On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
> The following patch fixes the problem with older versions of the SSL
> library.
>
> It also works on the latest Fedora 17, so I think it's low risk.
>
> Shall I commit it?
>
Sure
--Rafael
;decimal64", 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2**60)
> > > File
> > >
> > > "/home/kgiusti/proton-rc/qpid-proton-c-0.1/tests/proton_tests/codec.py",
> > > line 183, in _test
> > > putter(v)
> > > File
> > >
>
t; File
> > "/home/kgiusti/proton-rc/install/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/proton.py",
> > line 1134, in put_decimal64
> > self._check(pn_data_put_decimal64(self._data, d))
> > TypeError: in method 'pn_data_put_decimal64', argument 2 of t
ecimal64_t'
> proton_tests.codec.DataTest.testDescribedEmptyArray
> ...
> pass
>
> This happens to be on a 32-bit VM - I'll look into it.
>
> -K
>
> - Original Me
.
pass
This happens to be on a 32-bit VM - I'll look into it.
-K
- Original Message -
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've posted an initial release candidate here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/
>
> Please keep in mind there hasn't be
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 08:01 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 14:41 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > I've posted an initia
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
> The proton-j package doesn't seem to have a README or a LICENSE file
> included. The maven build can't run the tests as the directory
> structure doesn't include all the necessary files (nor does it have
> the same structure as the svn).
>
Wh
one,
>
> I've posted an initial release candidate here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/
>
> Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install testing so
> go ahead and try on as many different OS distro/versions as you can find
> and let me know if/when things break.
>
> --Rafael
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 14:41 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I've posted an initial release candidate here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/
> >
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The doc issue should be fixed on trunk. I'll see if anymore
> > > > > problems come
> > > > > up.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Oops, hit send too soon... I'll see if a
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 14:41 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've posted an initial release candidate here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/
>
> Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install testing s
> > > The doc issue should be fixed on trunk. I'll see if anymore
> > > > problems come
> > > > up.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Oops, hit send too soon... I'll see if anymore problems come up
> > > before
> > > generating
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:54:30PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > What I'd like to see would be to have qpid-proton and qpid-proton-java
> > as the two source tarballs if possible. That way I can keep the RPM
> > named qpid-proton (I would rather not put -c into the name).
>
> I'm not so sure
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:41:24PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I've posted an initial release candidate here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/
&g
on trunk. I'll see if anymore
> > > problems come
> > > up.
> > >
> >
> > Oops, hit send too soon... I'll see if anymore problems come up
> > before
> > generating more tarballs.
> >
> > --Rafael
> >
> >
>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Rafael Schloming
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I've posted an initial release candidate here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/
> >
> > Please keep in mind there hasn't been a
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:41:24PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've posted an initial release candidate here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/
>
> Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install testing s
el
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Ted Ross wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/23/2012 02:41 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I've posted an initial release candidate here:
> >&g
-1
The java distro does not have the pom versions updated. See my comments on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-47
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've posted an initial release candidate here:
>
> http://people.
gt;
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Ted Ross wrote:
>
>> On 10/23/2012 02:41 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I've posted an initial release candidate here:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.o
The doc issue should be fixed on trunk. I'll see if anymore problems come
up.
--Rafael
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Ted Ross wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 02:41 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I've posted an initial release candidate here:
>
Well done.
William
- Original Message -
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've posted an initial release candidate here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/
>
> Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install
> testing so
> go
On 10/23/2012 02:41 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've posted an initial release candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/
Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install testing so
go ahead and try on as many different OS distro/v
Hi Everyone,
I've posted an initial release candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/
Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install testing so
go ahead and try on as many different OS distro/versions as you can find
and let me know if/when th
24 matches
Mail list logo
