On 22 Nov 2013 10:58, Steve Dower steve.do...@microsoft.com wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
For 2.7.7, I think some combination of the two following ideas would be
worth
pursuing:
- a C runtime independent API flag (set by default on Windows when
building with
a compiler other than VS2008).
Hi,
I've been following this thread and the specific issue of the strong
negative reaction to the name Stackless Python 2.8, and I'm a bit
bothered by the whole experience.
Was there any concern about the name Stackless Python 0.x when
Christian released his original versions? More importantly,
Am 22.11.13 01:58, schrieb Steve Dower:
I'm happy to work on a PEP and changes for what I described above, if
there's enough interest? I can also update distutils to detect and
build with any available compiler, though this may be more of a
feature than we'd want for 2.7 at this point.
I
On 22 November 2013 19:00, Richard Tew richard.m@gmail.com wrote:
We're not talking about releasing a Python 2.8 against anyone's wishes
here. Or in _this specific case_, doing anything other than naming
something in a way we've been naming it for over a decade. Yet it's
reached the
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
A few folks overreacted in their concern about the community confusion
such a move would inevitably create - *anything* called Python 2.8
is going to give the impression that we've changed our mind about 2.7
being the
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/21 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
Huzzah! Thanks to you both for getting this ready for inclusion :)
I now hope that someone will use it :-)
Congratulations! I hope pyfailmalloc can go into 3.4, too.
Stefan Krah
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2013/11/15 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
2013/11/12 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:34 AM,
2013/11/22 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
2013/11/15 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
2013/11/12 anatoly techtonik
Am 22.11.13 10:00, schrieb Richard Tew:
That there are people who would consider using the trademark to force
us to change the name we've been using without harm for 14 years,
worries me. It's one thing to perhaps use it to stop someone scamming
Python users, and another to suggest using it
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2013/11/22 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
2013/11/15 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:08 PM,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.orgwrote:
2013/11/22 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
2013/11/15 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:08 PM,
On 11/22/2013 01:00 AM, Richard Tew wrote:
[snip]
Yet, suddenly, the chance that we may release a Stackless Python
2.8, is a concern.
Because there is no CPython 2.8 to mirror, and we've said there will not be one.
It certainly didn't help that this was presented one week before the feature
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:00:54 +1300
Richard Tew richard.m@gmail.com wrote:
Was there any concern about the dozens of Stackless Python 2.x and
Stackless Python 3.x versions that I have released over the years
being a cause for confusion? Or more importantly, any actual problems
On Nov 22, 2013, at 03:55 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
(perhaps Barry will play a bass solo? :-))
Now, now, we don't want to give Chris incentive, do we? :)
-Barry
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Is there a listing of buildbot categories (3.x.stable, custom-stable,
etc.)? The best I could find was http://python.org/dev/buildbot/. I
couldn't find it at http://buildbot.python.org/ or in the devguide,
both places where I expected to find such a list. Thanks!
-eric
The bulk of PEP 451 (all but the fluffy parts as Brett called them
wink) is now committed to default. We are tracking the remaining
items as dependencies of http://bugs.python.org/issue18864.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/07229c6104b1
changeset: 87347:07229c6104b1
user:Eric Snow
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com wrote:
The bulk of PEP 451 (all but the fluffy parts as Brett called them
wink) is now committed to default.
I'm looking into buildbot failures (on Windows of course).
-eric
___
Hello,
I've pushed pathlib to the repository. I'm hopeful there won't be
new buildbot failures because of it, but still, there may be some
platform-specific issues I'm unaware of.
I hope our Release Manager is doing ok :-)
Regards
Antoine.
___
On 22/11/13 13:47, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 22.11.13 10:00, schrieb Richard Tew:
That there are people who would consider using the trademark to force
us to change the name we've been using without harm for 14 years,
worries me. It's one thing to perhaps use it to stop someone scamming
Python
2013/11/22 Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net:
I've pushed pathlib to the repository. I'm hopeful there won't be
new buildbot failures because of it, but still, there may be some
platform-specific issues I'm unaware of.
A PEP wouldn't be successful if it doesn't break any buildbot. PEP 451
was
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:21 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
2013/11/15 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
wrote:
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2013-11-15 - 2013-11-22)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open4280 (+15)
closed 27206 (+87)
total 31486 (+102)
Open issues
It was too fast. I didn't had a chance to send the comments.
--
anatoly t.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed pathlib to the repository. I'm hopeful there won't be
new buildbot failures because of it, but still, there may be some
Am 22.11.13 17:54, schrieb Christian Tismer:
The discussion is over, but I cannot let this comment go through without
citing my original question, again:
My question
---
I have created a very clean Python 2.7.6+ based CPython with the
Stackless
additions, that compiles with VS
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com
wrote:
The bulk of PEP 451 (all but the fluffy parts as Brett called them
wink) is now committed to default.
I'm looking into buildbot
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:35:20 +0100 (CET)
barry.warsaw python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/706fe4b8b148
changeset: 5315:706fe4b8b148
user:Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org
date:Fri Nov 22 12:35:10 2013 -0500
summary:
3156 has also been committed.
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 22.11.13 01:58, schrieb Steve Dower:
I'm happy to work on a PEP and changes for what I described above, if
there's enough interest? I can also update distutils to detect and
build with any available compiler, though this may be more of a
feature than we'd want for
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:44:55 +0100
Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
I've pushed pathlib to the repository. I'm hopeful there won't be
new buildbot failures because of it, but still, there may be some
platform-specific issues I'm unaware of.
Actually, there turn out to be two
Am 22.11.13 19:10, schrieb Steve Dower:
I'd really want to update distutils.msvc9compiler to detect later
versions as well, since that would make 'pip install' work properly
for a large (majority?) of users for a large (majority?) of packages
with extension modules. Some may consider this
[Redirecting to Python Dev]
On 11/22/2013 10:25 AM, Richard Tew wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 11/22/2013 01:00 AM, Richard Tew wrote:
Yet, suddenly, the chance that we may release a Stackless Python
2.8, is a concern.
Because there is no
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:59:31 -0800
Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
Yet, we're told we should adopt wacky version numbers like 10, or
rename our project from Stackless Python.
Sometimes we have to do wacky stuff to avoid unnecessary confusion.
Or it can be Stackless Python 2.7
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:02:14 +0100 (CET)
guido.van.rossum python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/db6ae01a5f7f
changeset: 87364:db6ae01a5f7f
user:Guido van Rossum gu...@dropbox.com
date:Fri Nov 22 11:57:35 2013 -0800
summary:
Add note to
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:45:17 +0100 (CET)
andrew.kuchling python-check...@python.org wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/cce14bc9b675
changeset: 87371:cce14bc9b675
user:Andrew Kuchling a...@amk.ca
date:Fri Nov 22 15:45:02 2013 -0500
summary:
Wording changes to pathlib
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 22.11.13 19:10, schrieb Steve Dower:
I'd really want to update distutils.msvc9compiler to detect later
versions as well, since that would make 'pip install' work properly
for a large (majority?) of users for a large (majority?) of packages
with extension modules.
Due to Shtull-Trauring's marriage, his name is now changed to Turner-Trauring.
Please accept the suggestion to change his name in Misc/ACKS.___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Ethan Furman wrote:
[Redirecting to Python Dev]
On 11/22/2013 10:25 AM, Richard Tew wrote:
Yet, we're told we should adopt wacky version numbers like 10, or
rename our project from Stackless Python.
Sometimes we have to do wacky stuff to avoid unnecessary confusion.
Maybe imaginary
36 matches
Mail list logo
