Comment #14 on issue 531 by st.ere...@gmail.com: Cannot build protobuf
using VS2013
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=531
Same problem as #12
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 694 by va...@pushstrength.com: module machine type 'x64'
conflicts with target machine type 'X86'
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=694
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create
Comment #2 on issue 692 by alfred...@gmail.com: Function headers for has_
accessors within oneof are put as private for enum/string/int32/bool
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=692
This bug should be about how containing_oneof wasn't check in
src/google/protobuf/compiler
Comment #4 on issue 689 by narayan@gmail.com: Repeated fields do not
serialize the 'size' into the file. Hence deserialize of repeated expects
an unending sequence of repeated fields
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=689
Looks likeit.
--
You received this message
Comment #3 on issue 689 by dwah...@gmail.com: Repeated fields do not
serialize the 'size' into the file. Hence deserialize of repeated expects
an unending sequence of repeated fields
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=689
It sounds like you're looking
Comment #2 on issue 472 by narayan@gmail.com: C++ Versions of
ParseDelimitedFrom writeDelimitedTo
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=472
Well, WriteVarint32 may not be sufficient since size_t is actually 64 bit
in modern computers, though in practice, it is least
/protobuf/issues/detail?id=689
This is by design. Protobuf fields are serialized as tag, value pairs.
The parsing routine will check the tag to decide whether a value belongs to
a repeated field and act accordingly. There could be a potentially infinite
number of such tag, value pairs
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 693 by gahan.ro...@gmail.com: clan scan-build analysis of
generated protobuf code produces warnings.
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=693
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. generate
Comment #1 on issue 613 by vap...@chromium.org: protoc: Add options to
redirect input / output to files.
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=613
https://github.com/google/protobuf/pull/235
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #17 on issue 447 by xiaof...@google.com: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
Feel free to create a github issue for this as we don't have a plan for
automated migration of issues.
From our point of view, adding move constructors
Comment #15 on issue 82 by dengc...@gmail.com: Add JSON serialization
support
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=82
How about this: http://pastebin.com/0pZ5ESqu
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 691 by kr...@163.com: Make procedure not able to finish on Ubuntu
14.10
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=691
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.downlaod protobuf-2.5.0.tar.gz
2.use
Comment #1 on issue 691 by kr...@163.com: Make procedure not able to finish
on Ubuntu 14.10
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=691
I am sorry that I've made a mistake.
After a long time waiting, make command finished successfully.
And all 'make check' passed.
--
You
Comment #16 on issue 447 by benjamin...@gmail.com: No C++11 move
constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
Now that protobuf is hosted on github: https://github.com/google/protobuf
Should we manually move this ticket to a github issue? Or is there a plan
to do
Comment #15 on issue 447 by t...@ripple.com: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
This *is* unfortunate.
In particular, whomever the gatekeeper is for this isn't actually telling
us why they aren't convinced - so how can we respond? It seems
Comment #11 on issue 119 by daen...@gmail.com: TYPE_BOOL collides with
MacOS macro
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=119
Is this bug just abandoned? It's still broken.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 690 by btkenn...@gmail.com: protoc can produce cpp code that
fails to compile due to naming clash on generated classes
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=690
What steps will reproduce
Comment #21 on issue 493 by verun.ka...@gmail.com: protobuf-java (2.5.0)
GeneratedMessage#getUnknownFields() not implemented
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=493
Sorry to re-surrect this, but we've run into this exact same issue when
trying to move to the CDH5
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 689 by narayan@gmail.com: Repeated fields do not serialize
the 'size' into the file. Hence deserialize of repeated expects an unending
sequence of repeated fields
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf
Comment #10 on issue 119 by l0gicsub...@gmail.com: TYPE_BOOL collides with
MacOS macro
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=119
Will this issue be fixed somewhen? It's really disappointing.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 688 by rich.h.d...@gmail.com: de
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=688
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What version
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 687 by leandro@gmail.com: ..
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=687
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What version
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 687 by liuj...@google.com: ..
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=687
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address
Comment #6 on issue 526 by j...@squareup.com: Protocol compiler doesn't
issue an meaningful error message when two custom options use the same
extension field number.
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=526
Any update on this issue? It seems to be still a problem (I just
Comment #1 on issue 686 by haberl...@gmail.com: Protoc does not provide a
dependency manifest output file for build tools like make
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=686
this is what we're using - maybe can be built upon:
https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit/blob
Comment #14 on issue 447 by mend...@gmail.com: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
So a move constructor (eventually marked as noexcept) is not a peformance
gain? Right!
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #2 on issue 686 by xiaof...@google.com: Protoc does not provide a
dependency manifest output file for build tools like make
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=686
Hi, could you help file this issue
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 686 by richardg...@gmail.com: Protoc does not provide a
dependency manifest output file for build tools like make
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=686
Protobuf files can have import
Comment #4 on issue 685 by tryb...@gmail.com: java.lang.VerifyError: class
RealtimeBidding$BidRequest overrides final method
getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=685
Ticket can be closed.
Look for solution here
https
Comment #3 on issue 685 by tryb...@gmail.com: java.lang.VerifyError: class
RealtimeBidding$BidRequest overrides final method
getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=685
Created example project to show the errors i get
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 685 by tryb...@gmail.com: java.lang.VerifyError: class
RealtimeBidding$BidRequest overrides final method
getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues
Comment #1 on issue 685 by xiaof...@google.com: java.lang.VerifyError:
class RealtimeBidding$BidRequest overrides final method
getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=685
We don't have 2.5.0 on the github release page
Comment #2 on issue 685 by tryb...@gmail.com: java.lang.VerifyError: class
RealtimeBidding$BidRequest overrides final method
getUnknownFields.()Lcom/google/protobuf/UnknownFieldSet
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=685
I'm getting the same error with 2.6.0
--
You
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 684 by edgar@gmail.com: integer overflow
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=684
What steps will reproduce the problem?
svn diff stringprintf_unittest.cc
Index: stringprintf_unittest.cc
Comment #11 on issue 270 by osu...@gmail.com: Precompiled protoc binary for
OS X
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=270
You could also try this:
https://github.com/os72/protoc-jar
https://github.com/os72/protoc-jar-maven-plugin
Either directly via java -jar ..., or extract
Comment #7 on issue 670 by osu...@gmail.com: Not Able to compile protobuf
for mips platform
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=670
Note that protobuf 2.4.1 seems to cross-compile fine to MIPS
2.5.0 and 2.6.1 both fail for me as well with the reported error
I used gcc 4.4
Comment #8 on issue 670 by osu...@gmail.com: Not Able to compile protobuf
for mips platform
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=670
After more digging it appears to build to MIPS32 (2.4.1, 2.5.0, 2.6.1):
./configure -host=mips32 CXX=mips-linux-gnu-g++ CXXFLAGS=-D__MIPSEL__
Comment #3 on issue 399 by olli.s...@gmail.com: Add support for using batch
files to wrap plugins on Windows
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=399
This would also make the dart-protoc-plugin useable on windows...
https://github.com/dart-lang/dart-protoc-plugin
--
You
Comment #4 on issue 679 by jw...@dilect.us: protobuf causes crash beacuse
of mutex lock
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=679
I am also seeing this, also from VerifyUTF8StringFallback(). My code does
not call google::protobuf::ShutdownProtobufLibrary().
--
You received
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 683 by bisteni...@gmail.com: Protocol buffers java
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=683
I have a .java class created by RestaurantBestLocationDTO.proto called
Comment #2 on issue 682 by dobba...@gmail.com: Windows phone 8.1 problem
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=682
Thank you! Here is link of issue in github:
https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/132
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 682 by dobba...@gmail.com: Windows phone 8.1 problem
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=682
I use protobuf in winrt app for Windows and windows phone.
I got this message when build for ARM: Host
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 682 by xiaof...@google.com: Windows phone 8.1 problem
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=682
Hi dobballa, we moved to github not very long ago. Could you file this
issue on our github site?
https://github.com/google
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #4 on issue 556 by xiaof...@google.com: Unable to cross-compile for
i686-w64-mingw32 with Cygwin
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=556
For cross-compiling, you can specify an protoc binary using
Comment #3 on issue 556 by bible.ma...@gmail.com: Unable to cross-compile
for i686-w64-mingw32 with Cygwin
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=556
Having the same issue. Did this get resolved?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #2 on issue 679 by islm.ya...@gmail.com: protobuf causes crash
beacuse of mutex lock
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=679
take care wher you call
google::protobuf::ShutdownProtobufLibrary()
also dont call it in worker process or worker thread!
--
You received
Comment #3 on issue 679 by islm.ya...@gmail.com: protobuf causes crash
beacuse of mutex lock
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=679
take care where you call
google::protobuf::ShutdownProtobufLibrary()
also dont call it in worker process or worker thread!
--
You received
Comment #10 on issue 270 by forrest@gmail.com: Precompiled protoc
binary for OS X
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=270
Building protobuf 2.5.0 under Darwin (Mac OS X) was straight forward enough
for me but getting it to build with the MATLAB extension was anything
Comment #9 on issue 270 by erdem...@gmail.com: Precompiled protoc binary
for OS X
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=270
If you don't install Xcode and developer tools, you'll have to install the
required dependencies on your own.
Just for future reference, your
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 681 by seymour@gmail.com: ar
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=681
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What version
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 681 by liuj...@google.com: ar
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=681
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address
Comment #8 on issue 270 by peter.on...@gmail.com: Precompiled protoc binary
for OS X
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=270
Well, if you trust third party binary here it is:
http://blog.ondruska.com/2014/11/google-protocol-buffers-compiler-binary.html
--
You received
Comment #4 on issue 512 by rob.west...@gmail.com: Add support for atomic
operations on powerpc architecture
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=512
I pretty disappointed in the support for the PPC architecture. WontFix?
really.
--
You received this message because
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 680 by dbertoui...@gmail.com: Python pickling depends on the path
used during compilaton
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=680
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Extract the test
Comment #1 on issue 680 by xiaof...@google.com: Python pickling depends on
the path used during compilaton
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=680
Can you post the exception stack trace?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #2 on issue 680 by dbertoui...@gmail.com: Python pickling depends
on the path used during compilaton
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=680
In the first case (Step 2).
Traceback (most recent call last):
File test.py, line 11, in module
cPickle.dumps(obj
Comment #9 on issue 515 by peterhan...@yahoo.com: More intelligent enums
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=515
Wrapping enum with another message looks ugly to me, and only simple way
for this so far would be adding prefix for it, like
enum CURRENCY {
UNKNOWN = 0
Comment #5 on issue 464 by ryan.fog...@gmail.com: Inefficient Java handling
of repeated list of primitive types
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=464
In case anyone is wondering. I just diffed GPB versions 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 and
there is no significant changes that would
Comment #2 on issue 512 by austin.l...@gmail.com: Add support for atomic
operations on powerpc architecture
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=512
This still isn't fixed in the latest repo. I ran across this bug report
when debugging why my code wasn't working on powerpc
Comment #3 on issue 512 by oded.gab...@gmail.com: Add support for atomic
operations on powerpc architecture
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=512
Hi,
I'm no longer working on PowerPC processors, and I don't have the platform
to test it.
So, please feel free to send my
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 679 by islm.ya...@gmail.com: protobuf causes crash beacuse of
mutex lock
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=679
What steps will reproduce the problem?
FreeBSD 10, it sometimes crashes
Comment #1 on issue 679 by islm.ya...@gmail.com: protobuf causes crash
beacuse of mutex lock
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=679
if i comment the line in common.cc on line 185
MutexLock lock(log_silencer_count_mutex);
everything looks well.
--
You received
Comment #5 on issue 585 by mengxi...@gmail.com: No support compile for
Windows Phone 8
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=585
many many errors...
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may
Updates:
Summary: HasExtension() called on a repeated field should cause a compile
error (Protobuf 2.4.1)
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #2 on issue 678 by xiaof...@google.com: HasExtension() called on a
repeated field should cause a compile error (Protobuf 2.4.1)
https
Comment #3 on issue 678 by kaspar.f...@dreizak.com: HasExtension() called
on a repeated field should cause a compile error (Protobuf 2.4.1)
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=678
That makes sense – and is consistent with the other uses of has in the
API. Thanks
Comment #14 on issue 187 by austin.l...@gmail.com: Command-line argument to
override the optimize_for option
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=187
I was able to use Keaton's plugin as a starting point and am using it now.
I didn't know that the protobuf compiler
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 678 by kaspar.f...@dreizak.com: Clearing an extension message
clears it but HasExtension still reports it's not cleared (Protobuf 2.4.1)
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=678
What steps
Comment #1 on issue 678 by kaspar.f...@dreizak.com: Clearing an extension
message clears it but HasExtension still reports it's not cleared (Protobuf
2.4.1)
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=678
For the sake of completeness, here are the files contained in the ZIP:
$ cat
Comment #2 on issue 549 by arglanir: Cannot install to anywhere except
/usr/local/lib
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=549
I have found the missing option at
https://www.mail-archive.com/protobuf@googlegroups.com/msg02998.html.
So if someone needs it, you should use
Comment #9 on issue 226 by vladimir...@gmail.com: Python API doesn't
support reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
Here's a workaround - assuming you want to do this because you are writing
protobuf messages to sockets. The delimited
Comment #10 on issue 226 by vladimir...@gmail.com: Python API doesn't
support reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
Here's a workaround - assuming you want to do this because you are writing
protobuf messages to sockets. The delimited
Comment #8 on issue 324 by wouter.b...@gmail.com: Feature: Add a new
primitive type for a DateTime format
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=324
Temporenc (http://temporenc.org) is a comprehensive binary encoding format
for dates and times that tries to solve the problem
Comment #8 on issue 226 by vladimir...@gmail.com: Python API doesn't
support reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
You have few use cases in your codebase? Lame reason. Disappointing.
--
You received this message because this project
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #11 on issue 570 by xiaof...@google.com: build 2.4.1 failed on mac
os x 10.9
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=570
The latest code includes iostream which I believe has fixed this issue:
https://github.com/google/protobuf/blob/master
Comment #9 on issue 570 by azxf...@gmail.com: build 2.4.1 failed on mac os
x 10.9
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=570
it the cofing.h file
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust
Comment #7 on issue 266 by blakeman...@gmail.com: Protoc generates unused
variable in Java for protobuf with single repeated field
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=266
Still waiting on a fix for this...
--
You received this message because this project is configured
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 676 by klocksve...@gmail.com: protoc does not warn for Java
keyword super
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=676
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Be mindless and forget that super
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Labels: FixedIn-2.6.1
Comment #1 on issue 675 by xiaof...@google.com: memory leak
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=675
Fixed in:
https://github.com/google/protobuf/commit
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 675 by vxm...@gmail.com: memory leak
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=675
A memory leak is detected by vld(visual leak detector).
I think the problem is caused by this function:
void
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 673 by weegreen...@gmail.com: protoc: can't control output
directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=673
I am working on integrating the protoc compiler to my build system, however
I'm
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 674 by weegreen...@gmail.com: protoc: can't control output
directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=674
May be related to #693.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. unzip project
Updates:
Status: WorkingAsIntended
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 673 by xiaof...@google.com: protoc: can't control
output directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=673
This is just how protocol compiler is designed to work. For C
Comment #2 on issue 673 by weegreen...@gmail.com: protoc: can't control
output directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=673
Please document how it's designed to work.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications
Updates:
Status: WorkingAsIntended
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 674 by xiaof...@google.com: protoc: can't control
output directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=674
Here is how it works:
Support you invoke protoc as:
protoc -Ipath1
Comment #2 on issue 674 by weegreen...@gmail.com: protoc: can't control
output directory
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=674
Why not improve the documentation with this ticket?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Summary: Officially support Maven protoc plugin
Status: Accepted
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #10 on issue 476 by xiaof...@google.com: Officially support Maven
protoc plugin
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=476
(No comment was entered
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 489 by xiaof...@google.com: 2.5.0 build failed on
sparc-sun-solaris2.10
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=489
Atomicops support for solaris is added in this commit:
https://github.com
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #10 on issue 447 by xiaof...@google.com: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
FYI.
Google's Style Guide now permits rvalue references to be used in move
constructors
Comment #11 on issue 447 by chen3feng: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
Very disappointed to hear this message.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust
Comment #12 on issue 447 by cbsm...@gmail.com: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
Speaks volumes that after 22 months after submission and 5 months after a
working plugin was contributed, there isn't even a direct answer.
--
You received
Comment #13 on issue 447 by chen3feng: No C++11 move constructors
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=447
let't make a fork on github?
2014-10-16 上午11:01于 proto...@googlecode.com写道：
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #6 on issue 226 by xiaof...@google.com: Python API doesn't support
reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
I searched around our internal code base and it appears there are very few
use
Comment #7 on issue 226 by brian.olson: Python API doesn't support
reading/writing delimited messages
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=226
The lack of an API for a framed stream of protobuf messages is a feature
for lack of which projects have decided to go with Thrift
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #4 on issue 381 by xiaof...@google.com: Do not use heap where stack
can be used
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=381
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #3 on issue 423 by xiaof...@google.com: Cannot compile protobuf
example code on AIX 6.1
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=423
Marking this as Won't Fix as we don't have the environment to test/fix
Comment #3 on issue 499 by johnzhj...@gmail.com: using protobuf on ios
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=499
in xcode build phases, add all you protoc generated .a library
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications
Comment #8 on issue 607 by gli...@chromium.org: Replace TSan API
declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
Niall, which Clang version are you using? Clang 3.5 must have this header
(in fact we've just checked
Comment #9 on issue 607 by nialldouglas14: Replace TSan API declarations in
atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
I would assume at the time of report I would be running 3.4 as 3.5 wasn't
out yet. Actually, until
Updates:
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #10 on issue 607 by xiaof...@google.com: Replace TSan API
declarations in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
Yes, I think we need to make the header work on Clang 3.4
Comment #11 on issue 607 by nialldouglas14: Replace TSan API declarations
in atomicops_internals_tsan.h with a header inclusion
https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=607
I can verify someone else's work after they have tested it themselves. I
don't believe I am authorised
1 - 100 of 2000 matches
Mail list logo
