Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed!

2002-10-18 Thread Tony Karavidas
-Original Message- From: Terry Harris [mailto:terry.harris;iname.com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:16 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed! On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:07:12 +1000, you wrote: Well you could have downloaded my partlist

Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed!

2002-10-18 Thread Terry Harris
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:07:12 +1000, you wrote: Well you could have downloaded my partlist generator from Protel BOM csv files for years. I don't recall seeing too many references to it over the years - I do forget stuff so maybe you gave mentioned it. But if someone asked me I wouldn't have

Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed!

2002-10-18 Thread Terry Harris
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:47:19 -0400, Rob Young wrote: Plus it is far superior to P99SE! I just ran a BOM with the new simple BOM generator and it is by far the best BOM output in Protel yet! In fact, I can just open the *.csv file in Excel and don't really have to modify anything. In the

Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed!

2002-10-18 Thread Ian Wilson
On 08:16 AM 18/10/2002 +0100, Terry Harris said: On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:07:12 +1000, you wrote: Well you could have downloaded my partlist generator from Protel BOM csv files for years. I don't recall seeing too many references to it over the years - I do forget stuff so maybe you gave

Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed!

2002-10-18 Thread Ian Wilson
On 06:58 PM 17/10/2002 +0100, Terry Harris said: On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:47:19 -0400, Rob Young wrote: Plus it is far superior to P99SE! I just ran a BOM with the new simple BOM generator and it is by far the best BOM output in Protel yet! In fact, I can just open the *.csv file in Excel and

Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed!

2002-10-18 Thread Tim Hutcheson
; those that read binary and those that don't. -- Anonymous Poster -- -Original Message- From: Rob Young [mailto:ryoung35;mindspring.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:13 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed! Hi Tim, Below is a copy

Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed!

2002-10-18 Thread Ian Wilson
On 09:07 AM 18/10/2002 +1000, Ian Wilson said: ..snip.. Another issue for which maybe someone knows the answer. How do you globally add a schematic component parameter? Or come to that how you globaly edit them - they don't appear in the inspector. The query: IsParameter And (ParameterName

Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed!

2002-10-18 Thread Tim Hutcheson
that don't. -- Anonymous Poster -- -Original Message- From: Rob Young [mailto:ryoung35;mindspring.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:47 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed! Plus it is far superior to P99SE! I just ran a BOM with the new simple

Re: [PEDA] BOM output in DXP is now fixed!

2002-10-18 Thread Terry Harris
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:56:25 +1000, Ian wrote: What I'm getting at is I can open an existing 99SE project and only with great difficulty generate a useable partlist with the information it already contains. Another nail pinning 99SE on my system for eternity. However, since the header row is