Bram Zerbe:
> I'm having trouble finding anything in the documentation...
> How can I configure postfix to have the ability to archive emails, not
> as an archive for legal purposes, but in the way that gmail/outlook/any
> other major email service does archiving?
> After adding
I'm having trouble finding anything in the documentation...
How can I configure postfix to have the ability to archive emails, not
as an archive for legal purposes, but in the way that gmail/outlook/any
other major email service does archiving?
After adding my email server to my phone with IMAP
re: the last two posts
I must admit giving yourself the local equivalent
of your own lifetime email account is an interesting
approach if you don't really need access to the raw
message files on disk.
Am 27.04.2013 04:32, schrieb grarpamp:
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
pff and you realized that the not a file per message is
exactly the solution for problems with tens thousands of
It is *a* solution, not
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
it is what you want
No, actually right up there is what I was surveying.
But you failed to grok that in your search for more pfft.
I'm sure it's a nice day, go outside :)
Am 27.04.2013 23:03, schrieb grarpamp:
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
it is what you want
No, actually right up there is what I was surveying.
But you failed to grok that in your search for more pfft.
I'm sure
On 26/04/2013 00:15, grarpamp wrote:
maildir format scale[s] quite well; pretty much the only
limitation is storage I/O.
Depending on your FS and horsepower, anything over
1000 x (n * 10) files in a directory can start to sink you
pretty quick. I've always wondered if there's a maildir split
I've always wondered if there's a maildir split
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
what about shifting this problem to the storage layer?
Apart using SSDs, what about using having a striped array as a RAID 1+0
layout,
post...@netorbit.it:
On 26/04/2013 00:15, grarpamp wrote:
maildir format scale[s] quite well; pretty much the only
limitation is storage I/O.
Depending on your FS and horsepower, anything over
1000 x (n * 10) files in a directory can start to sink you
pretty quick. I've always wondered
Am 26.04.2013 13:20, schrieb Wietse Venema:
post...@netorbit.it:
On 26/04/2013 00:15, grarpamp wrote:
maildir format scale[s] quite well; pretty much the only
limitation is storage I/O.
Depending on your FS and horsepower, anything over
1000 x (n * 10) files in a directory can start to sink
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
alternate you may use mdbox
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
Both of these hold all messages in a single directory.
So sdbox would be no advantage there.
And mdbox does not
Am 26.04.2013 21:24, schrieb grarpamp:
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
alternate you may use mdbox
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
Both of these hold all messages in a single directory.
So sdbox
Quoting grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com:
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
alternate you may use mdbox
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
Both of these hold all messages in a single directory.
So sdbox would be
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
pff and you realized that the not a file per message is
exactly the solution for problems with tens thousands of
It is *a* solution, not *the* solution, and obviously not one
of the
be no advantage there.
And mdbox does not support one message per file, nor
without metadata added to it, so those needing that for
other purposes would have no advantage.
if done a mailbox archive test with postfix bcc, filtering
with sieve to domain, user, date, mail-in , mail-out sort
On 4/26/2013 9:32 PM, grarpamp wrote:
specified out there that applications could utilize...
where n is your split width... tmp/n, new/n, cur/n.
pff and you realized that the not a file per message is
exactly the solution for problems with tens thousands of
It is *a* solution, not *the*
I realize that this is off topic, but as there are more email experts
assembled here than any where else I know of
I have a couple of users who are using their maildir as online storage
for emails (current and archival).
They have done this on their own and are prepared to live with some
On 04/25/2013 08:56 PM, John Allen wrote:
I realize that this is off topic, but as there are more email experts
assembled here than any where else I know of
I have a couple of users who are using their maildir as online storage
for emails (current and archival).
They have done this on
maildir format scale[s] quite well; pretty much the only
limitation is storage I/O.
Depending on your FS and horsepower, anything over
1000 x (n * 10) files in a directory can start to sink you
pretty quick. I've always wondered if there's a maildir split
specified out there that applications
Am 11.10.2012 07:28, schrieb Josef Karliak:
Good morning,
I know about Postfix's always_bcc that sends all emails to another
email mailbox. But are there some other options to archive emails ? For
example all emails will be copied to a some direcotory. How do you solve
your emails
, schrieb Josef Karliak:
Good morning,
I know about Postfix's always_bcc that sends all emails to another
email mailbox. But are there some other options to archive emails ? For
example all emails will be copied to a some direcotory. How do you solve
your emails archoves ?
Thanks and best regards
Am 11.10.2012 09:13, schrieb Josef Karliak:
Hi,
thanks for answer. I forgot to write our daily email's count - about
4.
number is not that relevant for basic archive actions, relevant for the
archive storage is how much mail must be stored, where and for how long
and what
that we will archive emails for a month, archive is
mostly used only for false positive spam.
Or what are your expericiencies ? How do you solve emails filtered
by spam (flase positives) ? Ok, one option is only marking and not
filtering, but our users ..
Thanks
J.K
into a resend and postfix will send it.
I presume that we will archive emails for a month, archive is mostly
used only for false positive spam.
Or what are your expericiencies ? How do you solve emails filtered by
spam (flase positives) ? Ok, one option is only marking and not
filtering, but our users
or copy the file named by
that id into a resend and postfix will send it.
I presume that we will archive emails for a month, archive is mostly
used only for false positive spam.
Or what are your expericiencies ? How do you solve emails filtered by
spam (flase positives) ? Ok, one option is only
Good morning,
I know about Postfix's always_bcc that sends all emails to
another email mailbox. But are there some other options to archive
emails ? For example all emails will be copied to a some direcotory.
How do you solve your emails archoves ?
Thanks and best regards
J.Karliak
On 8/18/2012 8:51 PM, අයි. ඩී. චාමින්ද ඉන්ද්රජිත් wrote:
Thank you very much for your help...
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Dear All,
I have configured Enkive Mail Archive Server and pointed Messages of
my mail server to Enkive
Dear All,
I have configured Enkive Mail Archive Server and pointed Messages of
my mail server to Enkive as follows.
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
filterunix - n n - - pipe
flags
}
192.168.2.66 is Enkive Mail Archive Server.
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:03:43 +0530
අයි. ඩී. චාමින්ද ඉන්ද්රජිත් indraj...@adm.sltidc.lk wrote:
Dear All,
I have configured Enkive Mail Archive Server and pointed Messages of
my mail server to Enkive as follows.
smtp inet n - n
On 8/17/2012 9:36 PM, අයි. ඩී. චාමින්ද ඉන්ද්රජිත් wrote:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
filter unix - n n - - pipe
flags=Rq user=nobody null_sender=
argv=/etc/postfix/enkive-socket-filter 192.168.2.66 2527
${sender} ${recipient}
Hello,
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:26:04 -0400
Daniel Bromberg dan...@basezen.com wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html#online
but all can only read online, nothing find where can download the message.
When Mailman is the list Manager, can wounderful download the message, but
on the websites
with the list
- daily, monthly, or yearly archives for the list
To find out if a list has any files associated with it, use the index
command:
index demo-list
If you see files in which you're interested, you may retrieve them by
using the get command and specifying the list name and archive filename
Hello,
is there a archive from the list where can download the messages?
Regards
Silvio
On 7/15/2012 8:24 PM, Silvio Siefke wrote:
Hello,
is there a archive from the list where can download the messages?
Regards
Silvio
Many:
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html#online
-Daniel
Hi @ll
the idea is to gpg sign archived mail only on the fly
current working
--
main.cf
recipient_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre
sender_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/backup_bcc.pcre
I'm running Dovecot 2.0.15 and Postfix 2.7.7 with postfix handing off to
Dovecot's LDA. I am hosting multiple virtual domains with multiple
users and everything is working. I would now like to create a permanent
archive of all sent/received mail with each virtual user's mail saved to
its own
On 12/12/2011 2:17 PM, Andrew M wrote:
I'm running Dovecot 2.0.15 and Postfix 2.7.7 with postfix handing off to
Dovecot's LDA. I am hosting multiple virtual domains with multiple
users and everything is working. I would now like to create a permanent
archive of all sent/received mail
a permanent
archive of all sent/received mail with each virtual user's mail saved to
its own sent file and received file. This needs to be independent of
the user's regular Maildir store since he can't delete or modify the
permanent archive.
Any suggestions on how to best accomplish this either via
* Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
On 1/6/2011 3:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Bob Proulxb...@proulx.com:
I am helping a school and they have told me they need to keep an
archive of all email through the site for a short period of time.
They also need to delete email after a period
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
On 1/6/2011 3:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Bob Proulxb...@proulx.com:
I am helping a school and they have told me they need to keep an
archive of all email through the site for a short period of time
On 1/7/2011 7:15 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandtralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
* Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org:
On 1/6/2011 3:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Bob Proulxb...@proulx.com:
I am helping a school and they have told me they need to keep an
archive of all email
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
http://www.arschkrebs.de/postfix/postfix_archive.shtml
but you would use always_bcc_maps
Thanks for the pointer to that documentation. And all of the followup
discussion from the others. I will give that a try and see how it goes.
Thanks!
Bob
I am helping a school and they have told me they need to keep an
archive of all email through the site for a short period of time.
They also need to delete email after a period of time. In the mean
time this email needs to be available for review by authorized
persons. (In practice actually
* Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com:
I am helping a school and they have told me they need to keep an
archive of all email through the site for a short period of time.
They also need to delete email after a period of time. In the mean
time this email needs to be available for review by authorized
On 1/6/2011 3:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Bob Proulxb...@proulx.com:
I am helping a school and they have told me they need to keep an
archive of all email through the site for a short period of time.
They also need to delete email after a period of time. In the mean
time this email needs
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:04:42PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/6/2011 3:31 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Bob Proulxb...@proulx.com:
I am helping a school and they have told me they need to keep an
archive of all email through the site for a short period of time.
They also need to delete
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:41:11PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
That's what it does - it generates u...@domain@bcc.invalid - but I was
looking for something that preserves the BCC headers.
You are
On 09/22/2010 08:17 AM, Yang Zhang wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Victor Duchovni
victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:41:11PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
That's what it does - it generates u...@domain@bcc.invalid - but I was
looking for
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients? The
closest param I've found so far are always_bcc friends, but these
lose some information (at least the BCC field). Thanks in advance for
any hints.
--
Yang Zhang
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients?
You can't. [Typically someone on this list will chime in that doing so
is trivial if you just read the docs;
On 09/21/2010 08:56 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients? The
closest param I've found so far are always_bcc friends, but these
lose some information (at least the BCC field).
On 09/21/2010 09:01 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients?
You can't.
Of course you can.
That's what
Yang Zhang:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients? The
closest param I've found so far are always_bcc friends, but these
lose some information (at least the BCC field). Thanks in advance for
any
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 21:07 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/21/2010 09:01 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their
complete form (all headers + payload) as received from
On 09/21/2010 09:12 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 21:07 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/21/2010 09:01 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in
-adaptor that forks
an SMTP transaction into two streams. I've been using this approach for
5+ years. Messages are transmitted in parallel to both the archive and
the real destination, but . is sent to the archive stream first, and
if that fails, the transmission to the real destination is aborted
, is an SMTP Y-adaptor that forks
an SMTP transaction into two streams. I've been using this approach for
5+ years. Messages are transmitted in parallel to both the archive and
the real destination, but . is sent to the archive stream first, and
if that fails, the transmission to the real destination
://www.arschkrebs.de/postfix/postfix_archive.shtml
Does the method described there use recipient_bcc_maps to preserve
the envelope recipient list (via u...@domain@archive-domain encoding)?
If not, then this is not the right document. The right method is
in the list archives.
I tried this, but it doesn't
of
the message without losing envelope information.
Was this the technique?
http://www.arschkrebs.de/postfix/postfix_archive.shtml
Does the method described there use recipient_bcc_maps to preserve
the envelope recipient list (via u...@domain@archive-domain encoding
(via u...@domain@archive-domain encoding)?
If not, then this is not the right document. The right method is
in the list archives.
That's what it does - it generates u...@domain@bcc.invalid - but I was
looking for something that preserves the BCC headers.
You are mightily confused. Bcc
the method described there use recipient_bcc_maps to preserve
the envelope recipient list (via u...@domain@archive-domain encoding)?
If not, then this is not the right document. The right method is
in the list archives.
That's what it does - it generates u...@domain@bcc.invalid - but I
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:41:11PM -0700, Yang Zhang wrote:
That's what it does - it generates u...@domain@bcc.invalid - but I was
looking for something that preserves the BCC headers.
You are mightily confused. ?Bcc headers are never sent by the MUA,
so there is nothing to preserve.
Postfix prior version 2.3 allowed this using regexp transport_maps:
/^(.*)@(.*)$/smtp:[${2}.smtp.transport.company.com]
I'm looking for this result in postfix version 2.3+:
u...@domain1.comsmtp:[domain1.com.smtp.transport.company.com]
--
Thanks.
On 7/14/2010 11:11 AM, Dusan Obradovic wrote:
Postfix prior version 2.3 allowed this using regexp
transport_maps:
/^(.*)@(.*)$/ smtp:[${2}.smtp.transport.company.com]
I'm looking for this result in postfix version 2.3+:
u...@domain1.com mailto:u...@domain1.com
Hi Postfix-users,
Following on from my original post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg09957.html
We are now writing a Postfix Milter (in java), to forward email on in envelope
format to our Email Archive Server.
Current Config:
Fedora 11 (just for now)
postfix-2.5.6-3
65 matches
Mail list logo
