On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Jesus Cea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, it is my aim to keep bsddb in stdlib, providing a stable and
featureful module. I think keeping bsddb development inside python svn
is not appropiate. Currently (I could change idea), my approach will be
keeping
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
While the patches are appreciated, please submit them to the tracker at
bugs.python.org rather than mailing them directly to this list.
This comment doesn't apply to your recent posts - looks like
This inconsistency goes back to 2.3 at least and probably to the
initial unicode implementation.
set(dir(u'')) - set(dir(''))
['isnumeric', 'isdecimal']
UserString contains these two methods even though 8-bit strings do
not. I'm not sure what we should do for 2.6 or 3.0. My preference
would
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New sprint idea: getting all (inc. trunk) the buildbots green by
Thursday. Anyone interested?
I think the chance to achieve that is close to zero.
Sounds like a challenge if ever I've heard one -- care to
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is possible, though considerable work. Probably the
biggest win will be creating a mock for socket and using mock sockets
If you only care about this running on a single machine to get some
coverage and don't care about all architectures, you can change
Misc/build.sh to add the configure option.
n
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Martin v. Löwis martin at v.loewis.de
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Dr Andrew Perella a...@eutechnyx.com wrote:
Hi,
I was thinking of adding a breakpoint opcode to python to enable less
invasive debugging.
I came across posts from 1999 by Vladimir Marangozov and Christian Tismer
discussing this issue but the links to the
I ran 2.6, 3.0, and 3.1 manually. 2.7 should get picked up on the
next run. The problem is that regrtest.py -R hangs from time to time
which caused the machine to run out of memory. Does anyone else have
regrtest.py -R hang for them? Some tests were disabled to try to
prevent the problem, but
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:24 AM, A.M. Kuchling a...@amk.ca wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 09:16:48PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
I ran 2.6, 3.0, and 3.1 manually. 2.7 should get picked up on the
next run. The problem is that regrtest.py -R hangs from time to time
which caused the machine
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Heracles
st...@integrityintegrators.net wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a patch to add to the _cursesmodule.c file of the Python
core libraries. I figured I would take on one of the implemented functions
to try to get my feet wet contributing to the project.
Has anyone run valgrind/purify and pychecker/pylint on the 3.1 code
recently? Both sets of tools should be used before the final release
so we can fix any obvious problems.
n
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Barry, Neal, and myself had a conversation and changed the priority
fields in the tracker. You can click on 'priority' to see an
explanation, but the new fields are:
- release blocker
- critical
- high
- normal
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:17 AM, John Millikin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possible features for 2.6
New modules in the standard library:
- JSON implementation
Have there been any plans made for which one? All of the
No. This was something I added as a nice to have for
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The key goal here (well, mine in any case :-)
is to manage developers, not to get releases out at all cost. Even
though the release schedule is set in stone, I think we should send
out a variety of reminders ahead
[changing to: and subject: ]
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:58 PM, neal.norwitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Get this test to pass (UserList/UserDict no longer exist and caused a
skip).
I think the automatic skip on
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The tabs/spaces checker that is run before doing a svn ci on the python
repository spits out an error message about which files have problems.
Could someone please update this error message to say something to the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Henrik Vendelbo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears to me that if you can make mapping mechanisms faster in
Python you can make significant
overall speed improvements. I also think the proposed concept could
add flexibility to persistence formats
and RMI
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Benjamin Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that we're aggressively adding Py3k warnings to the trunk, I think it's
a good time to get this straightened out. The docs [1] say PyErr_Warn is
deprecated in favor of PyErr_WarnEx. However, I have seen both in
Great work Trent! You'll need to take a picture of Martin buying you
the beer once you get the rest green. :-)
n
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've just experienced our first 2.6 green x64 Windows builds on the build
slaves! Well, almost green.
Unfortunately, I don't have ssh access from my hotel room. This means
I won't be able to help much until I get home.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick update on the status of the trunk buildbots:
Failing:
[x86 gentoo trunk (Neal Norwitz
Hi Mike.
Travis is the best person to discuss the status of the buffer APIs.
Cheers,
n
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Mike Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the current state of the N-D Array Interface proposal
(http://numpy.scipy.org/array_interface.shtml). Some work was done on
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 Feb, 16:36, Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I'll try to take a look at all asyncore/chat reports and try to
summarize them by splitting patches which solve bugs and patches which
add
The next releases of 2.6/3.0 are planned for April 2, just over a week
from now. There is much work that needs to be done. The buildbots
are in a pretty sad state and the gods are seeing too much red.
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/stable/
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/
See my
We need to get the tests for Python to be more stable so we can push
out solid releases. In order to achieve this result, we need tests
that are *100% reliable* and fail _only when there is a problem with
Python_. While we aren't nearly as close to that goal as we need to
be, we have to work
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 26, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Facundo Batista wrote:
2008/3/26, Neal Norwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We need to get the tests for Python to be more stable so we can push
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The next releases of 2.6/3.0 are planned for April 2, just over a
week from now. There is much work that needs to be done. The
buildbots are in a pretty sad state and the gods are seeing too much
red.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neal Anything that connects to a remote host is definitely flaky.
Would it maybe help to set up a dedicated host (or virtual host) to serve as
the sole target of all network tests?
It would help, but not fix the problem. There
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Benjamin Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you'd like, I can merge the rest.
If you have the time to figure it all out, sure.
I found that quite a tedious task, and had to
test_io is the only leaky test on trunk that I know of. I narrowed
down the leaks to the code below.
It's possible there are other leaks in test_io.
n
--
import sys, gc
import _fileio, io
class FileIO(_fileio._FileIO, io.RawIOBase):
def close(self):
io.RawIOBase.close(self)
def
The Windows buildbots are still failing because some tests keep files
opened. This causes subsequent tests which use the same file to fail.
Here is a recent run which had a failure early on:
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/stable/x86%20XP-3%20trunk/builds/1209/step-test/0
I'm assuming the
The release schedule for 2.6/3.0 is http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0361/
3.0 will have the feature, 2.6 may or may not.
n
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:47 AM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need to work with annotations as it is said in [1]. Currently I am
using
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Thomas Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can offer an OS X x86 machine to run a buildbot on. This is a physical
machine,
running OS X 10.5 Leopard.
Thanks Thomas!
Martin and I will coordinate with you off-list.
n
I was also going to suggest a platform independent option. I like
-Xwhat-follows-is-impl-dependent.
n
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Dino Viehland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IronPython already uses -X:OptionName for special IronPython only options so
+1 for -X.
-Original
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried it, and although it works, I get this output:
svn: 'post-revprop-change' hook failed; no error output available
Significant?
It's the mailer.py hook failing. I'm not quite sure why it fails,
and
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is old stuff, but...
I want to update our Python 2.4 installation at work from 2.4.2 to 2.4.5
(the latest 2.4 source release). I get a test failure for test_pty, an
extra ^M at the end of one line. I don't get a
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good idea! A 3to2 project is going to make backporting io.py and other
new stuff less painful and much faster. For the io.py backport I spent
most time on removing annotations and replacing with u.
What needs to
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there another online sprint/bugfix day in the pipeline? If not, can
there be? ;-)
Trent, I think you just volunteered to lead it. :-)
We should either do it this weekend Apr 19-20 or wait until after the
release.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Stefan Behnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neal Norwitz wrote:
Iteration with the dict methods (e.g., keys - iterkeys()),
map/zip/filter returning iterator rather than list.
That's only an optimisation, it's not functionally required. A list behaves
like
[Michael working on cleaning up the unittest module]
it seems like most of the good ideas have been captured already. I'll
through two more (low priority) ideas out there.
1) Randomized test runner/option that runs tests in a random order
(like regrtest.py -r, but for methods)
2) decorator to
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My colleague and SVN developer Ben Sussman-Collins occasionally blogs
about the social side of (mostly open source) software development. He
just posted a new one that struck a chord:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Cannon schrieb:
After Christian mentioned how we could speed up interpreter start-up
by removing some dead imports he found, I decided to write up
Below are the problems I found that have not been fixed at r65995 on
trunk (2.6). There will be a separate mail for the 3.0 problems.
I've done the following:
* built in debug and opt mode (gcc 4.1.2) fixing the important warnings
* run all the tests in both modes
* run all the tests (except
Thanks Antoine!
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neal Norwitz nnorwitz at gmail.com writes:
Can someone (else) compare performance of 2.5, 2.6, and 3.0?
Tests done on a 32-bit Linux installation on an Athlon 3600+ X2. Compiled with
gcc in UCS2 mode
Many buildbots are running bsddb 4.7, particularly the debian/ubuntu
ones (4.7.25 which seems to be the latest). Some of them are
crashing, others are not. The max version we support in both 2.6 and
3.0 is 4.7. Should we allow this version or should we use a lower
maximum that is more likely to
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Trent Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 05:55:13PM +0200, Jesus Cea wrote:
Trent, are you available to look at the ?spurious? timeout failures in
bsddb replication code in the Windows buildbot?.
Ten seconds timeout should be plenty enough.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Benjamin Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neal Norwitz wrote:
test_epoll skipped -- kernel doesn't support epoll()
...
test_ioctl skipped -- Unable to open /dev/tty
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings!
I'm currently trying to assess the effort required for a CE port. I'm already
aware of the project at http://pythonce.sourceforge.net, but I find it a
waste of time to have two separate projects which then
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesse Noller schrieb:
So, we just released and there are a few doc typo bugs being filed -
my question is if all doc-fixes have to wait for 2.6.1/2.7 or if we
can hotfix the 2.6 docs?
I intend to set things up so that the
Should we plan to put out a final 2.5 release? If so, should we
continue to backport fixes (like Martin's removal of Alpha in
setup.py)? My preference is that we do put out a final 2.5 that has
all accumulated bug fixes. Then close the branch. That way if we put
out a security release for 2.5,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Mike Krell mbk.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any possibility of backporting support for the nonlocal keyword
into a 2.x release? I see it's not in 2.6, but I don't know if that was an
intentional design choice or due to a lack of demand / round tuits. I'm
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
Just wanted to publicly thank everyone who has been causing all the
checkins to fix and stabilize the test suite (I think it's mostly
Antoine and Mark,
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:53 AM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
(2) issue 4970: consistent signal 32 error on the norwitz-x86 Gentoo
buildslave in 3.1 and 3.x. This may be due to the box
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Interaction with the Python developers
==
I open an issue for each bug found in CPython. I describe how to reproduce it
and try to write a patch. I have learn to always
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Chris Bergstresser ch...@subtlety.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
Neal Norwitz nnorw...@gmail.com writes:
Who knows, someone might even write a book
401 - 454 of 454 matches
Mail list logo
