Re: C# port status update

2009-06-11 Thread ualtinok
Hey Jon, I sent you the project you asked. I'm not confident in the SL proto library and also i didn't remade the modifications on the original library with the latest updates.(I think it's from late February) Ufuk On Jun 7, 10:16 pm, Jon Skeet sk...@pobox.com wrote: On Jun 7, 2:24 pm,

Re: C# port status update

2009-06-11 Thread jonathan.sk...@googlemail.com
On Jun 11, 11:26 pm, ualtinok ufukalti...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Jon, I sent you the project you asked. I'm not confident in the SL proto library and also i didn't remade the modifications on the original library with the latest updates.(I think it's from late February) Thanks, I've got the

Re: C# port status update

2009-06-07 Thread ualtinok
Actually I had sent you some small changes on the library to make it compile in SL: -SortedLists are not implemented in SL2 so i used a similar method SortedDictionnary which i found while googling. -Regex performance parameter RegexOptions.Compiled is also missing. So i dropped them.

Re: C# port status update

2009-06-07 Thread Jon Skeet
On Jun 7, 2:24 pm, ualtinok ufukalti...@gmail.com wrote: snip Although those modifications had worked for me (at least just for my trials), it's not solid. Solid in what sense? Do you run into problems, or you're just not confident in them? Can you tell me what you will need in the sample

Re: C# port status update

2009-06-06 Thread ualtinok
Hi Jon, Is there any news on Silverlight ? We are approaching to SL3 release and it would be great if we have a working protobuf library for SL. Ufuk On May 30, 12:22 pm, Jon Skeet sk...@pobox.com wrote: Just a quick update on the C# port of the Java code

Re: C# port status update

2009-06-06 Thread Marc Gravell
For info, protobuf-net (a separate implementation) works on SL2; I haven't tried it on the SL3 bits, but I could give it a go. On the plus side, this is more .NET idiomatic, and allows either contract-first (.proto) or can be used with your existing types; on the other hand, it uses a different

Re: C# port status update

2009-06-06 Thread ualtinok
I considered using protobuf-net for my project but as you mentioned your library is more .net centric and I couldn't find a way to establish a reliable RPC connection between c++ port (server) and protobuf-net (client-SL), because I'm also using that RPC server to serve other client

C# port status update

2009-05-30 Thread Jon Skeet
Just a quick update on the C# port of the Java code (at http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/) I've just done a bit of work to get the C# code in line with the 2.1 release, with the exception of the RPC changes (which I need to take a closer look at). There are a number of things I'd