On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:55 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 5:30 AM Christian Heimes
> wrote:
>
>> On 09/10/2020 04.04, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
>> > I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially
>> > *before a 12-month ban*. If they
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:50 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 5:30 AM Christian Heimes
> wrote:
>
>> On 09/10/2020 04.04, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
>> > I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially
>> > *before a 12-month ban*. If they
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020, 5:30 AM Christian Heimes wrote:
> On 09/10/2020 04.04, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
> > I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially
> > *before a 12-month ban*. If they understand that their behavior is
> > wrong, there's no need for a ban, at
On 09.10.2020 15:28, Christian Heimes wrote:
On 09/10/2020 04.04, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially
*before a 12-month ban*. If they understand that their behavior is
wrong, there's no need for a ban, at least not such a
09.10.20 16:48, Antoine Pitrou пише:
> Also, we now have an unmaintained module
> (_decimal) requiring specific competence.
It is not so bad. Due to high quality of the module there were not much
changes in it in recent years, and many of them were cosmetic. We also
have other Decimal experts.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:05 PM David Mertz wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 10:25 AM Charalampos Stratakis
> wrote:
>
>> Does it really matter that much in regards to the specific context? If
>> someone poses problematic behavior (as it seems, as I'm not familiar with
>> any specifics here),
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 5:34 AM Christian Heimes
wrote:
> On 09/10/2020 04.04, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
> > I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially
> > *before a 12-month ban*. If they understand that their behavior is
> > wrong, there's no need for a ban,
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 7:23 AM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Antoine Pitrou"
> > To: python-dev@python.org
> > Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 4:02:51 PM
> > Subject: [Python-Dev] Re: [python-committers] Resignation from Stefan
> Krah
> >
> >
> > Le
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 10:25 AM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
> Does it really matter that much in regards to the specific context? If
> someone poses problematic behavior (as it seems, as I'm not familiar with
> any specifics here), maintenance of a module should be the last of the
> worries.
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2020-10-02 - 2020-10-09)
Python tracker at https://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open7690 ( +2)
closed 46029 (+69)
total 53719 (+71)
Open issues
Would be good to see @Lorena and @JulienPalard from the translation WG,
might be helpful
Kind Regards,
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://www.github.com/Abdur-RahmaanJ
Mauritius
sent from gmail client on Android, that's why the signature is so ugly.
Hey Team,
Has this workgroup started yet? If not, can I help get it going, or if so,
is there a mailing list or place where things are happening?
Brian Curtin
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 12:58 Carol Willing wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Thanks for the interest. I apologize for the delay in getting this
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Antoine Pitrou"
> To: python-dev@python.org
> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 4:02:51 PM
> Subject: [Python-Dev] Re: [python-committers] Resignation from Stefan Krah
>
>
> Le 09/10/2020 à 15:57, Christian Heimes a écrit :
> > On 09/10/2020 15.48, Antoine
Le 09/10/2020 à 15:57, Christian Heimes a écrit :
> On 09/10/2020 15.48, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 05:04:55 +0300
>> Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
>>> I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially
>>> *before a 12-month ban*. If they understand that
On 09/10/2020 15.48, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 05:04:55 +0300
> Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
>> I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially *before
>> a 12-month ban*. If they understand that their behavior is
>> wrong, there's no need for a ban,
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 05:04:55 +0300
Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
> I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially *before
> a 12-month ban*. If they understand that their behavior is
> wrong, there's no need for a ban, at least not such a long one; if they
> don't,
Gg python 3.5, and hello world to python 4 !
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
Hi Miro,
Thanks for your email. I will see if I can modify that file to include my
key.
> I see the text at
https://www.python.org/downloads/ about GPG has changed (since yesterday?)
and
it no longer contains the link.
The text changes because I added my key bug I didn't delete any link IIRC.
On 09/10/2020 04.04, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev wrote:
> I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially
> *before a 12-month ban*. If they understand that their behavior is
> wrong, there's no need for a ban, at least not such a long one; if they
> don't, they clearly aren't
Le ven. 9 oct. 2020 à 04:14, Ivan Pozdeev via Python-Dev
a écrit :
> I don't see the point of requiring to "write an apology", especially *before
> a 12-month ban*. If they understand that their behavior is wrong, there's no
> need for a ban, at least not such a long one; if they don't, they
20 matches
Mail list logo
