, March 05, 2015 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: Controlservice and screen question, better ask before buying ;)
Hi Mac,
You mention the Icon but I think you're possibly mistaken. I've seen Icon
surfaces in the $100,000 range. You might be thinking of some other surface.
At any rate, the Artist series
Hi,
question.
I am near to buy the proTools software and also a controlService.
My eyes lay on the controlservice of Icon, the pro, witch is expenabel up to 32
tracks or channels.
I am thinking of buying this one.
Are there on this list any tips for do's and dont's when it comes to controlers?
I
Hello to the list!
I'm starting to work wiht PT11.3.1.
When opening PT with a blank session there are still a lot of clusters,
controls etc. left in the edit and mix whindows.
Wich ones could be switched off and what is the best way to do it?
Thanks in advance and best regards! / Martin
--
-
From: Krister Ekstrom
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: Real quick question
Hi it sounds very interesting. Maybe one could make drum tracks in Logic if i
can understand the drummer and then import it into Protools somehow, would
Contreras
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: Real quick question
Hello,
Actually, accessing plug in parameters of third party synthesizers is not so
bad in logic. I downloaded pianoteqs piano demo and it seemed pretty
accessible, all
Message -
From: Daniel Contreras
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: Real quick question
Terry,
How do you typically exes the presets? Feel free to start a thread on the
logic accessibility list, with your answer, that way we
What program is best for doing drum tracks in? How about managing virtual
synths and the like and their parameters?Could you do the synth stuff in say
Logic and then the rest in PT?
/Krister
24 feb 2015 kl. 04:28 skrev Ricky Prevatte rickypreva...@gmail.com:
I will be glad to give your
@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Krister Ekstrom
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 7:24 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Real quick question
Hi it sounds very interesting. Maybe one could make drum tracks in Logic if
i can understand the drummer and then import it into Protools somehow
in
Logic. Editing of MIDI events currently isn't accessible.
Terry
_
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Krister Ekstrom
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:10 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Real quick question
What program
currently isn't accessible.
Terry
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Krister Ekstrom
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:10 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Real quick question
What program is best for doing drum tracks in? How about
Hi, that’s interesting; when I tried Pianotek 5, only the presets for the
default instrument / piano showed up, presets for the other Pianos weren’t in
the list. Perhaps I’ll have to take another look. I’ve also noticed that on
some synths you’ll get the first 128 presets and not the rest.
Terry,
How do you typically exes the presets? Feel free to start a thread on the logic
accessibility list, with your answer, that way we won't get in the way on this
list. Thanks.
Daniel Contreras
On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:58 AM, TL t.leiz...@cogeco.ca wrote:
Hi, that’s interesting; when I
I have plugins and instruments from Arturia, XLN Audio and Izotope, i wonder
how they are in terms of accessibility from within Logic? In PT i can access
parameters but not presets i wonder how it is in Logic?
/Krister
24 feb 2015 kl. 15:00 skrev Daniel Contreras daniel.c.9...@gmail.com:
Sorry I don't know about those. That might be a good question for the group.
Here is the link to the Google groups page.
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!forum/logic-accessibility
Daniel Contreras
On Feb 24, 2015, at 8:03 AM, Krister Ekstrom kris...@kristersplace.com
wrote:
I have
Hello,
Actually, accessing plug in parameters of third party synthesizers is not so
bad in logic. I downloaded pianoteqs piano demo and it seemed pretty
accessible, all parameters were visible, as well as the factory presets. I've
heard good things about waves plug-ins as well. Logic is great
I'm not going to dwell on this subject here on list, don't worry, I promise,
but I'm very much hoping that someone can at least provide me this info I seek.
Once they do, I'll put this thread to rest. Promised.
Yes, I am very much so primarily a ProTools user, however, this said, I'm very
Yeah, if you would call when able, that would be great!
Chris.
---
Check out my web site at:
http://www.clgproductions.net
- Original Message -
From: Ricky Prevatte
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: Real quick question
I
I will be glad to give your call. Logic is very helpful as a secondary
platform. I am busy but I plan to use it for mixing down all my midi files. I
will do the final mix in ProTools. But yes some plug-ins cost more than logic.
200 bucks that's not a bad investment for it.
Ricky Prevatte
wrote:
Sorry, I thought of one more question. Can you copy and paste multiple tracks
at a time? One of the clients I work with sends me his project files. I would
like to be able to quickly insert the audio from those files into the
template.
From Chad's iPhone
On Jan 27, 2015, at 8
And don't forget the ability to bounce out individual audio tracks files.
From Chad's iPhone
On Jan 27, 2015, at 9:17 PM, Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a feature that Cakewalk, Logic, and Reaper have been able to do since
day 1. Unfortunately, your only options are to
at a time. Using something like Keyboard
Maestro, it's sometimes possible to drag files from the Clip List into the
timeline but it's not terribly reliable.
HTH,
Slau
On Jan 27, 2015, at 9:16 PM, chad morrison chadmorrisonmob...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry, I thought of one more question. Can
Hi chad,
Simply, as you've been doing, import audio to a new track, select the audio
from that new track and paste it into the track into which you intended the
audio and delete the unused track.
Hope that helps,
Slau
On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:52 PM, chad morrison chadmorrisonmob...@gmail.com
Hello all,
I hope you all can help me. I was wondering if there is any way to import audio
on to a pre-existing track? The way I have been doing it imports the audio, but
it also creates an audio track. I've created a template that I would like to
use with sins and the track routed through the
I guess I should've thought of that one. LOL
Thank you!
From Chad's iPhone
On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:12 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi chad,
Simply, as you've been doing, import audio to a new track, select the audio
from that new track and paste it into the track into
This is a feature that Cakewalk, Logic, and Reaper have been able to do since
day 1. Unfortunately, your only options are to import to a new track and cut
and paste to your desired track, or import to the clip list and drag, which I
haven’t had much luck with.
Trust me, I love PT, but in
On 24 Jan 2015, at 7:43 am, CHUCK REICHEL
soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
About the automation question for all tracks.
Make a group from the selected tracks you want to automate now when in
the groups dialogue choose the Automation Mode option check it.
You'll find
2015, at 7:43 am, CHUCK REICHEL
soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
About the automation question for all tracks.
Make a group from the selected tracks you want to automate now when in
the groups dialogue choose the Automation Mode option check it.
You'll find this option
Steve,
make your selection,
do command-4 numpad,
the automation window opens,
VO right until you see manual write in that section you will see write to
selection.
Now the transport have to be engaged . so you might to set a hotspot their.
if your track is in write or lach, start the transport,
Hey slau, thanks. works just fine. Thanks also to mike. i will try that as well.
The whole thing would be easier with a control surface, but i think i should be
able to get by with all this.
i guess the only other interesting question is this. is there any way of
selecting all tracks
Hi, With the normal version of pro tools 11 can I make use of the Avid
cloud for storing projects and having projects on my local system get
uploaded to the cloud or is this just a pro tools first feature? How
much space do you get with the Avid cloud? Nick Gawronski
--
You received this
Hi Steve,
About the automation question for all tracks.
Make a group from the selected tracks you want to automate now when in the
groups dialogue choose the Automation Mode option check it.
You'll find this option after you select the Attributes tab.
The quick way is to build a VO item
Hey chuck. I figured it out. got the group up.
Steve
On 24 Jan 2015, at 7:43 am, CHUCK REICHEL soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Steve,
About the automation question for all tracks.
Make a group from the selected tracks you want to automate now when in the
groups dialogue
selected tracks. or are you talking about
asining them to a bus.i assume not.
Thanks
Steve
On 24 Jan 2015, at 7:43 am, CHUCK REICHEL soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
mailto:soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
About the automation question for all tracks.
Make a group from
Sparrow wrote:
thanks. chuck.
how do you make a group from selected tracks. or are you talking about
asining them to a bus.i assume not.
Thanks
Steve
On 24 Jan 2015, at 7:43 am, CHUCK REICHEL soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Steve,
About the automation question for all
thanks. chuck.
how do you make a group from selected tracks. or are you talking about asining
them to a bus.i assume not.
Thanks
Steve
On 24 Jan 2015, at 7:43 am, CHUCK REICHEL soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Steve,
About the automation question for all tracks.
Make a group
i’ve basically sussed out how to write and delete automation. only thing i
can’t seem to work out is how to just an individual phraze that i may have
selected
i think i wrote a static pass of automation, but maybe i did not do i t
correctly. although i’ve been over the instructions a couple of
talking about
asining them to a bus.i assume not.
Thanks
Steve
On 24 Jan 2015, at 7:43 am, CHUCK REICHEL
soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
About the automation question for all tracks.
Make a group from the selected tracks you want to automate now when in the
groups dialogue
asining them to a bus.i assume not.
Thanks
Steve
On 24 Jan 2015, at 7:43 am, CHUCK REICHEL
soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
About the automation question for all tracks.
Make a group from the selected tracks you want to automate now when in
the groups dialogue choose
Hi Steve,
As expected, doing this with a control surface is simple but, since you don't
have access to one there, you'll need to improvise.
I'm used to having the option of writing to an entire selection but that might
be an HD feature, I'm not sure, to be honest. However, I think this might
I’ve been asked to take on some broadcast production work for a local radio
station round here. I am going to use protools to do this work. One question i
have is this. I’m going to have to do it without a control surface, they don’t
have one ofcourse, and i can’t get my maki down there easily
production work for a local radio
station round here. I am going to use protools to do this work. One question
i have is this. I’m going to have to do it without a control surface, they
don’t have one ofcourse, and i can’t get my maki down there easily. Now as we
know when you want to automate
PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
I’ve been asked to take on some broadcast production work for a local radio
station round here. I am going to use protools to do this work. One question
i have is this. I’m going to have to do it without a control surface, they
don’t have
-0500
From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com
Reply-To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: automation question
Hi Steve,
One solution that might help you to some degree is to use half-speed playback.
Press Shift-space Bar and the transport will playback at half
with undo...
On Jan 16, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
I’ve been asked to take on some broadcast production work for a local radio
station round here. I am going to use protools to do this work. One question
i have is this. I’m going to have to do it without
broadcast production work for a local radio
station round here. I am going to use protools to do this work. One
question i have is this. I’m going to have to do it without a control
surface, they don’t have one ofcourse, and i can’t get my maki down there
easily. Now as we know when you want
to take on some broadcast production work for a local radio
station round here. I am going to use protools to do this work. One
question i have is this. I’m going to have to do it without a control
surface, they don’t have one ofcourse, and i can’t get my maki down there
easily. Now as we
: TheOreoMonster monkeypushe...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: Update on my Plugin Automation problem, and a quick question
The reason this works is because the reverb is now running in parallel. You
have the full dry vocals
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: automation question
Hi Steve,
One solution that might help you to some degree is to use half-speed
playback. Press Shift-space Bar and the transport will playback at
half-speed and any fader moves you make will play back at normal speed when
you finish
...
On Jan 16, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Steve Sparrow i...@sparrowsound.com.au wrote:
I’ve been asked to take on some broadcast production work for a local
radio station round here. I am going to use protools to do this work. One
question i have is this. I’m going to have to do it without a control
way around. Go to write
on the track, Then! change your plug settings.
5. Then! play your selectin through.
OK, so anyway, that's done. Now, here is my totally unrelated question. I
used to put my reverb for vocals on an insert of the actual vocal track
itself. Then, I'd set my wet mix
@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: Update on my Plugin Automation problem, and a quick question
Chris,
Maybe since now that you have the entire vocal in the wet mix, it lets the
reverb process the vocal and it's entirety. But you still maintain control
via
, then going to write, do it the other way around. Go to write
on the track, Then! change your plug settings.
5. Then! play your selectin through.
OK, so anyway, that's done. Now, here is my totally unrelated question. I
used to put my reverb for vocals on an insert of the actual vocal track
to write, do it the other way around. Go to
write on the track, Then! change your plug settings.
5. Then! play your selectin through.
OK, so anyway, that's done. Now, here is my totally unrelated
question. I used to put my reverb for vocals on an insert of the
actual vocal track itself
be a
little bit more to it than just that.
Chris.
- Original Message - From: Daniel Contreras
daniel.c.9...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: Update on my Plugin Automation problem, and a quick question
Chris,
Maybe since
, and a quick question
The reason this works is because the reverb is now running in parallel. You
have the full dry vocals and the fully wet vocals with more granular control
over signals. For even better results slap an eq on that reverb send and
high pass the lows and the highs. Set teh High
that some users
note that there is a new licensing procedure with Pace upon the first
launch of PT 11.3. So... my question is, can I safely upgrade to
V11.3, or if I do so, is that going to require me to get a new asset
for my ILok? My asset currently supports 10 and 11. I'm running 11.2
over
isn't one
that I have access to anymore.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: Question again about version 11.3
Hi, I have not had any issues using pro tools 11.3 and have
that there is a new
licensing procedure with Pace upon the first launch of PT 11.3. So... my
question is, can I safely upgrade to V11.3, or if I do so, is that going to
require me to get a new asset for my ILok? My asset currently supports 10
and 11. I'm running 11.2 over here just fine, but I don't want
Hi i am aware this is off topic but does anyone know how to select audio with
twisted wave.
How do i select portions of a file.
Steve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Hi there,
There are a lot of undocumented shortcuts in Twisted wave, as a matter of fact,
you can select portions of files by shift left- and shift right arrows. It’s
been a while since i was dealing with TwistedWave now so i don’t remember the
keyboard shortcuts, but there are some listed in
Hi again,
first of all thank you for your helpful hints concerning my fades-question.
Fortunately, I’m a little further with my problem and found out, that I can’t
delete a fade in of a clip after having consolidated clips (alt-shift-3). I
also found out that the original clip without the fade
to the Clips list. Select the original clip and export
it as a new file and name it something unique so there's no question what it is.
Use Import Audio to Track from the file menu or Command-Shift-i. Navigate to
the exported region and press Return then hit the Done button. In the
subsequent
Hi Slau,
thank you very much first. In my next session I will try your idea duplicating
tracks and working with different playlists. Unfortunately for this session,
the problem starts quite at the beginning: Of course I could have asked my wife
to do it for me. But I will have a lot of work
Hi Michael,
Have you tried Move Mouse yet?
YMMV
Chuck
On Dec 5, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Michael Kuhlmann wrote:
Hi Slau,
thank you very much first. In my next session I will try your idea
duplicating tracks and working with different playlists. Unfortunately for
this session, the problem
Hi Chuck,
just that’s the problem. Moving the mouse VO-CMD-f5 works at the top and till
the middle of the clip list. But at the bottom of the clip list, VO-CMD-f5
doesn’t perform the wanted action and moves the mouse anywhere instead, to the
menu-bar or to the desktop. Alt- left click doesn’t
Hi Chuck,
I didn’t know this app yet. Thanks for that. I will try this app and see, if
it is possible to move the mouse-pointer from outside Pro Tools to the clip
list, because the VO-command doesn’t seem to work.
Best
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hi Michael,
Chuck still doesn't understand what you're talking about so don't chase him
down his rabbit hole.
What you want to do is narrow down what's displayed in the clip list. Are you
working with only one track or several tracks? If the name of the track you're
working with is unique,
Hi folks.
I should know this but don't. What's the difference between a dynamic
EQ whose bands only swing into action when a certain threshold is
crossed, and a multiband compressor? To my brain at least, they seem
to be the same thing.
Chris
--
You received this message because you are
One difference I can think of is that every band on an EQ generally
has a q control, which I can't remember seeing much if ever on a
multiband comp...
I want to say there's a difference between scooping a la EQ and gain
reduction a la compressor, but apparently I'm too stupid to put it
into
hahaha fun isn't it?
There must be a difference, since iZotope Ozone 6 contains both. hmm
a multiband comp could contain a width adjustment for the bands,
which would be the same thing as Q.
At 09:12 PM 12/5/2014, you wrote:
One difference I can think of is that every band on an EQ
It could , but do any? I don't think I've seen that man...
How are you finding Ozone 6 accessibility wise btw? Anything new?
On 12/6/14, Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca wrote:
hahaha fun isn't it?
There must be a difference, since iZotope Ozone 6 contains both. hmm
a multiband comp could
i haven't actually gotten it yet. Hopefully it's like Ozone 5
Advanced, where the individual modules can be used separately.
Otherwise, we'll have a list of hundreds of parameters.
At 09:27 PM 12/5/2014, you wrote:
It could , but do any? I don't think I've seen that man...
How are you
-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Chris Smart
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 5:06 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Question: Multiband Compression versus Dynamic Equalizer
Hi folks.
I should know this but don't. What's the difference
on a crossover compression. along
with -Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Chris Smart
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 5:06 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Question: Multiband Compression versus Dynamic Equalizer
Hi folks.
I
So guys, I'm here at the studio taking a quick lunch break, and I have a
quick question.
I'm doing an arrangement for Christmas of Mary Did you Know. God that is a
beautiful song! Anyway, the guy working with me has a couple of ideas, but
figured we'd both throw this question out to you all
perform some
destructive editing on it.
-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Christopher-Mark Gilland
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:19 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Quick question
So guys, I'm here
:
cgwaxhawlo...@clgproductions.com
Zello: clgproductions
and: christablet123
Please kindly, add both, if you don't mind.
- Original Message -
From: Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 2:28 PM
Subject: RE: Quick question
Having a play in the input output window: I created a new stereo input path and
then pressed the default button. This seems to have worked.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Hi, You or they could always download the ogg tools and if no mac build
is around which I would think there is one around you can encode the wav
file to the ogg format then get it to them. I would think that pro
tools would have an ogg encoder in it but there has to be some good free
options
So, I have a session fully recorded that a friend wants to hear really
really badly. I have no problem at all sharing it with him, but he's very
very picky about his audio listenning. He wants the file in ogg vorbis. I
don't think PT 11.2 can bouncve into vorbis, can it? If not, are there
Honestly, unless it was a paying client, I'd send the guy a high bit rate mp3
and tell him to deal with it.
There's no reason for someone to make you do more work than you have to.
But, if the audio snobbery persists, Check out Switch, Amadeus Pro, Fission.
However, None of these options are
5 minutes of 16-bit 44.1K stereo wav is only 50.5 MB in size.
Even 5 minutes of 24-bit 48K stereo is 82.4 MB.
Neither of you have the bandwidth to transfer that much?
Even 24.192 is only going to take up about 330 MB.
Convert it to FLAC and you'll save approximately half the space, with
the subject other than
awkwardly planting it at the start or the end of the story, and anyway, I
think my bio, pasted below, reads fairly interestingly for the time being at
least.
Finally, I would encourage anyone else mulling over the same question to
evaluate it on their own terms and what
What Kevin said. Also, if he's a snob, let him download a stereo WAV file and
be done with it. I bet he can't reliably tell the difference between WAV, ogg
and a 320 kbps mp3.
Slau
On Oct 12, 2014, at 1:58 PM, Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly, unless it was a paying client,
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: Question about bouncing sessions
Honestly, unless it was a paying client, I'd send the guy a high bit rate
mp3 and tell him to deal with it.
There's no reason for someone to make you do more work than you have to.
But, if the audio snobbery
Well God damn! Fine! I'll just tell him to get over it young, and hope he
doesn't fire me in the process. I'm sorry for asking such an apparently
ridiculously stupid question!
Chris.
--
A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must
love one another
Message - From: Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: Question about bouncing sessions
Honestly, unless it was a paying client, I'd send the guy a high bit
rate mp3 and tell him to deal with it.
There's no reason
love one another.
(John 13:34 and 35: NIV.)
- Original Message - From: Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: Question about bouncing sessions
5 minutes of 16-bit 44.1K stereo wav is only 50.5 MB in size.
Even 5
Chris,
Nobody said it was a stupid question. The fact of the matter is that most
people on the planet who are paying for a file require the highest resolution
(eg. WAV, AIF, what have you) and the overwhelming majority are absolutely fine
with mpeg or AAC encoding for approval purpose. It's
to transfer
files that is more robust than free sendspace or Dropbox though, so
file sizes and bandwidth limitations are not an issue.
If you react this way to answers to a question, god help this client
of yours if he doesn't like your mix. How many do-overs does he get
before you freak out
one another. By this everyone will know that you are
my disciples, if you love one another.
(John 13:34 and 35: NIV.)
- Original Message - From: Kevin Reeves reeves...@gmail.com
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: Question about bouncing
As I said in my message, unless he's a paying client, I'd tell him to deal.
Since he's a paying client, then obviously not. Grabb one of the apps I
mentioned, and you'll be good to go.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro
Tools Accessibility group.
While you're encoding samples, can we hear one? I'd love to check out this mix.
At 02:34 PM 10/12/2014, you wrote:
Chris,
Nobody said it was a stupid question. The fact of the matter is that
most people on the planet who are paying for a file require the
highest resolution (eg. WAV, AIF
Does Pro Tools even do flac?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
no idea. but there are lots of tools to encode to flac.
At 02:41 PM 10/12/2014, you wrote:
Does Pro Tools even do flac?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
By default, PT supports WAV, AIF, mp3 and MXF.
On Oct 12, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca wrote:
no idea. but there are lots of tools to encode to flac.
At 02:41 PM 10/12/2014, you wrote:
Does Pro Tools even do flac?
--
You received this message because you are
can PT be set up to work with external encoders?
At 02:47 PM 10/12/2014, you wrote:
By default, PT supports WAV, AIF, mp3 and MXF.
On Oct 12, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Chris Smart csma...@cogeco.ca wrote:
no idea. but there are lots of tools to encode to flac.
At 02:41 PM 10/12/2014, you wrote:
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Question about bouncing sessions
As I said in my message, unless he's a paying client, I'd tell him to deal.
Since he's a paying client, then obviously not. Grabb one of the apps I
mentioned, and you'll be good to go.
--
You received this message because you
well with vo too.
-Original Message- From: Kevin Reeves
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 3:39 PM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Question about bouncing sessions
As I said in my message, unless he's a paying client, I'd tell him to deal.
Since he's a paying client
was
hoping! that this list would be a good resource to get some info. Instead
however, I feel belittled like my question isn't even worth answerring.
Don't give me the we did answer did we not? No! You really technically
didn't. Instead, you just bickerred about how it's not a good idea. OK
901 - 1000 of 1283 matches
Mail list logo
