So long, Art, and thanks for all the fish.
--tobie
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, at 16:45, Chaals McCathie Nevile wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> as you may have noticed, Art has resigned as a co-chair of the Web
> Platform group. He began chairing the Web Application Formats group about
> a decade ago,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015, at 18:52, Alice Boxhall wrote:
Doc in progress at
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Type-Extensions.md
Sent a pull request your way[1].
--tobie
---
[1]: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/pull/117
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015, at 19:41, Léonie Watson wrote:
Is there a succinct explanation of why the is= syntax is disliked? The
info on the WHATWG wiki explains where is= breaks, but doesn’t offer much
on the syntax issue [1].
Esthetics aside, the main issue it is takes the concept of inheritance
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Michael[tm] Smith m...@w3.org wrote:
Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com, 2015-02-02 08:47 -0500:
Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/54cf7fe0.6090...@gmail.com
On 2/2/15 7:14 AM
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Michael[tm] Smith m...@w3.org wrote:
Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com, 2015-02-02 08:47 -0500:
Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/54cf7fe0.6090...@gmail.com
On 2/2/15 7:14 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
Would recommend redirecting to the ED of the next
Hi,
Heads-up that the link to the Editor's Draft of the IndexedDB spec is now a
404.
Not sure whether that is on purpose or an accident.
Would recommend redirecting to the ED of the next version of the spec.
Thanks,
--tobie
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Ben Peters ben.pet...@microsoft.com
wrote:
There has been a lot of debate [1][2] about the correct name for device
independent events [3] as a concept*. We have considered Intention Events,
Command Events, and Action Events among others. I believe we now have a
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is your counter-proposal?
Heh.
Fair enough, I guess. :)
These seem related to what Java calls semantic events [JAVADOC], so I'd
give that a try to see if it fits the model. If not, would abstract
events or
Hi folks,
Couple of issues I've bumped into recently while looking at Service Workers
more closely.
1. e.respondWith + e.waitUntil.
I feel like those are strong code smells we haven't found the right design
for yet.
I have a suggestion for waitUntil[1]. None yet for respondWith, but plan to
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Marcos mar...@marcosc.com wrote:
enum RequestMode { same-origin, tainted cross-origin, CORS,
CORS-with-forced-preflight };
I think these are badly named (even though they use the names used in HTML
and Fetch). It's going to be annoying to type these out for
Hi,
Was just skimming through the Push API spec.
I'm aware that no payload is sent with push message for privacy reasons (as
push service is most certainly a third party), but that isn't mentioned in
the spec.
I suggest adding a non-normative note that:
1. describes the reasons of this
On Thursday, October 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 22:50:21 +0100, Vincent Scheib sch...@google.com
(mailto:sch...@google.com)
wrote:
Pointer lock is tricky to automate tests for. Consider some examples:
- Upon lock, no pointer should be visible.
On Thursday, July 4, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
On 24/04/13 11:13, Tobie Langel wrote:
While some of the original use cases required dynamically modifying
orientation lock (e.g. the Game within a game experience[5]), key use cases
simply require a declarative, page-wide
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
It might be though that maybe we should put the boundary for
applications on the web on the origin level. It would certainly be
extremely convenient and allow for a whole bunch of simplifications.
I feel the same way. It would be
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Tobie Langel to...@w3.org
(mailto:to...@w3.org) wrote:
It would be interesting to list the downsides of this approach to see if
the tradeoff is worth making.
Downsides:
* More DNS
Hi folks,
Attempting to parse the shadow-dom spec to gather test coverage data. Turns out
the markup significantly departs from other specs. Not sure if the spec is
edited using a special tool or by hand.
Regardless, adding a className of idl to WebIDL blocks would go a long way.
Think that's
Done: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22254. Thanks.
--tobie
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com
(mailto:tobie.lan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Regardless, adding a className of idl
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Fabian Raetz wrote:
I'm searching a way to unit test file uploads but i can't find any solutions
to that problem on the web.
That's work in the scope of the Browser Testing and Tools WG. Afaik, there's
ongoing discussions on how to best support that, but
Hi,
Screen orientation lock is critical to a whole set of mobile games (especially
those which rely on the accelerometer to control the gameplay). It's great that
it is now considered for specification and implementation.
I had collected some use cases a while back[1], some of which led to
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote:
Hi there,
CSS Device Adaptation should hopefully be enabled on all browsers (desktop
and mobile) unlike the viewport meta tag, which cannot be enabled on desktop
browsers easily as many desktop sites actually comes
X-posting to public-infra for those that have missed the conversation going on
in WebApps on the subject of test review within the web-platform-tests
repository on GitHub.
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM, James Graham wrote:
On 04/23/2013 08:43 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
On 22/04/2013
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 at 9:55 AM, James Graham wrote:
On 04/23/2013 08:43 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
On 22/04/2013 13:12 , James Graham wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Arthur Barstow wrote:
The only thing that we ask is that pull requests not be merged by
whoever made the request.
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
(I take it the fixing-appcache mailing list has since been closed in
http://www.w3.org/community/fixing-appcache/ favour of discussion here.)
Yes, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fixing-appcache/2013Feb/0005.html
On Friday, March 15, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Jarred Nicholls wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com
(mailto:slightly...@google.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
Workers exist
explicitly to allow you to
On Thursday, March 14, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
On Wednesday, March 6, 2013, Tobie Langel wrote:
Sync APIs are useful to do I/O inside of a Worker.
I don't understand why that's true. Workers have a message-oriented API
that's inherently async. They can get back
On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Jarred Nicholls wrote:
This is an entirely different conversation though. I don't know the answer to
why sync interfaces are there and expected, except that some would argue that
it makes the code easier to read/write for some devs. Since this is
On Monday, February 18, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
(mailto:ann...@annevk.nl) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com
(mailto:dglaz...@google.com) wrote:
Still
On 2/12/13 5:05 PM, Florian Bösch pya...@gmail.com wrote:
DRM does not belong into HTML, nor into any kind of W3C standard. [...]
This is the wrong mailing list. You might want to look at
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/lists/.
--tobie
On 2/2/13 12:16 PM, Florian Bösch pya...@gmail.com wrote:
Usually games (especially 3D applications) would like to get capabilities
that they can use out of the way up front so they don't have to care
about it later on.
This is not an either / or problem.
First, lets clarify that the granting
On 2/4/13 1:35 AM, Florian Bösch pya...@gmail.com wrote:
So how exactly do you imagine this going down when an application that
uses half a dozen such capabilities starts? Clicking trough half a dozen
allow - allow - allow - allow - allow - allow, you really think the
user's gonna bother what the
On 2/1/13 5:52 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On 1/31/13 3:18 PM, ext Rebecca Hauck wrote:
Since I'm not in the webapps working group, I had to first get access to
the repository. I was told that that to get write access, I (probably)
had
to join the working group [1].
Yes, it
On 2/1/13 4:23 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
One of things I wondering about is - after you leave your Fellow
position [BTW, that's totally wicked so congrats on that!], and Robin
has moved on to `greener pastures` and Odin has moved on to be CEO of
Opera - if/when there are
On 1/31/13 9:13 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
As I said during one of the testing breakouts in Lyon, ultimately I
suspect the saying beggars can't be choosy will trump. However, AFAIK,
currently, only one of WebApps' thirty active specs actually has an
outside contribution. As
FWIW that looks good to me. At risk of bikeshedding, I think that calling a
repo with tests for non-HTML specs html-testsuite is confusing and will
make the repository harder to find, especially since the people who are aware
that html is not a catch-all term are also the people most likely
On Jan 24, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Odin Hørthe Omdal odi...@opera.com wrote:
Arthur Barstow wrote:
Before we start a CfC to change WebApps' agreed testing process [Testing],
please make a clear proposal regarding the submission process, approval
process, roles, etc. as is defined in [Testing] and
On 1/22/13 11:53 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal odi...@opera.com wrote:
Hi!
We just had a small discussion on webapps-testsuite [1] about the
possibility of moving the webapps tests. I was wrongly under the
impression that we had discussed this before (hey, confusion is not a
crime ;) ).
We had such
On 1/22/13 12:20 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote:
There are benefits to both approaches. I would be in favor of having a
repository per spec (named tr_shortname-testsuite). This will make it a
lot easier
On 1/22/13 12:37 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote:
That's definitely something to keep in mind. How frequent is it that a
feature moves from one spec to another (that, is outside of the
continuous
flow of features
On 1/22/13 2:23 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote:
On 22/01/2013 13:27 , Odin Hørthe Omdal wrote:
I'm not really sure if that is needed. If we can trust someone in one
repository, why not in all?
I'd add to that: the odds are that if someone is screwing things up,
it's better to have more
On 1/22/13 4:45 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote:
On 22/01/2013 14:48 , Tobie Langel wrote:
Yes, I guess what I want to avoid at all costs is the split per WG which
has boundaries that partially happen at IP level, rather than strictly
at
the technology level.
My understanding is that we
On 1/23/13 12:48 AM, Julian Aubourg j...@ubourg.net wrote:
I love the idea of moving to github.
The one-repo idea, while much simpler from a maintenance point of view,
could easily be a burden on users that subscribe to it. Even more so for
people who can merge PRs (and thus will receive an email
On 1/17/13 11:36 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:15 AM, frederick.hir...@nokia.com wrote:
Dear Tab Atkins Jr. ,
The Device APIs Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on
the
Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Ambient Light Events
On 11/26/12 2:35 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile cha...@yandex-team.ru
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:58:02 +0400, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr
wrote:
Hi,
Anant stepped down as an editor of Web Application Manifest Format and
Management APIs specification [1] but Mozilla is still interested
On 11/23/12 5:36 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
However, we should be honest about the origin of the text and not try
to pass off Anne's work as our own.
Or better yet, provide a canvas where Anne is able to do his work as part
of the WebApps WG.
--tobie
On 10/31/12 6:03 PM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
I think the bigger question is What's a session?
Does it end if I:
* close the window?
* close the last window in this origin?
* close the last window in this browser profile?
* quit the browser?
-
On 11/5/12 6:47 PM, Brady Eidson beid...@apple.com wrote:
And/or coming up with an API to allow application developers
to close sessions on a per origin basis and benefit from related
security/privacy guarantees (wiping-out session storage, cookies, etc.).
Sites can already clean up
On 10/17/12 3:29 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
All - this is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last Call Working Draft
of the File API spec http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/. Note bug
17125 ([1] below) is open and Arun proposes it be postponed for v.next.
Additionally, Arun
On 9/28/12 10:18 AM, Charles McCathie Nevile cha...@yandex-team.ru
wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 23:55:37 +0400, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote:
On 9/27/12 9:35 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
W3C Advisory Committee members are asked to Please review the
specification
On 9/27/12 9:35 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
W3C Advisory Committee members are asked to Please review the
specification and indicate whether you endorse it as W3C Recommendation
or object to its advancement by completing the following questionnaire
On 9/11/12 11:13 AM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
I think I like this idea, but I'm also concerned with the fact that
Chromium has been shipping Quota API some time now and there're some
consumers of the old API.
Wasn't aware. Does't seem to be in Chrome, even prefixed, however.
On 9/11/12 12:29 PM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
It's prefixed, and based on the previous (original) proposal.
Which is why I didn't find it (I was expecting it to hang off of the
navigator property of the window object).
--tobie
Hi all,
Following a recent conversation with Jonas (and contrary to what I
initially claimed here) there's value in adding a third storage type to
the Quota API: Session storage.
Contrary to temporary storage which might not get wiped across UA
sessions, Session storage MUST get wiped when the
Hi,
I'm very happy with the API changes we where able to make to the Quota
API, but there's a method name we have left untouched and that I haven't
figured out how to tackle until today: queryUsageAndQuota.
The name is horrendous and is going to make developers cringe. It's also
not very
On 9/5/12 12:33 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@w3.org wrote:
On 05/09/2012 06:03 , Mark Nottingham wrote:
That's unfortunate, because part of the intent of the UA header is to
identify the software making the request, for debugging / tracing
purposes.
Given that lots of libraries generate XHR
On 8/1/12 10:04 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
Can we please stop saying lazy blob? It's a confused and confusing
phrase. Blobs are lazy by design.
Yes. Remote blob is more accurate and should help think about this
problem in a more meaningful way.
--tobie
On 8/2/12 2:29 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:45 , Tobie Langel wrote:
On 8/1/12 10:04 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
Can we please stop saying lazy blob? It's a confused and confusing
phrase. Blobs are lazy by design.
Yes. Remote blob is more
On Jun 27, 2012, at 9:14, Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/27/2012 05:44 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
On Jun 27, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Glenn Maynardgl...@zewt.org wrote:
Unrelated, screaming-caps on RFC2119 terms (eg. MUST) is jarring
and unnecessary. I'd suggest dropping the em.rfc2119 style
On 6/20/12 12:05 AM, Sylvain Galineau sylva...@microsoft.com wrote:
[Daniel Glazman:]
That's also the reason why I asked to explain requestFullscreen(). It
can
sound obvious, but it's not. And in fact, we should _never_ introduce a
new
syntax, API, whatever w/o saying _what it does_ from
On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@google.com wrote:
Yehuda,
Can you help clarify here whether jQuery's behavior is intentional
(i.e. use cases drive the need for executability), or if it's a
side-effect of the implementation?
I can't speak for jQuery, but in
Hi,
In section 5 of the Quota Management API (Quota handling in storage
API)[1], the last sentence of the first bullet point reads:
For example, Application Cache may silently discard or fail to cache
data when it is hitting quota limit.
This is actually incorrect, AppCache is atomic and
On 6/6/12 8:33 AM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
Based on the feedbacks I've updated the draft:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/quota/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
- Got rid of string enum, instead introduced navigator.persistentStorage
and navigator.temporaryStorage
- Some interface name changes
On 6/6/12 2:10 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
I don't recall the group discussing the UCs and requirements the spec
addresses. Perhaps it would also be useful to step back a bit and try to
get agreement on some high level requirements before proceeding.
Agreed.
--tobie
On 6/6/12 10:27 AM, Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
Having looked again at this, I think the easiest approach would not be to
publish WebApp Manifest as is, but simply to publish a new draft of the
Widget Interface[1] and do a search/replace on widget with webapp.
Republishing
On 6/6/12 3:35 PM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
Mozilla's proposal seems to essentially target applications distributed
through app stores. We'd like to see a solution that also enables
providing meta data to bookmarked apps
On 6/6/12 5:02 PM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
Absolutely, or:
html manifest=/path/to/config.webapp
and combine appcache and config into a single format. The AppCache
manifest format works beautifully in JSON
On 6/6/12 6:05 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote:
Here is the thread for the set of use cases I submitted for this API
during the rechartering:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/0008.html.
Additional use cases are welcome, and we can capture them and derived
Hi,
I recently stumbled upon a number of use case and requirements docs (such
as MediaStream Capture Scenarios[1] or HTML Speech XG[2]) that were
published as officially looking W3C documents (for whatever that means, at
least, it's not a page on a Wiki).
I think that's tremendously useful,
On 6/6/12 2:01 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Having seen no negative responses to the Is the Quota Management API
spec ready for FPWD? thread [1], this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to
publish a First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of the Quota Management API
using the following ED
On Jun 6, 2012, at 8:46 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote:
(Starting a new thread by replying to a mail and then changing the
subject and quoted text is not a good idea; just start a new mail.)
Guilty as charged. Sorry, won't happen again.
I recently stumbled upon a number of use
On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:04 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote:
* Tobie Langel wrote:
On Jun 6, 2012, at 8:46 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote:
Only documents under http://www.w3.org/TR/ are official publications
as far as Working Group's Technical Reports go.
Can't WG
On 6/5/12 4:00 PM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote:
On 05/31/2012 03:28 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
I'm probably missing something here, but notifications don't seem to be
going through a system- / browser-wide notification panel from which the
user can decide whether or not to navigate
On 6/1/12 12:07 PM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
Makes sense, ok let's keep it. Then we will have symmetric four
methods, request and query for each type.
Following up on the conversation on Quota Management API and the recent
changes which were agreed upon, I'm wondering whether we
On 6/4/12 11:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote:
Finally, I feel it's slightly misleading to have an interface called
info which enables changes (through `requestQuota`). Wouldn't
settings
or similar be more
On 6/2/12 6:54 AM, Fabrice Desre fabr...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 06/01/2012 02:36 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 9:58 PM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com
mailto:w...@marcosc.com wrote:
Sounds good. AFAICT, Moz's proposal doesn't really cover packaging
either ... Not in the sense
On 6/4/12 6:41 PM, Fabrice Desre fabr...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hi Tobie,
On 06/04/2012 03:03 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
On 6/2/12 6:54 AM, Fabrice Desré fabr...@mozilla.com wrote:
We're working on pre-loading the appcache at install time when the
appcache path is specified in the manifest. See
On 6/4/12 9:16 PM, Fabrice Desre fabr...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 06/04/2012 10:38 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
On 6/4/12 6:41 PM, Fabrice Desre fabr...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hi Tobie,
On 06/04/2012 03:03 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
On 6/2/12 6:54 AM, Fabrice Desré fabr...@mozilla.com wrote:
We're
On 6/1/12 10:34 AM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
If we go along the line we will have four methods on StorageInfo:
queryPersistentUsageAndQuota
queryTemporaryUsageAndQuota
requestPersistentQuota
We could also think of 'requestTemporaryQuota', a variant of
requestQuota, but by the
On Jun 1, 2012, at 7:50 PM, Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd be interested in implementing support for the JSON manifest format in
Apache Wookie/Apache Rave, but really want this to be properly harmonized
with the Widgets specs rather than a competing incompatible
--tobie
On Jun 1, 2012, at 9:58 PM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On 1 Jun 2012, at 18:18, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On 31 May 2012, at 23:23, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
Is anyone
On Jun 1, 2012, at 9:58 PM, Marcos Caceres
w...@marcosc.commailto:w...@marcosc.com wrote:
Sounds good. AFAICT, Moz's proposal doesn't really cover packaging either ...
Not in the sense of wrapping the app using zip or something. More metadata,
feature control (potentially relevant to requiring
On 5/30/12 11:14 AM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote:
* I guess the idea of |onmessage| is that the PushService instance will
get an event when the backend will push a notification to the webapp.
However, I wonder how you do handle the situation when the application
is actually not
On 5/31/12 11:58 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote:
bryan How about a practical suggestion for the (probably many) of us
that have to use Microsoft Outlook?
From: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#Mailing_List
If you use Outlook or Outlook Express, you can use either Outlook-QuoteFix
On 5/29/12 6:52 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Jean-Claude Dufourd
jean-claude.dufo...@telecom-paristech.fr wrote:
On 29/5/12 17:56 , Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2012-05-29 16:53, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Arthur
On 5/30/12 6:30 PM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
Thanks for the feedback!
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote:
On 5/17/12 11:02 AM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
For context for others, I assume they are comments for the draft pushed
Hi,
Section 6 (Privacy) and 7 (Authorization) of the IndexedDB LC draft[1]
feel very informative, yet they're not marked as such.
Is there ground to keep them as normative content or should we explicitly
mark them as non-normative, remove their usage of the RFC 2119 MAY
keyword, and mark the
On 5/30/12 9:03 PM, Eric U er...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 5/30/12 2:05 PM, Eric Uhrhane wrote:
How about session, which is guaranteed to go away when the browser
exits
Should it go away if the browser crashes (or is killed
On 5/17/12 11:02 AM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
Thanks for the feedback!
For context for others, I assume they are comments for the draft pushed
at:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/quota/Overview.html
I'm super excited to see an API for this is in the works. It's been a much
wanted
On 4/24/12 9:54 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Glenn, isTrusted is the indicator that helps the web developer
distinguish between an event fired by the UA, or one fired by JavaScript
(e.g., dispatchEvent).
From: Glenn Maynard [mailto:gl...@zewt.org]
What's the
On 4/24/12 10:00 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
Glenn, isTrusted is the indicator that helps the web developer
distinguish between an event fired by the UA, or one fired by JavaScript
(e.g.,
On 4/24/12 11:04 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 4/24/12 5:02 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Oh, and that's before we get into default actions implemented by
extensions.
And one more thing: extensions _definitely_ want to know whether events
are trusted or not. This doesn't necessitate
On 4/7/12 1:42 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
I kinda' recall there was a proposal in the HTML WG to move the app cache
functionality to a separate spec. Does anyone know the status of that
proposal?
I don't know what the status is, but we'd be highly supportive of such a
split.
On 4/4/12 5:37 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote:
I support the publication as a CR.
+1
On 4/4/12 5:37 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote:
I support the publication as a CR.
+1
I second Bryan's request.
Having apps that need to monitor remote events each spawn a (shared)worker
to do so could drain a phone's battery very quickly.
There needs to be a system-level way to do this.
--tobie
On 3/12/12 11:47 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L bs3...@att.com wrote:
Karl, excellent
In the Screen Orientation API draft, I don't see any references to
locking. Is this by design?
It's in the abstract:
The Screen Orientation API's goal is to provide an interface for web
applications to be able to read the screen orientation state, to be
informed when this state changes and to be
I'm not particularly set on one direction to solve this problem. I just
want to get it solved, and if SPDY, along with a much improved
programmatically controllable appCache is the preferred solution, let's
go for it.
I, along with probably plenty of other web developers, am still
inexperienced
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:57:00 +0100, Harald Alvestrand
har...@alvestrand.no wrote:
*This is a call for help from the WEBRTC working group.
We are defining a new API
(http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html) about:blankwhich
has a number of cases where it needs to use arguments, or
endorsing my opinion, I'm happy to
use its products.
On 2/8/12, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote:
The general use case is any UI that's been designed exclusively for
portrait or landscape mode because displaying it in the other mode
either
doesn't make any sense (e.g. most platform games
* method for addressing it across all
applications, native, web, and web written by other people who decide
to put buttons and widgets in places the user won't expect.
Disclaimer: while my employer isn't endorsing my opinion, I'm happy to
use its products.
On 2/8/12, Tobie Langel to...@fb.com wrote
On 2/9/12 1:21 PM, Marcos Caceres w...@marcosc.com wrote:
On Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Adrienne Porter Felt wrote:
I agree that the current UI is not great. However, I disagree about
everyone clicking through permission grants. I've done two user
studies and found that about
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
