At 10:16 PM 3/19/07, you wrote:
Okay, well I have found someone else who has had this issue, so Ken
Dibble, if you are on this list I am pinging you...
http://leafe.com/archives/showFullThd/341872
I'd be interested, too. I got that error with the prior Runtime
Engine, but
I've got 0.7.1.0 on Win 2000. It won't run anything at all, at least, not
via its file picker. It displays the file picker, I pick a .py file (like
the main.py in the recipes demo, for instance), and both the file picker
and console windows disappear and nothing else happens.
Traceback is:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
I've got 0.7.1.0 on Win 2000. It won't run anything at all, at
least, not
via its file picker. It displays the file picker, I pick a .py file
(like
the main.py in the recipes demo, for instance), and both the file
picker
and console
If you want to stay current, you can check out the subversion
repositories, replacing that dabo, demo and ide folders.
Yup, that's what I do. If you want folks to test the runtime engine, it
would be helpful to make it possible to get updates for it the same way.
The exe is
Okay, well I have found someone else who has had this issue, so Ken
Dibble, if you are on this list I am pinging you...
http://leafe.com/archives/showFullThd/341872
I'm sorry I didn't see this sooner; I'm about 3 days behind on the list
right now. It looks like you worked it out with Ed
Okay, well I have found someone else who has had this issue, so Ken
Dibble, if you are on this list I am pinging you...
http://leafe.com/archives/showFullThd/341872
I'd be interested, too. I got that error with the prior Runtime
Engine, but the new version is working as it
If you want to be free from the threat of your development tool
disappearing on you have to go with the open source tools, anything else
can be gobbled up by one of the big fish... sounds familiar?
--
Regards
Michael.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post
On Mar 16, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Tristan Leask wrote:
Okay, well I have found someone else who has had this issue, so Ken
Dibble, if you are on this list I am pinging you...
http://leafe.com/archives/showFullThd/341872
I'd be interested, too. I got that error with the prior Runtime
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:47:23 -0700, Matthew Jarvis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyone gone down this route already?
Yup, I picked C# because it has the brevity of C but without having to
worry about all the crap like pointers and the like. The .NET platform
is getting ever better and all the
Heh, looks like everyone else is having these thoughts at the moment
as well then.
I have been tinkering with Dabo, but for some reason it's all stopped
working for me, so I am a little worried. Even the demos are not
working.
An error.log is produced with the following errors...
TraceBack:
I've used c# since it was released and it is now pretty good, Linq will
make it very good but it is not an easy system to learn. VB is an easier
route if you don't already know C or better still c++. I would avoid C
for commercial apps.
There are huge issues for any businesses based on
On Mar 15, 2007, at 10:25 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
Ed -- can Dabo do Palm apps and/or cell phone apps? I've got a need
where field installers are going to need to send a signal to the web
database to signal when jobs (fencing/railing) are installed, and I'd
love to have this on some
On 3/16/07, Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:47:23 -0700, Matthew Jarvis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyone gone down this route already?
Yup, I picked C# because it has the brevity of C but without having to
worry about all the crap like pointers and the like.
Paul Hill wrote:
What? Pointers are the best bit about C!
Pointers to arrays of pointers which point to structs containing
pointers. I love 'em!
Oh Pointy Birds, oh Pointy Pointy,
Anoint my head, Anointy, nointy.
- Steve Martin: The Man with Two Brains
I bet you just love balancing B-Trees in purely malloced data
structures
Pervert!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hill
What? Pointers are the best bit about C!
Pointers to arrays of pointers which point to structs containing
Paul Hill wrote:
What? Pointers are the best bit about C!
Pointers to arrays of pointers which point to structs containing
pointers. I love 'em!
Masochist, Paul?
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but couldn't you just have them hit
the website to trigger that jobs are done? Every mobile device
already has support for browsing the web so there's little need for
you to write a custom mobile client app for them. I recall seeing
ways to create the web pages
Steve Ellenoff wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but couldn't you just have them hit
the website to trigger that jobs are done? Every mobile device
already has support for browsing the web so there's little need for
you to write a custom mobile client app for them. I recall seeing
Anyone gone down this route already?
Yup, I picked C# because it has the brevity of C but without having to
worry about all the crap like pointers and the like.
What? Pointers are the best bit about C!
And that's why they're really the only way .NET, Java, and VFP(for
objects) work--
09:40
Posted To: Profox Archive
Conversation: [NF] I guess it's time for another programming language...
Subject: RE: [NF] I guess it's time for another programming language...
Heh, looks like everyone else is having these thoughts at the moment
as well then.
I have been tinkering with Dabo
On Mar 16, 2007, at 5:40 AM, Tristan Leask wrote:
I have been tinkering with Dabo, but for some reason it's all stopped
working for me, so I am a little worried. Even the demos are not
working.
An error.log is produced with the following errors...
TraceBack:
File daborun.py, line 242, in
Well, you could do something like that, or you could have a page
special for them where they enter in job # and/or other related
items. It really depends on your situation, but my point was just to
think of using the web interface as the way to communicate back to
your database, rather than
Michael Hawksworth wrote:
snip
My only advise on this is to make a plan so you don't end up making
pressured decisions; look at were you want to be in x (ten?) years time
and draft out a route-map of how to get there. Maybe you may plan to
give yourself a year to decide but make sure you
What? Pointers are the best bit about C!
Pointers to arrays of pointers which point to structs containing
pointers. I love 'em!
Masochist!
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
REALbasic is not FOSS, but some might see that as a positive. There are
very few legal issues if you are going to sell commercial applications.
If the company stopped producing the product, you would still be
productive with the product for years to come, even through 2015 and
beyond. Wait.
Okay, maybe it isn't necessary to jump ship just *yet*, but it's only a
matter of time...
I know that I'll need to do a rewrite of our MS Access front end app at
some point so have been considering other apps/languages lately anyway...
I haven't given dabo a fair shakedown yet.. RealBasic
Or maybe python...
So I got to thinking that all modern based 'visual' languages are
actually written in something like C anyway, so why not go ahead and
learn C (or a derivitive of that) i.e. learn one of the base languages...
The idea being that there must be libraries out there to do
IMO - I don't think this is a good road for you to take unless you've
got lots of time and patience.
As someone that knows C pretty well I can say from experience that C
is not a good choice as a step from a visual (gui style) RAD
tool/language. Not only because of the language itself, but for
Matthew Jarvis wrote:
Okay, maybe it isn't necessary to jump ship just *yet*, but it's only a
matter of time...
8+ years to be exact. s
I know that I'll need to do a rewrite of our MS Access front end app at
some point so have been considering other apps/languages lately anyway...
Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
P.S. I'd argue that python would be your best bet. xplat, lotsa
libraries, fat-client + c/s + mobile + web apps, growing userbase, fewer
security problems than PHP's hole of the week, cool name, and lotsa women.
Ed -- can Dabo do Palm apps and/or cell phone
Steve Ellenoff wrote:
Of course, IMO all those pale to VFP for RAD tools, but VFP is dead..
ummm..in 8 yearsyes. Think about what has changed in the past 8
years in our industry. I think Windows DNA was the way to go, wasn't
it? Hungarian notation was the right way to do things,
MB Software Solutions wrote:
Matthew Jarvis wrote:
Okay, maybe it isn't necessary to jump ship just *yet*, but it's only a
matter of time...
8+ years to be exact. s
I know that I'll need to do a rewrite of our MS Access front end app at
some point so have been
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MB Software Solutions
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:26 PM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] Dabo for mobile apps? (was Re: [NF] I guess it's time for
another programming language...)
Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
P.S. I'd argue that python would be your best bet. xplat
33 matches
Mail list logo
