Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-09 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Michael Madigan wrote: You're a racist. Black people don't have tails. Thanks Massah (with my tongue out and wagging my black tail) Whoever spoke about black people ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-09 Thread Michael Madigan
You were mimicking a slave by calling him Massah. I find that offensive. --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: You're a racist. Black people don't have tails. Thanks Massah (with my tongue out and wagging my black tail) Whoever spoke about black

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-08 Thread Pete Theisen
On Friday 08 December 2006 11:47, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: snip Thanks Massah (with my tongue out and wagging my black tail) Hi Ricardo! Oh, look! An emailing dog. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-08 Thread Michael Madigan
You're a racist. Black people don't have tails. Thanks Massah (with my tongue out and wagging my black tail) Christmas gifts for Real Americans Free Shipping for orders over $50 http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike ___ Post Messages to:

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-07 Thread Pete Theisen
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 18:26, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Pete Theisen wrote: On Thursday 30 November 2006 19:22, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: No Dummy, I want to get it through the spam filters. I'm laughing and you are calling names. Now who's the dummy? hahaha

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-06 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Pete Theisen wrote: On Thursday 30 November 2006 19:22, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: No Dummy, I want to get it through the spam filters. I'm laughing and you are calling names. Now who's the dummy? hahaha Hi Ricardo! Quite often tone of voice, laughter and other

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-05 Thread Pete Theisen
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 20:58, Helio W. wrote: snip In Somalia Hi Helio! If I recall correctly, the field leadership in Somolia was colored, and the colored guys decided that killing a bunch of colored guys was ok. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-05 Thread Pete Theisen
On Thursday 30 November 2006 19:22, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: No Dummy, I want to get it through the spam filters. I'm laughing and you are calling names. Now who's the dummy? hahaha Hi Ricardo! Quite often tone of voice, laughter and other emotions don't communicate

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-05 Thread Pete Theisen
On Saturday 02 December 2006 14:40, Jean Laeremans wrote: On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Roman Empire was capitalist. why do you think it lasted so long? Any idea why it perished ? Hi Jean! Yes. There were too many homos. -- Regards, Pete

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-05 Thread Pete Theisen
On Saturday 02 December 2006 16:49, Michael Madigan wrote: There are no places in the US where the police won't go. Only pizza deliveries. Hi Michael! Call 911, ask the operator to announce that there are free donuts at your address. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Paul Hill
On 12/2/06, Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are places in Paris and London and possibly Brussels where police will not go. I'm quite sure there are places in the US where the police will not go. BTW dunno about PAris

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:18 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Why I agree with him. What you're

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Bierschwale http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:18 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Paul Hill wrote: On 12/2/06, Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are places in Paris and London and possibly Brussels where police will not go. I'm quite sure there are places in the US where the police will not go. BTW

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Michael Madigan
I stick to first-world countries, I've never been to Londonstan. LOL --- Paul Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/2/06, Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are places in Paris and London and possibly Brussels where

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Michael Madigan
Only from other blue states. He actually thinks US people from out of his state are stinkin' ferriners Christmas gifts for Real Americans Free Shipping for orders over $50 http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike ___ Post Messages to:

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 7:42 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Yep, and I'd bet

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 7:42 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Yep, and I'd bet that in there time, every one of them was known as an entrepreneur of some sort

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 1:27 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: People were present during those time frames

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Ed Leafe
On Dec 3, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Forget about all the history our historians have supposedly taught you. Stories get exaggerated when people sit around a camp fire at night, having a few cool ones.. Ah, so now we're talking about the Bible? ;-) -- Ed Leafe

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
, December 03, 2006 1:52 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? On Dec 3, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Forget about all the history our historians have supposedly taught you. Stories get exaggerated when people sit around a camp fire at night

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 1:27 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: People were present during those time frames. People were people back then, just like they are today. Forget

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 2:21 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: I'm sorry that we did not all have access to the schooling that you obviously had. But you can tell a lot from

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Stephen the Cook
Ed Leafe wrote: On Dec 3, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Forget about all the history our historians have supposedly taught you. Stories get exaggerated when people sit around a camp fire at night, having a few cool ones.. Ah, so now we're talking about the Bible? ;-)

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Ed Leafe
On Dec 3, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Stephen the Cook wrote: Forget about all the history our historians have supposedly taught you. Stories get exaggerated when people sit around a camp fire at night, having a few cool ones.. Ah, so now we're talking about the Bible? ;-) It's the longest

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Michael Madigan
There you go again confusing him with facts. --- Stephen the Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ed Leafe wrote: On Dec 3, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Forget about all the history our historians have supposedly taught you. Stories get exaggerated when people sit around a

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-03 Thread Michael Madigan
I think the Book of Liberal Successes if probably more exaggerated, or perhaps the Book of French War Heroes. --- Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 3, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Stephen the Cook wrote: Forget about all the history our historians have supposedly taught you. Stories get

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:18 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Why I agree with him. What you're not understanding is capatilism is what keeps us all working and what makes us strive to be the best

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:18 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Roman Empire was capitalist. why do you think it lasted so long? Any idea why it perished ? A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
It perished because people got fat and lazy, much like Europe today. Everyday was a Roman Holiday, debauchery was the past time of the day, sick entertainment such as animal and human slaughter, it fell under it's own weight. Much like today where we're being invaded by the Muslim hoards.

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
Heck, they'd rather the Muslims take over than lift a finger to prevent it. Until they find out that muslim law will prevent them from most things they do today... And that the punishment is death.. And that they will be forced like a bunch of mindless sheep to pray a bunch of times per day...

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
Only the strong survive. I'm betting on the Muslims. --- Virgil Bierschwale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heck, they'd rather the Muslims take over than lift a finger to prevent it. Until they find out that muslim law will prevent them from most things they do today... And that the

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
Madigan Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 1:58 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Only the strong survive. I'm betting on the Muslims. --- Virgil Bierschwale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heck, they'd rather the Muslims take over than lift a finger

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 1:58 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Only the strong

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm talking about the Europeans. I don't think they'll fight for anything. Just because we're not setting the world on fire and throwing wild punches like some drunken boxer ? A+ jml ___ Post

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Helio W.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helio W. Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 6:02 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? *It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Helio W.
Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:18 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Why I agree with him. What you're not understanding is capatilism is what keeps us all working and what makes us strive to be the best

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helio W. Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 11:35 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? So by extrapolating your reasoning you'd think corruption is OK. Mafia guys are cool, they're are just entrepreneurs. You can take

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Why I agree with him. What you're not understanding is capatilism is what keeps us all working and what makes us strive to be the best. Would you prefer that we all lived in the same community where

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
No Envious ? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
No, just because you've allowed the Muslims to take over parts of your cities without a fight. You won't even fight for your homeland. There are places in Paris and London and possibly Brussels where police will not go. --- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are places in Paris and London and possibly Brussels where police will not go. I'm quite sure there are places in the US where the police will not go. BTW dunno about PAris or London but i do know this sin't the case in Brussels...

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
There are no places in the US where the police won't go. Only pizza deliveries. --- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are places in Paris and London and possibly Brussels where police will not go. I'm quite sure there

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread john harvey
! John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 3:50 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? There are no places in the US where the police won't go. Only

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
Madigan Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 3:50 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? There are no places in the US where the police won't go. Only pizza deliveries. --- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 12/2/06, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's always been a popular thing for some to say, the PO-lice won't even go there. Personally, those are the places I took my troops, when I heard that. The last time I heard that gangsters had put out a death threat against the PO-lice, I

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you imagine an police force in an American city deciding that a certain area was no go? Are the French insane? Says a man who doesn't even know what the acronym CRS stands for, let alone saw them in action A+ jml

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
There are areas in Paris where the Police refuse to go. --- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you imagine an police force in an American city deciding that a certain area was no go? Are the French insane? Says a man

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are areas in Paris where the Police refuse to go. News to me but if you say so it must be true... A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread vbiersch
crs stands for can't remember ?hit I know because I suffer from it -Original Message- From: Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Date: Sat Dec 2, 2006 4:27 pm Size: 750 bytes To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com On 12/2/06, Michael

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
Well aren't you intellectually curious? I guess not. --- Jean Laeremans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/2/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are areas in Paris where the Police refuse to go. News to me but if you say so it must be true... A+ jml

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 12/3/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well aren't you intellectually curious? I guess not. man you're good today...violating your own standards quicker than you can lower them. A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:18 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Why I agree

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:18 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Why I agree with him. What you're not understanding is capatilism is what keeps us all working and what makes us strive to be the best. Would you prefer

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-02 Thread Michael Madigan
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:18 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Why I agree with him. What

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-01 Thread Hal Kaplan
Ricardo wrote ... = if 'NO ONE is above' then you in particular are 'not above'. = So who should he believe? His friend who's an expert and is = IN THE FIELD removing them? Or you, talking about a subject = you know nothing about (and I don't mean bombs but what's = going on in Lebanon). And

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-01 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 12/1/06, Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ricardo wrote ... =if 'NO ONE is above' then you in particular are 'not above'. =So who should he believe? His friend who's an expert and is =IN THE FIELD removing them? Or you, talking about a subject =you know nothing about (and I don't mean

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-01 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
. The renaissance? Virgil Bierschwale http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helio W. Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 6:02 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-12-01 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Hal Kaplan wrote: Ricardo wrote ... = if 'NO ONE is above' then you in particular are 'not above'. = So who should he believe? His friend who's an expert and is = IN THE FIELD removing them? Or you, talking about a subject = you know nothing about (and I don't mean bombs but what's =

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Helio W.
, November 29, 2006 6:47 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Five girls killed in Iraqi clash Five young girls have been killed in Iraq during a clash between US marines and insurgents in the western city of Ramadi, the US has said. A US military

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
Bierschwale http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helio W. Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 7:58 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Michael Madigan
: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 7:58 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil, I don't know about you, but I don't think the insurgents had a TANK on that roof. Perhaps the insurgent were using small-arms, perhaps even some RPG-7. You could try to use

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Hal Kaplan
= Subject: RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? =  = I can see that you have very few friends.. = If I had some buddies on a helo that went down and I saw = even one person performing what I consider an atrocity on = one of the helo personnel, I would personally machine gun

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Hal Kaplan
in common with the peanut cluster candies you ingest. B+ HALinNY = -Original Message- = From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean Laeremans = Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:11 = To: ProFox Email List = Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 11/30/06, Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean, what do you know about cluster bombs? They really have nothing in common with the peanut cluster candies you ingest. Except when one of your friends is for the moment in Lebanon removing those bloody things that is...(btw all US made)

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Michael Madigan
= Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 12:11 = To: ProFox Email List = Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? =  = On 11/30/06, Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = Cluster bombs are always a good idea as they have the added = advantage that only about 30% explode so you can

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread john harvey
Of Jean Laeremans Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 11:44 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? On 11/30/06, Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean, what do you know about cluster bombs? They really have nothing in common with the peanut cluster candies you

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Hal Kaplan
= Subject: RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? =  = You might want to exercise caution when using words like = all, none, always and never. I doubt that ALL = clusterbombs in Iraq are made in the U.S. Seems to me, I've = heard of terrorists making their own. =  = John =  That would

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Jean Laeremans
On 11/30/06, john harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might want to exercise caution when using words like all, none, always and never. I doubt that ALL clusterbombs in Iraq are made in the U.S. Seems to me, I've heard of terrorists making their own. John Sorry John , Thos guys know their

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Hal Kaplan
=  = On 11/30/06, Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: =  =  Jean, what do you know about cluster bombs? They really = have nothing in common with the peanut cluster candies you ingest. =  = Except when one of your friends is for the moment in Lebanon = removing those bloody things that

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Hal Kaplan
=  = Sorry John , =  = Thos guys know their stuff. He's with the Explosive Ordnance = Disposal unit removing the rubbish Israeli bombings left = behind. If he says US made he knows what he's talking about. =  = A+ = jml =  With all due respect, NO ONE is above misrepresenting things or allowing

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Hal Kaplan
=  = I believe in giving my friends all the support that I possible can.. =  = That is very commendable, Virgil. What was your pay grade when you left the Navy? B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
:32 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? = = I believe in giving my friends all the support that I possible can.. = = That is very commendable, Virgil. What was your pay grade when you left the Navy? B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Hal Kaplan
= Subject: RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? =  = Why ? = Do you equate the lack of a commission with a lack of intelligence ? =  = Virgil Bierschwale No. Do you? B+ HALinNY ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
of no importance? = Subject: RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? = = Why ? = Do you equate the lack of a commission with a lack of intelligence ? = = Virgil Bierschwale No. Do you? B+ HALinNY [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Michael Madigan wrote: Jean's life is a cluster f*ck, maybe that's where he got it from. Realy nice! Because of course if you put a '*' noobody will understand the word. So it's as if you didn't use it. You are s polite and your manners are so flawless. Should go to the

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Hal Kaplan wrote: = = On 11/30/06, Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = = Jean, what do you know about cluster bombs? They really = have nothing in common with the peanut cluster candies you ingest. = = Except when one of your friends is for the moment in Lebanon = removing those

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Michael Madigan
No Dummy, I want to get it through the spam filters. --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Jean's life is a cluster f*ck, maybe that's where he got it from. Realy nice! Because of course if you put a '*' noobody will understand the word. So

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Hal Kaplan wrote: = = Sorry John , = = Thos guys know their stuff. He's with the Explosive Ordnance = Disposal unit removing the rubbish Israeli bombings left = behind. If he says US made he knows what he's talking about. = = A+ = jml = With all due respect, NO ONE is above

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Ricardo Aráoz
Michael Madigan wrote: No Dummy, I want to get it through the spam filters. I'm laughing and you are calling names. Now who's the dummy? hahaha --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: Jean's life is a cluster f*ck, maybe that's where he got it from.

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Hal Kaplan wrote: = = On 11/30/06, Hal Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: = = Jean, what do you know about cluster bombs? They really = have nothing in common with the peanut cluster candies you ingest. = = Except when one of your friends

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Michael Madigan
Sorry, maybe I should have called you a clown instead. LOL --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Madigan wrote: No Dummy, I want to get it through the spam filters. I'm laughing and you are calling names. Now who's the dummy? hahaha --- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL

Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Helio W.
List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Virgil, I don't know about you, but I don't think the insurgents had a TANK on that roof. Perhaps the insurgent were using small-arms, perhaps even some RPG-7. You could try to use similar firepower to kill them. Perhaps you could

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-30 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
, 2006 6:02 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? *It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty-three years and four months in active military service in this country's most agile military force

[OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-29 Thread Helio W.
Five girls killed in Iraqi clash Five young girls have been killed in Iraq during a clash between US marines and insurgents in the western city of Ramadi, the US has said. A US military statement said militants on the roof of a house had fired on its forces, who responded with tank fire. It

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-29 Thread Virgil Bierschwale
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helio W. Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 6:47 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance? Five girls killed in Iraqi clash Five young girls have been killed in Iraq during a clash

RE: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance?

2006-11-29 Thread Michael Madigan
Bierschwale http://www.tccutlery.com http://www.bierschwalesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Helio W. Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 6:47 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [OT] Colateral damage of no importance