Re: [PEDA] Copy selection to layer

2004-08-10 Thread bob stephens
Thanks Jim, You are a font of information. I disabled Optimize Wires and Busses, and now it looks like good ol' Protel again. Hopefully this won't come back to bite me later with connectivity issues... Bob -Original Message- From: Jim Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,

Re: [PEDA] Orcad schem part field for TOPSIDE or BOTTSIDE

2004-08-10 Thread Ian Wilson
On 03:07 AM 10/08/2004, Dennis Saputelli said: Orcad Capture has a schem part field for TOPSIDE or BOTTSIDE is there a way in 99SE or P2004 to get the netlist to dump the part on the indicated side of the board ? No, not automatically. You could use a part field (99SE) or a parameter (DXP/P2004)

Re: [PEDA] Orcad schem part field for TOPSIDE or BOTTSIDE

2004-08-10 Thread Dennis Saputelli
seems like this would be possibly a nice feature to optionally control from the schematic and be fully automatic if you didn't like the result you could still muck about with the parts selectively Orcad capture also has what i think is a new feature to v. 10: a big spreadsheet type panel with

Re: [PEDA] Orcad schem part field for TOPSIDE or BOTTSIDE

2004-08-10 Thread Ian Wilson
On 10:31 AM 11/08/2004, Dennis Saputelli said: seems like this would be possibly a nice feature to optionally control from the schematic and be fully automatic if you didn't like the result you could still muck about with the parts selectively Yep. I agree. Users have been suggesting a number of

Re: [PEDA] Orcad schem part field for TOPSIDE or BOTTSIDE

2004-08-10 Thread Dennis Saputelli
In the case of this new orcad feature you specifically do it 'outside' of the graphical sch you point to sheets and it gathers a properties page kind of like a batch process ds Ian Wilson wrote: On 10:31 AM 11/08/2004, Dennis Saputelli said: seems like this would be possibly a nice feature

[PEDA] footprint clearance checking

2004-08-10 Thread Dom Bragge
I have a connector that could be viewed as a large U when placed on the board. If I want to place other components within this U shape (not overlapping the physical connector but within the bounding box) what choices do I have: - permanently enjoying the 20+ clearance errors? (not preferred) -

Re: [PEDA] footprint clearance checking

2004-08-10 Thread Brian Guralnick
Design it like all of the components in my publicly available library, where the silkscreen defines the outer inner edges of where the component surfaces meet the PCB. Shrink the component-component clearance to 1 mil, or 0 mil. This will allow you place, for example, some caps resistors