Hello all.
I made two checkins to the 25 maintainance branch before Martin kindly pointed
out to me that it is frozen.
These are quite simple fixes to real crashes I have experienced. The fix in
frameobject.c will be necessary if you work with opcodes 128, which we
routinely do at CCP J.
Hello again.
So, using __lltrace__, I stumbled over a crashbug (to which I have already
submitted a fix).i
To trigger the crash, I modified lib/test/test_trace.py, lines 609 onwards:
def test_16_no_jump_into_finally_block(self):
globals()[__lltrace__] = 1
In fileobject the mode string is sanitized using a function,
sanitize_the_mode().
The same thing needs to happen for posixmodule.fdopen(). Otherwise, the
universal_newlines regression test in test_subprocess.py will fail for python
compiled with Visual Studio 2005.
I have made a local patch
I just ran some static analysis of the python core 2.5 with Visual Studio team
system.
There was the stray error discovered. I will update the most obvious ones.
Some questions, though:
This code in binascii.c, line 1168 (and again 1238) is wrong:
while (in datalen) {
if
I just ran some static analysis of the python core 2.5 with Visual Studio team
system.
There was the stray error discovered. I will update the most obvious ones.
Some questions, though:
This code in binascii.c, line 1168 (and again 1238) is wrong:
while (in datalen) {
if
I was surprised when 2.5 stopped importing our custom modules.
So, I found this in dyload_win.c:
/* Temporarily disable .dll, to avoid conflicts between sqlite3.dll
and the sqlite3 package. If this needs to be reverted for 2.5,
some other solution for the naming conflict must be
I see. There appear to be two fixes, one for the dots, and another for the
quotetabs.
Shouldn't this be backported?
Kristján
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Georg Brandl
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 07:08
To: python-dev@python.org
@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] static analysis of python source
Kristján Valur Jónsson schrieb:
I see. There appear to be two fixes, one for the dots, and another for the
quotetabs.
Shouldn't this be backported?
Apparently I wasn't sure at the time.
You now checked in one half of the fix
What you really want is to use C++.
However, that is a brash and immature language that is still awaiting wider
acceptance
and is therefore not supported.
K
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Georg Brandl
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 21:00
Hm, I fail to see the importance of a special regression test for that
peculiar file then with its special magical OS properties. Why not focus
our attention on real, user generated files?.
-Original Message-
Wow, I'm very sorry, I didn't realize how much special pagefile.sys
and
but I got to a different conclusion. If it really goes through the
pymalloc pool (obmalloc), then it must hold the GIL while doing so.
obmalloc itself is not thread-safe, and relies on the GIL for
thread-safety.
In release mode, PyMEM_FREE goes directly to free, which is thread-
safe.
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 20:46
But then you would substantially change the memory access behavior of
the
program in a debug build, that is, more than it is already changed by
the
fact that you have changed
There is a considerable amount of warnings present for 64 bit builds on windows.
You can see them using VisualStudio 2005 even if you don't have the x64
compilers installed, by turning on Detect 64 bit portability issues in the
general tab for pythoncore.
Now, some of those just need
Hello there.
I'm working on getting the 64 bit build of the trunk pass the testsuite.
Here is one snag, that you could help me fix.
In test_getargs2(), there is at line 190: self.failUnlessEqual(99,
getargs_n(Long()))
Now, the Long class has a __int__ method which returns 99L.
However, we run
Hello again.
A lot of overflow tests fail in the testsuite, by expecting overflow using
sys.maxint.
for example this line, 196, in test_index.py:
self.assertEqual(x[self.neg:self.pos], (-1, maxint))
At the moment, I am disabling these tests with
if 64 bit not in sys.version:
So, two questions:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Thomas Heller
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 17:04
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] x64 and the testsuite
Kristján Valur Jónsson schrieb:
Hello again.
A lot of overflow tests
Well, I have checked in the fixes to the trunk to make an x64 build run the
testsuite.
It works pretty well. I did a quick test and found the x64Release to run 51000
pystones vs. 44000 for the win32Release version, a difference of some 10%.
And the x64PGO version ran some 61000 pystones.
Some
-Original Message-
From: Armin Rigo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Given that the __long__ vs __int__ difference doesn't really make sense
any more nowadays, I'd think it would be saner to change the nb_long
slot of old-style instances instead of PyInt_AsSsize_t(). The logic
would be
Hello there.
Does anyone know why getting the SVN logs for a project is so excruciatingly
slow?
Is this an inherent SVN problem or are the python.org servers simply overloaded?
It takes something like 10 minutes for me to get the log messages window up for
the root
of a branch.
Cheers,
Kristján
-Original Message-
ISTM you need one only question requiring human attention at a time,
because once a spammer assigns a human (or inhuman of equivalent
intelligence) to cracking you, you're toast.
I can't believe this is still profitable. It's either lucrative or
fulfilling,
-Original Message-
This was in C++, but the problem was really WCHAR, as used by much of
the
win32 API.
I'd rather make it a platform-specific definition (for
platform=Windows
API). Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't wchar_t also available in VS
2003 (and even in VC6?). And
-Original Message-
below appears to solve the problem, and given Martin's previous +1, I
decided to stop there. I failed in a quick attempt at replacing the
literal 2 with something involving sizeof. Does this look reasonable?
+1.
I should add that we have this local mod in our
-Original Message-
From: Martin v. Löwis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 05:33
To: Steve Holden
Cc: Kristján Valur Jónsson; Mark Hammond; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: Adventures with x64, VS7 and VS8 on Windows
Addressing only
-Original Message-
Nobody proposed to ditch cross-compilation. I very much like
cross-compilation, I do all Itanium and AMD64 in cross-compilation.
I just want the *file structure* of the output to be the very same
for all architectures, meaning that they can't coexist in a single
-Original Message-
It seems the
best thing might be to modify the PCBuild8 build process so the
output
binaries are in the ../PCBuild' directory - this way distutils and
others
continue to work fine. Does that sound reasonable?
I think Kristjan will have to say a word
-Original Message-
From: Martin v. Löwis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That couldn't work for me. I try avoid building on a network drive, and
with local drives, I just can't have a Windows build and a Linux build
on the same checkout - they live on separate file systems, after all
-Original Message-
though, not cygwin (a la bsmedberg's new MozillaBuild stuff). I just
wish there were an autoconf alternative that wasn't as painful as
autoconf. I have a few attempts for my purposes that are written in
Python (an obvious bootstrapping problem for building Python
-Original Message-
From: Martin v. Löwis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It doesn't need to, and reluctance is not wrt. to the proposed new
layout, but wrt. changing the current one. Tons of infrastructure
depends on the files having exactly the names that they have now,
and being
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Borzenkov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 20:36
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Martin v. Löwis; Mark Hammond; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; python-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Adventures with x64, VS7 and VS8 on Windows
-Original Message-
I personally think that if hostile users can replace DLLs on your
system, you have bigger problems than SxS installation of
pythhonxy.dll,
but perhaps that's just me.
An end user application on an end-user's machine is always voulnerable
to reverse engineering.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Armbruster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I noticed that one of the parts of ConfigParser was not using for line
in fp style of readline-ing
I'm afraid my authority is limited to .c stuff having to do with pcbuild8,
but I'm sure someone else here would
-Original Message-
From: Martin v. Löwis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just imagine the a school teacher who in good faith wants to
introduce
his pupils to the wonderful programming language of Python, but
when he installs it, all kinds of scary looking warnings drive him
off.
This is almost certainly not a bug in python.
A cursory look indicates that a list being traversed in list_traverse has a
NULL member.
I'd suggest examining the other members of the list to figure out what this
list is. Use the debugger for this, that is what it is for. It is probably a
list
Hello there.
in function_call() in funcobject.c, we have this comment:
/* XXX This is broken if the caller deletes dict items! */
Now, I wonder what specifically is meant here? are we really talking about
the 'callee' here?
In PyEval_EvalCodeEx() it looks as though all keywords are always
-Original Message-
From: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 00:02
To: Guido van Rossum
Cc: Kristján Valur Jónsson; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] XXX - in funcobject.c
Yet Another Kind Of Tuple... However this seems
And this is then compounded if you then proceed to diff those diff outputs.
Maybe we should just use vertical spacing?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 08:01
To: Skip Montanaro
Cc:
Only crt asserts, and those assertion features accessible through the
crtdbg.h file, such as _ASSERT and _ASSERTE.
Kristj'an
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of M.-A.
for the whole process isn't
a particularly nice thing to do.
Kristján
-Original Message-
From: M.-A. Lemburg [mailto:m...@egenix.com]
Sent: 6. janúar 2009 14:43
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: mhamm...@skippinet.com.au; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] #ifdef __cplusplus?
On 2009-01
Oh dear. C code indented by spaces?
I'll give up programming then.
Just set your editor tab size to 4 and all is well.
K
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of M.-A.
Lemburg
By accident i had a dir called @test in my PCBuild directory when I was running
the testsuite.
This caused the test_support to define TESTFN as tmp/@test.
This again caused a number of tests to fail. One issue I have already covered
in http://bugs.python.org/issue4927
Another issue is
Greetings.
I spent the morning trying to find out why the disabled tests in test_xmlrpc.py
ran so slowly on my vista box.
After much digging, I found that it boiled down to socket.create_connection()
trying to connect to localhost, port.
You see, it does a getaddrinfo() and then tries to
=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of
Antoine Pitrou
Sent: 14. janúar 2009 11:34
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] socket.create_connection slow
Kristján Valur Jónsson kristjan at ccpgames.com writes:
On Vista, it will return an AF_INET6 entry before the
AF_INET one and try
2009 12:23:46 Kristján Valur Jónsson, vous avez
écrit :
socket.create_connection() trying to connect to (localhost, port)
(...)
return an AF_INET6 entry before the AF_INET one and try connection
to that. This connect() attemt fails after approximately one second,
after which we proceed
Hardly. Successful connects complete in a jiffy, only actively refused ones
take a second to do so.
I suspect some michief in the vista tcp stack.
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org]
() waited long enough to obtain a connection since the service
really was there.
Yet another undefined thing affecting us, Martin.
Kristján
-Original Message-
From: Martin v. Löwis [mailto:mar...@v.loewis.de]
Sent: 14. janúar 2009 20:31
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Victor Stinner; python
Message-
From: Martin v. Löwis [mailto:mar...@v.loewis.de]
Sent: 14. janúar 2009 20:31
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Victor Stinner; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] socket.create_connection slow
I have no idea why the connect refusal takes so long.
Maybe it's a vista thing?
I've
do we want to bug MS about this? Clearly it is a performance problem
when implementing dual stack clients.
K
-Original Message-
From: Martin v. Löwis [mailto:mar...@v.loewis.de]
Sent: 15. janúar 2009 00:07
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev
Ok, in r 68610 I fixed some of this.
The strftime test is now just an excercise, since clearly some platforms accept
the %e without hesitation.
Also, there were errors in two test_os cases.
However, these:
==
ERROR:
-
From: Mark Dickinson [mailto:dicki...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15. janúar 2009 15:44
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Jean-Paul Calderone; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r68547 - in python/trunk/Lib/test:
test_datetime.py test_os.py
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:13 AM
Right. I've fixed the remainder, things should quiet down now.
K
-Original Message-
From: Mark Dickinson [mailto:dicki...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15. janúar 2009 20:40
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Jean-Paul Calderone; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r68547
I would appreciate if some of you could chip in your opinion of this issue.
http://bugs.python.org/issue4927
Cheers,
Kristján
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
Are you all certain that this mapping from a generator expression to a foor
loop isn't just a happy coincidence?
After all, the generator statement is just a generalization of the list
comprehension and that doesn't map quite so directly.
I have always taken both expressions at face value, and
Hello there.
I recently reactivated http://bugs.python.org/issue4448 because of the need to
port http://bugs.python.org/issue4879 to 3.1
This isn't a straightforward port because of the changes in the IO library.
I'd appreciate if someone could shed some light on the comment in line 268 in
Will testing an array of chars do?
You can easily allocate 4-5Gb on a regular 64bit pc, even with only 1G of ram,
given that your swap space is sufficient.
If you want to excercise your array, then you might get some paging, but it's
not completely impossible.
K
-Original Message-
From:
These issues should be resolved in the py3k branch, but it will need porting to
2.6.
Dialogue boxes are annoying, but do they pop up if you run your buildslave as a
service without access to the console?
K
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
:
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com writes:
These issues should be resolved in the py3k branch, but it will need
porting to 2.6. Dialogue boxes are annoying, but do they pop up if
you run your buildslave as a service without access to the console?
Not sure what the MSVC++ runtime
Right.
In fact, having embedded python25.dll into an app once, I'm inclined to think
that there is a lot of stuff that should be moved from that dll into
python.exe, like argument parsing, path magic, and so on. Py_Initialize()
really is designed in terms of python.exe
Anyway,
What I was
for
test_multiprocessing.
K
-Original Message-
From: Curt Hagenlocher [mailto:c...@hagenlocher.org]
Sent: 25. mars 2009 12:54
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: mhamm...@skippinet.com.au; David Bolen; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Test failures under Windows?
2009/3/25 Kristján Valur Jónsson
in a submission to the py3k branch.
K
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Noller [mailto:jnol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 31. mars 2009 21:31
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Curt Hagenlocher; mhamm...@skippinet.com.au; David Bolen;
python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Test failures under Windows
Jónsson
Cc: Curt Hagenlocher; mhamm...@skippinet.com.au; David Bolen;
python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Test failures under Windows?
Does it need to be backported? I wonder when that was introduced.
Also, what CL was it so I can review it?
2009/3/31 Kristján Valur Jónsson krist
What are the semantics of the type argument for PyCObject_FromVoidPtr()?
-Does it do a strdup, or is the type required to be valid while the object
exists (e.g. a static string)?
-How is the type match determined, strcmp, or pointer comparison?
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks Larry.
I didn't notice the patch, or indeed the defect, hence my question.
A clarification in the documentation that a string comparison is indeed used
might be useful.
As a user of CObject I appreciate this effort.
K
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hastings
Hello there.
Yesterday I created a number of defects for regression test failures on Windows:
http://bugs.python.org/issue5646 : test_importlib fails for py3k on Windows
http://bugs.python.org/issue5645 : test_memoryio fails for py3k on windows
http://bugs.python.org/issue5643 : test__locale fails
Here's one from EVE, where the DB module creates raw data, for our Crowsets,
and then hands it over to another module for consumption (actual creation of
the CRow and CrowDescriptor objects:
BluePy raw(PyCObject_FromVoidPtr(mColumnList, 0));
if (!raw)
return 0;
Hello there. I have sumitted the following patch:
Add an 'offset' argument to zlib.decompress
http://bugs.python.org/issue5804
I'd be interested on getting some more feedback on it.
Kristján
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
I've often thought of this.
The problem is that the GIL uses the regular python lock which has to be
non-recursive, since it is used for synchronization operations other than
mutual exclusion, e.g. one thread going to sleep, and another waking it up.
Now, we could easily create another class of
You are right, a small experiment confirmed that it is set to 0 (see
SetCriticalSectionSpinCount())
I had assumed that a small non-zero value might be chosen on multiprocessor
machines.
Do you think that the problem lies with the use of the event object as such?
Have you tried using a
Hello there.
I've been trying to, in the last weeks, to pass on to the trunk the
improvements I've made to XMLRPC.
I've created several issues in order to do these changes incrementally but have
got no comments.
Perhaps it is best to show the whole thing in context, then.
I´ve gathered all the
I added http://bugs.python.org/issue6654
I also put a not to python-ideas but have had no response yet. Any comments?
Here's the summary:
I've created http://codereview.appspot.com/100046 on Rietveld:
by passing the path component of the xmlrpc request to the dispatch
method, itbecomes
Unless I am very much mistaken, this is the approach Ruby takes.
Everything is an expression. For example, the value of a block is the value of
The last expression in the block.
I've never understood the need to have a distinction betwen statements and
expressions, not when expressions can have
+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of
Kristján Valur Jónsson
Sent: 6. ágúst 2009 20:56
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: [Python-Dev] issue 6654
I added http://bugs.python.org/issue6654
I also put a not to python-ideas but have
Not advocating a change, merely pointing out that it's how Ruby works.
K
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf
Of Nick Coghlan
Sent: 2. september 2009 11:12
To: Greg Ewing
I noticed something (in 2.5) yesterday, which may be a feature, but is more
likely a bug.
In tokenizer.c, tok-encoding is allocated using PyMem_MALLOC().
However, this then gets handed to a node-r_str in parsetok.c, and then
released in node.c using PyObject_Free().
Now, by coincidence,
http://bugs.python.org/issue14288
Raymond suggested that this patch should be discussed here, so here goes:
How this came about:
There are frameworks, such as the Nagare web framework,
(http://www.nagare.org/) that rely on suspending execution at some point and
resuming it again. Nagare does
Hi,
I´m interested in contributing a patch to duplicate sockets between processes
on windows.
Tha api to do this is WSADuplicateSocket/WSASocket(), as already used by dup()
in the _socketmodule.c
Here´s what I have:
1) Sockets have a method, duplicate(target_pid), that return a bytes
The reason I originally suggested wallclock was because that term is often
used to distinguish time measurements (delta) that show real world time from
those showing CPU or Kernel time. number.crunch() took 2 seconds wallclock
time but only 1 second CPU!. The original problem was that
a fallback mechanism, and it would
even be best to write such a mechanism inside the function itself, and just
return getsystemtimeasfiletime() instead.
K
-Original Message-
From: Christian Tismer [mailto:tis...@stackless.com]
Sent: 13. mars 2012 18:07
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc
To quote:
On Unix, return the current processor time as a floating point number
expressed in seconds. The precision, and in fact the very definition of the
meaning of processor time, depends on that of the C function of the same
name,
The problem is that it is defined to return processor
Yes, the intended use is relative timings and timeouts.
I think we are complicating things far too much.
1) Do we really need a fallback on windows? Will QPC ever fail?
2) is it a problem for the intended use if we cannot absolutely guarantee that
time won't ever tick backwards?
IMHO, we
- By default, it should fall back to time.time if a better source is
not available, but there should be a flag that can disable this
fallback for users who really *need* a monotonic/steady time source.
As pointed out on a different thread, you dont need this flag since the code
can easily
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of
Antoine Pitrou
Sent: 14. mars 2012 02:02
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] SocketServer issues
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 04:26:16 +
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
Hi there.
I want
-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of
Antoine Pitrou
Sent: 14. mars 2012 10:23
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] SocketServer issues
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:59:47 +
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com wrote:
It just seems odd to me
Message-
From: gvanros...@gmail.com [mailto:gvanros...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Guido van
Rossum
Sent: 14. mars 2012 11:44
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Antoine Pitrou; python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] SocketServer issues
2012/3/14 Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com
for time.steady(strict=False).
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com
wrote:
- By default, it should fall back to time.time if a better source is
not available, but there should be a flag that can disable this
fallback for users who really *need
. I need to read that code and understand it and
see if it can be persuaded to magically work on windows too.
K
From: Glyph Lefkowitz [mailto:gl...@twistedmatrix.com]
Sent: 14. mars 2012 17:22
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Python-Dev (python-dev@python.org)
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] sharing
Fyi:
http://bugs.python.org/issue14307
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of
Kristján Valur Jónsson
Sent: 14. mars 2012 12:36
To: Guido van Rossum
Cc: Antoine Pitrou; python
Fyi:
http://bugs.python.org/issue14310
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Foord
Sent: 14. mars 2012 14:42
To: Terry Reedy
Cc: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re:
Do you really want to add an obscure Boolean flag to the function just so that
python can warn you that perhaps your platform is so old and so weird that
Python can't guarantee that the performance measurements are to a certain
_undefined_ quality?
Please note, that the function makes no
Hi Carl.
I'm very interested in this work.
At CCP we work heavily with virtual environments. Except that we don't use
virtualenv because it is just a pain in the neck. We like to be able to run
virtual python environments of various types as they arrive checked out of
source control
-Original Message-
From: Carl Meyer [mailto:c...@oddbird.net]
Sent: 19. mars 2012 19:19
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Python-Dev (python-dev@python.org)
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 405 (built-in virtualenv) status
Hello Kristján,
I think there's one important (albeit odd
Hi,
Does anyone object if I submit my patches sxs.patch and errnomodule.patch?
These allow python to work correctly when built with vs2010.
There is also the PCBuild10.patch, but that can wait. I'm sure a number of
people are regularly building python using vs2010 using their own modified
Hi there.
Antoine Pitroue requested that this topic (http://bugs.python.org/issue14310)
be discussed by python-dev before moving further.
I'm adding a windows-only api to share sockets between processes to _socket
in the canonical way.
Multiprocessing already has code for this (using
, 2012 at 11:10 PM, kristjan.jonsson
python-check...@python.org wrote:
diff --git a/Misc/ACKS b/Misc/ACKS
--- a/Misc/ACKS
+++ b/Misc/ACKS
@@ -507,6 +507,7 @@
Richard Jones
Irmen de Jong
Lucas de Jonge
+Kristján Valur Jónsson
Jens B. Jorgensen
John Jorgensen
Sijin Joseph
*blinks
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On
Behalf Of Cameron Simpson
Sent: 30. mars 2012 21:43
There seem to be a few competing features for clocks that people want:
- monotonic -
-Original Message-
From: gvanros...@gmail.com [mailto:gvanros...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Guido van Rossum
Sent: 2. apríl 2012 17:43
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Cameron Simpson; Python Dev
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Use QueryPerformanceCounter() for
time.monotonic
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
[mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org] On
Behalf Of Lennart Regebro
Sent: 3. apríl 2012 14:14
To: Victor Stinner
Cc: Python Dev
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 418: rename
-Original Message-
From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames@python.org
Some years? I computed 584.5 years, so it should not occur in practice.
Funny that you mention it. should not occur in practice is exactly my point.
Here's actual code from production:
BOOL WINAPI
Hi there. Antoine Pitrou suggested that I float this on python-dev again. The
new patch should
1) be much simpler and less hacky
2) remove the special case code for PyGenObject from gcmodule.c
K
Frá: Kristján Valur Jónsson [rep...@bugs.python.org]
Sent
I just had my first fun with Pep 393 strings and debuggers. Trying to debug a
deadlocked python program, I'm trying to figure out the callstack of the thread
in the debugger.
I ended up with something like:
(char*)((PyASCIIObject*)(tstate-frame-f_code-co_filename))[1]
while previously,
This is the most amusing of discussions.
Teh key sentence here is the clock may not be adjusted. Slewing or
accelerating a clock is nerely adding to the already present error of the pace
of the clock.
Sometimes a clock runs fast, sometimes it runs slow. This is without any
purposeful slewing
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
