RELEASE THISFORM instead of THISFORM.RELEASE

Saw this last week and wondered about the value of doing such a thing. If you call RELEASE THISFORM, the Release method of the form never fires. Hmmseems like a bad idea to me. Other perspectives? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http:/

RE: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

>the options are to move to a different OS (XP, Vista, Linux >), or move to a different product that does support Win2k. We're settled on Win 2K for the foreseeable future. Trend Micro Officescan is a decent commercial centralized network anti-virus system that works fine on Win 2k. It has a we

vbizness.vcx

Looking for a classlib from an old VFE5 app called vbizness.vcx. I'd like to look at an old screen that uses something from this classlib and I can't because I don't have the classlib. tia for anyone who can send it to me! --Michael -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http:/

Re: VFP - crime fighting [OT]

Cowardly Anglo Saxon Protestants are yellow. John Kerry and John Edwards come to mind. Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Pete Theisen wrote: > On Monday 03 September 2007 16:35, Gérard Lochon wrote: >>> Why Gerard... are you implying that the more wasp a community is, the >>> less crime

Re: VFP - crime fighting [OT]

Pete Theisen wrote: > On Monday 03 September 2007 16:35, Gérard Lochon wrote: >>> Why Gerard... are you implying that the more wasp a community is, the >>> less crime there is? Could that be interpreted as a racist remark? >> Just the opposite. >> >> I'm wondering why this product has such a kind

Re: VFP - crime fighting

On Monday 03 September 2007 16:52, John Harvey wrote: > The app didn't have a name, until MS wanted to do a case study. I had found > a cool looking wasp gif and the application was wireless, mobile and > inflicted pain on criminals so. I made was sorta fit into the > acronym Wireless Appli

RE: VFP - crime fighting

The app didn't have a name, until MS wanted to do a case study. I had found a cool looking wasp gif and the application was wireless, mobile and inflicted pain on criminals so. I made was sorta fit into the acronym Wireless Application Solution Project. JH -Original Message- From:

Re: VFP - crime fighting [OT]

On Monday 03 September 2007 16:35, Gérard Lochon wrote: > > Why Gerard... are you implying that the more wasp a community is, the > > less crime there is? Could that be interpreted as a racist remark? > > Just the opposite. > > I'm wondering why this product has such a kind of name, especially in

re: Unexplained behavior when attempting to write to a low level file

Sorry about that - I'm not sure if that was a typo or if I copied the extension of a renamed file I was using for a test. Thanks for setting me straight - Joe On Monday, September 03, 2007 5:06 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > >Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 17:06:13 -0400 >From: Ed Leafe >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

re: Unexplained behavior when attempting to write to a low level file

Sorry for bothering you all with my stupidity! The reason it wouldn't work with the .PJX files is that they have a field named OutFile! When I changed my use to m.OutFile all was well. Joe On Monday, September 03, 2007 4:20 PM, Joe Yoder wrote: > >Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:20:39 -0400 >From:

Re: VFP - crime fighting

> > Why Gerard... are you implying that the more wasp a community is, the less > crime there is? Could that be interpreted as a racist remark? Just the opposite. I'm wondering why this product has such a kind of name, especially in the border of Mississipi ... is it just an innocent way ? [

Re: VFP - crime fighting [OT]

I didn't give that much thought. Criminals come in all flavors and I don't discriminate. My tools just make it easier to identify and prosecute them. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/pro

Re: VFP - crime fighting [OT]

On Monday 03 September 2007 15:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> ... I'd post something about how VFP is helping make Memphis safer. > > > >Safer or ... wasper ? > > Why Gerard... are you implying that the more wasp a community is, the less > crime there is? Could that be interpreted as a racist r

Re: Unexplained behavior when attempting to write to a low level file after opening a .PRX as a table

On Sep 3, 2007, at 4:20 PM, Joe Yoder wrote: > I have discovered that when I open a project file as a table I can > no longer write to a low level file that has been opened > previously. When I substitute an .scx or .vcx file for the .prx, I > can continue to write to the low level file. >

Re: SQL "improvements"

Ed Leafe wrote: > On Sep 3, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Mark Stanton wrote: > > >> However the crux of the matter is the same in both, without this new >> requirement I can include fields I know to be non-variant >> > > You may know this, but there is nothing in either SQL or the > database t

VFP - crime fighting

>> ... I'd post something about how VFP is helping make Memphis safer. > >Safer or ... wasper ? Why Gerard... are you implying that the more wasp a community is, the less crime there is? Could that be interpreted as a racist remark? Larry Miller --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

RE: VFP - crime fighting

At 2007-09-03 19:27, you wrote: >http://foxprousa.blogspot.com/ Nice - but when you are searching for keywords - shouldn't you get clickable links to the docs? ** * Dan Olsson * *

Unexplained behavior when attempting to write to a low level file after opening a .PRX as a table

I have discovered that when I open a project file as a table I can no longer write to a low level file that has been opened previously. When I substitute an .scx or .vcx file for the .prx, I can continue to write to the low level file. Can someone explain this behavior? TIA - Joe Here is my

RE: VFP - crime fighting

A little of both! JH -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gérard Lochon Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 1:01 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: VFP - crime fighting > ... I'd post something about how VFP is helping make Memphis safer. S

Re: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

On 9/3/07, mrgmhale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I never thought that would happen so soon. The next big move is when Vista > becomes so mainstream that I need to migrate to that platform. By the time > M$ goes all 64 bit I hope to be in Linux-Dabo-Python World , using VMWare > for the remaining

Re: VFP - crime fighting

On Monday 03 September 2007 12:27, John Harvey wrote: > Crime is down about 6% this year, so far. Once again, thanks to Dave > Bernard of Intellection Group and Rick Strahl for their help and their > work! Hi John! They are the guys who took 6% of the criminals out of action, one way or another

Re: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

On 9/3/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But is the level of protection in 2006 the same as 2007? Isn't the > issue that he already has 2006, and needs to upgrade to 2007 to > remain fully protected? No, the deal is that every 1st week in September, they offer the next version of

RE: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

It is a shame that even Win2k is now being moved aside in favor of XP and even Vista OS platforms for AV protection software. But, then again, there is not much market demand for Win ME/98se/98/95/3.x/DOS any longer. I am not as familiar with other AV software as I am with Symantec/Norton, likely

Re: VFP - crime fighting

> ... I'd post something about how VFP is helping make Memphis safer. Safer or ... wasper ? Analysé par G DATA AVK Version : AVK 17.7335 de 03.09.2007 Informations sur les virus : www.antiviruslab.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@le

Re: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

On Sep 3, 2007, at 12:59 PM, mrgmhale wrote: > Re: 2006 vs 2007 (much NAV2008 that is now out), NAV2006 is a fine > version > to stay on. NAV2007 is a little simpler looking, until one needs > to get > into the inner workings to set certain options that are not as > obvious to > find. And,

RE: VFP - crime fighting

I created a blog about VFP last year and haven't done much with it, so I thought I'd post something about how VFP is helping make Memphis safer. Crime is down about 6% this year, so far. Once again, thanks to Dave Bernard of Intellection Group and Rick Strahl for their help and their work! http://

RE: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

The move to NAV 2007 vs staying with NAV2006 was indeed the issue, but with Win2k it is not a viable option. Hence th need to move to different app, or update the signature file subscription. The new retail NAV2006 from buycheapsoftware.com, even with shipping, is less than a renewal from Symante

Re: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

On Sep 3, 2007, at 12:17 PM, mrgmhale wrote: > Bill is correct. You can still get NAV 2006 at > www.buycheapsoftware.com, But is the level of protection in 2006 the same as 2007? Isn't the issue that he already has 2006, and needs to upgrade to 2007 to remain fully protected? -- E

RE: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

Bill is correct. You can still get NAV 2006 at www.buycheapsoftware.com, which works with 1000 Pro SP3+ or XP (not Vista) (and supposedly Win98, but I think that stopped with NAV 2005) for $21 plus shipping, retail box. Good folks, I often get software through them (other than MSDN software ) Fo

Re: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

If I'm wrong someone will correct me but I don't think that NAV 2007 will run on any W2K computer. I think that XP is required. You can however re-license your NAV 2006 by going to their website or I think you can also do it by running live update. Bill > The latest NAV 2007 will not upgrad

Re: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

On Sep 3, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Ted Roche wrote: > This is a mission-critical machine used to connect to various remote > sites. Mission-critical machines that rely on 3rd-party anti-virus programs. Hmmm... > Norton no longer supports their anti-virus application on the > machine, leaving

Re: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

On 9/3/07, Michael Hawksworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > History shows that you will end up uninstalling the others or corrupt them > enough you have to re-install them anyway :( Isn't that atrocious? This is a mission-critical machine used to connect to various remote sites. Norton no longer

Re: [NF] Thunderbird forgetting/losing saved passwords

MB Software Solutions wrote: > Vince Teachout wrote: >> Michael J. Babcock, MCP wrote: >> >>> Does this happen to anyone else? TB is constantly "forgetting" the saved >>> passwords I entered for my various email accounts, and it's a RPITA for me >>> to continually supply them. (If they were al

RE: SQL "improvements"

Set EngineBevavior 80 is a default :( -Original Message- From: Mark Stanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 6:45 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: SQL "improvements" > And why is is that any simpler (or better, or cleaner, or...) > than: > > select Emplo

RE: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

History shows that you will end up uninstalling the others or corrupt them enough you have to re-install them anyway :( Regards Michael Hawksworth > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:profoxtech- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche > Sent: 03 September 2007 14:10

RE: [NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

Maybe hit the registry and look for all occurrences of nav, then delete them. Install AVG or Avast. JH -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 8:10 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: [NF] Recommendations fo

[NF] Recommendations for Norton AntiVirus removal?

The latest NAV 2007 will not upgrade a working Windows 2000 computer thats running NAV 2006. So, we need to remove NAV. Googling yields a Symantec uninstaller that demands we uninstall Norton Ghost and PCAnywhere before we can remove NAV. Talk about bundling! We need the Ghost and PCAnywhere functi

Re: SQL "improvements"

On 9/3/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Of course! Clarity and precision have no place in database code! As > long as it's brief, it's good! > Now, you're talking A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Mainten

Re: SQL "improvements"

On Sep 3, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Mark Stanton wrote: > Iggzackerley! And the extra code I now need to write & the database > needs to perform seems to me a step backwards rather than forwards. > Thank God (Calvin?) for "SET ENGINEBEHAVIOR (sic)" Of course! Clarity and precision have no place

Re: SQL "improvements"

On Sep 3, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Mark Stanton wrote: > However the crux of the matter is the same in both, without this new > requirement I can include fields I know to be non-variant You may know this, but there is nothing in either SQL or the database that requires/enforces this. And there

Re: SQL "improvements"

Mark Stanton wrote: >> Out of memory I could say that when you have 10 or 20 fields in >> your output but the group by is by 4 or 5 of them, then using max() >> will give you more readable code > > Hmmm, I have to say I'm with Ed on this, "max" of something non- > numeric looks odd to my eyes. Ha

Re: SQL "improvements"

> And why is is that any simpler (or better, or cleaner, or...) > than: > > select EmployeeId, EmpName, sum(salary) ; > from Employee ; > group by EmployeeId, EmpName Iggzackerley! And the extra code I now need to write & the database needs to perform seems to me a step backwards rather than fo

Re: SQL "improvements"

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave Crozier wrote: > The "new" behaviour only brings VFP into line with standard ANSI standards. As I said, that's what I suspected > It is VFP that previously had its own standard(s). However the standard > behaviour can simply be made equivalent to the old meth

Re: SQL "improvements"

> Out of memory I could say that when you have 10 or 20 fields in > your output but the group by is by 4 or 5 of them, then using max() > will give you more readable code Hmmm, I have to say I'm with Ed on this, "max" of something non- numeric looks odd to my eyes. Mark __

Re: SQL "improvements"

Hi Stephen, > why are you using the group by? Is it the sum of a column or > another aggregate? Two situations, only the first is an aggregation. However the crux of the matter is the same in both, without this new requirement I can include fields I know to be non-variant across my group in t

RE: SQL "improvements"

Mark, The "new" behaviour only brings VFP into line with standard ANSI standards. It is VFP that previously had its own standard(s). However the standard behaviour can simply be made equivalent to the old method and when you look at it closely the standard is more logical. Dave Crozier -Ori