Hi,
Replies inline.
fre jan 22 23:14:13 2016 GMT+0100 skrev François L.:
> Hi,
>
> I've same problem,
> Log say :
> Jan 22 23:07:30 s2sout13310a8 infooutgoing s2s stream myserver.tld
> ->gmail.com closed: Encrypted server-to-server communication is required
> but was not offered
> Jan 2
Hi,
I've same problem,
Log say :
Jan 22 23:07:30 s2sout13310a8 infooutgoing s2s stream myserver.tld
->gmail.com closed: Encrypted server-to-server communication is required
but was not offered
Jan 22 23:07:30 s2sout13310a8 infoSending error replies for 1 queued
stanzas because of fa
Timothée Ravier writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've read the XMPP TLS manifesto and I'd like to enforce it. But gmail.com
> doesn't do TLS and I'd like to exclude just this one.
>
> I know that this is not ideal, but that's still better for me than the
> current status: not enforcing TLS for anyone.
withou
On 5/22/14, 7:38 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
On 2014-05-21 20:57, Luis G.F wrote:
Is your decission, but in my modestly opinion, allow unencrypted
gmail.com connections is dangerous for the jabber network. If you allow
this with gmail.com, sooner or later you will allow too facebook.com or
a
On 2014-05-21 20:57, Luis G.F wrote:
> Is your decission, but in my modestly opinion, allow unencrypted
> gmail.com connections is dangerous for the jabber network. If you allow
> this with gmail.com, sooner or later you will allow too facebook.com or
> any other, you will always be a slave from ot
Is your decission, but in my modestly opinion, allow unencrypted
gmail.com connections is dangerous for the jabber network. If you allow
this with gmail.com, sooner or later you will allow too facebook.com or
any other, you will always be a slave from others. Is better for your
users, teach thems t
Le 21/05/2014 10:32, Luis G.F a écrit :
> Personally i don't like exclusion lists like that, even if the service
> are hosted by google. The manifesto says that all servers must switch to
> full encryption in order to work correctly with the rest of network, if
> google servers don't do, they will
Personally i don't like exclusion lists like that, even if the service
are hosted by google. The manifesto says that all servers must switch to
full encryption in order to work correctly with the rest of network, if
google servers don't do, they will be isolated but.. is his problem not
ours.
El
