i should have said
1 mil or greater INTEGER grid instead of
'1 mil or greater grid'
Dennis Saputelli
Dennis Saputelli wrote:
>
> earlier i had reported the following
> (the saga continues):
>
> history
> i used virtual shorts without problems for > 1 year
> hundreds and hundreds of bds (tur
earlier i had reported the following
(the saga continues):
history
i used virtual shorts without problems for > 1 year
hundreds and hundreds of bds (turns out i was lucky)
one day a bd shop calls and offers to increase some tiny gaps ("no,
thanks!")
later another shop 'fixes' them without call
At 11:27 AM 9/25/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Hey, Abdul, your message had the full text of the original thread in it. I
>thought you were the one who advocated not doing that! ;-)
Certainly I have. Do as I say, not as I do :-)
Seriously, I did not quote the "full text," the boilerplate at the en
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:24 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject:Re: [PEDA] Virtual Shorts
At 11:47 24.09.01 -0700, you wrote:
>At 08:21 AM 9/24/01 -0500, Mark E Witherite wrote:
>> The issue with the virtual short is that it must be cut to test
&
did work (most of the time). As long as we didn't reverse bias the
chips...
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
n Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Virtual Shorts
* * * * * * * * * * * *
I tried "virtual" shorts once but they were too drafty ; )
(sorry, I couldn't resist!)
- Original Message -
From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:19
At 08:23 AM 9/25/01 +0200, Edi Im Hof wrote:
>At 11:47 24.09.01 -0700, you wrote:
>>At 08:21 AM 9/24/01 -0500, Mark E Witherite wrote:
>>> The issue with the virtual short is that it must be cut to test
>>> the two nets.
>
>Has somebody tried to make the virtual short not virtual but real
At 11:47 24.09.01 -0700, you wrote:
>At 08:21 AM 9/24/01 -0500, Mark E Witherite wrote:
>> The issue with the virtual short is that it must be cut to test
>> the two nets.
Has somebody tried to make the virtual short not virtual but real?
I mean, put it on the _solder_ side with a small
At 08:21 AM 9/24/01 -0500, Mark E Witherite wrote:
> The issue with the virtual short is that it must be cut to test
> the two nets.
Right. And if you know you are going to cut it, and especially if you are
going to cut it before assembly, it is desireable to fabricate it "cut,"
i.e.,
I was wondering, Mark, was the issue that you wanted to test the nets before
assembly? Or was it just in case of problems after assembly? For the
second case, you might use a virtual short on the top or bottom layers,
which could be cut if need be.
-Original Message-
From: Mark E Wither
At 04:34 PM 9/21/01 -0500, Mark E Witherite wrote:
>I was going to let the group how I made out with the virtual short I was
>planing on using on my internal planes. After a short discussion We
>decided not to do it. Our main concern was there was no way to test the
>PCB to be sure that the n
At 05:40 PM 9/3/01 +1000, Don Ingram wrote:
>Just got PCB Fab Magazine & noticed that they are running 10 micron wide
>traces.
>
>Better make the virtual shorts way less than the customary 1mil
The "customary" gap for virtual shorts based on unfabricatable gaps is on
the order of 4 micro-inches,
I'm *wearing* my virtual shorts right now good thing this is radio and
not television
-chris
-Original Message-
From: Don Ingram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 3:41 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Virtual Shorts
Just got PCB Fab Mag
Just got PCB Fab Magazine & noticed that they are running 10 micron wide
traces.
Better make the virtual shorts way less than the customary 1mil
heh heh heh
Cheers
Don Ingram
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph +61 7 4954 6074UTC+10hrs
Fx +61 7 4954 6222
- Original Message -
From: Abd ul-Rahman
17 matches
Mail list logo
