About element attribute
On 18 дек, 01:25, kangax wrote:
> On Dec 17, 11:42 am, buda wrote:
>
> > I set required=true for some select on a form
>
> Are you talking about element attributes or object properties?
>
> [...]
>
> --
> kangax
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You r
On Dec 17, 11:42 am, buda wrote:
> I set required=true for some select on a form
Are you talking about element attributes or object properties?
[...]
--
kangax
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prot
I am tryinh to subscribe to web-dev list
if it'll sucsessfull - I send a list
On 17 дек, 21:52, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> But IE < 8 treats height as if it was min-height, not as height. I
> propose that you make a static copy of your HTML, post it somewhere,
> and then post a screenshot fro
But IE < 8 treats height as if it was min-height, not as height. I
propose that you make a static copy of your HTML, post it somewhere,
and then post a screenshot from IE for comparison purposes. But
really, we've gone pretty far off topic for this list. I'm happy to
help you in another ve
so I cant understand why its not work correctly
div.select('select[required="true"]')
On 17 дек, 21:38, buda wrote:
> I wan add that I dont produce invalid HTML code - I only use IEs quirk
> mode because of its true understanding of "height=100%"
>
> I need an lyaout which is fets only viewport
I wan add that I dont produce invalid HTML code - I only use IEs quirk
mode because of its true understanding of "height=100%"
I need an lyaout which is fets only viewport of window, not bigger it
It must have menubar and beneath left menu pane and right contentarea
and it must be elastic
On 17
There are lots and lots of Web sites out there, and many many books on
standards-based design. There is nothing that can't be done, usually
pretty simply. Anyone who works in the standards has run their head up
against a seeming-impossible layout before, so if you're really stuck,
post you
but if they dont allow me to do what I need - why they are?
I have spent alot of time trying to develop onviewport plastic layout
( look at CRM web pages )
it apperares that its impossible!!!
On 17 дек, 21:07, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> Don't you think that's the tail wagging the dog? The standar
Don't you think that's the tail wagging the dog? The standards are
there so that ALL the browser manufacturers can follow them, not the
other way around. We already suffered through what happens when each
browser manufacturer goes his or her own way -- I actually do remember
making multipl
It would be great if strict and others specificacions are so perfect
to render such laouts with HTML&css like IE do in quirk mode - I will
the first who throw away IE ))
On 17 дек, 20:20, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2008, at 1:13 PM, buda wrote:
>
>
>
> > We have to use IE because of it
On Dec 17, 2008, at 1:13 PM, buda wrote:
>
> We have to use IE because of its tight integration with all of
> Microsoft products - I do develop office products
That's fine as long as you can control the delivery of that product
absolutely. It may end up badly if you have any other more public
We have to use IE because of its tight integration with all of
Microsoft products - I do develop office products
On 17 дек, 19:51, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2008, at 12:33 PM, buda wrote:
>
> > I can't to verify HTML because it dynamic and I dont use quirk mode
> > knowingly - because
On Dec 17, 2008, at 12:33 PM, buda wrote:
> I can't to verify HTML because it dynamic and I dont use quirk mode
> knowingly - because so called strict or other modes dont let me to
> make my design, so do Microsoft in its CRM web app
You can, actually. View it in a browser, view source, copy, a
Thanks, I'll try
On 17 дек, 19:38, "Hector Virgen" wrote:
> I suggest using a class name of "required" instead of creating a new
> attribute. Then it becomes very simple to select() required elements (no to
> mention styling them with CSS).
>
> div.select('select.required');
>
> -Hector
>
>
>
>
I suggest using a class name of "required" instead of creating a new
attribute. Then it becomes very simple to select() required elements (no to
mention styling them with CSS).
div.select('select.required');
-Hector
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:35 AM, buda wrote:
>
> sorry - I do use quirk mode
sorry - I do use quirk mode knowingly! its misprint ))
On 17 дек, 19:33, buda wrote:
> I can't to verify HTML because it dynamic and I dont use quirk mode
> knowingly - because so called strict or other modes dont let me to
> make my design, so do Microsoft in its CRM web app
>
> On 17 дек, 19:2
I can't to verify HTML because it dynamic and I dont use quirk mode
knowingly - because so called strict or other modes dont let me to
make my design, so do Microsoft in its CRM web app
On 17 дек, 19:22, Walter Lee Davis wrote:
> I'm going to guess here, but maybe because this isn't valid HTML.
I'm going to guess here, but maybe because this isn't valid HTML. One
of the first things to do when debugging Prototoype is to run your
page through the W3C Validator and fix any errors it reports. Often
that is all it takes to get a non-working page to work as intended.
Walter
On Dec 17,
18 matches
Mail list logo
