ons were even better - I'm PROUD to say that I
> still maintain a few old
> designs using SDT386+ and PCB386+, and I enjoy doing
> it, too!
>
> Steve.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 30 June 2004 04:3
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 4:26 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
>
> Bill Wrote:
> I hear rumors that India and China are training PCB Designers
> as fast as they can...
>
>
> I heard that rumor too. It must be going
PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
Yea.. I think they added 'Manufacturing' to the name because they were
merging PCD with PC FAB magazine... the subscriptions for PCB Design we
falling off due to the industry suffering and lay offs...and they weren't
gettin
x27;Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
Bill,
Just an FYI.
PCB Libraries is in the process of taking out some ad space in PCB Design &
Fabrication Magazine and they just reported to us yesterday that their
circulation is now 37,000. This includes both printed an
From: Brooks,Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:12 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
Yes it is interesting, since PCB design magazine had indicated that there
were about 26,000 designers/engineers subscribed to PCD in the whole world
before i
than I thought
Bill Brooks
PCB Design Engineer , C.I.D., C.I.I.
Tel: (760)597-1500 Ext 3772 Fax: (760)597-1510
http://pcbwizards.com
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:49 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [
> Sent: 30 June 2004 04:34
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
>
>
> Mike,
>
> I've been using Orcad for a couple of months and I'd
> say it's completely different from Protel.
> Ver. 10 is not much different from ver.9.2. They had a
>
t to Asia.
>>
>> Mike Reagan
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: bob stephens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:26 PM
>> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
>> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
>>
>>
>>
> The last I heard just before Cadence purchased
> OrCAD, that OrCAD had sold
> 280,000 seats of OrCAD capture.
No wonder. Orcad capture is compatible with PSPICE.
Many engineers use it mainly for that reason and then
you only need to add the footprints and load the
netlist. Orcad capture is als
t; From: bob stephens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:26 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Sapienza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 6:49 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
>
> That is pretty interesting data gathered here. The
> interesting part is that Cadence
Altiums Protel will never be number 1, it is just too cumbersome. Fine for
people who have plenty of time but little $$
PH
From: "Joe Sapienza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTE
Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
-Original Message-
From: Joe Sapienza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:57 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
Mike,
I doubt that PADS schematic can overtake anythingend comment
With regard to Orcad y
]
Website: http://www.PCBLibraries.com & http://www.PCBYellowPages.com
-Original Message-
From: Joe Sapienza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:57 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
Mike,
I doubt that PADS schematic can overtake anythingend com
]
Website: http://www.PCBLibraries.com & http://www.PCBYellowPages.com
-Original Message-
From: bob stephens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:26 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
-Original Message-
From: Joe Sapienza
-Original Message-
From: Joe Sapienza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:57 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
Mike,
I doubt that PADS schematic can overtake anythingend comment
With regard to Orcad yes in it's day (DOS) it wa
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
>
> That is pretty interesting data gathered here. The interesting part is
that
> Cadence has been successful in trash
That is pretty interesting data gathered here. The interesting part is that
Cadence has been successful in trashing OrCAD from number 1 to a has been.
I doubt if PADs schematic has overtaken OrCad.
Mike Reagan
EDSI
Frederick MD
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hausherr [mailto:[EMAIL P
18 matches
Mail list logo
