originating
> domain.
Reverse DNS doesn't have
Philippe Gramoull?:
> Few stats from my mail server : i manage few personal domains, little
> less that 100k email over a 2 years span.
>
> Over that period of time, i count 113 emails with "timeout after
> END-OF-MESSAGE"
> where Postfix didn't received a QUIT command. Look at the breakdown
Hi Wietse,
I have a dedicated transport for this ISP, so I'll add this option right
now !
Thanks,
YM
Le mar. 12 avr. 2022 à 15:54, Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Jaros?aw Rafa:
> > W dniu wto, 12.04.2022 o godzinie 13?52?+0200, u?ytkownik Matus UHLAR -
> > fantomas napisa?:
> > > On 12.04.22
Jaros?aw Rafa:
> W dniu wto, 12.04.2022 o godzinie 13?52?+0200, u?ytkownik Matus UHLAR -
> fantomas napisa?:
> > On 12.04.22 11:21, Yves-Marie Le Pors Chauvel wrote:
> > > Using Postfix 3.5.6 on debian 11, I would like to know if there is
> > > any
> > > possibility not to use an alternative MX
I'm happy to announce that LetsDNS release 1.0 is now available and
ready for public use.
Website: https://letsdns.org
GitHub : https://github.com/LetsDNS/letsdns
PyPI : https://pypi.org/project/letsdns/
LetsDNS is a utility to manage DANE TLSA records in DNS servers with
only a few
Op 12-04-22 om 14:20 schreef Jaroslaw Rafa:
Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:07:13 Richard Rasker pisze:
But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to
use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see
https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I already
took care of the
Hi there,
@Rafa is right, the recipient domain has 2 MX-es and in case of that first
message, I don't wan't to my any retry on other MX. The issue it that the
deferred message does not contain this very first message so I can't see it
during my log analysis (bases on log message with 'to' and
On 2022-04-12 14:20, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Probably not, because smtp.xs4all.nl has IP address 195.121.65.191, and
reverse DNS for 195.121.65.191 is 195-121-65-191.dc.kpn.net. So it is
also a
"generic" hostname which may cause some systems to reject mail sent
from
this address. The ISP has
Hello,
My domain registrar has email forwarding for free. I plan to setup a
authorized SMTP in my ubuntu VPS for sending email from this domain.
I am newbie to email server and postfix.
Do you have any suggestion on doing this?
Thanks
On 2022-04-12 14:07, Richard Rasker wrote:
Op 11-04-22 om 18:34 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Hi Richard, ...
But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to
use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see
https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I already took
care
Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:20:11 Jaroslaw Rafa pisze:
> Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:07:13 Richard Rasker pisze:
> >
> > But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to
> > use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see
> > https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I
Dnia 12.04.2022 o godz. 14:07:13 Richard Rasker pisze:
>
> But according to the information supplied, I should also be able to
> use smtp.xs4all.nl as a relay host, see
> https://www.xs4all.nl/eigenmailserver/ (in Dutch -- and I already
> took care of the Spamhaus delisting).
>
> Question: does
Op 11-04-22 om 18:34 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Hi Richard,
...
Eventually you could use my mailserver as a relayhost.
That is a very friendly offer, but if I do, that would of course only
be temporary, so that I can send e-mail again, and I'd contact you in
advance.
You need a
W dniu wto, 12.04.2022 o godzinie 13∶52 +0200, użytkownik Matus UHLAR -
fantomas napisał:
> On 12.04.22 11:21, Yves-Marie Le Pors Chauvel wrote:
> > Using Postfix 3.5.6 on debian 11, I would like to know if there is
> > any
> > possibility not to use an alternative MX for outbound email
>
> MX is
(... sorry for late ...)
Byung-Hee HWANG writes:
> Hellow,
>
> My final Inbox Provider is Gmail(soyeo...@gmail.com) for 13 years. Also
> i added paid plan of Google Workspace for
>
> Someday far later i have to plan. That is to forward into
> soyeo...@gmail.com all emails (on
On 12.04.22 11:21, Yves-Marie Le Pors Chauvel wrote:
Using Postfix 3.5.6 on debian 11, I would like to know if there is any
possibility not to use an alternative MX for outbound email
MX is for inbound e-mail by definition
in case of a specific message with the very first attempt !
that's
Hi there,
Using Postfix 3.5.6 on debian 11, I would like to know if there is any
possibility not to use an alternative MX for outbound email in case of a
specific message with the very first attempt !
This is for a specific french ISP (Orange).
In some case, you can have these log messages :
36 matches
Mail list logo
