Re: [PEDA] (re)Annotation weirdness when using suffix

2001-07-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 05:17 PM 7/12/01 +0100, Steve Wiseman wrote: Hmm. If you use numeric allocation offset (start this sheet at 100, etc), the annotator gets it completely right - no allocation re-use. This is a straightforward, easy to understand, bug. We've all done similar. Actually, it does not get it

Re: [PEDA] (re)Annotation weirdness when using suffix

2001-07-13 Thread John Williams
Steve Wiseman wrote: And here I run into a brick wall. I have a vague memory that we have discussed in the past a shortcoming of the global edit Copy Attribute operation. I could find no way to use it to add a suffix. Perhaps someone knows how to do this! Hmm. Not me... Is this the

Re: [PEDA] 20H rule, Planes etc (Ex: perimeter stitched ground vi as question)

2001-07-13 Thread Ted Tontis
I never heard of the 20H rule, So I did a search on it. I found some very interesting articles on the subject, while I was searching I came across a article on X2Y technology. Has anyone used any of these devices? If so do they work as described and offer differential impedance within or close to

[PEDA] POTENTIOMETER

2001-07-13 Thread Richard Thompson
Hi Does anyone have a formula or a link to a spice model for a logarithmic scale potentiometer for use within the simulator on protel 99se sp6? ie. so that if i specify the wiper at 50% the resistance is not 50/50 but log law. hopefully this will be the last stupid question guys :-) Rich

Re: [PEDA] need uMAX10 footprint

2001-07-13 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support
having been in such a situation before i would suggest just making your own based on the mech dwg with pad dimensions adjusted according to your experience. there are not a lot of pins on those uMax True, but part of effective time management is managed laziness ;-) That is, spend your time

Re: [PEDA] need uMAX10 footprint

2001-07-13 Thread Brad Velander
Ivan, can you point me directly towards a detail for the package size? I will then send you the footprint I would use from SMT+ 's footprint patterns if it exists already. I use SMT+ because they give good support for new footprints that didn't previously exist in their reference. I

Re: [PEDA] need uMAX10 footprint

2001-07-13 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support
Brad: Is there a copyright issue with SMT+'s footprint? My fax # is 850-942-7905. Does SMT+ provide you with the part footprint in native Protel PCB format, or just a mech drawing of the land pattern? Best regards, Ivan Baggett Bagotronix Inc. website: www.bagotronix.com - Original

Re: [PEDA] need uMAX10 footprint

2001-07-13 Thread Bruce Walter
When I saw Ivan's initial request, I remembered using a small 10 pin package made by Analog Devices recently. I looked on the web, found the uMax package drawing, and compared it to the footprint I had made for that part, and it seemed to be compatible. I cannot now re-create where I got the

Re: [PEDA] MTBF Software

2001-07-13 Thread Soren Juel Andersen
Hey Vince. I know that MTBF software exist, but it is very expensive. It also depends on which kind of analyze you want to make: part count or parts stress. MTBF is not really used any more. The models it is based on is not valid, the data on the components are not up to date and so on. The

Re: [PEDA] need uMAX10 footprint

2001-07-13 Thread Dennis Saputelli
one last thought on this it may not matter what footprint you use because when you really get rolling and really need the chips they won't be available it is Maxim you know :) Dennis Saputelli -- ___

Re: [PEDA] need uMAX10 footprint

2001-07-13 Thread Brad Velander
Ha ha ha ha ha, good one Dennis! That story sounds too familiar, that's still SOP with Maxim is it? Brad Velander, Lead PCB Designer, Norsat International Inc., #300 - 4401 Still Creek Dr., Burnaby, B.C., V5C 6G9. Tel. (604) 292-9089 direct Fax (604) 292-9010 website www.norsat.com

Re: [PEDA] Trace jumpers generate DRC violations

2001-07-13 Thread MSIsallen

Re: [PEDA] need uMAX10 footprint

2001-07-13 Thread Dennis Saputelli
their game plan is to throw as many part types as they can against the wall and see which ones stick it works for them because the real money is in very high volume for which there is usually enough planning and time for the smaller guys ... Dennis Saputelli Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:

Re: [PEDA] need uMAX10 footprint

2001-07-13 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support
one last thought on this it may not matter what footprint you use because when you really get rolling and really need the chips they won't be available it is Maxim you know :) Yeah, they stink when it comes to parts availability. Their parts are great, if you can get 'em. I try to avoid

[PEDA] got what I needed; thanks

2001-07-13 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support
Hello, all: I got the info about the uMAX10 land pattern that I needed. Some kind folks on the Protel group helped me. Thanks. Best regards, Ivan Baggett Bagotronix Inc. website: www.bagotronix.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message:

Re: [PEDA] need uMAX10 footprint

2001-07-13 Thread Jon Elson
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote: one last thought on this it may not matter what footprint you use because when you really get rolling and really need the chips they won't be available it is Maxim you know :) Yeah, they stink when it comes to parts availability. Their parts are

Re: [PEDA] (re)Annotation weirdness when using suffix

2001-07-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 07:30 AM 7/13/01 -0700, John Williams wrote: Take a look at the (freeware) server called Reference Designator Modifier on the downloads page of: http://www.qualecad.com/ It can add arbitrary suffixes and/or increment reference designators of user selected schematic and PCB components.

Re: [PEDA] (re)Annotation weirdness when using suffix

2001-07-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 10:27 AM 7/13/01 +0100, Steve Wiseman wrote: [some response which was rooted in a misunderstanding of the full meanings of my statements. It appears that we both agree on how the program actually works and any differences were only semantic. It is moot who said it the most correctly.] If