Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE experience

2003-07-17 Thread Brad Velander
Choong, it is well documented on this forum that P99SE is not stable on Win98. The problem is with resource limits within Win98. If you can, upgrade to NT4 or W2K as well as upgrading your P99SE to Service pack 6. With one of those operating systems and the SP6, you should have very stable op

Re: [PEDA] PCB to Sch synchronizer

2003-07-17 Thread Peter Bennett
Graham Brown wrote: Hi all I want to synchronize my schematics with the reannotated PCB. Reannotation went well - Tools/reannotate etc., but Design/Update Schematics /Preview cannot match any components. Naturally I did a netlist compare and reloaded nets before reannotation just to refresh

[PEDA] DRC errors

2003-07-17 Thread Peter Moreton
I'm updating a PCB after making some schematic changes, and the PCB DRC checker is giving lots of violations of 'clearance constraints' and 'short circuit constraints' - I haven't changed any of the default protel design rules, and no matter how much I space out the parts, I'm still getting these

[PEDA] how to best connect multiple ground planes ?

2003-07-17 Thread rimas
hi there, this is a general PC board layout design question as opposed to a protel specific question - i hope noone minds too much my question is this - i have a double sided board with ground fills on both sides - what is the best way to go about connecting these? the board is an audio A/D c

Re: [PEDA] PCB to Sch synchronizer

2003-07-17 Thread Graham Brown
Thanks Peter . I tried both '( PCB ) Tools/ Update' schematics as the manual seems to suggest, and also '(Schematic) Tools/ Back Annotate'. Both gave the same result - failure to match designators. In my initial scheme I annotated the schematics using the advanced option to assign components on

Re: [PEDA] DRC errors

2003-07-17 Thread Heeter Brian T CNIN
Pete, I've had similar things happen when the Clearance Rule has been changed from "Different Nets Only" to "Any Net." I know that you said you hadn't changed any of the default rules but it's a quick and easy check. Hope this helps. brian -Original Message- From: Peter Moreton [mai

Re: [PEDA] how to best connect multiple ground planes ?

2003-07-17 Thread Jon Elson
rimas wrote: hi there, this is a general PC board layout design question as opposed to a protel specific question - i hope noone minds too much my question is this - i have a double sided board with ground fills on both sides - what is the best way to go about connecting these? the board i

Re: [PEDA] DRC errors

2003-07-17 Thread Steve Wiseman
17/07/2003 17:20:47, Peter Moreton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I'm updating a PCB after making some schematic changes, and the PCB DRC >checker is giving lots of violations of 'clearance constraints' and >'short circuit constraints' If you have units in PCB set to mm, not imperial, your rules

Re: [PEDA] how to best connect multiple ground planes ?

2003-07-17 Thread Harry Selfridge
Every signal path is a loop, consisting of the discrete trace that you normally regard as the "signal path", and the return side that follows either the ground or power supply return. The correct answer to your question is - whichever will produce the shortest return path for each signal while

Re: [PEDA] PCB to Sch synchronizer

2003-07-17 Thread Ian Wilson
On 09:45 AM 17/07/2003, Graham Brown said: Hi all I want to synchronize my schematics with the reannotated PCB. Reannotation went well - Tools/reannotate etc., but Design/Update Schematics /Preview cannot match any components. Naturally I did a netlist compare and reloaded nets before reannota

Re: [PEDA] CORRECTION: CAREER OPPORTUNITY FOR SENIOR PCB DESIGNER

2003-07-17 Thread JaMi Smith
Ron, I did not respond to your original post below, since I am a little too far away for the commute, living in Pasadena in the LA Area. The thought has occurred to me though that from time to time you my get snowed under and need a little "overflow" support, and as I have my own Protel 99 SE and