reply to shorter list
1. I probably can not finish testing BEFORE Sept 18, but ON Sept 18
2. I will send complete results when I'm done. Right now, the most critical
thing seems to border for tables not functioning correctly.
I will provide more details later -- Linux-32. I can NOT change line sty
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> I've deactivated 4.0.1-dev as a version for new defects. I've added
> 4.0.1 as new version. There already exists a 4.1.0-dev version string
>
> I also deactivated 4.0.1 as a milestone assignment.
>
> Note: there are three bugs that are assigned
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Rainer Bielefeld <
rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> last weekend I wanted to check whether I can try to use 4.1 for my daily
> work with acceptable risk. Using such a trunk version for normal work is a
> much more manifold and reliab
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Rainer Bielefeld <
rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in March 2014 we have got 47 new AOO Bug reporters, who reported all
> together 55 bugs:
>
Great news that these folks volunteered! Welcome everybody!
> No Reports Account
> ---
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26) does
> not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for
> Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old
> version for an u
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have released AOO 4.1 successfully on Apr 29 with voting, but we still
> have some test cases not completed during 4.1 stage, in order to check the
> post 4.1 quality status, here comes the call for volunteers on AOO post 4.1
> te
On 07/02/2014 12:08 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01.07.2014 23:26, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <
>> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> in order
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi all
>
> In case no one has noticed there haven't been any daily builds since Oct
> 18th (and as far as Oct 6th for 32 bit Linux).
>
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
>
> Best regards,
> Pedro
>
There daily builds are actually still
On 11/17/2014 11:48 AM, Boggavarapu Neelima wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for adding my email to the QA mailing list. My name is Neelima
> and I would like to contribute some time doing manual testing. Please
> provide me some guidance regarding where I can start.
>
> Thanks
>
Hello Neelima --
We
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Jonathan
wrote:
> I would like to be able to change the default date format for "Insert >
> Fields" in OpenOffice Writer. The mm/dd/yy format is good for
> spreadsheets, but in formal written documents it is better to spell the
> date out (November 21, 2014).
>
The following query lists issues of type = PATCH
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=162879&namedcmd=PATCHES
You will need to be a registered Bugzilla user to view it.
It would be helpful for QA and dev team members to determine if the
submitted patches are still r
My apologies, folks. I guess I chopped off the complete link in error. :(
Thanks for the correction.
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Regina Henschel
> wrote:
>
> > Kay Schenk schrieb:
> >
> >> The following query lists issues of type = PATCH
> >>
> &
On 12/04/2014 08:34 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Hi I want to know if there is any inmediate QA event coming through like, a
> release freeze that needs testing.
>
Not currently. You would see notices on the "dev" list if there were.
I think we're waiting on some additional builbots before pr
What is the procedure for closing an ENHANCEMENT issue when the
enhancement is not recommended?
See issue 125954 as an example --
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125954
So far I have found 6919 issues for ENHANCEMENTS regardless of status.
None of them are RESOLVED, so my assumption
On 01/27/2015 03:30 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> What is the procedure for closing an ENHANCEMENT issue when the
>> enhancement is not recommended?
>>
>
> IMHO, the set of all open ENHANCEMENT issues comprise a &q
On 02/13/2015 01:41 AM, Oukcha oukcha wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I download Windows Nightly
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_1658822.exe,
> where I can found notes for this version and list of resolved issue for
> 4.2.0 ?
>
> Best regards
>
Since this is a unreleased build, y
On 02/19/2015 01:48 PM, Oukcha oukcha wrote:
> it seemed to me that there was an issue involving all issues resolved by the
> new branch.
>
> thank you very much
>
Oh I see. There may be several issues that fall into this category. If
you know any specific issue number, you can, of course, download
Dear BZ admins --
Is there some way to associate "aliases" with actual field values in BZ?
I'm thinking it would be useful to have alias assignments for
"Version", such as:
* "current" alias to be used for 4.1.1 (I see we already have used
"current" for Version, but I don't know if this is a ha
On 02/24/2015 12:27 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> Hi Kay,
>
> On 2015-02-24 00:39, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Is there some way to associate "aliases" with actual field values in BZ?
>> I'm thinking it would be useful to have alias assignments for
>> "V
On 06/15/2015 12:50 PM, Boyan Alexiev wrote:
> Hello Open Office Team,
> In Your Bulgarian localization decimal symbol is comma, but most used is
> dot. Can You generate new localization that correct this issue?
> I send You generated .xml locale file.
>
> --
> Boyan Aleksiev
> Plastchim-T PLC
>
If you have a BZ account, we could use some help evaluating fixed issues
for importance and assigning Target Milestones to the following fixed
issues:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=fixed_since_4.1.1_and_no_target_milestone&sharer_id=7
Some of these are
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Update at the end ...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 14:22
> To: qa@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: [PROPOSAL] On Reproducibility of Defects
>
>
On 09/22/2015 12:14 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On one side it seems that we are accumulating a lot of stuff
> for 4.1.2, way more than what we would normally put in a
> x.y.2 release. On the other side, there are many reasons for
> releasing 4.1.2 reasonably soon.
>
> So it is time to shift fo
Hello QA --
If you have a Bugzilla account (see https://bz.apache.org/ooo/ on how to
get one if you don't) and can run the following search on fixed bugs that
also have associated commits to our source trunk --
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=fixed_since
On 10/05/2015 03:25 PM, Preethi Dhinesh wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I am preethi from USA . I am an engineering graduate and have done a course
> on software testing . I also contribute to QA team in mozilla .
> I came across apache open office recently and I would be intrested to
> Volunteer in QA .
> Pl
On 10/12/2015 09:40 PM, Hemu Hemendra wrote:
> hell QA team,
>
> can you tell me about some bugs or can i tell you some
> bugs in the open office .how to solve these bugs with you.
>
>
>
> withe regards,
> hemendra
Hello Hemendra --
I think our Orientation module on QA w
The following query is being referenced in the release notes for
4.1.2 for "fixed issues"--
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id=170710&namedcmd=4.1.2_approved_and_fixed&remaction=run&sharer_id=7
Unfortunately, I do not have "rights" to make this "public" without
the need f
On 10/15/2015 02:37 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 10/15/2015 09:20 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> The following query is being referenced in the release notes for
>> 4.1.2 for "fixed issues"--
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&list_id
us.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015
>> 09:31 To: qa@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Herbert Duerr (Apache)
>> ; Rob Weir (Apache)
>> Subject: Re: karma needed on a query
>>
>> Am 10/16/2015 12:51 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
> [ ... ]
>>> Thanks
Hello Phani --
I think you probably want to test one of the pre-built binaries
rather than source. Please see available languages and platforms from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-rc2-r1707648/binaries/
Once you click inside a language directory, you will see platform
o
Hello,BZ admins. It's time to add 4.1.2 to the Version menu list.
Thanks.
--
MzK
“The journey of a thousand miles begins
with a single step.”
--Lao Tzu
-
On 10/29/2015 02:27 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 10/29/2015 10:12 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> Hello,BZ admins. It's time to add 4.1.2 to the Version menu list.
>
> I thought about this already today. Thanks for your hint. I'll start
> this now.
>
> Unfortunate
On 10/29/2015 02:48 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 10/29/2015 10:27 PM, schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 10/29/2015 10:12 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>> Hello,BZ admins. It's time to add 4.1.2 to the Version menu list.
>>
>> I thought about this already today. Thanks fo
On 01/05/2016 11:55 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote:
>>> In my opinion it would be a good idea if /Priority/, /Importance/
>>> and
>>> /Severity/ of an issue can only be changed by people who has at
>>> least
>>> can-confirm-rights.
>>>
>>> Yes, also and in special the reporter of an issue (if he hasn't
On 01/08/2016 06:37 AM, Arijita Ghosh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new at Apache OpenOffice Project. I want to volunteer as a QA. I am
> requesting for a small batch of reports assigned to me as a first step of
> my QA volunteering.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
> Arijita Ghosh
>
Hello Arijita and apolo
To our BZ admins.
We seem to have a number of issues in BZ that are now listed
as Resolved/Fixed but don't seem to pertain to an actual
upcoming release.
Examples:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126652
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126828
Can we add something like "N/A" or
Forgot to copy qa on my reply.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kay Schenk
Date: Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
To: OOo Apache , Dennis Hamilton <
dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at
:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From: Patricia Shanahan
>> [mailto:p...@acm.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016
>> 09:10 To: d...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Can we
>> add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
>>
>> On 3/21/2016
I'm not sure how this happened but it seems not all issues
can access 4.2.0 as Target Milestone. I would think all
issues could access the same Target Milestone menu.
I hope this can be corrected. Thanks.
--
MzK
"Time spent with cats is never wasted."
now there is a new flag "4.2.0_release_blocker" which
> can maybe help in the meantime.
>
> BTW:
> You were just a few seconds faster with your mail than me. ;-)
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> Am 03/31/2016 12:59 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> I'm not sure how thi
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Marcus wrote:
> [Top-Posting]
>
> OK, as there were no further comments and no real disagree I'll create a
> new RESOLVED - NOCODEFIX resolution status. This status should be set when
> an issue was solved with no change in the source code (e.g., user requests
> o
I think typically the process for RESOLVED-FIXED (those
issues that were fixed by some kind of code change to
/trunk) issues is to:
* commit the change to a release build
* once the release build is out for testing, check that the
bug is fixed, and use RESOLVED-VERFIED, to verify the fix, then
* C
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
>> Am 04/07/2016 06:35 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
>>
>>> My only concern is that this is a giant CTR and pretty much assures that
>>> the "R&quo
ks.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=107619
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125613 (this one needs some
special attention it seems)
--
--------
Kay Schenk
Apache OpenOffice
"Things work out best for those who make
the best of the way
Hi all --
I know we have a number of Google tests incorporated currently. I don't
know much about how to construct these, but I'd like to help as well.
Currently the output of the tests is included in the normal build output if
I'm not mistaken. I think it would be valuable to provide a separate
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> I know we have a number of Google tests incorporated currently. I don't
>> know much about how to construct these, but I'd like to help as well.
>>
>
> Sure, this would be v
As I previously posted, the old TestLink instance is still alive but NOT
well on: http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/login.php?note=expired
referenced from the Apache OpenOffice QA information at:
https://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.html
* Is there any interest in revising T
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
> On 01/30/2018 05:47 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> As I previously posted, the old TestLink instance is still alive but NOT
>> well on: http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/login.php?note=expired
>>
>> referenced
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
>> On 01/30/2018 05:47 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>> As I previously posted, the old TestLink instance is still alive but NOT
>>> well on: http://a
:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
On 01/30/2018 05:47 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
As I previously posted, the old TestLink instance is still alive but NOT
well on: http://aootesting.adfinis-sygro
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 01/02/2018 Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> I can browse the test cases -- and there are a LOT of them -- but not do
>> an export as described in the documentation
>>
>
> If this is the issue, that instance will hav
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 11:33 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> If this is the issue, that instance will have an administrator that can
>>> do
>>> the export. Adfinis guy
On 02/09/2018 09:35 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 11:33 PM, Andrea Pescetti <mailto:pesce...@apache.org>> wrote:
Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
If this is the issue, that instance wil
Hello all--
After working on saving some of our case on the now mostly inaccessible
TestLink instance, I'm sending out a HELP message! Extractions can be done
with a guest account.
If you go to:
http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/login.php?note=expired
you can apply for a guest account. Afte
sheet info because the pages render fine without it.
In MANY cases, you can not even see the test case instructions unless
you use the "Print View" button.
On 02/12/2018 02:45 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Starting Impress/Header and Footer
On 2/12/2018 5:08 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Hello all
On 02/12/2018 03:04 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Kay Schenk wrote:
We will need to discuss further what to do with these at some point.
And, if you find a better way to do this -- please let us know.
If the Adfinis guys were responsive, what would you recommend? I mean,
if they gave you
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> If someone had admin options, we should be able to export ALL cases as
>> XML. However, in order to use them, we'd need to create an XSLT file for
>> them, then go through convertin
On 02/12/2018 03:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Wonderful! Thank you!
A few other information tidbits.
When you save the "Print View" version, you will actually be saving 2
files -- the html of the actual test case instructions, and a
directory that has just a style sheet in it. At som
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 02/12/2018 03:07 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> Wonderful! Thank you!
>>
>> A few other information tidbits.
>>
>> When you save the "Print View" version, you will actually be s
Hello all --
I now have 589 manual test cases extracted from TestLink ready to put
*somewhere*. I think ultimately it would be good to use them
(individually or as a group in a zipped file) eventually in BZ so
feedback on each case could be given easily as QA volunteers test.
These do not in
Many of the old TestLink test cases are now available (along with others)
from the QA web area --
https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
We could certainly use some feedback on them with respect to:
* usefulness -- what to keep, what to discard
* organization -- can you help with orga
Happy to help!
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thats very great!
>
> Thanks for your work
>
> More details later
>
> we should post it also to d...@openoffice.apache.org
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Am 19.04.2018 um
On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Many of the old TestLink test cases are now available (along with others)
>> from the QA web area --
>>
>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html
>>
>>
On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
> I think the first level of organization should be by application
>>&
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >>&g
On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
&g
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 6/8/2018 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
> ke
Keith, short update -- see below
On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
> keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> On 6/8/2018 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> > On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. Mc
On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>
> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Keith, short update -- see below
>>
>>
>>
>> This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things
>> look as they did. You
#x27;t work for you...
>
> Regards,
>Matthias
>
> Am 11.06.2018 um 23:09 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> >
> > On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>> Keith, short update -- see below
> >>>
Hi again...see below
On 06/12/2018 08:50 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 6/11/2018 5:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> On 06/11/2018 09:24 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>> On 6/9/2018 1:20 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> Keith, short update -- see below
>>>>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> Hi again Kay... see below
>
> On 6/17/2018 5:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > Hi again...see below
> >
> > On 06/12/2018 08:50 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >> On 6/11/2018 5:09 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
&
Test message. Please ignore.
--
"And in the end, only kindness matters."
-- Jewel, "Hands"
__
MzK
73 matches
Mail list logo
